Get E-Mail Updates

Is A-Rod Forgiveable?

Over brunch with my husband and one of my best guy friends last weekend, conversation turned, as it does, to Major League Baseball, doping and the nature of sin.

"A-Rod, possibly the greatest baseball player in the history of the game, will never, ever be in the Hall of Fame," my friend said with a mixture of anger and sadness. "All those guys -- Bonds, Roger Clemens -- none of them will be in the Hall of Fame."

"And they shouldn't be," my husband added.

New York Yankees slugger Alex Rodriguez is the latest MLB player accused of using performance-enhancing drugs.

Barry Bonds was among major leaguers listed as customers of the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative (BALCO), purveyors of illegal steroids. He's denied the charges, but was indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice in the BALCO investigation. His obstruction of justice trial is set to begin next month.

Clemens, certainly one of the greatest pitchers of all time, famously was accused of doping in Jose Canseco's book Juiced: Wild Times, Rampant 'Roids, Smash Hits & How Baseball Got Big, an accusation Clemens has vigorously denied.

Between sips of coffee, as his ire mounted, my friend proclaimed: "They tarnished the sanctity of our beloved national pastime!"

And that is, at least to diehard baseball fans, an unforgivable sin.

While I enjoy a good baseball game and consider myself a Cubs fan, I can't recite statistics or recall memorable plays, and usually I have to ask someone else the relief pitcher's name. But I understand the sense of betrayal my husband and friend feel.

There was an unspoken, sacred trust between the players and fans that was broken. Irreparably.

Even after his emotional, confession-filled news conference Tuesday, I doubt whether A-Rod will be the same kind of hero he once was. After admitting he had used a substance he called "Boli" that apparently could be purchased in the Dominican Republic between 2001 and 2003 when he was "naïve" and "young," A-Rod pleaded: "The only thing I can ask of the American people is to judge me from this day forward."

That's a tall order when it comes to unforgivable sins.

We Americans love a comeback story -- be it Whitney Houston battling back demons of addiction to retake the stage with her unmatched voice in all its glory, Paul Rubens once again making people laugh without wincing, or welcoming Martha Stewart and her "good things" back into our homes after her stint in white-collar prison.

We cherish rags-to-riches stories, and tales of people emerging phoenix-like from the ashes of their own self-destruction.

But there are certain things we don't forgive.

Harming a child in any way - especially if you're a coach, a teacher, or a member of the clergy.

Abusing and/or murdering your wife (particularly if you're acquitted and show no remorse when everyone thinks you're guilty as hell).

Blatant racism, at least when it's caught on tape (video or audio).

Hypocrisy, most notably the variety where you lobby very publicly against gay marriage and then get caught having sex with a male prostitute.

"It's hypocrisy more than anything in our society that we consider unforgivable," said John Portmann, a professor of religious studies at the University of Virginia and author of A History of Sin: Its Evolution to Today and Beyond.

Theologically speaking, though, what qualifies as an unforgivable sin?

In the Bible, both the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament mention something known as the "eternal" or "unpardonable" sin. Once you commit such a sin, according to some interpretations, salvation is impossible.

In the Jewish tradition, while the Torah (in Exodus) says humankind's ability to sin never surpasses God's capacity to forgive, there are three sins you're NEVER supposed to commit: idolatry, murder, and adultery (which included not only cheating on your spouse, but also homosexual acts and having sex with your wife while she was menstruating.)

According to the gospel of St. Matthew, Jesus himself described an unpardonable sin as "blaspheming" or "grieving" the Holy Spirit. What that is, exactly, Jesus doesn't say. I guess if you do commit the Big One, you'll know it. Game over.

Portmann believes the pariah status sports figures who are caught cheating in one way or another acquire is connected to a perception "that they have done some sort of invisible damage to children coming up who looked up to them."

When those who have been accused of cheating (or doping or perjury about doping, etc.) publicly confess and ask for forgiveness, they often find the forgiveness they seek.

Take the fallen Olympian Marion Jones, who served a six-month prison term last year for perjuring herself during the BALCO investigation. I bet Jones will be allowed to make a comeback some day because she showed contrition. She confessed humbly and publicly.

"With a great amount of shame

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: neuro_nurse

02-18-2009 @ 9:59pm

A-who?

by: nuclearferret

02-18-2009 @ 10:17pm

Why the seeming snort at the Bible about unforgivable sin, in an article about a baseball player who took drugs?

by: LBellinger

02-18-2009 @ 11:23pm

"There was an unspoken, sacred trust between the players and fans that was broken. Irreparably."

It seems that we, as baseball fans, are complicit in baseball's,"Steroid Era."

We cheered Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa during their home run battle of 1998, though, even if we admit or not, we had to know there was something up. After standing for 37 years, the late, great Roger Maris' home run record was surpassed by TWO players!

But we fans not only bought into the home run chase, we lionized the victor. Witness the Nike commercial in which McGwire is belting mammoth shots while being ogled by the actress Heather Locklear. Meanwhile, two Cy Young Award winning pitchers, Tom Glavine and Greg Maddux of the Braves come to realization, "Chicks Dig the Long Ball!"

The commercial tag-line?

Just Do It!

"Citius, Altius, Fortius."

by: squeaky

02-18-2009 @ 11:26pm

snort? Are you being punny?

by: BradyIvory

11-19-2009 @ 9:32pm

We see athletes as our modern gladiators. We admire them for their skill and dedication to the sport and game. But they have to do it following the idea of fair play. There is no excuse for those of them buying steroids because they betray our trust. Some may say they used them to become better and to amaze us even more, but I want to be amazed by skill not by medicine.

by: kevin47

02-19-2009 @ 12:25am

"According to the gospel of St. Matthew, Jesus himself described an unpardonable sin as "blaspheming" or "grieving" the Holy Spirit. What that is, exactly, Jesus doesn't say. I guess if you do commit the Big One, you'll know it. Game over."

Yeah, Jesus was a real idiot.

by: godgal

02-19-2009 @ 1:47am

for the record, the author, as a rule, does not snort. especially not at the bible.

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 3:15am

The only realistic expectation that we should hold for our sports stars is that their performance on the athletic field is the direct result of their God-given talent and their intense practice. We should not be surprised when we learn that they are alcoholics, that they chew tobacco, use foul language, or cheat on their wives. Many of the stars whose records we respect have committed one or more of those offenses.

However, we do have a right to impose some minimum standard which may be unique to each profession. We expect that our doctors will "first do no harm', that our lawyers will refrain from manufacturing evidence, that our politicians will refuse to take bribes, and that our ministers will abide by the gospel that they preach.

Can A-Rod be forgiven? If we limit the scope of that question to his relationship with God, the answer is of course he can. 'He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." My personal opinion is that many baseball fans will lose what little respect they maintain for that institution if the league officials do not act to discipline A-Rod and to adopt some strict rules to prevent a recurrence.

by: neuro_nurse

02-19-2009 @ 3:20am

I have the same reaction to stories like this as I do to the tabloid headlines about Brittany Spears tragic life:

Am I supposed to care?

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 6:06am

I agree that forgiveness is another matter entirely, but I disagree that steroids render the sport and record books fraudulent.

Steroids or not, it has never been apples to apples comparing players from different eras. Ruth didn't face minority pitchers and probably never saw a split finger fast ball. The mound got lower. The bats got lighter. Off-season work outs were invented.

You get a much more accurate idea how good a player is when you compare their performance against the peers in their era. Then you can take that comparison and compare it against how other players did against their eras. A stat like OPS+ (on base percentage plus slugging percentage measured against league average) is much more accurate than home run totals.

by: kevin47

02-19-2009 @ 6:17am

Only a conservative would find a way to bring OPS+ onto this blog. You were salivating at the opportunity, weren't you? That said, you are right, for the most part.

However, your example of Ruth never having to face Negro League pitchers proves my point. For baseball, this is an embarrassment on par with the existence of the Negro Leagues.

________________________________

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 4:54pm

I'm not buying your argument that perhaps one reason for Ruth's home run record was that "he didn't face minority pitchers." There is a link to a web site below which effectively shoots holes in that rationale.

Additionally, there are the standouts from when I was young (Maris, Mantle, Aaron) who amassed some pretty impressive slugging statistics without the benefit of steroids. If anything, the after-hours activities of some of our heroes from previous generations makes their performance on the field even more impressive.

In fact, the steroid use does render fraudulent both the record and the sport. If it is not effectively addressed by those who govern the sport, what was once the national pastime will become the national past time. If we want to see artificial players playing an artificial game, we can purchase a video game for a fraction of the price of admission tickets.

http://sabermetricresearch.blogspot.com/2006/08...

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 6:52pm

ha, salivating indeed.

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 7:04pm

I didn't mean to discount the Babe's career. He's the best of all time. My point is that there were many factors why each player's performance should be more heavily analyzed within on his own era rather than statistics in the aggregate.

And why is Maris included in your list of standouts with Mantle and Aaron?

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 7:24pm

Because he hit 61 home runs in a single season without the benefit of steroids - a record that remained until it was broken by players who did.

I agree that he did not have the lifetime career statistics of the other two, but he was the official record holder for an entire generation even though he did play in more games (I think - my memory is not that good anymore).

by: BradyIvory

11-19-2009 @ 9:32pm

We see athletes as our modern gladiators. We admire them for their skill and dedication to the sport and game. But they have to do it following the idea of fair play. There is no excuse for those of them buying steroids because they betray our trust. Some may say they used them to become better and to amaze us even more, but I want to be amazed by skill not by medicine.

by: jerryclatham28

06-08-2009 @ 6:50am

Thank you Gregory. I very much liked the feel and content of your blog.To answer your question, as I hear it--what could this imply about us--Buddha often being shown sitting upon a blossoming?It could imply that our consciousness is "like a blossom with petals curled tightly concealing the beauty within." ~unknown

by: jerryclatham28

06-08-2009 @ 6:50am

Thank you Gregory. I very much liked the feel and content of your blog.To answer your question, as I hear it--what could this imply about us--Buddha often being shown sitting upon a blossoming?It could imply that our consciousness is "like a blossom with petals curled tightly concealing the beauty within." ~unknown

by: neuro_nurse

02-18-2009 @ 9:59pm

A-who?

by: nuclearferret

02-18-2009 @ 10:17pm

Why the seeming snort at the Bible about unforgivable sin, in an article about a baseball player who took drugs?

by: LBellinger

02-18-2009 @ 11:23pm

"There was an unspoken, sacred trust between the players and fans that was broken. Irreparably."

It seems that we, as baseball fans, are complicit in baseball's,"Steroid Era."

We cheered Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa during their home run battle of 1998, though, even if we admit or not, we had to know there was something up. After standing for 37 years, the late, great Roger Maris' home run record was surpassed by TWO players!

But we fans not only bought into the home run chase, we lionized the victor. Witness the Nike commercial in which McGwire is belting mammoth shots while being ogled by the actress Heather Locklear. Meanwhile, two Cy Young Award winning pitchers, Tom Glavine and Greg Maddux of the Braves come to realization, "Chicks Dig the Long Ball!"

The commercial tag-line?

Just Do It!

"Citius, Altius, Fortius."

by: squeaky

02-18-2009 @ 11:26pm

snort? Are you being punny?

by: kevin47

02-19-2009 @ 12:25am

"According to the gospel of St. Matthew, Jesus himself described an unpardonable sin as "blaspheming" or "grieving" the Holy Spirit. What that is, exactly, Jesus doesn't say. I guess if you do commit the Big One, you'll know it. Game over."

Yeah, Jesus was a real idiot.

by: godgal

02-19-2009 @ 1:47am

for the record, the author, as a rule, does not snort. especially not at the bible.

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 3:15am

The only realistic expectation that we should hold for our sports stars is that their performance on the athletic field is the direct result of their God-given talent and their intense practice. We should not be surprised when we learn that they are alcoholics, that they chew tobacco, use foul language, or cheat on their wives. Many of the stars whose records we respect have committed one or more of those offenses.

However, we do have a right to impose some minimum standard which may be unique to each profession. We expect that our doctors will "first do no harm', that our lawyers will refrain from manufacturing evidence, that our politicians will refuse to take bribes, and that our ministers will abide by the gospel that they preach.

Can A-Rod be forgiven? If we limit the scope of that question to his relationship with God, the answer is of course he can. 'He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." My personal opinion is that many baseball fans will lose what little respect they maintain for that institution if the league officials do not act to discipline A-Rod and to adopt some strict rules to prevent a recurrence.

by: neuro_nurse

02-19-2009 @ 3:20am

I have the same reaction to stories like this as I do to the tabloid headlines about Brittany Spears tragic life:

Am I supposed to care?

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 6:06am

I agree that forgiveness is another matter entirely, but I disagree that steroids render the sport and record books fraudulent.

Steroids or not, it has never been apples to apples comparing players from different eras. Ruth didn't face minority pitchers and probably never saw a split finger fast ball. The mound got lower. The bats got lighter. Off-season work outs were invented.

You get a much more accurate idea how good a player is when you compare their performance against the peers in their era. Then you can take that comparison and compare it against how other players did against their eras. A stat like OPS+ (on base percentage plus slugging percentage measured against league average) is much more accurate than home run totals.

by: kevin47

02-19-2009 @ 6:17am

Only a conservative would find a way to bring OPS+ onto this blog. You were salivating at the opportunity, weren't you? That said, you are right, for the most part.

However, your example of Ruth never having to face Negro League pitchers proves my point. For baseball, this is an embarrassment on par with the existence of the Negro Leagues.

________________________________

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 4:54pm

I'm not buying your argument that perhaps one reason for Ruth's home run record was that "he didn't face minority pitchers." There is a link to a web site below which effectively shoots holes in that rationale.

Additionally, there are the standouts from when I was young (Maris, Mantle, Aaron) who amassed some pretty impressive slugging statistics without the benefit of steroids. If anything, the after-hours activities of some of our heroes from previous generations makes their performance on the field even more impressive.

In fact, the steroid use does render fraudulent both the record and the sport. If it is not effectively addressed by those who govern the sport, what was once the national pastime will become the national past time. If we want to see artificial players playing an artificial game, we can purchase a video game for a fraction of the price of admission tickets.

http://sabermetricresearch.blogspot.com/2006/08...

by: BradyIvory

11-19-2009 @ 7:32pm

An accessory that will always have a great impact along with a sexy lingerie are a pair of high heel boots. In such an outfit, I'm sure her show was a great success.

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 6:52pm

ha, salivating indeed.

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 7:04pm

I didn't mean to discount the Babe's career. He's the best of all time. My point is that there were many factors why each player's performance should be more heavily analyzed within on his own era rather than statistics in the aggregate.

And why is Maris included in your list of standouts with Mantle and Aaron?

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 7:24pm

Because he hit 61 home runs in a single season without the benefit of steroids - a record that remained until it was broken by players who did.

I agree that he did not have the lifetime career statistics of the other two, but he was the official record holder for an entire generation even though he did play in more games (I think - my memory is not that good anymore).

by: BradyIvory

11-19-2009 @ 7:32pm

An accessory that will always have a great impact along with a sexy lingerie are a pair of high heel boots. In such an outfit, I'm sure her show was a great success.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: LBellinger

02-18-2009 @ 11:23pm

"There was an unspoken, sacred trust between the players and fans that was broken. Irreparably."

It seems that we, as baseball fans, are complicit in baseball's,"Steroid Era."

We cheered Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa during their home run battle of 1998, though, even if we admit or not, we had to know there was something up. After standing for 37 years, the late, great Roger Maris' home run record was surpassed by TWO players!

But we fans not only bought into the home run chase, we lionized the victor. Witness the Nike commercial in which McGwire is belting mammoth shots while being ogled by the actress Heather Locklear. Meanwhile, two Cy Young Award winning pitchers, Tom Glavine and Greg Maddux of the Braves come to realization, "Chicks Dig the Long Ball!"

The commercial tag-line?

Just Do It!

"Citius, Altius, Fortius."

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 4:54pm

I'm not buying your argument that perhaps one reason for Ruth's home run record was that "he didn't face minority pitchers." There is a link to a web site below which effectively shoots holes in that rationale.

Additionally, there are the standouts from when I was young (Maris, Mantle, Aaron) who amassed some pretty impressive slugging statistics without the benefit of steroids. If anything, the after-hours activities of some of our heroes from previous generations makes their performance on the field even more impressive.

In fact, the steroid use does render fraudulent both the record and the sport. If it is not effectively addressed by those who govern the sport, what was once the national pastime will become the national past time. If we want to see artificial players playing an artificial game, we can purchase a video game for a fraction of the price of admission tickets.

http://sabermetricresearch.blogspot.com/2006/08...

by: neuro_nurse

02-18-2009 @ 9:59pm

A-who?

by: nuclearferret

02-18-2009 @ 10:17pm

Why the seeming snort at the Bible about unforgivable sin, in an article about a baseball player who took drugs?

by: LBellinger

02-18-2009 @ 11:23pm

"There was an unspoken, sacred trust between the players and fans that was broken. Irreparably."

It seems that we, as baseball fans, are complicit in baseball's,"Steroid Era."

We cheered Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa during their home run battle of 1998, though, even if we admit or not, we had to know there was something up. After standing for 37 years, the late, great Roger Maris' home run record was surpassed by TWO players!

But we fans not only bought into the home run chase, we lionized the victor. Witness the Nike commercial in which McGwire is belting mammoth shots while being ogled by the actress Heather Locklear. Meanwhile, two Cy Young Award winning pitchers, Tom Glavine and Greg Maddux of the Braves come to realization, "Chicks Dig the Long Ball!"

The commercial tag-line?

Just Do It!

"Citius, Altius, Fortius."

by: squeaky

02-18-2009 @ 11:26pm

snort? Are you being punny?

by: squeaky

02-18-2009 @ 11:26pm

snort? Are you being punny?

by: kevin47

02-19-2009 @ 12:25am

"According to the gospel of St. Matthew, Jesus himself described an unpardonable sin as "blaspheming" or "grieving" the Holy Spirit. What that is, exactly, Jesus doesn't say. I guess if you do commit the Big One, you'll know it. Game over."

Yeah, Jesus was a real idiot.

by: kevin47

02-19-2009 @ 12:25am

"According to the gospel of St. Matthew, Jesus himself described an unpardonable sin as "blaspheming" or "grieving" the Holy Spirit. What that is, exactly, Jesus doesn't say. I guess if you do commit the Big One, you'll know it. Game over."

Yeah, Jesus was a real idiot.

by: godgal

02-19-2009 @ 1:47am

for the record, the author, as a rule, does not snort. especially not at the bible.

by: godgal

02-19-2009 @ 1:47am

for the record, the author, as a rule, does not snort. especially not at the bible.

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 3:15am

The only realistic expectation that we should hold for our sports stars is that their performance on the athletic field is the direct result of their God-given talent and their intense practice. We should not be surprised when we learn that they are alcoholics, that they chew tobacco, use foul language, or cheat on their wives. Many of the stars whose records we respect have committed one or more of those offenses.

However, we do have a right to impose some minimum standard which may be unique to each profession. We expect that our doctors will "first do no harm', that our lawyers will refrain from manufacturing evidence, that our politicians will refuse to take bribes, and that our ministers will abide by the gospel that they preach.

Can A-Rod be forgiven? If we limit the scope of that question to his relationship with God, the answer is of course he can. 'He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." My personal opinion is that many baseball fans will lose what little respect they maintain for that institution if the league officials do not act to discipline A-Rod and to adopt some strict rules to prevent a recurrence.

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 3:15am

The only realistic expectation that we should hold for our sports stars is that their performance on the athletic field is the direct result of their God-given talent and their intense practice. We should not be surprised when we learn that they are alcoholics, that they chew tobacco, use foul language, or cheat on their wives. Many of the stars whose records we respect have committed one or more of those offenses.

However, we do have a right to impose some minimum standard which may be unique to each profession. We expect that our doctors will "first do no harm', that our lawyers will refrain from manufacturing evidence, that our politicians will refuse to take bribes, and that our ministers will abide by the gospel that they preach.

Can A-Rod be forgiven? If we limit the scope of that question to his relationship with God, the answer is of course he can. 'He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." My personal opinion is that many baseball fans will lose what little respect they maintain for that institution if the league officials do not act to discipline A-Rod and to adopt some strict rules to prevent a recurrence.

by: neuro_nurse

02-19-2009 @ 3:20am

I have the same reaction to stories like this as I do to the tabloid headlines about Brittany Spears tragic life:

Am I supposed to care?

by: neuro_nurse

02-19-2009 @ 3:20am

I have the same reaction to stories like this as I do to the tabloid headlines about Brittany Spears tragic life:

Am I supposed to care?

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 6:06am

I agree that forgiveness is another matter entirely, but I disagree that steroids render the sport and record books fraudulent.

Steroids or not, it has never been apples to apples comparing players from different eras. Ruth didn't face minority pitchers and probably never saw a split finger fast ball. The mound got lower. The bats got lighter. Off-season work outs were invented.

You get a much more accurate idea how good a player is when you compare their performance against the peers in their era. Then you can take that comparison and compare it against how other players did against their eras. A stat like OPS+ (on base percentage plus slugging percentage measured against league average) is much more accurate than home run totals.

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 6:06am

I agree that forgiveness is another matter entirely, but I disagree that steroids render the sport and record books fraudulent.

Steroids or not, it has never been apples to apples comparing players from different eras. Ruth didn't face minority pitchers and probably never saw a split finger fast ball. The mound got lower. The bats got lighter. Off-season work outs were invented.

You get a much more accurate idea how good a player is when you compare their performance against the peers in their era. Then you can take that comparison and compare it against how other players did against their eras. A stat like OPS+ (on base percentage plus slugging percentage measured against league average) is much more accurate than home run totals.

by: kevin47

02-19-2009 @ 6:17am

Only a conservative would find a way to bring OPS+ onto this blog. You were salivating at the opportunity, weren't you? That said, you are right, for the most part.

However, your example of Ruth never having to face Negro League pitchers proves my point. For baseball, this is an embarrassment on par with the existence of the Negro Leagues.

________________________________

by: kevin47

02-19-2009 @ 6:17am

Only a conservative would find a way to bring OPS+ onto this blog. You were salivating at the opportunity, weren't you? That said, you are right, for the most part.

However, your example of Ruth never having to face Negro League pitchers proves my point. For baseball, this is an embarrassment on par with the existence of the Negro Leagues.

________________________________

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 4:54pm

I'm not buying your argument that perhaps one reason for Ruth's home run record was that "he didn't face minority pitchers." There is a link to a web site below which effectively shoots holes in that rationale.

Additionally, there are the standouts from when I was young (Maris, Mantle, Aaron) who amassed some pretty impressive slugging statistics without the benefit of steroids. If anything, the after-hours activities of some of our heroes from previous generations makes their performance on the field even more impressive.

In fact, the steroid use does render fraudulent both the record and the sport. If it is not effectively addressed by those who govern the sport, what was once the national pastime will become the national past time. If we want to see artificial players playing an artificial game, we can purchase a video game for a fraction of the price of admission tickets.

http://sabermetricresearch.blogspot.com/2006/08...

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 6:52pm

ha, salivating indeed.

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 6:52pm

ha, salivating indeed.

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 7:04pm

I didn't mean to discount the Babe's career. He's the best of all time. My point is that there were many factors why each player's performance should be more heavily analyzed within on his own era rather than statistics in the aggregate.

And why is Maris included in your list of standouts with Mantle and Aaron?

by: DITE

02-19-2009 @ 7:04pm

I didn't mean to discount the Babe's career. He's the best of all time. My point is that there were many factors why each player's performance should be more heavily analyzed within on his own era rather than statistics in the aggregate.

And why is Maris included in your list of standouts with Mantle and Aaron?

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 7:24pm

Because he hit 61 home runs in a single season without the benefit of steroids - a record that remained until it was broken by players who did.

I agree that he did not have the lifetime career statistics of the other two, but he was the official record holder for an entire generation even though he did play in more games (I think - my memory is not that good anymore).

by: SisterMarie

02-19-2009 @ 7:24pm

Because he hit 61 home runs in a single season without the benefit of steroids - a record that remained until it was broken by players who did.

I agree that he did not have the lifetime career statistics of the other two, but he was the official record holder for an entire generation even though he did play in more games (I think - my memory is not that good anymore).

by: jerryclatham28

06-08-2009 @ 6:50am

Thank you Gregory. I very much liked the feel and content of your blog.To answer your question, as I hear it--what could this imply about us--Buddha often being shown sitting upon a blossoming?It could imply that our consciousness is "like a blossom with petals curled tightly concealing the beauty within." ~unknown

by: jerryclatham28

06-08-2009 @ 6:50am

Thank you Gregory. I very much liked the feel and content of your blog.To answer your question, as I hear it--what could this imply about us--Buddha often being shown sitting upon a blossoming?It could imply that our consciousness is "like a blossom with petals curled tightly concealing the beauty within." ~unknown

by: BradyIvory

11-19-2009 @ 7:32pm

An accessory that will always have a great impact along with a sexy lingerie are a pair of high heel boots. In such an outfit, I'm sure her show was a great success.

by: BradyIvory

11-19-2009 @ 7:32pm

An accessory that will always have a great impact along with a sexy lingerie are a pair of high heel boots. In such an outfit, I'm sure her show was a great success.

by: BradyIvory

11-19-2009 @ 9:32pm

We see athletes as our modern gladiators. We admire them for their skill and dedication to the sport and game. But they have to do it following the idea of fair play. There is no excuse for those of them buying steroids because they betray our trust. Some may say they used them to become better and to amaze us even more, but I want to be amazed by skill not by medicine.

by: BradyIvory

11-19-2009 @ 9:32pm

We see athletes as our modern gladiators. We admire them for their skill and dedication to the sport and game. But they have to do it following the idea of fair play. There is no excuse for those of them buying steroids because they betray our trust. Some may say they used them to become better and to amaze us even more, but I want to be amazed by skill not by medicine.

by: neuro_nurse

02-18-2009 @ 9:59pm

A-who?

by: nuclearferret

02-18-2009 @ 10:17pm

Why the seeming snort at the Bible about unforgivable sin, in an article about a baseball player who took drugs?