Get E-Mail Updates

Sin Nombre: Immigrants as Sojourners

President Obama recently addressed the crying need for comprehensive immigration reform. He reminded us that we are a nation of immigrants. Yet, for many, the question remains, "Why are so many people willing to risk so much to cross the U.S. border?" The award-winning independent film Sin Nombre elects to show, rather than tell us. It is a poetic portrait of this highly politicized social justice issue.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Filmmaker Cary Joji Fukunaga researched Honduran immigrants' plight, riding cargo trains loaded with hope-filled sojourners. His resulting first feature is a beautiful and troubling trek toward the Rio Grande. It also immerses viewers in the brutal initiation rites of the Mara Salvatrucha gang culture. Started by Salvadoran immigrants in Los Angeles, Mara Salvatrucha's network has now been exported (or rather deported) across Central America. Sin Nombre is a riveting story of escape and a haunting fight for survival -- a contemporary exodus not recommended for the squeamish. It connects the dots between economics and immigration. But for those who want to get inside the immigrant experience, Sin Nombre puts a compelling face on those who often die "without a name."

Sin Nombre begins in Tapachula, Chiapas, near the Mexican/Guatemalan border. Casper, a teenage member of Mara Salvatrucha, is ushering a young boy nicknamed Smiley into the gang. The local boss, Lil' Mago, counts down each crushing blow that gets Smiley closer to membership. Innocence is more than lost. It is beat out of Casper and Smiley. At times, Fukunaga's camera seems too fascinated by the tattoos, blood, and brutality that surround Casper. But eventually Casper comes to share our revulsion when Lil' Mago commits a particularly heinous crime. Casper casts off his gang name and seeks to erase his identifying tattoos. "Casper" is willing to die, so that his long-buried origins as Willy may live.

The second story starts even further south with a trio of Hondurans. A beautiful girl, Sayra, her estranged father, and her uncle hope to reunite with their extended family in New Jersey. They bide their time between trains, rushing to climb atop box cars. They face threats from the elements, gangs, and fellow travelers until Willy comes to Sayra's defense. Amid considerable tension, Fukunaga captures moments of raw beauty. We see lush cemeteries, bustling train stops, and tasty local foods. But scenes of quiet reflection are soon interrupted by the bloodlust of Mara Salvatrucha.

Young actors Edgar Flores (as Casper) and Paulina Gaitan (as Sayra) make a remarkably compelling couple. Our hearts break for adolescents shoved into survival mode. They share a single moment of respite in a church, transformed into a safe house for immigrants. Sin Nombre extends so much respect and empathy toward those who undertake such a challenging journey. How many trials must they endure before they even reach our shores? The film avoids overt political commentary, deciding that as our respect and understanding for the "nameless" rises, so will our compassion and embrace.

The 2009 Sundance Film Festival jury awarded prizes to both director Fukunaga and his cinematographer, Adriano Goldman, for their outstanding work. The lush visuals in Sin Nombre provide only fleeting relief from the pressure-packed story. My sharp student Jason Coker suggested that Sin Nombre reawakens the perspective found in Amos 9:7:

"Are not you Israelites the same to me as the Cushites?" declares the Lord. "Did I not bring Israel up from Egypt, the Philistines from Caphtor and the Arameans from Kir?"

I had the privilege of interviewing Fukunaga and his producer, Amy Kaufman, about Sin Nombre at the Windrider Forum at Sundance. You'll hear these young filmmakers demonstrate a commitment to their craft and a heart for humanity. They acknowledge how much faith informs immigrants' risk-taking exodus. But for Fukunaga, Sin Nombre is ultimately about family, about the unlikely bonds that form when our support systems are shredded. We'll be hearing more from Fukunaga for years to come. Yet until we enact significant and comprehensive immigration reform, Sin Nombre is likely to grow in heartbreaking relevance.

Craig Detweiler directs the Reel Spirituality Institute at Fuller Theological Seminary. His comedic documentary, Purple State of Mind, bridges the cultural and religious divide.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: neuro_nurse

03-26-2009 @ 4:42pm

Must be nice!

by: canucklehead

03-26-2009 @ 1:20am

my feet

by: neuro_nurse

03-26-2009 @ 4:42pm

Must be nice!

by: jasonacoker

03-27-2009 @ 10:15pm

Joe,

I'm not sure I understand your point. The ancient Hebrews, according to the Torah account, militarily invaded a territory not belonging to them, executing a bloody rampage of ethnic cleansing in order to claim the land for themselves. Frankly, that's far worse than merely, "breaking the law" and hardly vindicates them in comparison to today's illegal immigrants coming into the U.S. - most of whom are happy to integrate peacefully.

Also, Amos 9:7 is not presented here as a "proof text." It's merely a reminder that we often make the theological error of assuming that God is on our side, when in fact, he's always at work among all the people of the world and often through a kind of exodus. How do you know God is not presently delivering latin people into the relative safety of the United States?

I know your answer to that question can't possibly be, "Because it's against the law," for, we both know from the exodus narrative (as well as others) that God is no repsector of Kings, governments, or their laws, and even Christ himself broke unjust laws in his day. Since then, some of his best followers have indeed broken the law and helped others break the law in order to follow him faithfully.

by: jasonacoker

03-27-2009 @ 10:15pm

Joe,

I'm not sure I understand your point. The ancient Hebrews, according to the Torah account, militarily invaded a territory not belonging to them, executing a bloody rampage of ethnic cleansing in order to claim the land for themselves. Frankly, that's far worse than merely, "breaking the law" and hardly vindicates them in comparison to today's illegal immigrants coming into the U.S. - most of whom are happy to integrate peacefully.

Also, Amos 9:7 is not presented here as a "proof text." It's merely a reminder that we often make the theological error of assuming that God is on our side, when in fact, he's always at work among all the people of the world and often through a kind of exodus. How do you know God is not presently delivering latin people into the relative safety of the United States?

I know your answer to that question can't possibly be, "Because it's against the law," for, we both know from the exodus narrative (as well as others) that God is no repsector of Kings, governments, or their laws, and even Christ himself broke unjust laws in his day. Since then, some of his best followers have indeed broken the law and helped others break the law in order to follow him faithfully.

by: neuro_nurse

03-24-2009 @ 7:24pm

Tangent: To those of us who read "Emerging Infectious Diseases" and the "Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report," 'sin nombre' is a strain of the hantavirus endemic in the U.S.

by: Joe_Allen_Doty

03-24-2009 @ 9:00pm

Almost all of the people who have entered the United States of America illegally by crossing the Mexico-US Border knew they would be breaking the law before the left the country of Mexico.

The Israelites who had left Egypt (mentioned in Amos 9:7) were not citizens of the country of Canaan which they took over. They weren't even born there: almost all of the Israelites who were involved in the invasion of Canaan in the book of Joshua were born in the Sinai Wilderness.

It is wrong to proof-text scriptures from the Bible to suit one's on agenda when it comes to illegal aliens in the United States of America. I seriously doubt that Israel, Judea and Samaria, the places where Jesus and the disciples traveled, had border patrols and gates of entry like the United States has. Aliens in Jesus' time apparently weren't restricted as far as going from country to county in the Roman Empire in the 1st Century AD (before 70 AD, that is).

Believers in Jesus are NOT supposed to help people break the law.

by: neuro_nurse

03-24-2009 @ 9:20pm

"It is wrong to proof-text scriptures from the Bible to suit one's on agenda when it comes to illegal aliens in the United States of America."

Does that mean it's okay to prooftext scripture to suit other agenda?

by: canucklehead

03-25-2009 @ 4:03am

are those devotional volumes?

by: neuro_nurse

03-25-2009 @ 2:52pm

I guess that depends on to what you are devoted.

What's on your coffee table?

by: neuro_nurse

03-24-2009 @ 7:24pm

Tangent: To those of us who read "Emerging Infectious Diseases" and the "Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report," 'sin nombre' is a strain of the hantavirus endemic in the U.S.

by: Joe_Allen_Doty

03-24-2009 @ 9:00pm

Almost all of the people who have entered the United States of America illegally by crossing the Mexico-US Border knew they would be breaking the law before the left the country of Mexico.

The Israelites who had left Egypt (mentioned in Amos 9:7) were not citizens of the country of Canaan which they took over. They weren't even born there: almost all of the Israelites who were involved in the invasion of Canaan in the book of Joshua were born in the Sinai Wilderness.

It is wrong to proof-text scriptures from the Bible to suit one's on agenda when it comes to illegal aliens in the United States of America. I seriously doubt that Israel, Judea and Samaria, the places where Jesus and the disciples traveled, had border patrols and gates of entry like the United States has. Aliens in Jesus' time apparently weren't restricted as far as going from country to county in the Roman Empire in the 1st Century AD (before 70 AD, that is).

Believers in Jesus are NOT supposed to help people break the law.

by: neuro_nurse

03-24-2009 @ 9:20pm

"It is wrong to proof-text scriptures from the Bible to suit one's on agenda when it comes to illegal aliens in the United States of America."

Does that mean it's okay to prooftext scripture to suit other agenda?

by: Joe_Allen_Doty

03-25-2009 @ 8:55pm

It is wrong to proof-text scriptures to suit any kind of agenda.

To "proof-text" anything from a piece of literature, even the Bible, means to take it out of its original context and attempt to apply it to an unrelated context.

Lots of people proof-text from the Old Testament and try to Christianize it in an attempt to make it part of their doctrine when there is no proof that Jesus or others during the New Testament period even mentioned it.

by: canucklehead

03-25-2009 @ 4:03am

are those devotional volumes?

by: neuro_nurse

03-25-2009 @ 2:52pm

I guess that depends on to what you are devoted.

What's on your coffee table?

by: canucklehead

03-26-2009 @ 1:20am

my feet

by: Joe_Allen_Doty

03-25-2009 @ 8:55pm

It is wrong to proof-text scriptures to suit any kind of agenda.

To "proof-text" anything from a piece of literature, even the Bible, means to take it out of its original context and attempt to apply it to an unrelated context.

Lots of people proof-text from the Old Testament and try to Christianize it in an attempt to make it part of their doctrine when there is no proof that Jesus or others during the New Testament period even mentioned it.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: neuro_nurse

03-24-2009 @ 7:24pm

Tangent: To those of us who read "Emerging Infectious Diseases" and the "Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report," 'sin nombre' is a strain of the hantavirus endemic in the U.S.

by: neuro_nurse

03-24-2009 @ 7:24pm

Tangent: To those of us who read "Emerging Infectious Diseases" and the "Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report," 'sin nombre' is a strain of the hantavirus endemic in the U.S.

by: Joe_Allen_Doty

03-24-2009 @ 9:00pm

Almost all of the people who have entered the United States of America illegally by crossing the Mexico-US Border knew they would be breaking the law before the left the country of Mexico.

The Israelites who had left Egypt (mentioned in Amos 9:7) were not citizens of the country of Canaan which they took over. They weren't even born there: almost all of the Israelites who were involved in the invasion of Canaan in the book of Joshua were born in the Sinai Wilderness.

It is wrong to proof-text scriptures from the Bible to suit one's on agenda when it comes to illegal aliens in the United States of America. I seriously doubt that Israel, Judea and Samaria, the places where Jesus and the disciples traveled, had border patrols and gates of entry like the United States has. Aliens in Jesus' time apparently weren't restricted as far as going from country to county in the Roman Empire in the 1st Century AD (before 70 AD, that is).

Believers in Jesus are NOT supposed to help people break the law.

by: Joe_Allen_Doty

03-24-2009 @ 9:00pm

Almost all of the people who have entered the United States of America illegally by crossing the Mexico-US Border knew they would be breaking the law before the left the country of Mexico.

The Israelites who had left Egypt (mentioned in Amos 9:7) were not citizens of the country of Canaan which they took over. They weren't even born there: almost all of the Israelites who were involved in the invasion of Canaan in the book of Joshua were born in the Sinai Wilderness.

It is wrong to proof-text scriptures from the Bible to suit one's on agenda when it comes to illegal aliens in the United States of America. I seriously doubt that Israel, Judea and Samaria, the places where Jesus and the disciples traveled, had border patrols and gates of entry like the United States has. Aliens in Jesus' time apparently weren't restricted as far as going from country to county in the Roman Empire in the 1st Century AD (before 70 AD, that is).

Believers in Jesus are NOT supposed to help people break the law.

by: neuro_nurse

03-24-2009 @ 9:20pm

"It is wrong to proof-text scriptures from the Bible to suit one's on agenda when it comes to illegal aliens in the United States of America."

Does that mean it's okay to prooftext scripture to suit other agenda?

by: neuro_nurse

03-24-2009 @ 9:20pm

"It is wrong to proof-text scriptures from the Bible to suit one's on agenda when it comes to illegal aliens in the United States of America."

Does that mean it's okay to prooftext scripture to suit other agenda?

by: canucklehead

03-25-2009 @ 4:03am

are those devotional volumes?

by: canucklehead

03-25-2009 @ 4:03am

are those devotional volumes?

by: neuro_nurse

03-25-2009 @ 2:52pm

I guess that depends on to what you are devoted.

What's on your coffee table?

by: neuro_nurse

03-25-2009 @ 2:52pm

I guess that depends on to what you are devoted.

What's on your coffee table?

by: Joe_Allen_Doty

03-25-2009 @ 8:55pm

It is wrong to proof-text scriptures to suit any kind of agenda.

To "proof-text" anything from a piece of literature, even the Bible, means to take it out of its original context and attempt to apply it to an unrelated context.

Lots of people proof-text from the Old Testament and try to Christianize it in an attempt to make it part of their doctrine when there is no proof that Jesus or others during the New Testament period even mentioned it.

by: Joe_Allen_Doty

03-25-2009 @ 8:55pm

It is wrong to proof-text scriptures to suit any kind of agenda.

To "proof-text" anything from a piece of literature, even the Bible, means to take it out of its original context and attempt to apply it to an unrelated context.

Lots of people proof-text from the Old Testament and try to Christianize it in an attempt to make it part of their doctrine when there is no proof that Jesus or others during the New Testament period even mentioned it.

by: canucklehead

03-26-2009 @ 1:20am

my feet

by: canucklehead

03-26-2009 @ 1:20am

my feet

by: neuro_nurse

03-26-2009 @ 4:42pm

Must be nice!

by: neuro_nurse

03-26-2009 @ 4:42pm

Must be nice!

by: jasonacoker

03-27-2009 @ 10:15pm

Joe,

I'm not sure I understand your point. The ancient Hebrews, according to the Torah account, militarily invaded a territory not belonging to them, executing a bloody rampage of ethnic cleansing in order to claim the land for themselves. Frankly, that's far worse than merely, "breaking the law" and hardly vindicates them in comparison to today's illegal immigrants coming into the U.S. - most of whom are happy to integrate peacefully.

Also, Amos 9:7 is not presented here as a "proof text." It's merely a reminder that we often make the theological error of assuming that God is on our side, when in fact, he's always at work among all the people of the world and often through a kind of exodus. How do you know God is not presently delivering latin people into the relative safety of the United States?

I know your answer to that question can't possibly be, "Because it's against the law," for, we both know from the exodus narrative (as well as others) that God is no repsector of Kings, governments, or their laws, and even Christ himself broke unjust laws in his day. Since then, some of his best followers have indeed broken the law and helped others break the law in order to follow him faithfully.

by: jasonacoker

03-27-2009 @ 10:15pm

Joe,

I'm not sure I understand your point. The ancient Hebrews, according to the Torah account, militarily invaded a territory not belonging to them, executing a bloody rampage of ethnic cleansing in order to claim the land for themselves. Frankly, that's far worse than merely, "breaking the law" and hardly vindicates them in comparison to today's illegal immigrants coming into the U.S. - most of whom are happy to integrate peacefully.

Also, Amos 9:7 is not presented here as a "proof text." It's merely a reminder that we often make the theological error of assuming that God is on our side, when in fact, he's always at work among all the people of the world and often through a kind of exodus. How do you know God is not presently delivering latin people into the relative safety of the United States?

I know your answer to that question can't possibly be, "Because it's against the law," for, we both know from the exodus narrative (as well as others) that God is no repsector of Kings, governments, or their laws, and even Christ himself broke unjust laws in his day. Since then, some of his best followers have indeed broken the law and helped others break the law in order to follow him faithfully.