Get E-Mail Updates

Watch and Pray

Last week, before the budget vote, I talked with several senators on the phone as they were about to cast their vote. The ones I spoke to were friends, and I told them that I was praying for them. I said that many of us in the faith community were watching this budget vote very carefully, because it would impact low-income families and vulnerable people in such critical ways. We talked about some of the policy details, the amendments being put forward that could water down or eliminate many of the budget's most important provisions or sources of revenue, and about how hard many of their constituents were being hit by the economic crisis. But at the end of each conversation I would always come back to a promise: "Know that right now across the country, people of faith are watching and praying around this budget." After a slight pause, they each told me that they would vote for this budget and especially would defend the key commitments for struggling families and our poorest people. The senators thanked me for those prayers and ask that they keep coming.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Perhaps the hesitation, that slight pause, that occurred before they thanked me for my prayers and the prayers of so many of you was the realization of what it means when people of faith commit themselves to "watch and pray." Often, "to watch" is thought of as a passive activity that requires little or no effort on the part of the one doing the watching. But that's not how Jesus used the phrase.

On the night he was betrayed, Jesus took his disciples to the Garden of Gethsemane and asked them to stay with him and to watch and pray. He told them that his soul was troubled to the point of death, he prayed to his Father that "the cup would pass," and the scriptures tell us that his sweat was like blood. Three times Jesus left the disciples to pray, and each time when he returned they were sleeping. Jesus told them, "Watch and pray so that you will not fall into temptation. The spirit is willing, but the body is weak." To watch and pray was not the role of a passive observer but an invitation to be an active participant in the scene that was about to unfold. Instead, the disciples fell asleep.

In the black church tradition, "Watch Night" services, which are anything but passive, are held on New Years Eve, a tradition that has its roots in the celebration of "Freedom's Eve" the night before the Emancipation Proclamation began to take effect on January 1, 1863.

It is the act of both watching and praying that allows us to resist temptation and allows the weakness of the flesh to be overcome by the desires of the Spirit. And most insightful legislators will tell you that is a battle they face most every day.

I have often said that a budget is a moral document. Well, after studying this first Obama budget carefully, many of us who have been fighting poverty for years believe this one really is a moral document-with more commitments to struggling families and people than any budget in our lifetimes. But while the president's budget did pass last week, it is far from finished. In fact, this is only the beginning. After a conference committee reconciles the differences between the House and Senate versions, the final budget language will be approved when the members of Congress get back to Washington from their spring break. And then the real work begins. The crucial appropriations process will continue for months with most decisions on the many crucial programs to support low income people yet to be decided. Without continued pressure, without phone calls, letters and e-mails, visits, and conversations with members of the House and Senate, the "temptations" of special interests and the "weakness of the flesh" (Washington's bad habits and priorities) could still block the hopes for the poor in this budget. This is why we need to watch and pray.

While many good steps have been taken in this budget, it is far from complete and we have already seen several key provisions challenged and spending weakened. I have been told by members of the Obama White House team that key provisions for nutrition, child care and early education, the child tax credit, affordable housing, job training, educational opportunity, health care, and vital foreign aid to combat hunger and disease will all be "big fights." Our politics and this budget will revert naturally to old habits and bad priorities, with the poor bearing the brunt, once again, of deficit reduction unless there are powerful, even spiritual, forces pushing better and newer priorities. Now, more than ever, we need to watch and pray.

April 26-29, more than 1,000 Christians from across the country will come to Washington, D.C., to learn, worship, and lobby Congress for a budget that remembers the least of these and pushes forward policies that break the chains of poverty. And we hope President Obama will be speaking to us. I hope you will join us in Washington at the Mobilization to End Poverty to watch and pray.

Over the years we have said time and time again to our elected officials that a budget is a moral document. Now, to each and every one of our fellow Sojourners, I'm saying that your calendar is also a moral document. Each of us, as we are able, is called to commit our time to God's work in this world. More of God's work could be done if this is a good budget for poor families. So I encourage you to join us in person in Washington, or back home to tell your political representatives that you are watching and praying. And keep watching Sojomail and God's Politics blog to keep you informed about when the "big fights" are coming up in Congress.

As people of faith, to watch and pray is never passive but always active, and that is exactly how God has called us to change the world, both outside and inside of politics.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: DITE

04-09-2009 @ 4:03pm

"I have been told by members of the Obama White House team that key provisions for nutrition, child care and early education, the child tax credit, affordable housing, job training, educational opportunity, health care, and vital foreign aid to combat hunger and disease will all be "big fights."

...and a government subsidy for kitten giggles.

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 5:11pm

"

by: jdfromtn

04-13-2009 @ 11:32pm

Do you actually think that President Obama is advocating "mass murder," or is he just politically intelligent enough to know that if he so much as mentions cutting the defense budget, the Republican party, as well as some members of his own party, will collectively and very publicly villify him, leading to the disappearance of any chance he may have of orchestrating long overdue and much needed changes in the way Congress "does business?"

by: letjusticerolldown

04-09-2009 @ 5:34pm

I guess this is one of the open wounds in a very sick, affluent patient. We are a drunken society unable to see our own diseases and act in our own interest.

I know the problem you describe is critical. My wife had round-the-clock RN care at home for two years before her death in '06. I found one agency out of 25 contacts that was willing to take the case--due to nursing shortages. I always felt guilty pushing to get the shifts filled--knowing if I was successful, I would be pulling a nurse off another case.

This was about $1300/day in nursing costs. Yet her cares could have been met--with a much lower-cost mix of care. But the system did not allow for it. And frankly, according to the RN's, my wife's case was much more medically complex than most the cases they worked on.

The quality was often very poor; with home health attracting new immigrant grads who could not get higher paying hospital jobs. It caused me great consternation reflecting on what they were and were not getting in their RN programs.

I understand the lack of nursing instructors is a huge problem in the schools being able to ramp up their capacities.

Pumping more nurses into the system feels like pumping trillions into the banking industry.they are desperately needed to hold up a critical system--but the system itself is woefully ill.

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 6:12pm

I am sorry to hear about your wife.

"

by: judithod

04-09-2009 @ 8:04pm

Praying for the guidance of the Spirit for all who were voting, that they would choose to vote for the best in consideration of the needs of all their constituents, would have been most appropriate. What Mr. Wallis was doing was advocacy on behalf of those he views as his constituents.

by: letjusticerolldown

04-09-2009 @ 9:46pm

What I am saying is that it may well be that the problem is not an absolute shortage of nurses, but rather how many nurses it takes for a dysfunctional system to provide care.

A micro analogy: One day I was with my wife in an ICU. A friend came to visit. He had some interactions with the staff about some request and remarked back to me, "It's amazing anything gets done."

Another take on it is comparing the nursing inputs (and all other inputs) to health outcomes. My wife needed lots of care at home. But $500,000 a year for RN's was not the best way to get at the best outcomes. And $400,000 of those hours could have serviced other persons who couldn't get help.

My comments about immigrant nurses was not clear. Hospitals in the local market have recruited significantly overseas. I was referencing that a significant amount of the new nurses coming out of local nursing programs are new immigrants to the US. These are wonderful jobs and often persons working very hard. I was just remarking on it because the strains on the system were so obvious to me as a consumer. Only 1 in 25 agencies would even take the case. Then it was obvious they were scraping for every nurse they could get--including ones with virtually no experience--who raised questions in my mind, "Where in the world were you trained??" Instructors are lacking. Schools are lacking. The system allocates resources badly. etc. etc.

My analogy to the banks was that we could double the nursing supply. It would solve the shortage problem. But it would not solve the systemic problem of allocating massive inputs to achieve dismal outcomes.

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 10:15pm

"One day I was with my wife in an ICU. A friend came to visit. He had some interactions with the staff about some request and remarked back to me, "It's amazing anything gets done."

I'm going to try not to be too harsh in my response to that comment.

Non-medical people do not understand how nurses prioritize

by: BillSamuel

04-09-2009 @ 10:22pm

I think mass murder is a moral issue. The Obama budget devotes 52% of all discretionary spending to the military. It increases the already bloated military budget. I remember the days when that would have been an important moral issue for Sojourners. Unfortunately, it seems that Wallis' effort to be a VIP, a friend of the elite, has served to compromise his moral stance.

Is it really OK to kill poor people in other countries as long as one provides some money to alleviate poverty at home? Jim Wallis appears to answer yes. I say no.

With massive deficits and a major House committee chair campaigning for a 25% reduction in the military budget, we have had a wonderful opportunity to make progress against militarism. This opportunity has been squandered because faith groups with the strength to act effectively on it like Sojourners and FCNL have stilled their voices on the issue of military spending. This abject failure is why I will no longer support these groups.

by: letjusticerolldown

04-10-2009 @ 12:15am

I think our comments may well be pretty much passing in the night--and likely due to my not writing with any concise clarity.

I am attempting to comment of the capacity and incapacity of a system; and how the dysfunction of a system shows up in issues like the nursing shortage which you wrote about. The ICU comment was not aimed at your nursing or the nurses in the circustance I alluded to. It was a comment recognizing the inherent capacities and limitations of the system.

The US Military, Harvard, Wal-Mart, and the Catholic Church have amazing systems--with great capacities and great incapacities.

by: neuro_nurse

04-10-2009 @ 8:42am

The nursing shortage is one of the consequences of poor health system planning.

It is amazing that anything gets done in a hospital, and when it does get done, it's usually because the nurse pulls it together and makes it happen.

by: DITE

04-09-2009 @ 4:03pm

"I have been told by members of the Obama White House team that key provisions for nutrition, child care and early education, the child tax credit, affordable housing, job training, educational opportunity, health care, and vital foreign aid to combat hunger and disease will all be "big fights."

...and a government subsidy for kitten giggles.

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 5:11pm

"

by: letjusticerolldown

04-09-2009 @ 5:34pm

I guess this is one of the open wounds in a very sick, affluent patient. We are a drunken society unable to see our own diseases and act in our own interest.

I know the problem you describe is critical. My wife had round-the-clock RN care at home for two years before her death in '06. I found one agency out of 25 contacts that was willing to take the case--due to nursing shortages. I always felt guilty pushing to get the shifts filled--knowing if I was successful, I would be pulling a nurse off another case.

This was about $1300/day in nursing costs. Yet her cares could have been met--with a much lower-cost mix of care. But the system did not allow for it. And frankly, according to the RN's, my wife's case was much more medically complex than most the cases they worked on.

The quality was often very poor; with home health attracting new immigrant grads who could not get higher paying hospital jobs. It caused me great consternation reflecting on what they were and were not getting in their RN programs.

I understand the lack of nursing instructors is a huge problem in the schools being able to ramp up their capacities.

Pumping more nurses into the system feels like pumping trillions into the banking industry.they are desperately needed to hold up a critical system--but the system itself is woefully ill.

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 6:12pm

I am sorry to hear about your wife.

"

by: judithod

04-09-2009 @ 8:04pm

Praying for the guidance of the Spirit for all who were voting, that they would choose to vote for the best in consideration of the needs of all their constituents, would have been most appropriate. What Mr. Wallis was doing was advocacy on behalf of those he views as his constituents.

by: letjusticerolldown

04-09-2009 @ 9:46pm

What I am saying is that it may well be that the problem is not an absolute shortage of nurses, but rather how many nurses it takes for a dysfunctional system to provide care.

A micro analogy: One day I was with my wife in an ICU. A friend came to visit. He had some interactions with the staff about some request and remarked back to me, "It's amazing anything gets done."

Another take on it is comparing the nursing inputs (and all other inputs) to health outcomes. My wife needed lots of care at home. But $500,000 a year for RN's was not the best way to get at the best outcomes. And $400,000 of those hours could have serviced other persons who couldn't get help.

My comments about immigrant nurses was not clear. Hospitals in the local market have recruited significantly overseas. I was referencing that a significant amount of the new nurses coming out of local nursing programs are new immigrants to the US. These are wonderful jobs and often persons working very hard. I was just remarking on it because the strains on the system were so obvious to me as a consumer. Only 1 in 25 agencies would even take the case. Then it was obvious they were scraping for every nurse they could get--including ones with virtually no experience--who raised questions in my mind, "Where in the world were you trained??" Instructors are lacking. Schools are lacking. The system allocates resources badly. etc. etc.

My analogy to the banks was that we could double the nursing supply. It would solve the shortage problem. But it would not solve the systemic problem of allocating massive inputs to achieve dismal outcomes.

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 10:15pm

"One day I was with my wife in an ICU. A friend came to visit. He had some interactions with the staff about some request and remarked back to me, "It's amazing anything gets done."

I'm going to try not to be too harsh in my response to that comment.

Non-medical people do not understand how nurses prioritize

by: BillSamuel

04-09-2009 @ 10:22pm

I think mass murder is a moral issue. The Obama budget devotes 52% of all discretionary spending to the military. It increases the already bloated military budget. I remember the days when that would have been an important moral issue for Sojourners. Unfortunately, it seems that Wallis' effort to be a VIP, a friend of the elite, has served to compromise his moral stance.

Is it really OK to kill poor people in other countries as long as one provides some money to alleviate poverty at home? Jim Wallis appears to answer yes. I say no.

With massive deficits and a major House committee chair campaigning for a 25% reduction in the military budget, we have had a wonderful opportunity to make progress against militarism. This opportunity has been squandered because faith groups with the strength to act effectively on it like Sojourners and FCNL have stilled their voices on the issue of military spending. This abject failure is why I will no longer support these groups.

by: letjusticerolldown

04-10-2009 @ 12:15am

I think our comments may well be pretty much passing in the night--and likely due to my not writing with any concise clarity.

I am attempting to comment of the capacity and incapacity of a system; and how the dysfunction of a system shows up in issues like the nursing shortage which you wrote about. The ICU comment was not aimed at your nursing or the nurses in the circustance I alluded to. It was a comment recognizing the inherent capacities and limitations of the system.

The US Military, Harvard, Wal-Mart, and the Catholic Church have amazing systems--with great capacities and great incapacities.

by: neuro_nurse

04-10-2009 @ 8:42am

The nursing shortage is one of the consequences of poor health system planning.

It is amazing that anything gets done in a hospital, and when it does get done, it's usually because the nurse pulls it together and makes it happen.

by: jdfromtn

04-13-2009 @ 9:32pm

Do you actually think that President Obama is advocating "mass murder," or is he just politically intelligent enough to know that if he so much as mentions cutting the defense budget, the Republican party, as well as some members of his own party, will collectively and very publicly villify him, leading to the disappearance of any chance he may have of orchestrating long overdue and much needed changes in the way Congress "does business?"

by: jdfromtn

04-13-2009 @ 11:32pm

Do you actually think that President Obama is advocating "mass murder," or is he just politically intelligent enough to know that if he so much as mentions cutting the defense budget, the Republican party, as well as some members of his own party, will collectively and very publicly villify him, leading to the disappearance of any chance he may have of orchestrating long overdue and much needed changes in the way Congress "does business?"

by: jdfromtn

04-13-2009 @ 9:32pm

Do you actually think that President Obama is advocating "mass murder," or is he just politically intelligent enough to know that if he so much as mentions cutting the defense budget, the Republican party, as well as some members of his own party, will collectively and very publicly villify him, leading to the disappearance of any chance he may have of orchestrating long overdue and much needed changes in the way Congress "does business?"

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: DITE

04-09-2009 @ 4:03pm

"I have been told by members of the Obama White House team that key provisions for nutrition, child care and early education, the child tax credit, affordable housing, job training, educational opportunity, health care, and vital foreign aid to combat hunger and disease will all be "big fights."

...and a government subsidy for kitten giggles.

by: DITE

04-09-2009 @ 4:03pm

"I have been told by members of the Obama White House team that key provisions for nutrition, child care and early education, the child tax credit, affordable housing, job training, educational opportunity, health care, and vital foreign aid to combat hunger and disease will all be "big fights."

...and a government subsidy for kitten giggles.

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 5:11pm

"

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 5:11pm

"

by: letjusticerolldown

04-09-2009 @ 5:34pm

I guess this is one of the open wounds in a very sick, affluent patient. We are a drunken society unable to see our own diseases and act in our own interest.

I know the problem you describe is critical. My wife had round-the-clock RN care at home for two years before her death in '06. I found one agency out of 25 contacts that was willing to take the case--due to nursing shortages. I always felt guilty pushing to get the shifts filled--knowing if I was successful, I would be pulling a nurse off another case.

This was about $1300/day in nursing costs. Yet her cares could have been met--with a much lower-cost mix of care. But the system did not allow for it. And frankly, according to the RN's, my wife's case was much more medically complex than most the cases they worked on.

The quality was often very poor; with home health attracting new immigrant grads who could not get higher paying hospital jobs. It caused me great consternation reflecting on what they were and were not getting in their RN programs.

I understand the lack of nursing instructors is a huge problem in the schools being able to ramp up their capacities.

Pumping more nurses into the system feels like pumping trillions into the banking industry.they are desperately needed to hold up a critical system--but the system itself is woefully ill.

by: letjusticerolldown

04-09-2009 @ 5:34pm

I guess this is one of the open wounds in a very sick, affluent patient. We are a drunken society unable to see our own diseases and act in our own interest.

I know the problem you describe is critical. My wife had round-the-clock RN care at home for two years before her death in '06. I found one agency out of 25 contacts that was willing to take the case--due to nursing shortages. I always felt guilty pushing to get the shifts filled--knowing if I was successful, I would be pulling a nurse off another case.

This was about $1300/day in nursing costs. Yet her cares could have been met--with a much lower-cost mix of care. But the system did not allow for it. And frankly, according to the RN's, my wife's case was much more medically complex than most the cases they worked on.

The quality was often very poor; with home health attracting new immigrant grads who could not get higher paying hospital jobs. It caused me great consternation reflecting on what they were and were not getting in their RN programs.

I understand the lack of nursing instructors is a huge problem in the schools being able to ramp up their capacities.

Pumping more nurses into the system feels like pumping trillions into the banking industry.they are desperately needed to hold up a critical system--but the system itself is woefully ill.

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 6:12pm

I am sorry to hear about your wife.

"

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 6:12pm

I am sorry to hear about your wife.

"

by: judithod

04-09-2009 @ 8:04pm

Praying for the guidance of the Spirit for all who were voting, that they would choose to vote for the best in consideration of the needs of all their constituents, would have been most appropriate. What Mr. Wallis was doing was advocacy on behalf of those he views as his constituents.

by: judithod

04-09-2009 @ 8:04pm

Praying for the guidance of the Spirit for all who were voting, that they would choose to vote for the best in consideration of the needs of all their constituents, would have been most appropriate. What Mr. Wallis was doing was advocacy on behalf of those he views as his constituents.

by: letjusticerolldown

04-09-2009 @ 9:46pm

What I am saying is that it may well be that the problem is not an absolute shortage of nurses, but rather how many nurses it takes for a dysfunctional system to provide care.

A micro analogy: One day I was with my wife in an ICU. A friend came to visit. He had some interactions with the staff about some request and remarked back to me, "It's amazing anything gets done."

Another take on it is comparing the nursing inputs (and all other inputs) to health outcomes. My wife needed lots of care at home. But $500,000 a year for RN's was not the best way to get at the best outcomes. And $400,000 of those hours could have serviced other persons who couldn't get help.

My comments about immigrant nurses was not clear. Hospitals in the local market have recruited significantly overseas. I was referencing that a significant amount of the new nurses coming out of local nursing programs are new immigrants to the US. These are wonderful jobs and often persons working very hard. I was just remarking on it because the strains on the system were so obvious to me as a consumer. Only 1 in 25 agencies would even take the case. Then it was obvious they were scraping for every nurse they could get--including ones with virtually no experience--who raised questions in my mind, "Where in the world were you trained??" Instructors are lacking. Schools are lacking. The system allocates resources badly. etc. etc.

My analogy to the banks was that we could double the nursing supply. It would solve the shortage problem. But it would not solve the systemic problem of allocating massive inputs to achieve dismal outcomes.

by: letjusticerolldown

04-09-2009 @ 9:46pm

What I am saying is that it may well be that the problem is not an absolute shortage of nurses, but rather how many nurses it takes for a dysfunctional system to provide care.

A micro analogy: One day I was with my wife in an ICU. A friend came to visit. He had some interactions with the staff about some request and remarked back to me, "It's amazing anything gets done."

Another take on it is comparing the nursing inputs (and all other inputs) to health outcomes. My wife needed lots of care at home. But $500,000 a year for RN's was not the best way to get at the best outcomes. And $400,000 of those hours could have serviced other persons who couldn't get help.

My comments about immigrant nurses was not clear. Hospitals in the local market have recruited significantly overseas. I was referencing that a significant amount of the new nurses coming out of local nursing programs are new immigrants to the US. These are wonderful jobs and often persons working very hard. I was just remarking on it because the strains on the system were so obvious to me as a consumer. Only 1 in 25 agencies would even take the case. Then it was obvious they were scraping for every nurse they could get--including ones with virtually no experience--who raised questions in my mind, "Where in the world were you trained??" Instructors are lacking. Schools are lacking. The system allocates resources badly. etc. etc.

My analogy to the banks was that we could double the nursing supply. It would solve the shortage problem. But it would not solve the systemic problem of allocating massive inputs to achieve dismal outcomes.

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 10:15pm

"One day I was with my wife in an ICU. A friend came to visit. He had some interactions with the staff about some request and remarked back to me, "It's amazing anything gets done."

I'm going to try not to be too harsh in my response to that comment.

Non-medical people do not understand how nurses prioritize

by: neuro_nurse

04-09-2009 @ 10:15pm

"One day I was with my wife in an ICU. A friend came to visit. He had some interactions with the staff about some request and remarked back to me, "It's amazing anything gets done."

I'm going to try not to be too harsh in my response to that comment.

Non-medical people do not understand how nurses prioritize

by: BillSamuel

04-09-2009 @ 10:22pm

I think mass murder is a moral issue. The Obama budget devotes 52% of all discretionary spending to the military. It increases the already bloated military budget. I remember the days when that would have been an important moral issue for Sojourners. Unfortunately, it seems that Wallis' effort to be a VIP, a friend of the elite, has served to compromise his moral stance.

Is it really OK to kill poor people in other countries as long as one provides some money to alleviate poverty at home? Jim Wallis appears to answer yes. I say no.

With massive deficits and a major House committee chair campaigning for a 25% reduction in the military budget, we have had a wonderful opportunity to make progress against militarism. This opportunity has been squandered because faith groups with the strength to act effectively on it like Sojourners and FCNL have stilled their voices on the issue of military spending. This abject failure is why I will no longer support these groups.

by: BillSamuel

04-09-2009 @ 10:22pm

I think mass murder is a moral issue. The Obama budget devotes 52% of all discretionary spending to the military. It increases the already bloated military budget. I remember the days when that would have been an important moral issue for Sojourners. Unfortunately, it seems that Wallis' effort to be a VIP, a friend of the elite, has served to compromise his moral stance.

Is it really OK to kill poor people in other countries as long as one provides some money to alleviate poverty at home? Jim Wallis appears to answer yes. I say no.

With massive deficits and a major House committee chair campaigning for a 25% reduction in the military budget, we have had a wonderful opportunity to make progress against militarism. This opportunity has been squandered because faith groups with the strength to act effectively on it like Sojourners and FCNL have stilled their voices on the issue of military spending. This abject failure is why I will no longer support these groups.

by: letjusticerolldown

04-10-2009 @ 12:15am

I think our comments may well be pretty much passing in the night--and likely due to my not writing with any concise clarity.

I am attempting to comment of the capacity and incapacity of a system; and how the dysfunction of a system shows up in issues like the nursing shortage which you wrote about. The ICU comment was not aimed at your nursing or the nurses in the circustance I alluded to. It was a comment recognizing the inherent capacities and limitations of the system.

The US Military, Harvard, Wal-Mart, and the Catholic Church have amazing systems--with great capacities and great incapacities.

by: letjusticerolldown

04-10-2009 @ 12:15am

I think our comments may well be pretty much passing in the night--and likely due to my not writing with any concise clarity.

I am attempting to comment of the capacity and incapacity of a system; and how the dysfunction of a system shows up in issues like the nursing shortage which you wrote about. The ICU comment was not aimed at your nursing or the nurses in the circustance I alluded to. It was a comment recognizing the inherent capacities and limitations of the system.

The US Military, Harvard, Wal-Mart, and the Catholic Church have amazing systems--with great capacities and great incapacities.

by: neuro_nurse

04-10-2009 @ 8:42am

The nursing shortage is one of the consequences of poor health system planning.

It is amazing that anything gets done in a hospital, and when it does get done, it's usually because the nurse pulls it together and makes it happen.

by: neuro_nurse

04-10-2009 @ 8:42am

The nursing shortage is one of the consequences of poor health system planning.

It is amazing that anything gets done in a hospital, and when it does get done, it's usually because the nurse pulls it together and makes it happen.

by: jdfromtn

04-13-2009 @ 9:32pm

Do you actually think that President Obama is advocating "mass murder," or is he just politically intelligent enough to know that if he so much as mentions cutting the defense budget, the Republican party, as well as some members of his own party, will collectively and very publicly villify him, leading to the disappearance of any chance he may have of orchestrating long overdue and much needed changes in the way Congress "does business?"

by: jdfromtn

04-13-2009 @ 9:32pm

Do you actually think that President Obama is advocating "mass murder," or is he just politically intelligent enough to know that if he so much as mentions cutting the defense budget, the Republican party, as well as some members of his own party, will collectively and very publicly villify him, leading to the disappearance of any chance he may have of orchestrating long overdue and much needed changes in the way Congress "does business?"

by: jdfromtn

04-13-2009 @ 11:32pm

Do you actually think that President Obama is advocating "mass murder," or is he just politically intelligent enough to know that if he so much as mentions cutting the defense budget, the Republican party, as well as some members of his own party, will collectively and very publicly villify him, leading to the disappearance of any chance he may have of orchestrating long overdue and much needed changes in the way Congress "does business?"

by: jdfromtn

04-13-2009 @ 11:32pm

Do you actually think that President Obama is advocating "mass murder," or is he just politically intelligent enough to know that if he so much as mentions cutting the defense budget, the Republican party, as well as some members of his own party, will collectively and very publicly villify him, leading to the disappearance of any chance he may have of orchestrating long overdue and much needed changes in the way Congress "does business?"