Get E-Mail Updates

Stop Starbucks

When Robert Greenwald, founder and president of Brave New Films -- an organization that uses new media and internet video campaigns to take action on social issues nationwide -- first told us that our next campaign was going to be about Starbucks, a lot of us here were very surprised.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

We've all had the "Starbucks experience" -- smooth folksy music, leather couches, community book shelves, luxury drinks, and cheerful barista service. It just feels good to be inside a Starbucks, and why shouldn't it? All around the store are signals that coffee makers and drinkers are part of a blissful, ethical community where everyone is taken care of with health care and dignity on the job. Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz says that workers should "believe in their hearts that management trusted them and treated them with respect ... If they had faith in me and my motives, they wouldn't need a union."

I'm not naive enough to believe that a transnational mega corporation truly is all that it claims to be, but when our production teams started investigating Starbucks' corporate response to coffee roaster and barista unions, I was shocked. Starbucks has forced store managers to work overtime without pay, fired people for talking about a union, discriminated in hiring against people with a past union affiliation, and is lobbying hard against the passage of EFCA. Oh, and those health benefits for "partners" they make a big deal about? You need to work 240 hours a quarter to be eligible - and anyone who has worked retail or service jobs part-time knows that we have almost no control over the amount of hours that are set for us. Just to put it in perspective, Starbucks insures less than 42 percent of its workers -- while Wal-Mart insures 47 percent.

If you want to work full-time for Starbucks, you have to make yourself available 80.5 hours of the week. Daniel Gross, a founding member of the Starbucks union, describes the full-time scheduling like this: "Starbucks can schedule you on any day, at any time within those hours ... How are you supposed to get a second job or plan for child care if you have to be available 80.5 hours?" To learn more about these issues, visit the Stop Starbucks truth page.

Firing people for organizing is not an employer's right -- it's against federal law. Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz likes to remind people that he grew up poor in New York, and that his father never made more than $20,000 a year. His father probably could have used a union. Watch the video and sign the memo to CEO Howard Schultz demanding that he allow his workers to form unions here at Stop Starbucks.

Anna Almendrala was a Sojourners intern from 2007-2008. She now lives in Los Angeles, California, and works for Brave New Foundation as the Marketing & Distribution associate. Follow her on Twitter to keep updated on the Stop Starbucks campaign.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 7:13am

Great Work !

Regards

{Name}

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 7:11am

where do i get more information on this

Regards

name

by: Police Car Auctions

06-26-2011 @ 7:25pm

Police Car Auctions...

This design is incredible! You most certainly know how to keep a reader entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost...HaHa!) Fantastic job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that,...

by: altarofego

06-01-2009 @ 7:17pm

Capitalism is not driven by greed and social justice not by envy. Greed and envy are the motivators driving sinful people to exploit capitalism and manipulate social justice, both for purely self-serving ends.

by: Sok Noni

07-24-2011 @ 10:06am

Noni...

Hi! Would you mind if I share your blog with my myspace group? There's a lot of people that I think would really enjoy your content. Please let me know. Many thanks...

by: free music download programs

08-05-2011 @ 5:22pm

free safe music downloads...

Thanks for the great post, I have linked back to your site here. http://therapidsearch.com/sites-we-like.php Thanks for the great article....

by: Lose Belly Fat

08-16-2011 @ 4:37pm

Lose Belly Fat...

This design is spectacular! You definitely know how to keep a reader entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost...HaHa!) Wonderful job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, ho...

by: registry cleaners

07-04-2011 @ 3:09pm

registry cleaners...

Good day! Would you mind if I share your blog with my myspace group? There's a lot of folks that I think would really appreciate your content. Please let me know. Cheers...

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 5:13am

Great Work !

Regards

{Name}

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 5:11am

where do i get more information on this

Regards

name

by: KevinLewis10

09-23-2009 @ 3:48am

Nice Read

Regards

{Name}

by: KevinLewis10

09-23-2009 @ 3:45am

Hi nice to read this I realy like to

Thanks for such a nice post.

Regards

{Name}

by: Low Acid Coffee

04-12-2010 @ 8:29am

This article should be titled. "Stop Overpriced Coffee of Starbucks" I hate their overpricing.

by: nissan juke wiki

07-19-2011 @ 6:22am

juke nissan review...

Awesome post, I've linked back to your blog here http://www.vwsuv.net/sites-we-like/ return the favor if you can, thanks!...

by: Property Solicitor

08-12-2011 @ 7:43am

by: DITE

05-27-2009 @ 5:14pm

Good for Starbucks. There will always be those that resent the companies that are successful. There will always be people, despite their best intentions, that fail to understand that prices are communicators and the price of labor is no different.

by: SisterMarie

05-27-2009 @ 5:43pm

I have long thought that Starbucks coffee was overrated and overpriced. Now I have one more reason to not buy their coffee.

by: Tell

08-14-2011 @ 2:07pm

Pig...

[

by: jesse3

05-27-2009 @ 6:51pm

"(Starbucks) is lobbying hard against the passage of EFCA."
--Good for them!

"Just to put it in perspective, Starbucks insures less than 42 percent of its workers - while Wal-Mart insures 47 percent."
--To put it further into perspective, your average independent coffee house (which I tend to prefer, actually) insures less than 10 percent of its workers.

by: Palosaari

05-27-2009 @ 7:23pm

What is it with these big Seattle companies? Amazon has an atrocious record in caring for the poor; Microsoft takes advantage of its workers and has policies to deny benefits; Boeing actively works to kill people; and now Starbucks, the last of the "good" major Seattle companies! One has to wonder what the wonderful Seattle life is built upon.

If one could create the perfect society, but with the involuntary untold suffering of one lowly individual, would it be worth it?

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 8:01pm

If you think it's expensive now, wait until the entire company is unionized! Unions make us pay more for the products that would otherwise be less expensive to produce or create. That translates to poor stewardship of resources that could otherwise be used in better places.

by: Treasure Hunters Roadshow

05-13-2011 @ 7:39am

fantastic......

[..]Check this out, i loved this page!![..]...

by: 1Grace

05-27-2009 @ 8:01pm

What is it with these big Seattle companies?

Seattle is one of the most liberal areas in the nation .

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 8:15pm

"(Starbucks) is lobbying hard against the passage of EFCA."

There's nothing "pro-choice" about the EFCA. Honestly, it's probably the most damaging piece of legislation that could be passed to hurt our economy. Unions are largely the source of many of the economic problems of GM and Chrysler, and hurt the economy more so than it helps. I have to pay a lot more for an automobile because people in Michigan want to make twice as much as I do. Somehow that doesn't compute. I get along just fine with my income and benefits, yet for some absurd reason the unions want to make the rest of the world pay more for what could be produced for less. That's poor stewardship of scarce resources. Much of those resources could be used for other things that people want and need, and at a cheaper price.

Unions started out with a great purpose: prohibit employers from harming its employees. It's gotten way to greedy and has harmed our economy in the meantime.

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 11:45pm

agreed. If capitalism is driven by greed, social justice is driven by envy.

by: cfpdx

05-28-2009 @ 12:32am

Large companies are walking targets. My daughter has worked at Starbucks p/t for 6 years while attending school and has had benefits the entire time. She has stock and health care. They are awesome!

by: DITE

05-27-2009 @ 5:14pm

Good for Starbucks. There will always be those that resent the companies that are successful. There will always be people, despite their best intentions, that fail to understand that prices are communicators and the price of labor is no different.

by: 1Grace

05-28-2009 @ 5:18am

Yikes for serving coffee ? That does sound like a good company . I live in the Seattle area , actually do not like their coffee, and can't afford the coffee experience that so many out here love . People spend about 3 bucks a day on their cup of StarBucks blended coffee, flavors and more .

Your right about any company that is sucessfull being a target . Starbucks actuaklly has hit hard times wuth the recessiion , so has Boeing and Microsoft out here . Interesting the lefty politicians make a big deal out of how they have made it better for them to be in business out here , but the same political slant in regards to politics puts a harsh slant on their operations on blogs such as this .

by: SisterMarie

05-27-2009 @ 5:43pm

I have long thought that Starbucks coffee was overrated and overpriced. Now I have one more reason to not buy their coffee.

by: rryand35

05-28-2009 @ 6:49am

Agreed!!! Couldn't agree more.

I talked with my grandpa the other day and he was saying that if a unionized worker dropped a piece of paper he couldn't pick it up because it wasn't in his job discription. Think of how this would hurt Starbucks!!!
(Imagine)
"oh I'm sorry I can't make a soy latte, thats Bobs job. And don't even get me started with the whole tea bit!"

Since when did being Christian being pro-union? I never thought that greed was a value Christ emphasized. Hmm.

by: jesse3

05-27-2009 @ 6:51pm

"(Starbucks) is lobbying hard against the passage of EFCA."
--Good for them!

"Just to put it in perspective, Starbucks insures less than 42 percent of its workers - while Wal-Mart insures 47 percent."
--To put it further into perspective, your average independent coffee house (which I tend to prefer, actually) insures less than 10 percent of its workers.

by: Butler Auto Auction

07-29-2011 @ 8:35pm

Butler Auto Auction...

I'm really enjoying the design and layout of your blog. It's a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Great work!...

by: Palosaari

05-27-2009 @ 7:23pm

What is it with these big Seattle companies? Amazon has an atrocious record in caring for the poor; Microsoft takes advantage of its workers and has policies to deny benefits; Boeing actively works to kill people; and now Starbucks, the last of the "good" major Seattle companies! One has to wonder what the wonderful Seattle life is built upon.

If one could create the perfect society, but with the involuntary untold suffering of one lowly individual, would it be worth it?

by: justintime

05-28-2009 @ 3:47pm

Once again, xtrafree spouts off against labor unions.

Xfree is using standard anti union talking points,
emanating from the corporate right wing of the Republican Party --
'mindspeak' from a libertarian 'think tank', amplified through the corporate media,
reverberating inside 'dittohead' skulls all across America.

I wonder how xfree earns his living?

Is xfree an entrepreneur,
an investor,
business owner,
corporate manager,
hourly wage earner,
commission salesperson,
government worker,
politician,
soldier,
policeman,
teacher,
attorney,
engineer,
architect,
craftsman,
scientist,
social worker,
a cleric,
or is he retired, posting on God's Politics blog just for the fun of it?

I wish xfree would be more proactive in his search for the truth about social justice.

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 8:01pm

If you think it's expensive now, wait until the entire company is unionized! Unions make us pay more for the products that would otherwise be less expensive to produce or create. That translates to poor stewardship of resources that could otherwise be used in better places.

by: 1Grace

05-27-2009 @ 8:01pm

What is it with these big Seattle companies?

Seattle is one of the most liberal areas in the nation .

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 8:15pm

"(Starbucks) is lobbying hard against the passage of EFCA."

There's nothing "pro-choice" about the EFCA. Honestly, it's probably the most damaging piece of legislation that could be passed to hurt our economy. Unions are largely the source of many of the economic problems of GM and Chrysler, and hurt the economy more so than it helps. I have to pay a lot more for an automobile because people in Michigan want to make twice as much as I do. Somehow that doesn't compute. I get along just fine with my income and benefits, yet for some absurd reason the unions want to make the rest of the world pay more for what could be produced for less. That's poor stewardship of scarce resources. Much of those resources could be used for other things that people want and need, and at a cheaper price.

Unions started out with a great purpose: prohibit employers from harming its employees. It's gotten way to greedy and has harmed our economy in the meantime.

by: FatToaster

05-28-2009 @ 5:04pm

I live in Michigan... it happens to be the poorest state in the union right now with the highest unemployment rate. The people in Michigan want jobs (period)... and I think it is relatively unfair to generalize all Michigan residents so broadly by labeling them greedy... wanting to "make twice as much" as you do. Not to mention that it is unfair to claim that someone else wants to have something that I'm sure you would not refuse yourself.... i.e. I doubt you would object to a 100% raise if offered.

Your statements sound as "envious" as you stated in an earlier post was the negative position of social justice.

Unions tend to be just as susceptible to the problems of size and money that major corporations face (corruption, mismanagement, focus away from people, etc). I have a feeling that companies like Starbucks start out with the best of intentions toward them employees, but when they become a mega-corporation, they find that they need to standardize practices to maintain their "system," and in doing so they inadvertently create new systems that override their earlier best intentions. Problem is that we don't have systems in place currently to hold these corporations accountable when they start to miss the mark.

Unions might be an imperfect solution, but on the other hand, I don't see better ideas being implemented anywhere with success... WalMarts and Starbuckses are overrunning neighborhoods, and bad practices continue unabated.

Your local coffeehouse may not offer the same corporate benefits, but they are still personal enough to deal with employee issues on a case by case basis. There is no study marking how many coffeehouse owners have paid out of pocket for an employee's medical bills, or given paid time off for an emergency, or offered flexibility in scheduling to accommodate a second job, etc.

by: justontime

05-28-2009 @ 6:28pm

Hey extrafree, get your mind out of the right wing noise machine. You and your Karl Rove clones and Limbaugh wanna-bees can't think for themselves. Why don't you go worship Reagan or some hedge fund manager. Turn off Fox News turn on to reality.

You and the stoopid Republicans make me so frustrated I can't even respond to your specific points. I'm just going to rage and imply that you somehow came by your knowledge by reading Heritage Foundation issue briefs. At least when I cut and paste other people's ideas I give them credit!! And what do you do for a living? You must be one of those people who works!

Keith! Keith! I can't take it anymore. argggh! Rage... ..over...taking....me...I...must...get...help... *inserting I-V line direct from KO* aaahhh... peace...

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 11:45pm

agreed. If capitalism is driven by greed, social justice is driven by envy.

by: cfpdx

05-28-2009 @ 12:32am

Large companies are walking targets. My daughter has worked at Starbucks p/t for 6 years while attending school and has had benefits the entire time. She has stock and health care. They are awesome!

by: best london

08-05-2011 @ 2:39pm

FindUK London Escorts...

FindUK London Escorts, 53 Regency Street, London, SW1P 4AF, 020 3011 3058...

by: 1Grace

05-28-2009 @ 5:18am

Yikes for serving coffee ? That does sound like a good company . I live in the Seattle area , actually do not like their coffee, and can't afford the coffee experience that so many out here love . People spend about 3 bucks a day on their cup of StarBucks blended coffee, flavors and more .

Your right about any company that is sucessfull being a target . Starbucks actuaklly has hit hard times wuth the recessiion , so has Boeing and Microsoft out here . Interesting the lefty politicians make a big deal out of how they have made it better for them to be in business out here , but the same political slant in regards to politics puts a harsh slant on their operations on blogs such as this .

by: Low Acid Coffee

04-12-2010 @ 8:29am

This article should be titled. "Stop Overpriced Coffee of Starbucks" I hate their overpricing.

by: rryand35

05-28-2009 @ 6:49am

Agreed!!! Couldn't agree more.

I talked with my grandpa the other day and he was saying that if a unionized worker dropped a piece of paper he couldn't pick it up because it wasn't in his job discription. Think of how this would hurt Starbucks!!!
(Imagine)
"oh I'm sorry I can't make a soy latte, thats Bobs job. And don't even get me started with the whole tea bit!"

Since when did being Christian being pro-union? I never thought that greed was a value Christ emphasized. Hmm.

by: Tegaderm film 1626w

05-12-2011 @ 6:22am

tegaderm dressing...

this site is worth a backlink and I backlinked to it to get more backlinks...

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 7:13am

Great Work !

Regards

{Name}

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 7:11am

where do i get more information on this

Regards

name

by: JamesM

05-28-2009 @ 11:49pm

Look who is cheering them on! That's reason enough not to purchase their products.

by: justintime

05-28-2009 @ 3:47pm

Once again, xtrafree spouts off against labor unions.

Xfree is using standard anti union talking points,
emanating from the corporate right wing of the Republican Party --
'mindspeak' from a libertarian 'think tank', amplified through the corporate media,
reverberating inside 'dittohead' skulls all across America.

I wonder how xfree earns his living?

Is xfree an entrepreneur,
an investor,
business owner,
corporate manager,
hourly wage earner,
commission salesperson,
government worker,
politician,
soldier,
policeman,
teacher,
attorney,
engineer,
architect,
craftsman,
scientist,
social worker,
a cleric,
or is he retired, posting on God's Politics blog just for the fun of it?

I wish xfree would be more proactive in his search for the truth about social justice.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: DITE

05-27-2009 @ 5:14pm

Good for Starbucks. There will always be those that resent the companies that are successful. There will always be people, despite their best intentions, that fail to understand that prices are communicators and the price of labor is no different.

by: DITE

05-27-2009 @ 5:14pm

Good for Starbucks. There will always be those that resent the companies that are successful. There will always be people, despite their best intentions, that fail to understand that prices are communicators and the price of labor is no different.

by: SisterMarie

05-27-2009 @ 5:43pm

I have long thought that Starbucks coffee was overrated and overpriced. Now I have one more reason to not buy their coffee.

by: SisterMarie

05-27-2009 @ 5:43pm

I have long thought that Starbucks coffee was overrated and overpriced. Now I have one more reason to not buy their coffee.

by: jesse3

05-27-2009 @ 6:51pm

"(Starbucks) is lobbying hard against the passage of EFCA."
--Good for them!

"Just to put it in perspective, Starbucks insures less than 42 percent of its workers - while Wal-Mart insures 47 percent."
--To put it further into perspective, your average independent coffee house (which I tend to prefer, actually) insures less than 10 percent of its workers.

by: jesse3

05-27-2009 @ 6:51pm

"(Starbucks) is lobbying hard against the passage of EFCA."
--Good for them!

"Just to put it in perspective, Starbucks insures less than 42 percent of its workers - while Wal-Mart insures 47 percent."
--To put it further into perspective, your average independent coffee house (which I tend to prefer, actually) insures less than 10 percent of its workers.

by: Palosaari

05-27-2009 @ 7:23pm

What is it with these big Seattle companies? Amazon has an atrocious record in caring for the poor; Microsoft takes advantage of its workers and has policies to deny benefits; Boeing actively works to kill people; and now Starbucks, the last of the "good" major Seattle companies! One has to wonder what the wonderful Seattle life is built upon.

If one could create the perfect society, but with the involuntary untold suffering of one lowly individual, would it be worth it?

by: Palosaari

05-27-2009 @ 7:23pm

What is it with these big Seattle companies? Amazon has an atrocious record in caring for the poor; Microsoft takes advantage of its workers and has policies to deny benefits; Boeing actively works to kill people; and now Starbucks, the last of the "good" major Seattle companies! One has to wonder what the wonderful Seattle life is built upon.

If one could create the perfect society, but with the involuntary untold suffering of one lowly individual, would it be worth it?

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 8:01pm

If you think it's expensive now, wait until the entire company is unionized! Unions make us pay more for the products that would otherwise be less expensive to produce or create. That translates to poor stewardship of resources that could otherwise be used in better places.

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 8:01pm

If you think it's expensive now, wait until the entire company is unionized! Unions make us pay more for the products that would otherwise be less expensive to produce or create. That translates to poor stewardship of resources that could otherwise be used in better places.

by: 1Grace

05-27-2009 @ 8:01pm

What is it with these big Seattle companies?

Seattle is one of the most liberal areas in the nation .

by: 1Grace

05-27-2009 @ 8:01pm

What is it with these big Seattle companies?

Seattle is one of the most liberal areas in the nation .

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 8:15pm

"(Starbucks) is lobbying hard against the passage of EFCA."

There's nothing "pro-choice" about the EFCA. Honestly, it's probably the most damaging piece of legislation that could be passed to hurt our economy. Unions are largely the source of many of the economic problems of GM and Chrysler, and hurt the economy more so than it helps. I have to pay a lot more for an automobile because people in Michigan want to make twice as much as I do. Somehow that doesn't compute. I get along just fine with my income and benefits, yet for some absurd reason the unions want to make the rest of the world pay more for what could be produced for less. That's poor stewardship of scarce resources. Much of those resources could be used for other things that people want and need, and at a cheaper price.

Unions started out with a great purpose: prohibit employers from harming its employees. It's gotten way to greedy and has harmed our economy in the meantime.

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 8:15pm

"(Starbucks) is lobbying hard against the passage of EFCA."

There's nothing "pro-choice" about the EFCA. Honestly, it's probably the most damaging piece of legislation that could be passed to hurt our economy. Unions are largely the source of many of the economic problems of GM and Chrysler, and hurt the economy more so than it helps. I have to pay a lot more for an automobile because people in Michigan want to make twice as much as I do. Somehow that doesn't compute. I get along just fine with my income and benefits, yet for some absurd reason the unions want to make the rest of the world pay more for what could be produced for less. That's poor stewardship of scarce resources. Much of those resources could be used for other things that people want and need, and at a cheaper price.

Unions started out with a great purpose: prohibit employers from harming its employees. It's gotten way to greedy and has harmed our economy in the meantime.

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 11:45pm

agreed. If capitalism is driven by greed, social justice is driven by envy.

by: xfree9

05-27-2009 @ 11:45pm

agreed. If capitalism is driven by greed, social justice is driven by envy.

by: cfpdx

05-28-2009 @ 12:32am

Large companies are walking targets. My daughter has worked at Starbucks p/t for 6 years while attending school and has had benefits the entire time. She has stock and health care. They are awesome!

by: cfpdx

05-28-2009 @ 12:32am

Large companies are walking targets. My daughter has worked at Starbucks p/t for 6 years while attending school and has had benefits the entire time. She has stock and health care. They are awesome!

by: 1Grace

05-28-2009 @ 5:18am

Yikes for serving coffee ? That does sound like a good company . I live in the Seattle area , actually do not like their coffee, and can't afford the coffee experience that so many out here love . People spend about 3 bucks a day on their cup of StarBucks blended coffee, flavors and more .

Your right about any company that is sucessfull being a target . Starbucks actuaklly has hit hard times wuth the recessiion , so has Boeing and Microsoft out here . Interesting the lefty politicians make a big deal out of how they have made it better for them to be in business out here , but the same political slant in regards to politics puts a harsh slant on their operations on blogs such as this .

by: 1Grace

05-28-2009 @ 5:18am

Yikes for serving coffee ? That does sound like a good company . I live in the Seattle area , actually do not like their coffee, and can't afford the coffee experience that so many out here love . People spend about 3 bucks a day on their cup of StarBucks blended coffee, flavors and more .

Your right about any company that is sucessfull being a target . Starbucks actuaklly has hit hard times wuth the recessiion , so has Boeing and Microsoft out here . Interesting the lefty politicians make a big deal out of how they have made it better for them to be in business out here , but the same political slant in regards to politics puts a harsh slant on their operations on blogs such as this .

by: rryand35

05-28-2009 @ 6:49am

Agreed!!! Couldn't agree more.

I talked with my grandpa the other day and he was saying that if a unionized worker dropped a piece of paper he couldn't pick it up because it wasn't in his job discription. Think of how this would hurt Starbucks!!!
(Imagine)
"oh I'm sorry I can't make a soy latte, thats Bobs job. And don't even get me started with the whole tea bit!"

Since when did being Christian being pro-union? I never thought that greed was a value Christ emphasized. Hmm.

by: rryand35

05-28-2009 @ 6:49am

Agreed!!! Couldn't agree more.

I talked with my grandpa the other day and he was saying that if a unionized worker dropped a piece of paper he couldn't pick it up because it wasn't in his job discription. Think of how this would hurt Starbucks!!!
(Imagine)
"oh I'm sorry I can't make a soy latte, thats Bobs job. And don't even get me started with the whole tea bit!"

Since when did being Christian being pro-union? I never thought that greed was a value Christ emphasized. Hmm.

by: justintime

05-28-2009 @ 3:47pm

Once again, xtrafree spouts off against labor unions.

Xfree is using standard anti union talking points,
emanating from the corporate right wing of the Republican Party --
'mindspeak' from a libertarian 'think tank', amplified through the corporate media,
reverberating inside 'dittohead' skulls all across America.

I wonder how xfree earns his living?

Is xfree an entrepreneur,
an investor,
business owner,
corporate manager,
hourly wage earner,
commission salesperson,
government worker,
politician,
soldier,
policeman,
teacher,
attorney,
engineer,
architect,
craftsman,
scientist,
social worker,
a cleric,
or is he retired, posting on God's Politics blog just for the fun of it?

I wish xfree would be more proactive in his search for the truth about social justice.

by: justintime

05-28-2009 @ 3:47pm

Once again, xtrafree spouts off against labor unions.

Xfree is using standard anti union talking points,
emanating from the corporate right wing of the Republican Party --
'mindspeak' from a libertarian 'think tank', amplified through the corporate media,
reverberating inside 'dittohead' skulls all across America.

I wonder how xfree earns his living?

Is xfree an entrepreneur,
an investor,
business owner,
corporate manager,
hourly wage earner,
commission salesperson,
government worker,
politician,
soldier,
policeman,
teacher,
attorney,
engineer,
architect,
craftsman,
scientist,
social worker,
a cleric,
or is he retired, posting on God's Politics blog just for the fun of it?

I wish xfree would be more proactive in his search for the truth about social justice.

by: FatToaster

05-28-2009 @ 5:04pm

I live in Michigan... it happens to be the poorest state in the union right now with the highest unemployment rate. The people in Michigan want jobs (period)... and I think it is relatively unfair to generalize all Michigan residents so broadly by labeling them greedy... wanting to "make twice as much" as you do. Not to mention that it is unfair to claim that someone else wants to have something that I'm sure you would not refuse yourself.... i.e. I doubt you would object to a 100% raise if offered.

Your statements sound as "envious" as you stated in an earlier post was the negative position of social justice.

Unions tend to be just as susceptible to the problems of size and money that major corporations face (corruption, mismanagement, focus away from people, etc). I have a feeling that companies like Starbucks start out with the best of intentions toward them employees, but when they become a mega-corporation, they find that they need to standardize practices to maintain their "system," and in doing so they inadvertently create new systems that override their earlier best intentions. Problem is that we don't have systems in place currently to hold these corporations accountable when they start to miss the mark.

Unions might be an imperfect solution, but on the other hand, I don't see better ideas being implemented anywhere with success... WalMarts and Starbuckses are overrunning neighborhoods, and bad practices continue unabated.

Your local coffeehouse may not offer the same corporate benefits, but they are still personal enough to deal with employee issues on a case by case basis. There is no study marking how many coffeehouse owners have paid out of pocket for an employee's medical bills, or given paid time off for an emergency, or offered flexibility in scheduling to accommodate a second job, etc.

by: FatToaster

05-28-2009 @ 5:04pm

I live in Michigan... it happens to be the poorest state in the union right now with the highest unemployment rate. The people in Michigan want jobs (period)... and I think it is relatively unfair to generalize all Michigan residents so broadly by labeling them greedy... wanting to "make twice as much" as you do. Not to mention that it is unfair to claim that someone else wants to have something that I'm sure you would not refuse yourself.... i.e. I doubt you would object to a 100% raise if offered.

Your statements sound as "envious" as you stated in an earlier post was the negative position of social justice.

Unions tend to be just as susceptible to the problems of size and money that major corporations face (corruption, mismanagement, focus away from people, etc). I have a feeling that companies like Starbucks start out with the best of intentions toward them employees, but when they become a mega-corporation, they find that they need to standardize practices to maintain their "system," and in doing so they inadvertently create new systems that override their earlier best intentions. Problem is that we don't have systems in place currently to hold these corporations accountable when they start to miss the mark.

Unions might be an imperfect solution, but on the other hand, I don't see better ideas being implemented anywhere with success... WalMarts and Starbuckses are overrunning neighborhoods, and bad practices continue unabated.

Your local coffeehouse may not offer the same corporate benefits, but they are still personal enough to deal with employee issues on a case by case basis. There is no study marking how many coffeehouse owners have paid out of pocket for an employee's medical bills, or given paid time off for an emergency, or offered flexibility in scheduling to accommodate a second job, etc.

by: justontime

05-28-2009 @ 6:28pm

Hey extrafree, get your mind out of the right wing noise machine. You and your Karl Rove clones and Limbaugh wanna-bees can't think for themselves. Why don't you go worship Reagan or some hedge fund manager. Turn off Fox News turn on to reality.

You and the stoopid Republicans make me so frustrated I can't even respond to your specific points. I'm just going to rage and imply that you somehow came by your knowledge by reading Heritage Foundation issue briefs. At least when I cut and paste other people's ideas I give them credit!! And what do you do for a living? You must be one of those people who works!

Keith! Keith! I can't take it anymore. argggh! Rage... ..over...taking....me...I...must...get...help... *inserting I-V line direct from KO* aaahhh... peace...

by: justontime

05-28-2009 @ 6:28pm

Hey extrafree, get your mind out of the right wing noise machine. You and your Karl Rove clones and Limbaugh wanna-bees can't think for themselves. Why don't you go worship Reagan or some hedge fund manager. Turn off Fox News turn on to reality.

You and the stoopid Republicans make me so frustrated I can't even respond to your specific points. I'm just going to rage and imply that you somehow came by your knowledge by reading Heritage Foundation issue briefs. At least when I cut and paste other people's ideas I give them credit!! And what do you do for a living? You must be one of those people who works!

Keith! Keith! I can't take it anymore. argggh! Rage... ..over...taking....me...I...must...get...help... *inserting I-V line direct from KO* aaahhh... peace...

by: JamesM

05-28-2009 @ 11:49pm

Look who is cheering them on! That's reason enough not to purchase their products.

by: JamesM

05-28-2009 @ 11:49pm

Look who is cheering them on! That's reason enough not to purchase their products.

by: carlcopas

05-29-2009 @ 12:46pm

the prophet Amos was driven by envy?? hmmmmmmmm

by: carlcopas

05-29-2009 @ 12:46pm

the prophet Amos was driven by envy?? hmmmmmmmm

by: xfree9

05-29-2009 @ 2:36pm

Good response.

No, Amos wasn't driven by envy. And today's poor aren't driven by envy. But today's social justice advocates seem to be very envious of the wealth that other people have, and want to and seek to take it from them. If I've got a neighbor across the street who is very poor, and another who is very rich; and all I do is obsess about how horrible the rich neighbor is because my poor neighbor (who is also his poor neighbor) doesn't have much to his name, and I go about scheming how to take from my rich neighbor to help my poor neighbor, I would certainly be "envious" of my rich neighbor's wealth. It's not legal or ethical to take what is not mine and do with it what I wish my neighbor would do with it. If I want my rich neighbor to be concerned with social justice, Jesus is a great example to follow. He said, "Follow me," and he did not add, "and drag others along with you against their will."

by: xfree9

05-29-2009 @ 2:36pm

Good response.

No, Amos wasn't driven by envy. And today's poor aren't driven by envy. But today's social justice advocates seem to be very envious of the wealth that other people have, and want to and seek to take it from them. If I've got a neighbor across the street who is very poor, and another who is very rich; and all I do is obsess about how horrible the rich neighbor is because my poor neighbor (who is also his poor neighbor) doesn't have much to his name, and I go about scheming how to take from my rich neighbor to help my poor neighbor, I would certainly be "envious" of my rich neighbor's wealth. It's not legal or ethical to take what is not mine and do with it what I wish my neighbor would do with it. If I want my rich neighbor to be concerned with social justice, Jesus is a great example to follow. He said, "Follow me," and he did not add, "and drag others along with you against their will."

by: Alsaints

05-29-2009 @ 3:52pm

"The economy must serve people, not the other way around. Work is more than a way to make a living; it is a form of continuing participation in God's creation. Employers contribute to the common good by creating jobs that uphold the dignity and rights of workers-to productive work, to decent and fair wages, to adequate benefits and security in their old age, to the choice of whether to organize and join unions, to the opportunity for legal status for immigrant workers, to private property, and to economic initiative."
- United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

by: Alsaints

05-29-2009 @ 3:52pm

"The economy must serve people, not the other way around. Work is more than a way to make a living; it is a form of continuing participation in God's creation. Employers contribute to the common good by creating jobs that uphold the dignity and rights of workers-to productive work, to decent and fair wages, to adequate benefits and security in their old age, to the choice of whether to organize and join unions, to the opportunity for legal status for immigrant workers, to private property, and to economic initiative."
- United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

by: altarofego

06-01-2009 @ 7:17pm

Capitalism is not driven by greed and social justice not by envy. Greed and envy are the motivators driving sinful people to exploit capitalism and manipulate social justice, both for purely self-serving ends.

by: altarofego

06-01-2009 @ 7:17pm

Capitalism is not driven by greed and social justice not by envy. Greed and envy are the motivators driving sinful people to exploit capitalism and manipulate social justice, both for purely self-serving ends.

by: KevinLewis10

09-23-2009 @ 3:45am

Hi nice to read this I realy like to

Thanks for such a nice post.

Regards

{Name}

by: KevinLewis10

09-23-2009 @ 3:45am

Hi nice to read this I realy like to

Thanks for such a nice post.

Regards

{Name}

by: KevinLewis10

09-23-2009 @ 3:48am

Nice Read

Regards

{Name}

by: KevinLewis10

09-23-2009 @ 3:48am

Nice Read

Regards

{Name}

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 5:11am

where do i get more information on this

Regards

name

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 5:11am

where do i get more information on this

Regards

name

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 5:13am

Great Work !

Regards

{Name}

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 5:13am

Great Work !

Regards

{Name}

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 7:11am

where do i get more information on this

Regards

name

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 7:11am

where do i get more information on this

Regards

name

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 7:13am

Great Work !

Regards

{Name}

by: Torres10

09-28-2009 @ 7:13am

Great Work !

Regards

{Name}