Get E-Mail Updates

Pope Benedict on the Global Economy

As the G8 Summit begins in Italy, Pope Benedict XVI has released a new encyclical on the global economy. Despite the sometimes dense philosophical and theological language, his message is clear: The economy must be guided by the criteria of justice and the common good. It is a comprehensive document, and while I haven't yet read the entire encyclical, from news reports and a quick skim, a number of important things stand out.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Caritas in Veritate (Charity in Truth), is rooted in a stream of papal teaching on economic justice that goes back to 1891 with the encyclical Rerum Novarum (Of New Things). It is a far-reaching look at the relationships and issues that the global economy has created, and their impact on the world's people.

From the beginning Benedict states his basic foundation, that "charity in truth is the principle around which the Church's social doctrine turns." It is:

a principle that takes on practical form in the criteria that govern moral action. I would like to consider two of these in particular, of special relevance to the commitment to development in an increasingly globalized society: justice and the common good.

And, he says, those principles are both in service and involvement in the political arena.

The more we strive to secure a common good corresponding to the real needs of our neighbours, the more effectively we love them. Every Christian is called to practice this charity, in a manner corresponding to his vocation and according to the degree of influence he wields in the pólis. This is the institutional path -- we might also call it the political path -- of charity, no less excellent and effective than the kind of charity which encounters the neighbour directly, outside the institutional mediation of the pólis.

He deals with profit, writing that while it is useful, once it "becomes the exclusive goal, if it is produced by improper means and without the common good as its ultimate end, it risks destroying wealth and creating poverty." The current economic crisis, he writes,

obliges us to re-plan our journey, to set ourselves new rules and to discover new forms of commitment.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: ???????????????

01-27-2010 @ 8:33pm

thanks for sharing with us.

by: White Dresses For Women

08-16-2011 @ 2:05pm

Cheap Car Insurance For Women...

Hello, I think your website might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your blog site in Chrome, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that...

by: army surplus vehicles for sale

07-12-2011 @ 9:32am

seized cars...

Wonderful blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I've been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thanks...

by: ???????????????

01-27-2010 @ 6:33pm

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Printable Address Labels

01-13-2010 @ 9:57am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: address labels envelops

01-13-2010 @ 9:55am

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Butler Auto Auction

07-29-2011 @ 2:38pm

Butler Auto Auction...

Hi! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog. Is it very hard to set up your own blog? I'm not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty fast. I'm thinking about creating my own but I'm not sure where to begi...

by: 1500 Calorie Diabetic Diet

01-13-2010 @ 9:49am

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Skinfood

01-12-2010 @ 5:52am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Lemonade diet

01-12-2010 @ 5:52am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Etude

01-12-2010 @ 5:52am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-12-2010 @ 1:28am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-11-2010 @ 3:12pm

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: Apple Cider Vinegar Diet

01-11-2010 @ 3:11pm

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Portable Air Conditioner

01-11-2010 @ 3:11pm

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Printable Address Labels

01-11-2010 @ 10:34am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: Diet

01-11-2010 @ 10:34am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Sears Craftsman Air Compressor

01-11-2010 @ 10:34am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 4:53pm

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 4:53pm

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: Personalized Address Labels

01-10-2010 @ 4:53pm

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Sears Parts

01-10-2010 @ 11:57am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: Sport Club Portugu

01-10-2010 @ 11:57am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: self-directed IRAs

01-10-2010 @ 11:57am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: nation2nation

07-09-2009 @ 4:47pm

I am Catholic and respect the Pope, but sometimes his comments seem to be compartmentalized. It would be nice to see religious leaders connect the dots across the spectrum of issues. When he says: "The more we strive to secure a common good corresponding to the real needs of our neighbours, the more effectively we love them." Why didn't this thought process apply when he told the African continent that the use of condoms to help control HIV/AIDS was not a "moral" option?

I also found it interesting that when the Pope was visiting Israel he said, and I am paraphrasing: [When one institution has too much say and diversity is not allowed to thrive, people become repressed and ineffective and tyranny sets in." This was during the same period that a group of Catholics and other "fundamentalist" Christians were condemning Notre Dame for inviting President Obama to speak at their graduation commencement ceremony.

Social Justice, in my opinion, cannot occur unless contradictions are removed
and "leaders" realize that justice should not be approached from a narrow self-serving perspective.

by: Shelagh

07-09-2009 @ 5:16pm

I was raised Catholic too, but then I read books by Daniel Quinn like "Ishmael" and "The Story of B," which raise some fascinating questions. For example, the story of Cain and Abel may be an allegory representing nomadic societies vs agricultural societies. For a quick summary, watch the powerpoint presentation at http://www.panearth.org/panearth/

Basically, more food means more people. Hunger can never be solved, because increasing food availability causes an increase in human population, just as in deer population, cockroach population, or any other population. Then, as the population numbers get high relative to the available food, scarcity sets in and then famine. It is very sad and very painful, but we are not doing anyone any favors over the long term by increasing agricultural yields using fossil fuels and modern machinery.

by: RandyMcC

07-09-2009 @ 5:59pm

I'm Catholic (Altar Boy late 1960s Holy Redeemer Evansville IN), the World food situation will never be solved... sorry to say. Government corruption / Greed for MONEY and Greed for CONTROL! Look below about WFP-IFAD-FAO...
Found this website and thought I'd share. Very Good website for someone who wants the UNITED NATIONS and WORLD Instant Up-To-The-Minute News ALL from ONE PLACE! Press Releases, Speech, and Various Transcripts / Documents with PDFs to PRINT

http://www.UnitedNationsUS.com
It is NOT a blog website! Get info, then come back here to write your thoughts!

UN overall General News with 5 World geographical areas defined and 10 subject areas such as Worldwide Human Rights, World Pease and Security, Humanitarian Aid and Refugees

by: ando

07-09-2009 @ 8:05pm

"Social Justice, in my opinion, cannot occur unless contradictions are removed
and "leaders" realize that justice should not be approached from a narrow self-serving perspective."

What I appreciate is that the pope is not bound by political dogmatism, as it seems so many others are, but by a sense of not only peace and justice, but Truth. The Church, Catholic or Protestant, should never aquiesce (sp) to the powers and principalities of this age. It needs to speak the truth in love, whether it be taking on the corporate powers or the political ideologies that often plague the most innocent of society.

Thank you, Pope Benedict. I heard a Catholic professor speak yesterday on my state's public radio aft. talk show. She noted that the Pope not only takes on corporate powers, but also takes on those who did not tell the truth in order to secure loans they couldn't afford. In other words, it's about taking on corporate powers, but it's also about how the rest of us are also part of the problem by participating in this materialistic binge starting under Reagan and perpetuated by the Clintons and Bushes.

by: BuckeyeDon

07-09-2009 @ 8:36pm

The materialistic binge predates Reagan, Ando.

Thirty years ago next week, on July 15, 1979, President Jimmy Carter delivered his (in)famous "crisis of confidence" speech, sometimes labeled the "malaise" speech, even though Carter never used that word. Here are two excerpts:

"In a nation that was proud of hard work, strong families, close-knit communities, and our faith in God, too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption. Human identity is no longer defined by what one does, but by what one owns. But we've discovered that owning things and consuming things does not satisfy our longing for meaning. We've learned that piling up material goods cannot fill the emptiness of lives which have no confidence or purpose."

"We are at a turning point in our history. There are two paths to choose. One is a path I've warned about tonight, the path that leads to fragmentation and self-interest. Down that road lies a mistaken idea of freedom, the right to grasp for ourselves some advantage over others. That path would be one of constant conflict between narrow interests ending in chaos and immobility. It is a certain route to failure."

Clearly, materialism and consumerism were on Carter's mind as issues the nation needed to confront that night.

The beginning of the materialistic binge probably can be dated sometime during the Vietnam War era, at the time when consumerism began trumping productivity--the time when we began importing more goods than we were exporting.

You are absolutely right that taking on the corporate powers won't be enough. We need to confront this problem as individuals and as a society, because we all are part of the problem. Carter's words, whatever any of us thought of his presidency at the time, were prophetic.

by: kdl1363

07-09-2009 @ 10:22pm

As long as the Roman Catholic Church continues to preach that contraception is a sin and that sex is only for procreation we will never be able to stop the spiraling population growth which is at the root of all problems.

It is critical that all women have access to health care, including access to contraceptives. When they have fewer children those children do better.

The Pope must recognize his responsibility in today's global crises. He also needs to free up the monumental wealth of the Catholic Church to bring about change.

by: johnrallison

07-09-2009 @ 10:47pm

The Flaws in "Redistributive Justice".

The idea that those with wealth must, by the compulsion of law and penalty, give to those who have little has a spiritual flaw, a political flaw, an ethical flaw and an economic flaw.

The spiritual flaw is thinking that this equates to charity. Charity is grounded in a compassionate heart not compulsion. The spiritual benefit to both the giver and receiver are in grave danger in any system that makes charitable giving compulsory.

The political flaw is that in every compulsory redistribution system, there must be an entity that decides what gets redistributed to whom. This may work well when a benevolent and reasonably altruistic person runs that entity, but the very creation of the entity creates a point of power which will eventually be sought by those who would use power for their own sake.

The ethical flaw is the assumption that it is 'just' to redistribute wealth. Most people of wealth have worked hard and made great sacrifices to attain their wealth. Many people who are now hard-working and poor aspire to be hard-working and well-off. It seems manifestly unjust to take from someone who works 11 hour days while continuing to improve their knowledge and skills and give to someone who punches the clock and puts in their 8 hours.

The economic flaw is two-fold. First, the assumption that productivity and thus wealth will continue to be produced at the same pace under a system that involves compulsory redistribution of the product of a person's labor. Each person is motivated by whatever motivates them. The individual liberty to use the product of your labor as you see fit is the most universal motivator of labor and productivity. The idea that people will work as hard when they get to keep less and less gravely mistakes what motivates hard work. As wealth redistribution increases, the overall productivity of a society will decrease because those who would otherwise choose to work long and hard to increase their earnings are less motivated.

Second, people who are motivated to 'get ahead,' in a society that emphasizes 'redistributive justice,' will get ahead through befriending the right people and saying the right things

by: ando

07-09-2009 @ 11:12pm

I am a great fan of Jimmy Carter. His emphasis on such issues as energy conservation and agricultural sustainability were quite radical policies for the time. Unfortunately, we did not follow up on his vision and foresight.

by: johnrallison

07-09-2009 @ 11:23pm

Looking back at the above posts, I believe much of what Jimmy Carter said. However, I think that people need to be won over to that view through passionate dialogue of heart and mind. You cannot legislate the kinds of things Jimmy Carter was talking about. That is my big bone to pick with Sojourners, not the values they espouse, but their idea that government provides the solution. Power is not the solution. When did Jesus use power?

by: Rob Rasner Magician

06-13-2011 @ 9:43am

Rob Rasner Suggests It's A Fantastic Article Well Done?...

Terrific story, thinking we would include a few not related posts, although still worthwhile having a look......

by: BuckeyeDon

07-10-2009 @ 9:48am

Carter has increasingly earned my respect over the years. He was so right about energy policy and other matters.

Here's an article about the "crisis of confidence" speech that you might enjoy. I'm thinking of ordering the book this scholar has written. http://www.hnn.us/articles/95308.html#

Peace,
D

by: Eric77

07-10-2009 @ 1:10pm

"As long as the Roman Catholic Church continues to preach that contraception is a sin and that sex is only for procreation we will never be able to stop the spiraling population growth which is at the root of all problems."

Yet the Roman Catholic Church continues to preach that contraception is a sin and many European countries are seeing declining birthrates. One doesn't have to stop in order for the other to become reality. The issue really is how many people listen to the RCC on this issue.

by: Eric77

07-10-2009 @ 1:20pm

Basically, more food means more people.

How do you explain the facts that Europe has more food than ever in its history yet its birth rate has been declining for years?

by: Shelagh

07-10-2009 @ 1:49pm

Your question is a good one and it is answered by the presentation. Please watch slide # 35 on http://www.panearth.org/panearth/

It explains why wealthy areas have lower birth rates. There is an inverse relationship between consumption rate and fertility rate. (And I think you are right in that a lot of people, in wealthy countries especially, do not listen (and rightly so) to the RCC on the issue of birth control.)

But unfortunately we would need more than ten planet earths for this trend to create population equilibrium.

Also, that wealth (and food) in Europe or the US draws immigrants which bring the population up in the wealthy country without slowing the birthrate in the country of origin.

by: Flash Website Builder

07-04-2011 @ 2:31am

Online Website Builder...

Best post, thought I could include several not related info, nevertheless still worth having a look wow have anyone read concerning Middle East has got much more difficulties too ....

by: nation2nation

07-09-2009 @ 4:47pm

I am Catholic and respect the Pope, but sometimes his comments seem to be compartmentalized. It would be nice to see religious leaders connect the dots across the spectrum of issues. When he says: "The more we strive to secure a common good corresponding to the real needs of our neighbours, the more effectively we love them." Why didn't this thought process apply when he told the African continent that the use of condoms to help control HIV/AIDS was not a "moral" option?

I also found it interesting that when the Pope was visiting Israel he said, and I am paraphrasing: [When one institution has too much say and diversity is not allowed to thrive, people become repressed and ineffective and tyranny sets in." This was during the same period that a group of Catholics and other "fundamentalist" Christians were condemning Notre Dame for inviting President Obama to speak at their graduation commencement ceremony.

Social Justice, in my opinion, cannot occur unless contradictions are removed
and "leaders" realize that justice should not be approached from a narrow self-serving perspective.

by: Eric77

07-10-2009 @ 5:34pm

Okay, thanks for the explanation. So is this report saying that even if there are declining birth rates, increased wealth will mean declining death rates as well so the overall population won't actually go down? Hmmm, I'll have to think about this, but thanks for the response.

by: Shelagh

07-09-2009 @ 5:16pm

I was raised Catholic too, but then I read books by Daniel Quinn like "Ishmael" and "The Story of B," which raise some fascinating questions. For example, the story of Cain and Abel may be an allegory representing nomadic societies vs agricultural societies. For a quick summary, watch the powerpoint presentation at http://www.panearth.org/panearth/

Basically, more food means more people. Hunger can never be solved, because increasing food availability causes an increase in human population, just as in deer population, cockroach population, or any other population. Then, as the population numbers get high relative to the available food, scarcity sets in and then famine. It is very sad and very painful, but we are not doing anyone any favors over the long term by increasing agricultural yields using fossil fuels and modern machinery.

by: RandyMcC

07-09-2009 @ 5:59pm

I'm Catholic (Altar Boy late 1960s Holy Redeemer Evansville IN), the World food situation will never be solved... sorry to say. Government corruption / Greed for MONEY and Greed for CONTROL! Look below about WFP-IFAD-FAO...
Found this website and thought I'd share. Very Good website for someone who wants the UNITED NATIONS and WORLD Instant Up-To-The-Minute News ALL from ONE PLACE! Press Releases, Speech, and Various Transcripts / Documents with PDFs to PRINT

http://www.UnitedNationsUS.com
It is NOT a blog website! Get info, then come back here to write your thoughts!

UN overall General News with 5 World geographical areas defined and 10 subject areas such as Worldwide Human Rights, World Pease and Security, Humanitarian Aid and Refugees

by: ando

07-09-2009 @ 8:05pm

"Social Justice, in my opinion, cannot occur unless contradictions are removed
and "leaders" realize that justice should not be approached from a narrow self-serving perspective."

What I appreciate is that the pope is not bound by political dogmatism, as it seems so many others are, but by a sense of not only peace and justice, but Truth. The Church, Catholic or Protestant, should never aquiesce (sp) to the powers and principalities of this age. It needs to speak the truth in love, whether it be taking on the corporate powers or the political ideologies that often plague the most innocent of society.

Thank you, Pope Benedict. I heard a Catholic professor speak yesterday on my state's public radio aft. talk show. She noted that the Pope not only takes on corporate powers, but also takes on those who did not tell the truth in order to secure loans they couldn't afford. In other words, it's about taking on corporate powers, but it's also about how the rest of us are also part of the problem by participating in this materialistic binge starting under Reagan and perpetuated by the Clintons and Bushes.

by: BuckeyeDon

07-09-2009 @ 8:36pm

The materialistic binge predates Reagan, Ando.

Thirty years ago next week, on July 15, 1979, President Jimmy Carter delivered his (in)famous "crisis of confidence" speech, sometimes labeled the "malaise" speech, even though Carter never used that word. Here are two excerpts:

"In a nation that was proud of hard work, strong families, close-knit communities, and our faith in God, too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption. Human identity is no longer defined by what one does, but by what one owns. But we've discovered that owning things and consuming things does not satisfy our longing for meaning. We've learned that piling up material goods cannot fill the emptiness of lives which have no confidence or purpose."

"We are at a turning point in our history. There are two paths to choose. One is a path I've warned about tonight, the path that leads to fragmentation and self-interest. Down that road lies a mistaken idea of freedom, the right to grasp for ourselves some advantage over others. That path would be one of constant conflict between narrow interests ending in chaos and immobility. It is a certain route to failure."

Clearly, materialism and consumerism were on Carter's mind as issues the nation needed to confront that night.

The beginning of the materialistic binge probably can be dated sometime during the Vietnam War era, at the time when consumerism began trumping productivity--the time when we began importing more goods than we were exporting.

You are absolutely right that taking on the corporate powers won't be enough. We need to confront this problem as individuals and as a society, because we all are part of the problem. Carter's words, whatever any of us thought of his presidency at the time, were prophetic.

by: kdl1363

07-09-2009 @ 10:22pm

As long as the Roman Catholic Church continues to preach that contraception is a sin and that sex is only for procreation we will never be able to stop the spiraling population growth which is at the root of all problems.

It is critical that all women have access to health care, including access to contraceptives. When they have fewer children those children do better.

The Pope must recognize his responsibility in today's global crises. He also needs to free up the monumental wealth of the Catholic Church to bring about change.

by: johnrallison

07-09-2009 @ 10:47pm

The Flaws in "Redistributive Justice".

The idea that those with wealth must, by the compulsion of law and penalty, give to those who have little has a spiritual flaw, a political flaw, an ethical flaw and an economic flaw.

The spiritual flaw is thinking that this equates to charity. Charity is grounded in a compassionate heart not compulsion. The spiritual benefit to both the giver and receiver are in grave danger in any system that makes charitable giving compulsory.

The political flaw is that in every compulsory redistribution system, there must be an entity that decides what gets redistributed to whom. This may work well when a benevolent and reasonably altruistic person runs that entity, but the very creation of the entity creates a point of power which will eventually be sought by those who would use power for their own sake.

The ethical flaw is the assumption that it is 'just' to redistribute wealth. Most people of wealth have worked hard and made great sacrifices to attain their wealth. Many people who are now hard-working and poor aspire to be hard-working and well-off. It seems manifestly unjust to take from someone who works 11 hour days while continuing to improve their knowledge and skills and give to someone who punches the clock and puts in their 8 hours.

The economic flaw is two-fold. First, the assumption that productivity and thus wealth will continue to be produced at the same pace under a system that involves compulsory redistribution of the product of a person's labor. Each person is motivated by whatever motivates them. The individual liberty to use the product of your labor as you see fit is the most universal motivator of labor and productivity. The idea that people will work as hard when they get to keep less and less gravely mistakes what motivates hard work. As wealth redistribution increases, the overall productivity of a society will decrease because those who would otherwise choose to work long and hard to increase their earnings are less motivated.

Second, people who are motivated to 'get ahead,' in a society that emphasizes 'redistributive justice,' will get ahead through befriending the right people and saying the right things

by: ando

07-09-2009 @ 11:12pm

I am a great fan of Jimmy Carter. His emphasis on such issues as energy conservation and agricultural sustainability were quite radical policies for the time. Unfortunately, we did not follow up on his vision and foresight.

by: johnrallison

07-09-2009 @ 11:23pm

Looking back at the above posts, I believe much of what Jimmy Carter said. However, I think that people need to be won over to that view through passionate dialogue of heart and mind. You cannot legislate the kinds of things Jimmy Carter was talking about. That is my big bone to pick with Sojourners, not the values they espouse, but their idea that government provides the solution. Power is not the solution. When did Jesus use power?

by: BuckeyeDon

07-10-2009 @ 9:48am

Carter has increasingly earned my respect over the years. He was so right about energy policy and other matters.

Here's an article about the "crisis of confidence" speech that you might enjoy. I'm thinking of ordering the book this scholar has written. http://www.hnn.us/articles/95308.html#

Peace,
D

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: nation2nation

07-09-2009 @ 4:47pm

I am Catholic and respect the Pope, but sometimes his comments seem to be compartmentalized. It would be nice to see religious leaders connect the dots across the spectrum of issues. When he says: "The more we strive to secure a common good corresponding to the real needs of our neighbours, the more effectively we love them." Why didn't this thought process apply when he told the African continent that the use of condoms to help control HIV/AIDS was not a "moral" option?

I also found it interesting that when the Pope was visiting Israel he said, and I am paraphrasing: [When one institution has too much say and diversity is not allowed to thrive, people become repressed and ineffective and tyranny sets in." This was during the same period that a group of Catholics and other "fundamentalist" Christians were condemning Notre Dame for inviting President Obama to speak at their graduation commencement ceremony.

Social Justice, in my opinion, cannot occur unless contradictions are removed
and "leaders" realize that justice should not be approached from a narrow self-serving perspective.

by: nation2nation

07-09-2009 @ 4:47pm

I am Catholic and respect the Pope, but sometimes his comments seem to be compartmentalized. It would be nice to see religious leaders connect the dots across the spectrum of issues. When he says: "The more we strive to secure a common good corresponding to the real needs of our neighbours, the more effectively we love them." Why didn't this thought process apply when he told the African continent that the use of condoms to help control HIV/AIDS was not a "moral" option?

I also found it interesting that when the Pope was visiting Israel he said, and I am paraphrasing: [When one institution has too much say and diversity is not allowed to thrive, people become repressed and ineffective and tyranny sets in." This was during the same period that a group of Catholics and other "fundamentalist" Christians were condemning Notre Dame for inviting President Obama to speak at their graduation commencement ceremony.

Social Justice, in my opinion, cannot occur unless contradictions are removed
and "leaders" realize that justice should not be approached from a narrow self-serving perspective.

by: Shelagh

07-09-2009 @ 5:16pm

I was raised Catholic too, but then I read books by Daniel Quinn like "Ishmael" and "The Story of B," which raise some fascinating questions. For example, the story of Cain and Abel may be an allegory representing nomadic societies vs agricultural societies. For a quick summary, watch the powerpoint presentation at http://www.panearth.org/panearth/

Basically, more food means more people. Hunger can never be solved, because increasing food availability causes an increase in human population, just as in deer population, cockroach population, or any other population. Then, as the population numbers get high relative to the available food, scarcity sets in and then famine. It is very sad and very painful, but we are not doing anyone any favors over the long term by increasing agricultural yields using fossil fuels and modern machinery.

by: Shelagh

07-09-2009 @ 5:16pm

I was raised Catholic too, but then I read books by Daniel Quinn like "Ishmael" and "The Story of B," which raise some fascinating questions. For example, the story of Cain and Abel may be an allegory representing nomadic societies vs agricultural societies. For a quick summary, watch the powerpoint presentation at http://www.panearth.org/panearth/

Basically, more food means more people. Hunger can never be solved, because increasing food availability causes an increase in human population, just as in deer population, cockroach population, or any other population. Then, as the population numbers get high relative to the available food, scarcity sets in and then famine. It is very sad and very painful, but we are not doing anyone any favors over the long term by increasing agricultural yields using fossil fuels and modern machinery.

by: RandyMcC

07-09-2009 @ 5:59pm

I'm Catholic (Altar Boy late 1960s Holy Redeemer Evansville IN), the World food situation will never be solved... sorry to say. Government corruption / Greed for MONEY and Greed for CONTROL! Look below about WFP-IFAD-FAO...
Found this website and thought I'd share. Very Good website for someone who wants the UNITED NATIONS and WORLD Instant Up-To-The-Minute News ALL from ONE PLACE! Press Releases, Speech, and Various Transcripts / Documents with PDFs to PRINT

http://www.UnitedNationsUS.com
It is NOT a blog website! Get info, then come back here to write your thoughts!

UN overall General News with 5 World geographical areas defined and 10 subject areas such as Worldwide Human Rights, World Pease and Security, Humanitarian Aid and Refugees

by: RandyMcC

07-09-2009 @ 5:59pm

I'm Catholic (Altar Boy late 1960s Holy Redeemer Evansville IN), the World food situation will never be solved... sorry to say. Government corruption / Greed for MONEY and Greed for CONTROL! Look below about WFP-IFAD-FAO...
Found this website and thought I'd share. Very Good website for someone who wants the UNITED NATIONS and WORLD Instant Up-To-The-Minute News ALL from ONE PLACE! Press Releases, Speech, and Various Transcripts / Documents with PDFs to PRINT

http://www.UnitedNationsUS.com
It is NOT a blog website! Get info, then come back here to write your thoughts!

UN overall General News with 5 World geographical areas defined and 10 subject areas such as Worldwide Human Rights, World Pease and Security, Humanitarian Aid and Refugees

by: ando

07-09-2009 @ 8:05pm

"Social Justice, in my opinion, cannot occur unless contradictions are removed
and "leaders" realize that justice should not be approached from a narrow self-serving perspective."

What I appreciate is that the pope is not bound by political dogmatism, as it seems so many others are, but by a sense of not only peace and justice, but Truth. The Church, Catholic or Protestant, should never aquiesce (sp) to the powers and principalities of this age. It needs to speak the truth in love, whether it be taking on the corporate powers or the political ideologies that often plague the most innocent of society.

Thank you, Pope Benedict. I heard a Catholic professor speak yesterday on my state's public radio aft. talk show. She noted that the Pope not only takes on corporate powers, but also takes on those who did not tell the truth in order to secure loans they couldn't afford. In other words, it's about taking on corporate powers, but it's also about how the rest of us are also part of the problem by participating in this materialistic binge starting under Reagan and perpetuated by the Clintons and Bushes.

by: ando

07-09-2009 @ 8:05pm

"Social Justice, in my opinion, cannot occur unless contradictions are removed
and "leaders" realize that justice should not be approached from a narrow self-serving perspective."

What I appreciate is that the pope is not bound by political dogmatism, as it seems so many others are, but by a sense of not only peace and justice, but Truth. The Church, Catholic or Protestant, should never aquiesce (sp) to the powers and principalities of this age. It needs to speak the truth in love, whether it be taking on the corporate powers or the political ideologies that often plague the most innocent of society.

Thank you, Pope Benedict. I heard a Catholic professor speak yesterday on my state's public radio aft. talk show. She noted that the Pope not only takes on corporate powers, but also takes on those who did not tell the truth in order to secure loans they couldn't afford. In other words, it's about taking on corporate powers, but it's also about how the rest of us are also part of the problem by participating in this materialistic binge starting under Reagan and perpetuated by the Clintons and Bushes.

by: BuckeyeDon

07-09-2009 @ 8:36pm

The materialistic binge predates Reagan, Ando.

Thirty years ago next week, on July 15, 1979, President Jimmy Carter delivered his (in)famous "crisis of confidence" speech, sometimes labeled the "malaise" speech, even though Carter never used that word. Here are two excerpts:

"In a nation that was proud of hard work, strong families, close-knit communities, and our faith in God, too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption. Human identity is no longer defined by what one does, but by what one owns. But we've discovered that owning things and consuming things does not satisfy our longing for meaning. We've learned that piling up material goods cannot fill the emptiness of lives which have no confidence or purpose."

"We are at a turning point in our history. There are two paths to choose. One is a path I've warned about tonight, the path that leads to fragmentation and self-interest. Down that road lies a mistaken idea of freedom, the right to grasp for ourselves some advantage over others. That path would be one of constant conflict between narrow interests ending in chaos and immobility. It is a certain route to failure."

Clearly, materialism and consumerism were on Carter's mind as issues the nation needed to confront that night.

The beginning of the materialistic binge probably can be dated sometime during the Vietnam War era, at the time when consumerism began trumping productivity--the time when we began importing more goods than we were exporting.

You are absolutely right that taking on the corporate powers won't be enough. We need to confront this problem as individuals and as a society, because we all are part of the problem. Carter's words, whatever any of us thought of his presidency at the time, were prophetic.

by: BuckeyeDon

07-09-2009 @ 8:36pm

The materialistic binge predates Reagan, Ando.

Thirty years ago next week, on July 15, 1979, President Jimmy Carter delivered his (in)famous "crisis of confidence" speech, sometimes labeled the "malaise" speech, even though Carter never used that word. Here are two excerpts:

"In a nation that was proud of hard work, strong families, close-knit communities, and our faith in God, too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption. Human identity is no longer defined by what one does, but by what one owns. But we've discovered that owning things and consuming things does not satisfy our longing for meaning. We've learned that piling up material goods cannot fill the emptiness of lives which have no confidence or purpose."

"We are at a turning point in our history. There are two paths to choose. One is a path I've warned about tonight, the path that leads to fragmentation and self-interest. Down that road lies a mistaken idea of freedom, the right to grasp for ourselves some advantage over others. That path would be one of constant conflict between narrow interests ending in chaos and immobility. It is a certain route to failure."

Clearly, materialism and consumerism were on Carter's mind as issues the nation needed to confront that night.

The beginning of the materialistic binge probably can be dated sometime during the Vietnam War era, at the time when consumerism began trumping productivity--the time when we began importing more goods than we were exporting.

You are absolutely right that taking on the corporate powers won't be enough. We need to confront this problem as individuals and as a society, because we all are part of the problem. Carter's words, whatever any of us thought of his presidency at the time, were prophetic.

by: kdl1363

07-09-2009 @ 10:22pm

As long as the Roman Catholic Church continues to preach that contraception is a sin and that sex is only for procreation we will never be able to stop the spiraling population growth which is at the root of all problems.

It is critical that all women have access to health care, including access to contraceptives. When they have fewer children those children do better.

The Pope must recognize his responsibility in today's global crises. He also needs to free up the monumental wealth of the Catholic Church to bring about change.

by: kdl1363

07-09-2009 @ 10:22pm

As long as the Roman Catholic Church continues to preach that contraception is a sin and that sex is only for procreation we will never be able to stop the spiraling population growth which is at the root of all problems.

It is critical that all women have access to health care, including access to contraceptives. When they have fewer children those children do better.

The Pope must recognize his responsibility in today's global crises. He also needs to free up the monumental wealth of the Catholic Church to bring about change.

by: johnrallison

07-09-2009 @ 10:47pm

The Flaws in "Redistributive Justice".

The idea that those with wealth must, by the compulsion of law and penalty, give to those who have little has a spiritual flaw, a political flaw, an ethical flaw and an economic flaw.

The spiritual flaw is thinking that this equates to charity. Charity is grounded in a compassionate heart not compulsion. The spiritual benefit to both the giver and receiver are in grave danger in any system that makes charitable giving compulsory.

The political flaw is that in every compulsory redistribution system, there must be an entity that decides what gets redistributed to whom. This may work well when a benevolent and reasonably altruistic person runs that entity, but the very creation of the entity creates a point of power which will eventually be sought by those who would use power for their own sake.

The ethical flaw is the assumption that it is 'just' to redistribute wealth. Most people of wealth have worked hard and made great sacrifices to attain their wealth. Many people who are now hard-working and poor aspire to be hard-working and well-off. It seems manifestly unjust to take from someone who works 11 hour days while continuing to improve their knowledge and skills and give to someone who punches the clock and puts in their 8 hours.

The economic flaw is two-fold. First, the assumption that productivity and thus wealth will continue to be produced at the same pace under a system that involves compulsory redistribution of the product of a person's labor. Each person is motivated by whatever motivates them. The individual liberty to use the product of your labor as you see fit is the most universal motivator of labor and productivity. The idea that people will work as hard when they get to keep less and less gravely mistakes what motivates hard work. As wealth redistribution increases, the overall productivity of a society will decrease because those who would otherwise choose to work long and hard to increase their earnings are less motivated.

Second, people who are motivated to 'get ahead,' in a society that emphasizes 'redistributive justice,' will get ahead through befriending the right people and saying the right things

by: johnrallison

07-09-2009 @ 10:47pm

The Flaws in "Redistributive Justice".

The idea that those with wealth must, by the compulsion of law and penalty, give to those who have little has a spiritual flaw, a political flaw, an ethical flaw and an economic flaw.

The spiritual flaw is thinking that this equates to charity. Charity is grounded in a compassionate heart not compulsion. The spiritual benefit to both the giver and receiver are in grave danger in any system that makes charitable giving compulsory.

The political flaw is that in every compulsory redistribution system, there must be an entity that decides what gets redistributed to whom. This may work well when a benevolent and reasonably altruistic person runs that entity, but the very creation of the entity creates a point of power which will eventually be sought by those who would use power for their own sake.

The ethical flaw is the assumption that it is 'just' to redistribute wealth. Most people of wealth have worked hard and made great sacrifices to attain their wealth. Many people who are now hard-working and poor aspire to be hard-working and well-off. It seems manifestly unjust to take from someone who works 11 hour days while continuing to improve their knowledge and skills and give to someone who punches the clock and puts in their 8 hours.

The economic flaw is two-fold. First, the assumption that productivity and thus wealth will continue to be produced at the same pace under a system that involves compulsory redistribution of the product of a person's labor. Each person is motivated by whatever motivates them. The individual liberty to use the product of your labor as you see fit is the most universal motivator of labor and productivity. The idea that people will work as hard when they get to keep less and less gravely mistakes what motivates hard work. As wealth redistribution increases, the overall productivity of a society will decrease because those who would otherwise choose to work long and hard to increase their earnings are less motivated.

Second, people who are motivated to 'get ahead,' in a society that emphasizes 'redistributive justice,' will get ahead through befriending the right people and saying the right things

by: ando

07-09-2009 @ 11:12pm

I am a great fan of Jimmy Carter. His emphasis on such issues as energy conservation and agricultural sustainability were quite radical policies for the time. Unfortunately, we did not follow up on his vision and foresight.

by: ando

07-09-2009 @ 11:12pm

I am a great fan of Jimmy Carter. His emphasis on such issues as energy conservation and agricultural sustainability were quite radical policies for the time. Unfortunately, we did not follow up on his vision and foresight.

by: johnrallison

07-09-2009 @ 11:23pm

Looking back at the above posts, I believe much of what Jimmy Carter said. However, I think that people need to be won over to that view through passionate dialogue of heart and mind. You cannot legislate the kinds of things Jimmy Carter was talking about. That is my big bone to pick with Sojourners, not the values they espouse, but their idea that government provides the solution. Power is not the solution. When did Jesus use power?

by: johnrallison

07-09-2009 @ 11:23pm

Looking back at the above posts, I believe much of what Jimmy Carter said. However, I think that people need to be won over to that view through passionate dialogue of heart and mind. You cannot legislate the kinds of things Jimmy Carter was talking about. That is my big bone to pick with Sojourners, not the values they espouse, but their idea that government provides the solution. Power is not the solution. When did Jesus use power?

by: BuckeyeDon

07-10-2009 @ 9:48am

Carter has increasingly earned my respect over the years. He was so right about energy policy and other matters.

Here's an article about the "crisis of confidence" speech that you might enjoy. I'm thinking of ordering the book this scholar has written. http://www.hnn.us/articles/95308.html#

Peace,
D

by: BuckeyeDon

07-10-2009 @ 9:48am

Carter has increasingly earned my respect over the years. He was so right about energy policy and other matters.

Here's an article about the "crisis of confidence" speech that you might enjoy. I'm thinking of ordering the book this scholar has written. http://www.hnn.us/articles/95308.html#

Peace,
D

by: Eric77

07-10-2009 @ 1:10pm

"As long as the Roman Catholic Church continues to preach that contraception is a sin and that sex is only for procreation we will never be able to stop the spiraling population growth which is at the root of all problems."

Yet the Roman Catholic Church continues to preach that contraception is a sin and many European countries are seeing declining birthrates. One doesn't have to stop in order for the other to become reality. The issue really is how many people listen to the RCC on this issue.

by: Eric77

07-10-2009 @ 1:10pm

"As long as the Roman Catholic Church continues to preach that contraception is a sin and that sex is only for procreation we will never be able to stop the spiraling population growth which is at the root of all problems."

Yet the Roman Catholic Church continues to preach that contraception is a sin and many European countries are seeing declining birthrates. One doesn't have to stop in order for the other to become reality. The issue really is how many people listen to the RCC on this issue.

by: Eric77

07-10-2009 @ 1:20pm

Basically, more food means more people.

How do you explain the facts that Europe has more food than ever in its history yet its birth rate has been declining for years?

by: Eric77

07-10-2009 @ 1:20pm

Basically, more food means more people.

How do you explain the facts that Europe has more food than ever in its history yet its birth rate has been declining for years?

by: Shelagh

07-10-2009 @ 1:49pm

Your question is a good one and it is answered by the presentation. Please watch slide # 35 on http://www.panearth.org/panearth/

It explains why wealthy areas have lower birth rates. There is an inverse relationship between consumption rate and fertility rate. (And I think you are right in that a lot of people, in wealthy countries especially, do not listen (and rightly so) to the RCC on the issue of birth control.)

But unfortunately we would need more than ten planet earths for this trend to create population equilibrium.

Also, that wealth (and food) in Europe or the US draws immigrants which bring the population up in the wealthy country without slowing the birthrate in the country of origin.

by: Shelagh

07-10-2009 @ 1:49pm

Your question is a good one and it is answered by the presentation. Please watch slide # 35 on http://www.panearth.org/panearth/

It explains why wealthy areas have lower birth rates. There is an inverse relationship between consumption rate and fertility rate. (And I think you are right in that a lot of people, in wealthy countries especially, do not listen (and rightly so) to the RCC on the issue of birth control.)

But unfortunately we would need more than ten planet earths for this trend to create population equilibrium.

Also, that wealth (and food) in Europe or the US draws immigrants which bring the population up in the wealthy country without slowing the birthrate in the country of origin.

by: Eric77

07-10-2009 @ 5:34pm

Okay, thanks for the explanation. So is this report saying that even if there are declining birth rates, increased wealth will mean declining death rates as well so the overall population won't actually go down? Hmmm, I'll have to think about this, but thanks for the response.

by: Eric77

07-10-2009 @ 5:34pm

Okay, thanks for the explanation. So is this report saying that even if there are declining birth rates, increased wealth will mean declining death rates as well so the overall population won't actually go down? Hmmm, I'll have to think about this, but thanks for the response.

by: ando

07-11-2009 @ 12:03am

Sorry, perhaps you don't know about the Hmong. They were being wiped out by
the communists in Laos after the Vietnam War. That's why they came here and
settled in places like Minnesota and Wisconsin. They are very
traditionalist, and were no way in a higher class. They have always been
hard workers, mainly toiling in the earth.

by: ando

07-11-2009 @ 12:03am

Sorry, perhaps you don't know about the Hmong. They were being wiped out by
the communists in Laos after the Vietnam War. That's why they came here and
settled in places like Minnesota and Wisconsin. They are very
traditionalist, and were no way in a higher class. They have always been
hard workers, mainly toiling in the earth.

by: christopherpophamsmith

07-11-2009 @ 12:48am

The movie called "The Shoes of the Fisherman", starring
Anthony Quinn, comes to mind. Perhaps the Pope could
take a lesson from the film.

by: christopherpophamsmith

07-11-2009 @ 12:48am

The movie called "The Shoes of the Fisherman", starring
Anthony Quinn, comes to mind. Perhaps the Pope could
take a lesson from the film.

by: BlueDeacon

07-11-2009 @ 2:18am

However, like most Asians, they also had a very strong family structure that has generally remained intact. Furthermore, they came to an alien culture and as a result (at least at first) kept to themselves.

by: BlueDeacon

07-11-2009 @ 2:18am

However, like most Asians, they also had a very strong family structure that has generally remained intact. Furthermore, they came to an alien culture and as a result (at least at first) kept to themselves.

by: arthurpena

07-18-2009 @ 3:08am

Again, BlueDeacon, thank you for keeping the conversation grounded in conrete ocio-economic and historical realities.

In the same vein:

Slavery ended less than 150 years ago--that's barely two or three generations. And segregatition (i.e. de facto slavery) didn't end, on paper, until just 30 years ago, and the socio-economic redress is still going on. While individuals are not wholly in the thrall of historic forces, neither are they wholly free of them. Slavery was rape and murder and spiritual destruction on a scale that is hard to imagine. There IS a reason why blacks are still largely impoverished, imprisoned, etc. etc. And that reason STILL is slavery.

And people are saying the days of "affirmative action" are OVER????

Hah! The NEGATIVE action of centuries is NOT wiped out in a matter of decades. Again, individual freedom and responsibility are important to cultivate and encourage; but collective and institutional response to damage done is still necessary.

by: arthurpena

07-18-2009 @ 3:08am

Again, BlueDeacon, thank you for keeping the conversation grounded in conrete ocio-economic and historical realities.

In the same vein:

Slavery ended less than 150 years ago--that's barely two or three generations. And segregatition (i.e. de facto slavery) didn't end, on paper, until just 30 years ago, and the socio-economic redress is still going on. While individuals are not wholly in the thrall of historic forces, neither are they wholly free of them. Slavery was rape and murder and spiritual destruction on a scale that is hard to imagine. There IS a reason why blacks are still largely impoverished, imprisoned, etc. etc. And that reason STILL is slavery.

And people are saying the days of "affirmative action" are OVER????

Hah! The NEGATIVE action of centuries is NOT wiped out in a matter of decades. Again, individual freedom and responsibility are important to cultivate and encourage; but collective and institutional response to damage done is still necessary.

by: self-directed IRAs

01-10-2010 @ 11:57am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: self-directed IRAs

01-10-2010 @ 11:57am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Sears Parts

01-10-2010 @ 11:57am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: Sport Club Portugu

01-10-2010 @ 11:57am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Sears Parts

01-10-2010 @ 11:57am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: Sport Club Portugu

01-10-2010 @ 11:57am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Personalized Address Labels

01-10-2010 @ 4:53pm

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Personalized Address Labels

01-10-2010 @ 4:53pm

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 4:53pm

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 4:53pm

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 4:53pm

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 4:53pm

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Sears Craftsman Air Compressor

01-11-2010 @ 10:34am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Sears Craftsman Air Compressor

01-11-2010 @ 10:34am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.