Get E-Mail Updates

Mark Sanford, John Ensign, and 'The Family'

Presently, the glare of the media spotlight has started to shine on a number of political figures, all of whom coincidentally have a connection to a D.C.-based group called The Family. Stories linking The Family to these politicos have appeared on a number of media outlets including NPR's Fresh Air, The Rachel Maddow Show, and Salon. Recently, I contacted religion scholar Jeff Sharlet, author of the New York Times bestseller The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power and contributing editor for Rolling Stone and Harper's, to discuss his research into this group and its connection to this current round of political scandals.

What is The Family?

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Let me put in the words of a Washington insider who's an admirer of the group: David Kuo, White House aide in Bush's term, calls it "the most powerful group in Washington that nobody knows." That's actually been quantified by a Rice University sociologist, who surveyed 360 Christian politicians, including two former presidents, and discovered that more respondents -- 1 in 3 -- named The Family as a key player more than any other organization. That shouldn't be surprising, given that it's also the oldest Christian conservative organization, dating back to a 1935 new revelation from God (so Family founder Abraham Vereide believed) that Christians should work on behalf not of the down and out -- the poor, the suffering, the meek -- but the "up and out," the powerful "key men," as The Family calls them, who will dispense blessings to the rest of us. One evangelical Senate aide describes that as "trickle down religion." So why haven't you heard of them before? The Family believes it's most effective behind the scenes. "The more invisible you can make your organization," says Family leader Doug Coe, "the more influence it will have."

Briefly elaborate how you came into contact with this group.

The way you become a member is you get invited. I was invited. A friend -- a conservative Christian, as it happens -- asked me to talk with her brother, who she feared had joined a cult. He invited me to join his movement, too. I'm less of an investigative reporter than I am a religiously curious writer, so I agreed, moving into a house The Family runs for young men they're grooming for leadership.

How is embattled Governor Mark Sanford connected to The Family's C Street House?

Gov. Sanford says he turned to the C Street House for spiritual counsel. He was aware of it from his days in Congress. What's disturbing is that he brought this news to his political peers months before it was disclosed by someone who hacked into his mistress's computer, and these guys kept Sanford's secrets for him. They consider that accountability; I think most people would call it a cover-up. Because when you're a governor, your actions impact far more people than just you and those around you. Here was a man besotted with love or infatuation, going off the rails, and, eventually, abandoning his post -- and The Family brothers thought it appropriate to protect his interests before the people of South Carolina.

What's The Family's role with the Senator John Ensign scandal?

Senator Ensign has been living at the C Street House for some time now. (I met him there in 2002). He was part of a prayer group to which, according to Family documents, he would have given "veto rights" over his life. If we believe the allegations of Doug Hampton, his former friend and aide whom he cuckolded -- and I think we should -- we saw those exercised when The Family learned of his affair. Their first instinct, however, was not to look out for the people of Nevada -- it was to protect their "brother." They forced him against his will to break it off, and then, according to Hampton, urged him to make large cash payments to his mistress and her family. That's what we call hush money. The Family, however, saw it as a means to make the "victims" whole. Of course, the real victims here are the people of Nevada, who sent this guy to Washington to be his own man, to make his own decisions, and to be open with them about the influences in his life.

What's the significance of David Coe citing King David as a model for present-day political power?

It's important to recognize which aspect of King David they're drawn to. It's not the repentant king or the wise king or even simply the powerful king. It's the bad king. David Coe -- the son -- explained it by way of example, asking a Family man what he thought Coe would think of him if Coe heard he'd raped three little girls. The guy of course said he assumed Coe would think he was awful; but Coe assured him he wouldn't, because he was "chosen." That's dumbed-down Calvinism, and very dangerous politics. It means that guys like Mark Sanford and John Ensign have a justification for staying in power, even though both in the past called for Bill Clinton -- NOT chosen -- to resign for the very same actions. But much more importantly, it's the justification by which The Family supports some of its most brutal overseas allies, dictators such as the late Suharto. The CIA called the massacre of some 600,000 Indonesians by which he came to power one of the worst mass killings of the 20th century. The Family called it a "spiritual revolution," and Suharto was God's man for Indonesia. Suharto was a Muslim, but that didn't bother them -- as far as they were concerned, he was chosen to keep Indonesia from going red.

How has The Family managed to stay off the radar?

Mainly through the religious illiteracy of the American political press corps. A lot of my friends who are strictly political reporters are very wary of asking questions about religion. In part because they respect the First Amendment and liberty of conscience -- they don't want to inadvertently contribute to creating a de facto religious test for public office. And, in part, for commercial considerations -- they're afraid of offending their Christian readers and viewers. But the truth is, that kind of tip-toe approach is a lot more offensive. If politicians like Senator Coburn and Senator Ensign are declaring their religious affiliations central to their political identities, we have a responsibility to ask them tough questions about what that entails. Had those questions been asked a long time ago, I don't think The Family would have grown as powerful as it has.

portrait-becky-garrisonBecky Garrison is featured in the documentaries The Ordinary Radicals and Nailin' it to the Church.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: ???????????????

01-27-2010 @ 8:27pm

thanks for sharing with us.

by: ???????????????

01-27-2010 @ 6:27pm

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-08-2010 @ 4:08pm

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: address labels envelops

01-13-2010 @ 9:49am

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Printable Address Labels

01-13-2010 @ 9:47am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: 1500 Calorie Diabetic Diet

01-13-2010 @ 9:43am

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Skinfood

01-12-2010 @ 5:45am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Etude

01-12-2010 @ 5:45am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: Envision

01-08-2010 @ 4:11pm

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Lemonade diet

01-12-2010 @ 5:44am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-12-2010 @ 1:22am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-11-2010 @ 3:06pm

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: Portable Air Conditioner

01-11-2010 @ 3:05pm

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Apple Cider Vinegar Diet

01-11-2010 @ 3:04pm

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Printable Address Labels

01-11-2010 @ 10:28am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: Diet

01-11-2010 @ 10:27am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Sears Craftsman Air Compressor

01-11-2010 @ 10:27am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 4:47pm

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 4:47pm

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: Personalized Address Labels

01-10-2010 @ 4:47pm

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Sport Club Portugu

01-10-2010 @ 11:50am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: self-directed IRAs

01-10-2010 @ 11:50am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Design build austin

09-17-2009 @ 5:25am

I don't know much about this but thanks for informing us, this was a great read indeed.

by: Eric77

07-24-2009 @ 5:18pm

This "Family" certainly sounds pretty odd from Sharlet's telling. I'd be surprised that David Kuo, someone I respect, would considering himself an admirer of the group if Sharlet's account is all there is to it. But I don't know anything else but what's presented here. I feel like there's more to "The Family" than simply Sharlet's account.

But I disagree with Sharlet when he implies that "The Family" had a duty to go public with Ensign and Sanford's affairs. I don't know why any of that is the public's business (unless they, as it appears it may be in Sanford's case, were using public funds to help finance their affairs). The people of Nevada do not have a right to know what's going on in Ensign's bedroom or to know of all the influences on his life. It's definitely not in the same category as something that's illegal such as "raping three little girls".

by: Design build austin

09-17-2009 @ 5:25am

I don't know much about this but thanks for informing us, this was a great read indeed.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 6:09am

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Seth MacFarlane

01-10-2010 @ 6:25am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: Android Tablets

06-14-2011 @ 5:31pm

Equally impressed as all the other folks.
The best Android Tablets under 500

by: etude

01-10-2010 @ 6:32am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: lumens

07-25-2009 @ 4:41am

Read the excerpt, from which the "three little girls" originates. All of the dialogue is extremely stilted and contrived. That's usually a good indication that it is fabricated.

People say stupid things, and Christian groups who desire political power are certainly no exception. However, even stupid things are announced with a certain cadence, a certain inflection and nuance that makes the insipid seem convincing.

The exchange cited would be convincing to precisely no-one, which is why it makes for such a great book. Literally every reader can read that exchange and say "hey, some people sure are idiots!"

It just doesn't work that way in real life.

by: Eric77

07-24-2009 @ 5:18pm

This "Family" certainly sounds pretty odd from Sharlet's telling. I'd be surprised that David Kuo, someone I respect, would considering himself an admirer of the group if Sharlet's account is all there is to it. But I don't know anything else but what's presented here. I feel like there's more to "The Family" than simply Sharlet's account.

But I disagree with Sharlet when he implies that "The Family" had a duty to go public with Ensign and Sanford's affairs. I don't know why any of that is the public's business (unless they, as it appears it may be in Sanford's case, were using public funds to help finance their affairs). The people of Nevada do not have a right to know what's going on in Ensign's bedroom or to know of all the influences on his life. It's definitely not in the same category as something that's illegal such as "raping three little girls".

by: Honey Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 7:25am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Printable address labels

01-10-2010 @ 7:34am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: JeffSharlet

07-27-2009 @ 1:29am

Lumens, you've just violated the second rule of the blog, based on Matthew 5:22, by suggesting that I fabricated the quotes. That is, in fact, libelous. That quote originally appeared in Harper's magazine, where it went through fact checking and legal review. The Coes had the opportunity to dispute it. They didn't, and neither did anyone else who was in the room. Next time you find something that offends your sensibilities, lumens, try arguing rather than insulting.

As for John Ensign and Nevada, yes, they have a right to know whether their senator used the campaign fund structure to pay his mistress hush money. A request for an investigation by the Committee for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, seconded by the hardly-liberal Washington Post editorial board, agrees. Moreover, they have a right to know whether their senator is his own man, and whether he stays informed about his associations. As the Las Vegas Sun has reported, Ensign traveled extensively on the Family's dime. Pressed to explain, he now says he had no idea who the group was that was sending him around the world. Either he's lying, or he's not competent to hold office.

Last, and, sadly, least -- I think it's important that readers know that this interview disappeared over the weekend because a God's Politics editor, by his own account responding to complaints from a friend, decided to throw it down the memory hole. That's an insult not just to me, but to the interviewer, the readers, and the basic principles of journalism. If you think you've published something factually inaccurate, correct it. If you've published something you disagree with, balance it with something else. But disappearing? I think even my friends on the far right would be troubled by that. Fortunately, the editor came to his senses and restored the post. I remain deeply unsettled at this small encounter with censorship, and in a forum I've respected for so long.

by: lumens

07-25-2009 @ 4:41am

Read the excerpt, from which the "three little girls" originates. All of the dialogue is extremely stilted and contrived. That's usually a good indication that it is fabricated.

People say stupid things, and Christian groups who desire political power are certainly no exception. However, even stupid things are announced with a certain cadence, a certain inflection and nuance that makes the insipid seem convincing.

The exchange cited would be convincing to precisely no-one, which is why it makes for such a great book. Literally every reader can read that exchange and say "hey, some people sure are idiots!"

It just doesn't work that way in real life.

by: Printable Address Labels

01-10-2010 @ 10:13am

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 6:09am

thanks for sharing with us.

by: ??????????????????

01-10-2010 @ 10:25am

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Seth MacFarlane

01-10-2010 @ 6:25am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: skinfood

01-10-2010 @ 10:27am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: idiot proof diet reviews

01-10-2010 @ 10:28am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: etude

01-10-2010 @ 6:32am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: ???????????????

01-27-2010 @ 6:27pm

thanks for sharing with us.

by: address labels envelops

01-13-2010 @ 9:49am

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Printable Address Labels

01-13-2010 @ 9:47am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: 1500 Calorie Diabetic Diet

01-13-2010 @ 9:43am

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-07-2010 @ 5:14pm

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: JeffSharlet

07-27-2009 @ 1:29am

Lumens, you've just violated the second rule of the blog, based on Matthew 5:22, by suggesting that I fabricated the quotes. That is, in fact, libelous. That quote originally appeared in Harper's magazine, where it went through fact checking and legal review. The Coes had the opportunity to dispute it. They didn't, and neither did anyone else who was in the room. Next time you find something that offends your sensibilities, lumens, try arguing rather than insulting.

As for John Ensign and Nevada, yes, they have a right to know whether their senator used the campaign fund structure to pay his mistress hush money. A request for an investigation by the Committee for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, seconded by the hardly-liberal Washington Post editorial board, agrees. Moreover, they have a right to know whether their senator is his own man, and whether he stays informed about his associations. As the Las Vegas Sun has reported, Ensign traveled extensively on the Family's dime. Pressed to explain, he now says he had no idea who the group was that was sending him around the world. Either he's lying, or he's not competent to hold office.

Last, and, sadly, least -- I think it's important that readers know that this interview disappeared over the weekend because a God's Politics editor, by his own account responding to complaints from a friend, decided to throw it down the memory hole. That's an insult not just to me, but to the interviewer, the readers, and the basic principles of journalism. If you think you've published something factually inaccurate, correct it. If you've published something you disagree with, balance it with something else. But disappearing? I think even my friends on the far right would be troubled by that. Fortunately, the editor came to his senses and restored the post. I remain deeply unsettled at this small encounter with censorship, and in a forum I've respected for so long.

by: Skinfood

01-12-2010 @ 5:45am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Sears Parts

01-10-2010 @ 11:49am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: Eric77

07-24-2009 @ 5:18pm

This "Family" certainly sounds pretty odd from Sharlet's telling. I'd be surprised that David Kuo, someone I respect, would considering himself an admirer of the group if Sharlet's account is all there is to it. But I don't know anything else but what's presented here. I feel like there's more to "The Family" than simply Sharlet's account.

But I disagree with Sharlet when he implies that "The Family" had a duty to go public with Ensign and Sanford's affairs. I don't know why any of that is the public's business (unless they, as it appears it may be in Sanford's case, were using public funds to help finance their affairs). The people of Nevada do not have a right to know what's going on in Ensign's bedroom or to know of all the influences on his life. It's definitely not in the same category as something that's illegal such as "raping three little girls".

by: Eric77

07-24-2009 @ 5:18pm

This "Family" certainly sounds pretty odd from Sharlet's telling. I'd be surprised that David Kuo, someone I respect, would considering himself an admirer of the group if Sharlet's account is all there is to it. But I don't know anything else but what's presented here. I feel like there's more to "The Family" than simply Sharlet's account.

But I disagree with Sharlet when he implies that "The Family" had a duty to go public with Ensign and Sanford's affairs. I don't know why any of that is the public's business (unless they, as it appears it may be in Sanford's case, were using public funds to help finance their affairs). The people of Nevada do not have a right to know what's going on in Ensign's bedroom or to know of all the influences on his life. It's definitely not in the same category as something that's illegal such as "raping three little girls".

by: lumens

07-25-2009 @ 4:41am

Read the excerpt, from which the "three little girls" originates. All of the dialogue is extremely stilted and contrived. That's usually a good indication that it is fabricated.

People say stupid things, and Christian groups who desire political power are certainly no exception. However, even stupid things are announced with a certain cadence, a certain inflection and nuance that makes the insipid seem convincing.

The exchange cited would be convincing to precisely no-one, which is why it makes for such a great book. Literally every reader can read that exchange and say "hey, some people sure are idiots!"

It just doesn't work that way in real life.

by: lumens

07-25-2009 @ 4:41am

Read the excerpt, from which the "three little girls" originates. All of the dialogue is extremely stilted and contrived. That's usually a good indication that it is fabricated.

People say stupid things, and Christian groups who desire political power are certainly no exception. However, even stupid things are announced with a certain cadence, a certain inflection and nuance that makes the insipid seem convincing.

The exchange cited would be convincing to precisely no-one, which is why it makes for such a great book. Literally every reader can read that exchange and say "hey, some people sure are idiots!"

It just doesn't work that way in real life.

by: JeffSharlet

07-27-2009 @ 1:29am

Lumens, you've just violated the second rule of the blog, based on Matthew 5:22, by suggesting that I fabricated the quotes. That is, in fact, libelous. That quote originally appeared in Harper's magazine, where it went through fact checking and legal review. The Coes had the opportunity to dispute it. They didn't, and neither did anyone else who was in the room. Next time you find something that offends your sensibilities, lumens, try arguing rather than insulting.

As for John Ensign and Nevada, yes, they have a right to know whether their senator used the campaign fund structure to pay his mistress hush money. A request for an investigation by the Committee for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, seconded by the hardly-liberal Washington Post editorial board, agrees. Moreover, they have a right to know whether their senator is his own man, and whether he stays informed about his associations. As the Las Vegas Sun has reported, Ensign traveled extensively on the Family's dime. Pressed to explain, he now says he had no idea who the group was that was sending him around the world. Either he's lying, or he's not competent to hold office.

Last, and, sadly, least -- I think it's important that readers know that this interview disappeared over the weekend because a God's Politics editor, by his own account responding to complaints from a friend, decided to throw it down the memory hole. That's an insult not just to me, but to the interviewer, the readers, and the basic principles of journalism. If you think you've published something factually inaccurate, correct it. If you've published something you disagree with, balance it with something else. But disappearing? I think even my friends on the far right would be troubled by that. Fortunately, the editor came to his senses and restored the post. I remain deeply unsettled at this small encounter with censorship, and in a forum I've respected for so long.

by: JeffSharlet

07-27-2009 @ 1:29am

Lumens, you've just violated the second rule of the blog, based on Matthew 5:22, by suggesting that I fabricated the quotes. That is, in fact, libelous. That quote originally appeared in Harper's magazine, where it went through fact checking and legal review. The Coes had the opportunity to dispute it. They didn't, and neither did anyone else who was in the room. Next time you find something that offends your sensibilities, lumens, try arguing rather than insulting.

As for John Ensign and Nevada, yes, they have a right to know whether their senator used the campaign fund structure to pay his mistress hush money. A request for an investigation by the Committee for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, seconded by the hardly-liberal Washington Post editorial board, agrees. Moreover, they have a right to know whether their senator is his own man, and whether he stays informed about his associations. As the Las Vegas Sun has reported, Ensign traveled extensively on the Family's dime. Pressed to explain, he now says he had no idea who the group was that was sending him around the world. Either he's lying, or he's not competent to hold office.

Last, and, sadly, least -- I think it's important that readers know that this interview disappeared over the weekend because a God's Politics editor, by his own account responding to complaints from a friend, decided to throw it down the memory hole. That's an insult not just to me, but to the interviewer, the readers, and the basic principles of journalism. If you think you've published something factually inaccurate, correct it. If you've published something you disagree with, balance it with something else. But disappearing? I think even my friends on the far right would be troubled by that. Fortunately, the editor came to his senses and restored the post. I remain deeply unsettled at this small encounter with censorship, and in a forum I've respected for so long.

by: alanbean

07-28-2009 @ 11:33am

Thanks, Becky. I have been interested in the Family since I heard Jeff Sharlet speak in Austin, TX a few years back. Very disturbing stuff.

Alan Bean

by: alanbean

07-28-2009 @ 11:33am

Thanks, Becky. I have been interested in the Family since I heard Jeff Sharlet speak in Austin, TX a few years back. Very disturbing stuff.

Alan Bean

by: Design build austin

09-17-2009 @ 5:25am

I don't know much about this but thanks for informing us, this was a great read indeed.

by: Design build austin

09-17-2009 @ 5:25am

I don't know much about this but thanks for informing us, this was a great read indeed.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-07-2010 @ 5:14pm

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-07-2010 @ 5:14pm

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Cleansing Diet

01-08-2010 @ 12:17am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: Cleansing Diet

01-08-2010 @ 12:17am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: ????????

01-08-2010 @ 12:38am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: ????????

01-08-2010 @ 12:38am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: Printable address label

01-08-2010 @ 11:14am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: Printable address label

01-08-2010 @ 11:14am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: Sears Parts

01-08-2010 @ 11:26am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Sears Parts

01-08-2010 @ 11:26am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-08-2010 @ 4:08pm

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-08-2010 @ 4:08pm

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Envision

01-08-2010 @ 4:11pm

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Envision

01-08-2010 @ 4:11pm

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 6:09am

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 6:09am

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Seth MacFarlane

01-10-2010 @ 6:25am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: Seth MacFarlane

01-10-2010 @ 6:25am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: etude

01-10-2010 @ 6:32am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: etude

01-10-2010 @ 6:32am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: Honey Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 7:25am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Honey Cayenne Pepper Diet

01-10-2010 @ 7:25am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Printable address labels

01-10-2010 @ 7:34am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: Printable address labels

01-10-2010 @ 7:34am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: Printable Address Labels

01-10-2010 @ 10:13am

thanks for sharing with us.

by: Printable Address Labels

01-10-2010 @ 10:13am

thanks for sharing with us.

by: ??????????????????

01-10-2010 @ 10:25am

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: ??????????????????

01-10-2010 @ 10:25am

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: skinfood

01-10-2010 @ 10:27am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: skinfood

01-10-2010 @ 10:27am

this is telly awesome article.Thanks for sharing with us..

by: idiot proof diet reviews

01-10-2010 @ 10:28am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: idiot proof diet reviews

01-10-2010 @ 10:28am

Thank you, it is very good! I like it very much

by: Sears Parts

01-10-2010 @ 11:49am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: Sears Parts

01-10-2010 @ 11:49am

Great stuff dude.. I was really impressed.

by: self-directed IRAs

01-10-2010 @ 11:50am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: self-directed IRAs

01-10-2010 @ 11:50am

this is such great information. thanks for the insight.

by: Sport Club Portugu

01-10-2010 @ 11:50am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Sport Club Portugu

01-10-2010 @ 11:50am

Nicely done, very impressive. Keep up the good work and of course, keep sharing your ideas.

by: Personalized Address Labels

01-10-2010 @ 4:47pm

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.

by: Personalized Address Labels

01-10-2010 @ 4:47pm

This is a great job! Well done. Thank you sharing your ideas and knowledge.