Get E-Mail Updates

Making Peace with Sam Harris

Dr. Francis Collins, President Obama's choice to head the National Institute of Health, has been met with much resistance from certain quarters of the scientific community. Sam Harris, a prominent atheist, recently expressed his own resistance to the idea of Dr. Collins heading the NIH in a recent New York Times Op-ed piece, "Science is in the Details."

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Mr. Harris has one main complaint: "Francis Collins is an accomplished scientist and a man who is sincere in his beliefs. And that is precisely what makes me so uncomfortable about his nomination." Of course calling Dr. Collins an "accomplished scientist" is an understatement equivalent to calling Lebron James a decent basketball player. As the head of Human Genome Project, Dr. Collins came in under budget and ahead of schedule. He has also been very prominent for isolating genes that cause cystic fibrosis and many other diseases. His work is largely unquestioned.

Unfortunately, not so his beliefs. What bothers Mr. Harris is that Dr. Collins is a Christian, and a vocal Christian to boot. Further, Dr. Collins apparently commits the sin of claiming to be both a scientist and a Christian. That Dr. Collins sees no conflict between science and faith clearly offends Sam Harris' belief that faith and science do not belong together. For those who believe faith and science are at war, there are just four logical conclusions to Dr. Collins' work as a scientist: A) Dr. Collins is not a true scientist; B) He can compartmentalize his work from his beliefs; C) His faith will sooner or later pollute his science; D) The premise of science in conflict with religion is mistaken.

Dr. Collins' work already eliminates option A. Few are questioning his previous work. Mr. Harris chooses option C, and yet Mr. Harris fails to give any evidence of polluted science in Dr. Collins' work, only the possibility of it. If there were such evidence, it would have emerged in Dr. Collins' already long career. It seems logic would dictate that only B or D are compatible with the facts, and with either conclusion, Mr. Harris has nothing to worry about with Dr. Collins' appointment.

Now from here it seems only two paths for dialogue are available. The first is to get into a debate about faith vs. atheism, which would be futile. I could offer no arguments to convince Mr. Harris of Christianity's truth and nothing he can say will dissuaded me from my faith in Jesus, nor I imagine could Mr. Harris convince Dr. Collins or me of atheism. The second is to get into a serious name calling session, which in reality is a devolved debate. Certainly, name-calling sometimes feels good, but it remains ultimately useless discourse, after which all we can do is go back to our own tribe for agreement. We will never find peace if we stay in the argument.

There is, however, a third option, which is the most difficult. As Christians, it is the one that beckons us to find peace with adversaries. Paul's often quoted line in Romans 3:23, that we "all fall short of the glory of God," means that we all commit the sin of judging people based on their labels, predispositions, and categories, but to do so is to devolve into useless discourse. It is the sin of playing God.

Instead of arguing until we are purple in the face, all sides of the God debate should first acknowledge the truth that religion is not going away, and neither are atheists. If we choose to live in an open society, then we must learn to live and, for Christians, love our neighbors, be they Muslim, Christian, or atheist. I cannot fault Mr. Harris for his fears based on his presuppositions about religion, but we must face the truth. We are more than our ideas and presuppositions, and we have no other option but to try to live with each other.

So how do we find peace? Step by step and side by side, facing the truth, for the truth will set us free.

Ernesto Tinajero is a freelance writer in Spokane, Washington, who earned his master's degree in theology from Fuller Seminary. Visit his blog at www.life-and-faith.org.

To read Dr. Francis Collins' commentary on the relationship between faith and science, see this month's issue of Sojourners magazine, and also listen to our audio interview with Dr. Collins in this month's web extras.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: bhaack

08-10-2009 @ 3:44am

I agree, we need to examine ourselves. But sometimes its not us. Sometimes there are bigoted people who hate Christianity. Jesus himself was hated and warned us that we too would be.

________________________________

by: Palosaari

08-13-2009 @ 7:31pm

I would prefer another option, of how we can have a serious discussion on how faith can inform our science and science can inform our faith- not either dictating one to the other, but allowing ourselves to be more holistic beings, with all areas of our lives influencing each other.

by: Palosaari

08-13-2009 @ 7:31pm

I would prefer another option, of how we can have a serious discussion on how faith can inform our science and science can inform our faith- not either dictating one to the other, but allowing ourselves to be more holistic beings, with all areas of our lives influencing each other.

by: duhsciple

08-03-2009 @ 9:44pm

Here's to hoping that Dr. Collins will do a fantastic job and to praying that regardless of faith perspective we can learn to turn foes into friends despite our disagreements!

by: bhaack

08-04-2009 @ 1:20am

"Instead of arguing until we are purple in the face..."

Huh, what's to argue about here. Harris is a sophist who trafficks in religious bigotry. What's more to say?

by: shelia32

08-04-2009 @ 1:53am

Having some form of religion in your life can be a buffer from taking science past moral boundries

by: Mark Baker-Wright

08-04-2009 @ 1:34pm

There probably ISN'T much more to say, but surely you don't mean to suggest that there aren't going to be those who will try (on both sides of this debate)? Christians and atheists alike seem to LOVE getting into arguments.

by: MarianoApologeticus

08-04-2009 @ 2:34pm

Fascinating that Harris would complain as he has admitted that he, himself, is becoming a scientist not in order to conduct unbiased research but in order to evidence his atheist presuppositions.

http://atheismisdead.blogspot.com/2009/05/athei...

by: Palosaari

08-13-2009 @ 9:31pm

I would prefer another option, of how we can have a serious discussion on how faith can inform our science and science can inform our faith- not either dictating one to the other, but allowing ourselves to be more holistic beings, with all areas of our lives influencing each other.

by: bhaack

08-04-2009 @ 11:48pm

Sound like you're looking to get into an argument with me. :)

by: duhsciple

08-03-2009 @ 9:44pm

Here's to hoping that Dr. Collins will do a fantastic job and to praying that regardless of faith perspective we can learn to turn foes into friends despite our disagreements!

by: bhaack

08-04-2009 @ 1:20am

"Instead of arguing until we are purple in the face..."

Huh, what's to argue about here. Harris is a sophist who trafficks in religious bigotry. What's more to say?

by: shelia32

08-04-2009 @ 1:53am

Having some form of religion in your life can be a buffer from taking science past moral boundries

by: darlenebatchelder

08-05-2009 @ 3:58pm

I invite the author and readers to consider that there is something more powerful to do here, other than to "try" to live with each other and our differences. What happens when we commit to it? Jesus was committed to bringing the good news and doing it with love. God is committed to allowing and loving us through our lives.

When we say we will "try", we give ourselves an out, a back door, an escape hatch, a reason to give up. And our context when we say we will "try" is that it is so very difficult to love those with whom we differ. I wonder if with practice and commitment, it might become easy and effortless?

Jesus said, repeating the commandment from God in the old testament, "love one another".He said it is the first and most important thing! How would this discussion about science versus religion shift if we approached it from that context? What if we loved Mr. Harris first and then sought a dialogue? The alternative is to perpetuate the name calling, the righteous taking of positions, that has us stuck, unable to really speak with each other, unable to listen for God's voice in all voices.

by: Mark Baker-Wright

08-04-2009 @ 1:34pm

There probably ISN'T much more to say, but surely you don't mean to suggest that there aren't going to be those who will try (on both sides of this debate)? Christians and atheists alike seem to LOVE getting into arguments.

by: BlueDeacon

08-05-2009 @ 4:25pm

Might backfire.

by: MarianoApologeticus

08-04-2009 @ 2:34pm

Fascinating that Harris would complain as he has admitted that he, himself, is becoming a scientist not in order to conduct unbiased research but in order to evidence his atheist presuppositions.

http://atheismisdead.blogspot.com/2009/05/athei...

by: bhaack

08-04-2009 @ 11:48pm

Sound like you're looking to get into an argument with me. :)

by: WaveTossed

08-06-2009 @ 12:05pm

Dr. Collins should ignore this guy and simply do the job for which he is well-qualified.

by: darlenebatchelder

08-05-2009 @ 3:58pm

I invite the author and readers to consider that there is something more powerful to do here, other than to "try" to live with each other and our differences. What happens when we commit to it? Jesus was committed to bringing the good news and doing it with love. God is committed to allowing and loving us through our lives.

When we say we will "try", we give ourselves an out, a back door, an escape hatch, a reason to give up. And our context when we say we will "try" is that it is so very difficult to love those with whom we differ. I wonder if with practice and commitment, it might become easy and effortless?

Jesus said, repeating the commandment from God in the old testament, "love one another".He said it is the first and most important thing! How would this discussion about science versus religion shift if we approached it from that context? What if we loved Mr. Harris first and then sought a dialogue? The alternative is to perpetuate the name calling, the righteous taking of positions, that has us stuck, unable to really speak with each other, unable to listen for God's voice in all voices.

by: BlueDeacon

08-05-2009 @ 4:25pm

Might backfire.

by: mharper

08-06-2009 @ 6:49pm

If Harris thinks Collins' is disqualified because of his religious beliefs that amounts to religious prejudice, which was illegal the last time checked.

by: WaveTossed

08-06-2009 @ 12:05pm

Dr. Collins should ignore this guy and simply do the job for which he is well-qualified.

by: mharper

08-06-2009 @ 6:49pm

If Harris thinks Collins' is disqualified because of his religious beliefs that amounts to religious prejudice, which was illegal the last time checked.

by: titopoet

08-08-2009 @ 3:29pm

Thank you for your thoughts. The reason we can not ignore the New Atheist like Sam Harris is that by the amount of books he sells and the attention he draws, he represents a large group of people. We have to look at ourselves as Christians if we have some culpability. Jesus calls to proclaim the Gospel, and to be peace-makers.

by: Palosaari

08-13-2009 @ 9:31pm

I would prefer another option, of how we can have a serious discussion on how faith can inform our science and science can inform our faith- not either dictating one to the other, but allowing ourselves to be more holistic beings, with all areas of our lives influencing each other.

by: bhaack

08-10-2009 @ 3:44am

I agree, we need to examine ourselves. But sometimes its not us. Sometimes there are bigoted people who hate Christianity. Jesus himself was hated and warned us that we too would be.

________________________________

by: titopoet

08-08-2009 @ 3:29pm

Thank you for your thoughts. The reason we can not ignore the New Atheist like Sam Harris is that by the amount of books he sells and the attention he draws, he represents a large group of people. We have to look at ourselves as Christians if we have some culpability. Jesus calls to proclaim the Gospel, and to be peace-makers.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: duhsciple

08-03-2009 @ 9:44pm

Here's to hoping that Dr. Collins will do a fantastic job and to praying that regardless of faith perspective we can learn to turn foes into friends despite our disagreements!

by: duhsciple

08-03-2009 @ 9:44pm

Here's to hoping that Dr. Collins will do a fantastic job and to praying that regardless of faith perspective we can learn to turn foes into friends despite our disagreements!

by: bhaack

08-04-2009 @ 1:20am

"Instead of arguing until we are purple in the face..."

Huh, what's to argue about here. Harris is a sophist who trafficks in religious bigotry. What's more to say?

by: bhaack

08-04-2009 @ 1:20am

"Instead of arguing until we are purple in the face..."

Huh, what's to argue about here. Harris is a sophist who trafficks in religious bigotry. What's more to say?

by: shelia32

08-04-2009 @ 1:53am

Having some form of religion in your life can be a buffer from taking science past moral boundries

by: shelia32

08-04-2009 @ 1:53am

Having some form of religion in your life can be a buffer from taking science past moral boundries

by: Mark Baker-Wright

08-04-2009 @ 1:34pm

There probably ISN'T much more to say, but surely you don't mean to suggest that there aren't going to be those who will try (on both sides of this debate)? Christians and atheists alike seem to LOVE getting into arguments.

by: Mark Baker-Wright

08-04-2009 @ 1:34pm

There probably ISN'T much more to say, but surely you don't mean to suggest that there aren't going to be those who will try (on both sides of this debate)? Christians and atheists alike seem to LOVE getting into arguments.

by: MarianoApologeticus

08-04-2009 @ 2:34pm

Fascinating that Harris would complain as he has admitted that he, himself, is becoming a scientist not in order to conduct unbiased research but in order to evidence his atheist presuppositions.

http://atheismisdead.blogspot.com/2009/05/athei...

by: MarianoApologeticus

08-04-2009 @ 2:34pm

Fascinating that Harris would complain as he has admitted that he, himself, is becoming a scientist not in order to conduct unbiased research but in order to evidence his atheist presuppositions.

http://atheismisdead.blogspot.com/2009/05/athei...

by: bhaack

08-04-2009 @ 11:48pm

Sound like you're looking to get into an argument with me. :)

by: bhaack

08-04-2009 @ 11:48pm

Sound like you're looking to get into an argument with me. :)

by: darlenebatchelder

08-05-2009 @ 3:58pm

I invite the author and readers to consider that there is something more powerful to do here, other than to "try" to live with each other and our differences. What happens when we commit to it? Jesus was committed to bringing the good news and doing it with love. God is committed to allowing and loving us through our lives.

When we say we will "try", we give ourselves an out, a back door, an escape hatch, a reason to give up. And our context when we say we will "try" is that it is so very difficult to love those with whom we differ. I wonder if with practice and commitment, it might become easy and effortless?

Jesus said, repeating the commandment from God in the old testament, "love one another".He said it is the first and most important thing! How would this discussion about science versus religion shift if we approached it from that context? What if we loved Mr. Harris first and then sought a dialogue? The alternative is to perpetuate the name calling, the righteous taking of positions, that has us stuck, unable to really speak with each other, unable to listen for God's voice in all voices.

by: darlenebatchelder

08-05-2009 @ 3:58pm

I invite the author and readers to consider that there is something more powerful to do here, other than to "try" to live with each other and our differences. What happens when we commit to it? Jesus was committed to bringing the good news and doing it with love. God is committed to allowing and loving us through our lives.

When we say we will "try", we give ourselves an out, a back door, an escape hatch, a reason to give up. And our context when we say we will "try" is that it is so very difficult to love those with whom we differ. I wonder if with practice and commitment, it might become easy and effortless?

Jesus said, repeating the commandment from God in the old testament, "love one another".He said it is the first and most important thing! How would this discussion about science versus religion shift if we approached it from that context? What if we loved Mr. Harris first and then sought a dialogue? The alternative is to perpetuate the name calling, the righteous taking of positions, that has us stuck, unable to really speak with each other, unable to listen for God's voice in all voices.

by: BlueDeacon

08-05-2009 @ 4:25pm

Might backfire.

by: BlueDeacon

08-05-2009 @ 4:25pm

Might backfire.

by: WaveTossed

08-06-2009 @ 12:05pm

Dr. Collins should ignore this guy and simply do the job for which he is well-qualified.

by: WaveTossed

08-06-2009 @ 12:05pm

Dr. Collins should ignore this guy and simply do the job for which he is well-qualified.

by: mharper

08-06-2009 @ 6:49pm

If Harris thinks Collins' is disqualified because of his religious beliefs that amounts to religious prejudice, which was illegal the last time checked.

by: mharper

08-06-2009 @ 6:49pm

If Harris thinks Collins' is disqualified because of his religious beliefs that amounts to religious prejudice, which was illegal the last time checked.

by: titopoet

08-08-2009 @ 3:29pm

Thank you for your thoughts. The reason we can not ignore the New Atheist like Sam Harris is that by the amount of books he sells and the attention he draws, he represents a large group of people. We have to look at ourselves as Christians if we have some culpability. Jesus calls to proclaim the Gospel, and to be peace-makers.

by: titopoet

08-08-2009 @ 3:29pm

Thank you for your thoughts. The reason we can not ignore the New Atheist like Sam Harris is that by the amount of books he sells and the attention he draws, he represents a large group of people. We have to look at ourselves as Christians if we have some culpability. Jesus calls to proclaim the Gospel, and to be peace-makers.

by: bhaack

08-10-2009 @ 3:44am

I agree, we need to examine ourselves. But sometimes its not us. Sometimes there are bigoted people who hate Christianity. Jesus himself was hated and warned us that we too would be.

________________________________

by: bhaack

08-10-2009 @ 3:44am

I agree, we need to examine ourselves. But sometimes its not us. Sometimes there are bigoted people who hate Christianity. Jesus himself was hated and warned us that we too would be.

________________________________

by: Palosaari

08-13-2009 @ 7:31pm

I would prefer another option, of how we can have a serious discussion on how faith can inform our science and science can inform our faith- not either dictating one to the other, but allowing ourselves to be more holistic beings, with all areas of our lives influencing each other.

by: Palosaari

08-13-2009 @ 7:31pm

I would prefer another option, of how we can have a serious discussion on how faith can inform our science and science can inform our faith- not either dictating one to the other, but allowing ourselves to be more holistic beings, with all areas of our lives influencing each other.

by: Palosaari

08-13-2009 @ 9:31pm

I would prefer another option, of how we can have a serious discussion on how faith can inform our science and science can inform our faith- not either dictating one to the other, but allowing ourselves to be more holistic beings, with all areas of our lives influencing each other.

by: Palosaari

08-13-2009 @ 9:31pm

I would prefer another option, of how we can have a serious discussion on how faith can inform our science and science can inform our faith- not either dictating one to the other, but allowing ourselves to be more holistic beings, with all areas of our lives influencing each other.