Get E-Mail Updates

Video: Ted Kennedy Speaking at Jerry Falwell's College

Evidence of Sen. Ted Kennedy's bipartisan bridge-building: On Oct. 3, 1983, he addressed Rev. Jerry Falwell's Liberty Baptist College on the theme of "Faith and country, tolerance and truth in America." Watch a younger Kennedy address a younger Falwell at a time when the Moral Majority was ascendant:

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

You can watch the entire speech here. Dave Brody at CBN has excerpted some key passages on his blog.

Ryan Rodrick Beiler is the web editor for Sojourners and a photographer whose photos can be seen at www.ryanrodrickbeiler.com.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: Eastern Oregon University

10-28-2009 @ 5:35pm

Thanks for the great reading,Great Posting,I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.
http://www.universityloveconnection.com/

by: nuclearferret

08-26-2009 @ 3:58pm

Did you post this as evidence of Jerry Falwell's bridge building when he died? After all, Liberty invited Kennedy to speak.

by: Nathan4U

08-26-2009 @ 4:05pm

For the record, Jerry invited Ted to speak. Ted, to his great credit, accepted. Good article here on Jerry's many bridge-bulding efforts.

http://www.christiancentury.org/article.lasso?i...

They both fought the good fight, in accordance with their own very different, but equally strong, consciences. They are both missed.

by: duhsciple

08-26-2009 @ 5:54pm

Bravo for Dr. Falwell and Senator Kennedy!

May we take this example of reaching beyond our tribal, ideological communities to speak to and listen to one another. I know that I have been hesitant to post here because of increasing polarization. It is good to know that these two polarizing figures were able to be gracious to each other.

by: university

10-28-2009 @ 3:33pm

Thanks for the great reading, college videos . I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.

by: university

10-28-2009 @ 3:35pm

Thanks for the great reading,Great Posting,I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.
http://www.universityloveconnection.com/

by: ChristGraceFaith

08-26-2009 @ 6:48pm

"I . . . hope that . . in the months and years ahead, we will always respect the right of others to differ, that we will never lose sight of our own fallibility, that we will view ourselves with a sense of perspective and a sense of humor. After all, in the New Testament, even the Disciples had to be taught to look first to the beam in their own eyes, and only then to the mote in their neighbor's eyes."

We need to protect one another in Love, especially when we disagree. How to avoid impositions from any side and allow freedom of conscience to flourish on all sides of whatever issue? Lord, help us.

by: university

10-28-2009 @ 3:33pm

Thanks for the great reading, college videos . I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.

by: BlueDeacon

08-26-2009 @ 7:26pm

Why would he? Falwell regularly blasted -- publicly -- people he opposed, including Jim Wallis.

by: nuclearferret

08-26-2009 @ 3:58pm

Did you post this as evidence of Jerry Falwell's bridge building when he died? After all, Liberty invited Kennedy to speak.

by: university

10-28-2009 @ 3:35pm

Thanks for the great reading,Great Posting,I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.
http://www.universityloveconnection.com/

by: BlueDeacon

08-26-2009 @ 7:28pm

That happened because Kennedy received an invitation to join Moral Majority. By mistake.

by: Nathan4U

08-26-2009 @ 4:05pm

For the record, Jerry invited Ted to speak. Ted, to his great credit, accepted. Good article here on Jerry's many bridge-bulding efforts.

http://www.christiancentury.org/article.lasso?i...

They both fought the good fight, in accordance with their own very different, but equally strong, consciences. They are both missed.

by: JamesM

08-27-2009 @ 12:43am

Great speech by Ted Kennedy. I admire his sense of humor in front of what was obviously not a friendly crowd.

by: duhsciple

08-26-2009 @ 5:54pm

Bravo for Dr. Falwell and Senator Kennedy!

May we take this example of reaching beyond our tribal, ideological communities to speak to and listen to one another. I know that I have been hesitant to post here because of increasing polarization. It is good to know that these two polarizing figures were able to be gracious to each other.

by: Truth2Power

08-27-2009 @ 2:12am

Blue,

If you think about it for even a nanosecond, you'd realize your comment is demonstrably false.

Falwell was the head of Liberty U back in 1983. It was within his absolute discretion to invite whomever he wanted to speak at Liberty. He didn't have to invite Ted any more than the ACLU has to invite me to speak in front of them, even though I've received several invitations to join (by mistake, I'm guessing, since I guess I'm now a part of the evil religious right). Jerry invited Ted because Jerry was actually a very decent and open-minded man whose friendships spanned many political and religious divides.

Blue, I'm actually on your side in many ways. For years, I credulously accepted the MSM accounts of Falwell's character as though they were gospel because, quite frankly, the MSM was my functional gospel. At some point, however, I decided to investigate for myself who this man whom I'd eagerly hated at the request of his cultured despisers.

To my deep surprise (and even deeper shame) what I found was a man, not a caricature. What I found was a deeply intelligent person of integrity who genuinely made friends with those I assumed he hated. What I found was a someone who was so deeply committed to social justice, he didn't feel the need to call a press conference every time he passed out an alm to the poor.

I want you to do me a favor, Blue. I want you to actually read the article Nathan linked to. I want you to pretend that "judge not lest ye be judged" is a principle worth following. I want to to imagine that "love your enemies" is a principle that applies to all of us. Most importantly, I want you to think before you judge.

Then I want you to come back and post whatever you feel justified in posting about Jerry. I've got $20 riding on your response.

For what it's worth, buddy, I'm betting on your better nature.

Truth

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 2:52am

I actually did read it and find no reason to alter my view of Falwell, because his legacy is out there for all to see. On top of that, I have heard what he had to say in his own words, unedited, and frankly found him two-faced at key points. On "Nightline," when he was talking about his political action, he said, "We just want a voice." On the other hand, on his "Old-Time Gospel Hour," he said, "We were meant to rule!" (or something to that effect). On another show he passed out verbal "orchids" to those groups whom he agreed with and "onions" to those he didn't. And here's the kicker: Falwell started Moral Majority in the first place at the behest of a Nixon/Goldwater era fundraiser to add to his direct-mail empire, so in one sense he already was compromised. He may have been very nice in person, but he will always be remembered as a polarizing person -- because that's what brought the money in. And as I mentioned above, five years ago he directly insulted Jim Wallis.

by: ChristGraceFaith

08-26-2009 @ 6:48pm

"I . . . hope that . . in the months and years ahead, we will always respect the right of others to differ, that we will never lose sight of our own fallibility, that we will view ourselves with a sense of perspective and a sense of humor. After all, in the New Testament, even the Disciples had to be taught to look first to the beam in their own eyes, and only then to the mote in their neighbor's eyes."

We need to protect one another in Love, especially when we disagree. How to avoid impositions from any side and allow freedom of conscience to flourish on all sides of whatever issue? Lord, help us.

by: Nathan4U

08-27-2009 @ 10:27am

Truth2Power,

I believe you owe me $20. Under the terms of our little agreement, anything would have sufficed. An ounce of mercy, a scintilla of compassion, even the slightest acknowledgment from Blue that a political enemy could actually be a decent, principled person or (and this was a long shot, I'll admit) that our faith demands us to give people the benefit of the doubt rather than rushing to judgment on second and third hand reports (or something to that effect).

Blue,

I knew you wouldnt let me down.

. . . and thanks for the onions! I'll send them to T2P so ha can make onion soup :- )

by: Truth2Power

08-27-2009 @ 10:33am

You want to try double or nothing?

by: BlueDeacon

08-26-2009 @ 7:26pm

Why would he? Falwell regularly blasted -- publicly -- people he opposed, including Jim Wallis.

by: BlueDeacon

08-26-2009 @ 7:28pm

That happened because Kennedy received an invitation to join Moral Majority. By mistake.

by: Nathan4U

08-27-2009 @ 10:36am

Truth,

You're on. I will ride this horse until you run out of money. With any luck, I'll be able to retire early.

by: JamesM

08-27-2009 @ 12:43am

Great speech by Ted Kennedy. I admire his sense of humor in front of what was obviously not a friendly crowd.

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 12:28pm

Unfortunately, I've seen way, way too many first-hand reports of Falwell's
lack of charity toward people who don't see things his way. Besides, as
mentioned in another thread, the problem is that we often see people as "all
good" or "all bad" because that's easy to do; however, at some point you paint
yourself into a corner. You see, God calls us to repentance, which is never
an easy thing; FWIW, I already knew that he had renounced his segregationist
past, but conservative ideology is still seen, for some very good historical
reasons, as fundamentally racist (which is where that student was going with
the question).

by: Truth2Power

08-27-2009 @ 2:12am

Blue,

If you think about it for even a nanosecond, you'd realize your comment is demonstrably false.

Falwell was the head of Liberty U back in 1983. It was within his absolute discretion to invite whomever he wanted to speak at Liberty. He didn't have to invite Ted any more than the ACLU has to invite me to speak in front of them, even though I've received several invitations to join (by mistake, I'm guessing, since I guess I'm now a part of the evil religious right). Jerry invited Ted because Jerry was actually a very decent and open-minded man whose friendships spanned many political and religious divides.

Blue, I'm actually on your side in many ways. For years, I credulously accepted the MSM accounts of Falwell's character as though they were gospel because, quite frankly, the MSM was my functional gospel. At some point, however, I decided to investigate for myself who this man whom I'd eagerly hated at the request of his cultured despisers.

To my deep surprise (and even deeper shame) what I found was a man, not a caricature. What I found was a deeply intelligent person of integrity who genuinely made friends with those I assumed he hated. What I found was a someone who was so deeply committed to social justice, he didn't feel the need to call a press conference every time he passed out an alm to the poor.

I want you to do me a favor, Blue. I want you to actually read the article Nathan linked to. I want you to pretend that "judge not lest ye be judged" is a principle worth following. I want to to imagine that "love your enemies" is a principle that applies to all of us. Most importantly, I want you to think before you judge.

Then I want you to come back and post whatever you feel justified in posting about Jerry. I've got $20 riding on your response.

For what it's worth, buddy, I'm betting on your better nature.

Truth

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 2:52am

I actually did read it and find no reason to alter my view of Falwell, because his legacy is out there for all to see. On top of that, I have heard what he had to say in his own words, unedited, and frankly found him two-faced at key points. On "Nightline," when he was talking about his political action, he said, "We just want a voice." On the other hand, on his "Old-Time Gospel Hour," he said, "We were meant to rule!" (or something to that effect). On another show he passed out verbal "orchids" to those groups whom he agreed with and "onions" to those he didn't. And here's the kicker: Falwell started Moral Majority in the first place at the behest of a Nixon/Goldwater era fundraiser to add to his direct-mail empire, so in one sense he already was compromised. He may have been very nice in person, but he will always be remembered as a polarizing person -- because that's what brought the money in. And as I mentioned above, five years ago he directly insulted Jim Wallis.

by: Nathan4U

08-27-2009 @ 10:27am

Truth2Power,

I believe you owe me $20. Under the terms of our little agreement, anything would have sufficed. An ounce of mercy, a scintilla of compassion, even the slightest acknowledgment from Blue that a political enemy could actually be a decent, principled person or (and this was a long shot, I'll admit) that our faith demands us to give people the benefit of the doubt rather than rushing to judgment on second and third hand reports (or something to that effect).

Blue,

I knew you wouldnt let me down.

. . . and thanks for the onions! I'll send them to T2P so ha can make onion soup :- )

by: Truth2Power

08-27-2009 @ 10:33am

You want to try double or nothing?

by: Nathan4U

08-27-2009 @ 10:36am

Truth,

You're on. I will ride this horse until you run out of money. With any luck, I'll be able to retire early.

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 12:28pm

Unfortunately, I've seen way, way too many first-hand reports of Falwell's
lack of charity toward people who don't see things his way. Besides, as
mentioned in another thread, the problem is that we often see people as "all
good" or "all bad" because that's easy to do; however, at some point you paint
yourself into a corner. You see, God calls us to repentance, which is never
an easy thing; FWIW, I already knew that he had renounced his segregationist
past, but conservative ideology is still seen, for some very good historical
reasons, as fundamentally racist (which is where that student was going with
the question).

by: nuclearferret

08-27-2009 @ 6:16pm

So Kennedy gets invited BY Rev. Falwell, and Kennedy is the bridge builder? I guess this is bizarro world. But you're right, Edward Kennedy never regularly blasted anyone he opposed.

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 7:13pm

My point that it wasn't completely out of the blue -- Kennedy actually sent back an application, which he received by mistake, to join Moral Majority, which is how he ended up being invited in the first place.

by: nuclearferret

08-27-2009 @ 6:16pm

So Kennedy gets invited BY Rev. Falwell, and Kennedy is the bridge builder? I guess this is bizarro world. But you're right, Edward Kennedy never regularly blasted anyone he opposed.

by: Eastern Oregon University

10-28-2009 @ 5:35pm

Thanks for the great reading,Great Posting,I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.
http://www.universityloveconnection.com/

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 7:13pm

My point that it wasn't completely out of the blue -- Kennedy actually sent back an application, which he received by mistake, to join Moral Majority, which is how he ended up being invited in the first place.

by: Eugene Spammer

09-13-2011 @ 2:46pm

Ted's ecumenical approach ("can't we all just get along?") sounds all warm and fuzzy but I'd have greater admiration for him had he taken on these theocrats instead of pandering to them. Even as Kennedy proclaims that our freedom depends on a separation of church and state, he undermines his message with historical nonsense.He says that the American Revolution was fought to create, John Winthrop's "city upon a hill." Hardly. Winthrop's "city upon a hill" was a Puritan theocracy modeled on Calvinism. It would be like saying the American revolution was designed to turn America into Liberty University, a place where doctrinal Christianity and the inerrancy of the bible is the law, where religious and political dissent is not permitted, where scientific inquiry is scorned and this world is regarded as a mere proving ground for the apocolyptic end of days. City upon a hill? Sounds like hell on earth. IT Support London

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: nuclearferret

08-26-2009 @ 3:58pm

Did you post this as evidence of Jerry Falwell's bridge building when he died? After all, Liberty invited Kennedy to speak.

by: nuclearferret

08-26-2009 @ 3:58pm

Did you post this as evidence of Jerry Falwell's bridge building when he died? After all, Liberty invited Kennedy to speak.

by: Nathan4U

08-26-2009 @ 4:05pm

For the record, Jerry invited Ted to speak. Ted, to his great credit, accepted. Good article here on Jerry's many bridge-bulding efforts.

http://www.christiancentury.org/article.lasso?i...

They both fought the good fight, in accordance with their own very different, but equally strong, consciences. They are both missed.

by: Nathan4U

08-26-2009 @ 4:05pm

For the record, Jerry invited Ted to speak. Ted, to his great credit, accepted. Good article here on Jerry's many bridge-bulding efforts.

http://www.christiancentury.org/article.lasso?i...

They both fought the good fight, in accordance with their own very different, but equally strong, consciences. They are both missed.

by: duhsciple

08-26-2009 @ 5:54pm

Bravo for Dr. Falwell and Senator Kennedy!

May we take this example of reaching beyond our tribal, ideological communities to speak to and listen to one another. I know that I have been hesitant to post here because of increasing polarization. It is good to know that these two polarizing figures were able to be gracious to each other.

by: duhsciple

08-26-2009 @ 5:54pm

Bravo for Dr. Falwell and Senator Kennedy!

May we take this example of reaching beyond our tribal, ideological communities to speak to and listen to one another. I know that I have been hesitant to post here because of increasing polarization. It is good to know that these two polarizing figures were able to be gracious to each other.

by: ChristGraceFaith

08-26-2009 @ 6:48pm

"I . . . hope that . . in the months and years ahead, we will always respect the right of others to differ, that we will never lose sight of our own fallibility, that we will view ourselves with a sense of perspective and a sense of humor. After all, in the New Testament, even the Disciples had to be taught to look first to the beam in their own eyes, and only then to the mote in their neighbor's eyes."

We need to protect one another in Love, especially when we disagree. How to avoid impositions from any side and allow freedom of conscience to flourish on all sides of whatever issue? Lord, help us.

by: ChristGraceFaith

08-26-2009 @ 6:48pm

"I . . . hope that . . in the months and years ahead, we will always respect the right of others to differ, that we will never lose sight of our own fallibility, that we will view ourselves with a sense of perspective and a sense of humor. After all, in the New Testament, even the Disciples had to be taught to look first to the beam in their own eyes, and only then to the mote in their neighbor's eyes."

We need to protect one another in Love, especially when we disagree. How to avoid impositions from any side and allow freedom of conscience to flourish on all sides of whatever issue? Lord, help us.

by: BlueDeacon

08-26-2009 @ 7:26pm

Why would he? Falwell regularly blasted -- publicly -- people he opposed, including Jim Wallis.

by: BlueDeacon

08-26-2009 @ 7:26pm

Why would he? Falwell regularly blasted -- publicly -- people he opposed, including Jim Wallis.

by: BlueDeacon

08-26-2009 @ 7:28pm

That happened because Kennedy received an invitation to join Moral Majority. By mistake.

by: BlueDeacon

08-26-2009 @ 7:28pm

That happened because Kennedy received an invitation to join Moral Majority. By mistake.

by: JamesM

08-27-2009 @ 12:43am

Great speech by Ted Kennedy. I admire his sense of humor in front of what was obviously not a friendly crowd.

by: JamesM

08-27-2009 @ 12:43am

Great speech by Ted Kennedy. I admire his sense of humor in front of what was obviously not a friendly crowd.

by: Truth2Power

08-27-2009 @ 2:12am

Blue,

If you think about it for even a nanosecond, you'd realize your comment is demonstrably false.

Falwell was the head of Liberty U back in 1983. It was within his absolute discretion to invite whomever he wanted to speak at Liberty. He didn't have to invite Ted any more than the ACLU has to invite me to speak in front of them, even though I've received several invitations to join (by mistake, I'm guessing, since I guess I'm now a part of the evil religious right). Jerry invited Ted because Jerry was actually a very decent and open-minded man whose friendships spanned many political and religious divides.

Blue, I'm actually on your side in many ways. For years, I credulously accepted the MSM accounts of Falwell's character as though they were gospel because, quite frankly, the MSM was my functional gospel. At some point, however, I decided to investigate for myself who this man whom I'd eagerly hated at the request of his cultured despisers.

To my deep surprise (and even deeper shame) what I found was a man, not a caricature. What I found was a deeply intelligent person of integrity who genuinely made friends with those I assumed he hated. What I found was a someone who was so deeply committed to social justice, he didn't feel the need to call a press conference every time he passed out an alm to the poor.

I want you to do me a favor, Blue. I want you to actually read the article Nathan linked to. I want you to pretend that "judge not lest ye be judged" is a principle worth following. I want to to imagine that "love your enemies" is a principle that applies to all of us. Most importantly, I want you to think before you judge.

Then I want you to come back and post whatever you feel justified in posting about Jerry. I've got $20 riding on your response.

For what it's worth, buddy, I'm betting on your better nature.

Truth

by: Truth2Power

08-27-2009 @ 2:12am

Blue,

If you think about it for even a nanosecond, you'd realize your comment is demonstrably false.

Falwell was the head of Liberty U back in 1983. It was within his absolute discretion to invite whomever he wanted to speak at Liberty. He didn't have to invite Ted any more than the ACLU has to invite me to speak in front of them, even though I've received several invitations to join (by mistake, I'm guessing, since I guess I'm now a part of the evil religious right). Jerry invited Ted because Jerry was actually a very decent and open-minded man whose friendships spanned many political and religious divides.

Blue, I'm actually on your side in many ways. For years, I credulously accepted the MSM accounts of Falwell's character as though they were gospel because, quite frankly, the MSM was my functional gospel. At some point, however, I decided to investigate for myself who this man whom I'd eagerly hated at the request of his cultured despisers.

To my deep surprise (and even deeper shame) what I found was a man, not a caricature. What I found was a deeply intelligent person of integrity who genuinely made friends with those I assumed he hated. What I found was a someone who was so deeply committed to social justice, he didn't feel the need to call a press conference every time he passed out an alm to the poor.

I want you to do me a favor, Blue. I want you to actually read the article Nathan linked to. I want you to pretend that "judge not lest ye be judged" is a principle worth following. I want to to imagine that "love your enemies" is a principle that applies to all of us. Most importantly, I want you to think before you judge.

Then I want you to come back and post whatever you feel justified in posting about Jerry. I've got $20 riding on your response.

For what it's worth, buddy, I'm betting on your better nature.

Truth

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 2:52am

I actually did read it and find no reason to alter my view of Falwell, because his legacy is out there for all to see. On top of that, I have heard what he had to say in his own words, unedited, and frankly found him two-faced at key points. On "Nightline," when he was talking about his political action, he said, "We just want a voice." On the other hand, on his "Old-Time Gospel Hour," he said, "We were meant to rule!" (or something to that effect). On another show he passed out verbal "orchids" to those groups whom he agreed with and "onions" to those he didn't. And here's the kicker: Falwell started Moral Majority in the first place at the behest of a Nixon/Goldwater era fundraiser to add to his direct-mail empire, so in one sense he already was compromised. He may have been very nice in person, but he will always be remembered as a polarizing person -- because that's what brought the money in. And as I mentioned above, five years ago he directly insulted Jim Wallis.

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 2:52am

I actually did read it and find no reason to alter my view of Falwell, because his legacy is out there for all to see. On top of that, I have heard what he had to say in his own words, unedited, and frankly found him two-faced at key points. On "Nightline," when he was talking about his political action, he said, "We just want a voice." On the other hand, on his "Old-Time Gospel Hour," he said, "We were meant to rule!" (or something to that effect). On another show he passed out verbal "orchids" to those groups whom he agreed with and "onions" to those he didn't. And here's the kicker: Falwell started Moral Majority in the first place at the behest of a Nixon/Goldwater era fundraiser to add to his direct-mail empire, so in one sense he already was compromised. He may have been very nice in person, but he will always be remembered as a polarizing person -- because that's what brought the money in. And as I mentioned above, five years ago he directly insulted Jim Wallis.

by: Nathan4U

08-27-2009 @ 10:27am

Truth2Power,

I believe you owe me $20. Under the terms of our little agreement, anything would have sufficed. An ounce of mercy, a scintilla of compassion, even the slightest acknowledgment from Blue that a political enemy could actually be a decent, principled person or (and this was a long shot, I'll admit) that our faith demands us to give people the benefit of the doubt rather than rushing to judgment on second and third hand reports (or something to that effect).

Blue,

I knew you wouldnt let me down.

. . . and thanks for the onions! I'll send them to T2P so ha can make onion soup :- )

by: Nathan4U

08-27-2009 @ 10:27am

Truth2Power,

I believe you owe me $20. Under the terms of our little agreement, anything would have sufficed. An ounce of mercy, a scintilla of compassion, even the slightest acknowledgment from Blue that a political enemy could actually be a decent, principled person or (and this was a long shot, I'll admit) that our faith demands us to give people the benefit of the doubt rather than rushing to judgment on second and third hand reports (or something to that effect).

Blue,

I knew you wouldnt let me down.

. . . and thanks for the onions! I'll send them to T2P so ha can make onion soup :- )

by: Truth2Power

08-27-2009 @ 10:33am

You want to try double or nothing?

by: Truth2Power

08-27-2009 @ 10:33am

You want to try double or nothing?

by: Nathan4U

08-27-2009 @ 10:36am

Truth,

You're on. I will ride this horse until you run out of money. With any luck, I'll be able to retire early.

by: Nathan4U

08-27-2009 @ 10:36am

Truth,

You're on. I will ride this horse until you run out of money. With any luck, I'll be able to retire early.

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 12:28pm

Unfortunately, I've seen way, way too many first-hand reports of Falwell's
lack of charity toward people who don't see things his way. Besides, as
mentioned in another thread, the problem is that we often see people as "all
good" or "all bad" because that's easy to do; however, at some point you paint
yourself into a corner. You see, God calls us to repentance, which is never
an easy thing; FWIW, I already knew that he had renounced his segregationist
past, but conservative ideology is still seen, for some very good historical
reasons, as fundamentally racist (which is where that student was going with
the question).

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 12:28pm

Unfortunately, I've seen way, way too many first-hand reports of Falwell's
lack of charity toward people who don't see things his way. Besides, as
mentioned in another thread, the problem is that we often see people as "all
good" or "all bad" because that's easy to do; however, at some point you paint
yourself into a corner. You see, God calls us to repentance, which is never
an easy thing; FWIW, I already knew that he had renounced his segregationist
past, but conservative ideology is still seen, for some very good historical
reasons, as fundamentally racist (which is where that student was going with
the question).

by: nuclearferret

08-27-2009 @ 6:16pm

So Kennedy gets invited BY Rev. Falwell, and Kennedy is the bridge builder? I guess this is bizarro world. But you're right, Edward Kennedy never regularly blasted anyone he opposed.

by: nuclearferret

08-27-2009 @ 6:16pm

So Kennedy gets invited BY Rev. Falwell, and Kennedy is the bridge builder? I guess this is bizarro world. But you're right, Edward Kennedy never regularly blasted anyone he opposed.

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 7:13pm

My point that it wasn't completely out of the blue -- Kennedy actually sent back an application, which he received by mistake, to join Moral Majority, which is how he ended up being invited in the first place.

by: BlueDeacon

08-27-2009 @ 7:13pm

My point that it wasn't completely out of the blue -- Kennedy actually sent back an application, which he received by mistake, to join Moral Majority, which is how he ended up being invited in the first place.

by: university

10-28-2009 @ 3:33pm

Thanks for the great reading, college videos . I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.

by: university

10-28-2009 @ 3:33pm

Thanks for the great reading, college videos . I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.

by: university

10-28-2009 @ 3:35pm

Thanks for the great reading,Great Posting,I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.
http://www.universityloveconnection.com/

by: university

10-28-2009 @ 3:35pm

Thanks for the great reading,Great Posting,I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.
http://www.universityloveconnection.com/

by: Eastern Oregon University

10-28-2009 @ 5:35pm

Thanks for the great reading,Great Posting,I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.
http://www.universityloveconnection.com/

by: Eastern Oregon University

10-28-2009 @ 5:35pm

Thanks for the great reading,Great Posting,I will pass this on to our ira clients to read.
http://www.universityloveconnection.com/

by: Eugene Spammer

09-13-2011 @ 2:46pm

Ted's ecumenical approach ("can't we all just get along?") sounds all warm and fuzzy but I'd have greater admiration for him had he taken on these theocrats instead of pandering to them. Even as Kennedy proclaims that our freedom depends on a separation of church and state, he undermines his message with historical nonsense.He says that the American Revolution was fought to create, John Winthrop's "city upon a hill." Hardly. Winthrop's "city upon a hill" was a Puritan theocracy modeled on Calvinism. It would be like saying the American revolution was designed to turn America into Liberty University, a place where doctrinal Christianity and the inerrancy of the bible is the law, where religious and political dissent is not permitted, where scientific inquiry is scorned and this world is regarded as a mere proving ground for the apocolyptic end of days. City upon a hill? Sounds like hell on earth. IT Support London