Get E-Mail Updates

A Jewish-American Advocate Against the Injustice of Occupation

090909-anna-balzerJust the basic facts about Anna Baltzer make her a provocative presence. She's a 30-year-old Jewish-American woman who is arguing passionately for justice for Palestinians.

But she mixes her passion with a crisp description of life in the Occupied Territories of Gaza and the West Bank, a story of personal transformation, and a disarming charm. She is crisscrossing the country to make the case not only for a better future for the Palestinians but also for active non-violent resistance as a way to achieve that. She is doing this on her own, although she is allied with a number of groups that share her viewpoint.

Baltzer argues that the Israeli government policies in the occupied territories run counter "to the tradition of social justice that has been the pride of many Jewish people, including myself." She acknowledges the fears in Israel from Palestinian terrorist acts over the years, but says the politics of Israel have played to those fears over ideals.

090909-separation-wallHer description of occupation is familiar to those who have followed the Middle East saga in recent years: Israeli settlements dot the landscape in the Palestinian West Bank. A separate system of roads in the West Bank segregate Israelis and Palestinians. Israeli army checkpoints throughout the West Bank make movement to work, schools, clinics and hospitals very difficult for Palestinians. A separation barrier being built along the 425-mile line between Israel and Palestine often snakes into Palestinian lands.

In the U.S. -- Israel's primary political and financial backer since its creation in 1948 -- there has been little room in political dialogue for a defense of the Palestinians. The transformation Baltzer went through, however, is similar to what is happening on a broader scale in this country, although hers is distinctive because of her own heritage.

Her grandmother fled Europe and most of her family was killed in the Nazi Holocaust. She saw Israel as the safe haven for Jews in the future.

When Baltzer went to Turkey to teach English in 2002, she accepted that understanding of Israel as a safe haven. As she traveled around the Middle East, she began to hear the stories of the Palestinians displaced by the creation of Israel and then of Israel's treatment of Palestinians in the occupied territories. What she heard was at odds with how she thought the world should be.

As a volunteer with the International Women's Peace Service, she went to the West Bank to document human rights abuses. She took photos, wrote a book, Witness in Palestine, and for the last few years, has been speaking full-time about the conditions in the West Bank. She has been trying to inspire people to take action to change U.S. policies that might in turn change Israeli policies.

Last week, she was in the Madison, Wisconsin, area talking to service clubs, church groups, and students; she reached nearly 1,000 people in person, plus more through radio interviews. She found not only receptivity to her viewpoint, but also people interested in knowing what they could do.

That's the point for her -- to get people involved as well as informed. "The goal is not sympathy," she says. "It's change. Palestinians don't need more people feeling sorry for them. They need people to take action."

She offers simple steps -- learning about the situation, supporting groups working for change like Five for Palestine and the American Association for Palestinian Equal Rights, maybe even visiting Israel and Palestine, and certainly contacting members of Congress.

In some ways, Baltzer personifies the small shifts in the political landscape over the situation in Israel and Palestine. She certainly gets plenty of heat from the more-established Jewish groups in this country, but her own movement -- from unquestioning support for Israel, to skepticism of what the Israeli and U.S. governments are doing, to a willingness to push for an end to occupation -- forms a familiar pattern in the growing pressure for change in the untenable status quo in the Middle East.

Phil Haslanger is pastor at Memorial United Church of Christ in Fitchburg, Wisconsin. His e-mail is phaslanger@gmail.com. Learn more about Anna Balzer at www.annainthemiddleeast.com.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: kansasmennonite

09-09-2009 @ 11:49pm

I alwasy felt a little uneasy when I heard at my home church (and every conservative religious program since) that Israel was to be protected or God would not protect us. I'm glad I've found that religious people here and in the Mennonite USA conference that "generally" we don't believe that modern Israel is God's people as found in the Bible. They need to be praised when due and rebuked when due.

by: squeaky

09-10-2009 @ 2:31pm

Yah, den. Your point vould haff had more impact, den, iff you vould haff written it all in dere Norvegian script. don'tcha know, den. Uffda. Ya, ya betcha.

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 12:42am

But, there they are.

by: kansasmennonite

09-10-2009 @ 12:47am

And they keep bulding!

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 12:51am

What do you expect them to do? They are growing.

by: kansasmennonite

09-10-2009 @ 1:11am

Tell me what you think John. Should we give loyal support to Israel just because the Jews are God's chosen in Bible times?

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 9:23am

Yes. That's not to say we need to support them in everything, but as a
general rule, yes.

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 9:31am

Yes. That does not mean they are above criticism, but as a general principle, yes.

by: squeaky

09-10-2009 @ 2:31pm

Yah, den. Your point vould haff had more impact, den, iff you vould haff written it all in dere Norvegian script. don'tcha know, den. Uffda. Ya, ya betcha.

by: bvo

09-12-2009 @ 8:51pm

While it is true that Palestinians were offered a share of (their own) land and water, that share has been dwindling since 1948 because of the conflict and ongoing Israeli encroachment. It has also been reported that Arafat was offered a good deal (under the reconciliation efforts of then-President Clingon) and he walked away. But, in fact, it was not a good deal. Although the percentage of land "offered" to the Palestinians was reportedly a decent amount, it was chopped up into virtual cantons (some use the term swiss cheese) which would have not made possible a viable and contingent country. Anna Baltzer had an excellent map produced by an independent sourse that showed the current landscape of Israel and Palestine - with Israeli settlements IN Palestinian land and Israeli-only roads slicing up the countryside, it does look a lot like swiss cheese!!

Yes, both sides must make some concessions but there needs to be a better sense of what would make it a viable solution.

Thank you Phil and Anna for your reasoned and justice-seeking telling of the story.

by: bvo

09-12-2009 @ 6:51pm

While it is true that Palestinians were offered a share of (their own) land and water, that share has been dwindling since 1948 because of the conflict and ongoing Israeli encroachment. It has also been reported that Arafat was offered a good deal (under the reconciliation efforts of then-President Clingon) and he walked away. But, in fact, it was not a good deal. Although the percentage of land "offered" to the Palestinians was reportedly a decent amount, it was chopped up into virtual cantons (some use the term swiss cheese) which would have not made possible a viable and contingent country. Anna Baltzer had an excellent map produced by an independent sourse that showed the current landscape of Israel and Palestine - with Israeli settlements IN Palestinian land and Israeli-only roads slicing up the countryside, it does look a lot like swiss cheese!!

Yes, both sides must make some concessions but there needs to be a better sense of what would make it a viable solution.

Thank you Phil and Anna for your reasoned and justice-seeking telling of the story.

by: bvo

09-12-2009 @ 6:51pm

While it is true that Palestinians were offered a share of (their own) land and water, that share has been dwindling since 1948 because of the conflict and ongoing Israeli encroachment. It has also been reported that Arafat was offered a good deal (under the reconciliation efforts of then-President Clingon) and he walked away. But, in fact, it was not a good deal. Although the percentage of land "offered" to the Palestinians was reportedly a decent amount, it was chopped up into virtual cantons (some use the term swiss cheese) which would have not made possible a viable and contingent country. Anna Baltzer had an excellent map produced by an independent sourse that showed the current landscape of Israel and Palestine - with Israeli settlements IN Palestinian land and Israeli-only roads slicing up the countryside, it does look a lot like swiss cheese!!

Yes, both sides must make some concessions but there needs to be a better sense of what would make it a viable solution.

Thank you Phil and Anna for your reasoned and justice-seeking telling of the story.

by: bvo

09-12-2009 @ 8:51pm

While it is true that Palestinians were offered a share of (their own) land and water, that share has been dwindling since 1948 because of the conflict and ongoing Israeli encroachment. It has also been reported that Arafat was offered a good deal (under the reconciliation efforts of then-President Clingon) and he walked away. But, in fact, it was not a good deal. Although the percentage of land "offered" to the Palestinians was reportedly a decent amount, it was chopped up into virtual cantons (some use the term swiss cheese) which would have not made possible a viable and contingent country. Anna Baltzer had an excellent map produced by an independent sourse that showed the current landscape of Israel and Palestine - with Israeli settlements IN Palestinian land and Israeli-only roads slicing up the countryside, it does look a lot like swiss cheese!!

Yes, both sides must make some concessions but there needs to be a better sense of what would make it a viable solution.

Thank you Phil and Anna for your reasoned and justice-seeking telling of the story.

by: jazzact13

09-09-2009 @ 4:21pm

--That's the point for her

by: squeaky

09-09-2009 @ 5:40pm

"But first, it would be good if the Palestinians themselves would take action. "

We have a lot of four-way stops in the town I live in. That would be OK if people in this town knew how to proceed through one (and if we weren't all friendly Norwegian Minnesotans). Instead, when two people arrive at the same time, we get this "you go first""no, you""no, you""no, really, you" "no, I insist. you" phenomenon. No one goes first, each waits for the other to go with the end result being no one goes at all.

True, someone must go first. Whether it is the Israelis or Palestinians, I could care less. As long as someone just takes the initiative and goes. Otherwise, they will be sitting at that crossroad forever.

by: ando

09-09-2009 @ 9:56pm

Of course, yah don't vant two vehicles takin' off at the same time either....said one of dem friendly Norvegians from a neighboring state.

I read a Leon Uris book -- can't recall the title -- that takes place in Palestine, 1948. It's decidedly pro-Israeli, but if there's a grain of truth in it, the Palestinians were offered a share of the land and water, but their leaders were so vehemently anti-Jewish -- even though the general population wasn't -- that all they wanted was blood. I've always been amazed that a nation of 6 million has been able to survive for so long surrounded by so many enemies.

by: kansasmennonite

09-09-2009 @ 11:49pm

I alwasy felt a little uneasy when I heard at my home church (and every conservative religious program since) that Israel was to be protected or God would not protect us. I'm glad I've found that religious people here and in the Mennonite USA conference that "generally" we don't believe that modern Israel is God's people as found in the Bible. They need to be praised when due and rebuked when due.

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 12:42am

But, there they are.

by: jazzact13

09-09-2009 @ 4:21pm

--That's the point for her

by: kansasmennonite

09-10-2009 @ 12:47am

And they keep bulding!

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 12:51am

What do you expect them to do? They are growing.

by: kansasmennonite

09-10-2009 @ 1:11am

Tell me what you think John. Should we give loyal support to Israel just because the Jews are God's chosen in Bible times?

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 9:23am

Yes. That's not to say we need to support them in everything, but as a
general rule, yes.

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 9:31am

Yes. That does not mean they are above criticism, but as a general principle, yes.

by: squeaky

09-09-2009 @ 5:40pm

"But first, it would be good if the Palestinians themselves would take action. "

We have a lot of four-way stops in the town I live in. That would be OK if people in this town knew how to proceed through one (and if we weren't all friendly Norwegian Minnesotans). Instead, when two people arrive at the same time, we get this "you go first""no, you""no, you""no, really, you" "no, I insist. you" phenomenon. No one goes first, each waits for the other to go with the end result being no one goes at all.

True, someone must go first. Whether it is the Israelis or Palestinians, I could care less. As long as someone just takes the initiative and goes. Otherwise, they will be sitting at that crossroad forever.

by: ando

09-09-2009 @ 9:56pm

Of course, yah don't vant two vehicles takin' off at the same time either....said one of dem friendly Norvegians from a neighboring state.

I read a Leon Uris book -- can't recall the title -- that takes place in Palestine, 1948. It's decidedly pro-Israeli, but if there's a grain of truth in it, the Palestinians were offered a share of the land and water, but their leaders were so vehemently anti-Jewish -- even though the general population wasn't -- that all they wanted was blood. I've always been amazed that a nation of 6 million has been able to survive for so long surrounded by so many enemies.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: jazzact13

09-09-2009 @ 4:21pm

--That's the point for her

by: jazzact13

09-09-2009 @ 4:21pm

--That's the point for her

by: squeaky

09-09-2009 @ 5:40pm

"But first, it would be good if the Palestinians themselves would take action. "

We have a lot of four-way stops in the town I live in. That would be OK if people in this town knew how to proceed through one (and if we weren't all friendly Norwegian Minnesotans). Instead, when two people arrive at the same time, we get this "you go first""no, you""no, you""no, really, you" "no, I insist. you" phenomenon. No one goes first, each waits for the other to go with the end result being no one goes at all.

True, someone must go first. Whether it is the Israelis or Palestinians, I could care less. As long as someone just takes the initiative and goes. Otherwise, they will be sitting at that crossroad forever.

by: squeaky

09-09-2009 @ 5:40pm

"But first, it would be good if the Palestinians themselves would take action. "

We have a lot of four-way stops in the town I live in. That would be OK if people in this town knew how to proceed through one (and if we weren't all friendly Norwegian Minnesotans). Instead, when two people arrive at the same time, we get this "you go first""no, you""no, you""no, really, you" "no, I insist. you" phenomenon. No one goes first, each waits for the other to go with the end result being no one goes at all.

True, someone must go first. Whether it is the Israelis or Palestinians, I could care less. As long as someone just takes the initiative and goes. Otherwise, they will be sitting at that crossroad forever.

by: ando

09-09-2009 @ 9:56pm

Of course, yah don't vant two vehicles takin' off at the same time either....said one of dem friendly Norvegians from a neighboring state.

I read a Leon Uris book -- can't recall the title -- that takes place in Palestine, 1948. It's decidedly pro-Israeli, but if there's a grain of truth in it, the Palestinians were offered a share of the land and water, but their leaders were so vehemently anti-Jewish -- even though the general population wasn't -- that all they wanted was blood. I've always been amazed that a nation of 6 million has been able to survive for so long surrounded by so many enemies.

by: ando

09-09-2009 @ 9:56pm

Of course, yah don't vant two vehicles takin' off at the same time either....said one of dem friendly Norvegians from a neighboring state.

I read a Leon Uris book -- can't recall the title -- that takes place in Palestine, 1948. It's decidedly pro-Israeli, but if there's a grain of truth in it, the Palestinians were offered a share of the land and water, but their leaders were so vehemently anti-Jewish -- even though the general population wasn't -- that all they wanted was blood. I've always been amazed that a nation of 6 million has been able to survive for so long surrounded by so many enemies.

by: kansasmennonite

09-09-2009 @ 11:49pm

I alwasy felt a little uneasy when I heard at my home church (and every conservative religious program since) that Israel was to be protected or God would not protect us. I'm glad I've found that religious people here and in the Mennonite USA conference that "generally" we don't believe that modern Israel is God's people as found in the Bible. They need to be praised when due and rebuked when due.

by: kansasmennonite

09-09-2009 @ 11:49pm

I alwasy felt a little uneasy when I heard at my home church (and every conservative religious program since) that Israel was to be protected or God would not protect us. I'm glad I've found that religious people here and in the Mennonite USA conference that "generally" we don't believe that modern Israel is God's people as found in the Bible. They need to be praised when due and rebuked when due.

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 12:42am

But, there they are.

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 12:42am

But, there they are.

by: kansasmennonite

09-10-2009 @ 12:47am

And they keep bulding!

by: kansasmennonite

09-10-2009 @ 12:47am

And they keep bulding!

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 12:51am

What do you expect them to do? They are growing.

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 12:51am

What do you expect them to do? They are growing.

by: kansasmennonite

09-10-2009 @ 1:11am

Tell me what you think John. Should we give loyal support to Israel just because the Jews are God's chosen in Bible times?

by: kansasmennonite

09-10-2009 @ 1:11am

Tell me what you think John. Should we give loyal support to Israel just because the Jews are God's chosen in Bible times?

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 9:23am

Yes. That's not to say we need to support them in everything, but as a
general rule, yes.

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 9:23am

Yes. That's not to say we need to support them in everything, but as a
general rule, yes.

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 9:31am

Yes. That does not mean they are above criticism, but as a general principle, yes.

by: JohnH54

09-10-2009 @ 9:31am

Yes. That does not mean they are above criticism, but as a general principle, yes.

by: squeaky

09-10-2009 @ 2:31pm

Yah, den. Your point vould haff had more impact, den, iff you vould haff written it all in dere Norvegian script. don'tcha know, den. Uffda. Ya, ya betcha.

by: squeaky

09-10-2009 @ 2:31pm

Yah, den. Your point vould haff had more impact, den, iff you vould haff written it all in dere Norvegian script. don'tcha know, den. Uffda. Ya, ya betcha.

by: bvo

09-12-2009 @ 6:51pm

While it is true that Palestinians were offered a share of (their own) land and water, that share has been dwindling since 1948 because of the conflict and ongoing Israeli encroachment. It has also been reported that Arafat was offered a good deal (under the reconciliation efforts of then-President Clingon) and he walked away. But, in fact, it was not a good deal. Although the percentage of land "offered" to the Palestinians was reportedly a decent amount, it was chopped up into virtual cantons (some use the term swiss cheese) which would have not made possible a viable and contingent country. Anna Baltzer had an excellent map produced by an independent sourse that showed the current landscape of Israel and Palestine - with Israeli settlements IN Palestinian land and Israeli-only roads slicing up the countryside, it does look a lot like swiss cheese!!

Yes, both sides must make some concessions but there needs to be a better sense of what would make it a viable solution.

Thank you Phil and Anna for your reasoned and justice-seeking telling of the story.

by: bvo

09-12-2009 @ 6:51pm

While it is true that Palestinians were offered a share of (their own) land and water, that share has been dwindling since 1948 because of the conflict and ongoing Israeli encroachment. It has also been reported that Arafat was offered a good deal (under the reconciliation efforts of then-President Clingon) and he walked away. But, in fact, it was not a good deal. Although the percentage of land "offered" to the Palestinians was reportedly a decent amount, it was chopped up into virtual cantons (some use the term swiss cheese) which would have not made possible a viable and contingent country. Anna Baltzer had an excellent map produced by an independent sourse that showed the current landscape of Israel and Palestine - with Israeli settlements IN Palestinian land and Israeli-only roads slicing up the countryside, it does look a lot like swiss cheese!!

Yes, both sides must make some concessions but there needs to be a better sense of what would make it a viable solution.

Thank you Phil and Anna for your reasoned and justice-seeking telling of the story.

by: bvo

09-12-2009 @ 8:51pm

While it is true that Palestinians were offered a share of (their own) land and water, that share has been dwindling since 1948 because of the conflict and ongoing Israeli encroachment. It has also been reported that Arafat was offered a good deal (under the reconciliation efforts of then-President Clingon) and he walked away. But, in fact, it was not a good deal. Although the percentage of land "offered" to the Palestinians was reportedly a decent amount, it was chopped up into virtual cantons (some use the term swiss cheese) which would have not made possible a viable and contingent country. Anna Baltzer had an excellent map produced by an independent sourse that showed the current landscape of Israel and Palestine - with Israeli settlements IN Palestinian land and Israeli-only roads slicing up the countryside, it does look a lot like swiss cheese!!

Yes, both sides must make some concessions but there needs to be a better sense of what would make it a viable solution.

Thank you Phil and Anna for your reasoned and justice-seeking telling of the story.

by: bvo

09-12-2009 @ 8:51pm

While it is true that Palestinians were offered a share of (their own) land and water, that share has been dwindling since 1948 because of the conflict and ongoing Israeli encroachment. It has also been reported that Arafat was offered a good deal (under the reconciliation efforts of then-President Clingon) and he walked away. But, in fact, it was not a good deal. Although the percentage of land "offered" to the Palestinians was reportedly a decent amount, it was chopped up into virtual cantons (some use the term swiss cheese) which would have not made possible a viable and contingent country. Anna Baltzer had an excellent map produced by an independent sourse that showed the current landscape of Israel and Palestine - with Israeli settlements IN Palestinian land and Israeli-only roads slicing up the countryside, it does look a lot like swiss cheese!!

Yes, both sides must make some concessions but there needs to be a better sense of what would make it a viable solution.

Thank you Phil and Anna for your reasoned and justice-seeking telling of the story.