Get E-Mail Updates

Don't Isolate Gender from the Biblical Big Picture

The gender discussion in the church today is captured succinctly by New Testament scholar Gordon Fee in Listening to the Spirit in the Text. He writes:

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Perhaps the worst thing the evangelical tradition has done on gender matters is to isolate them from the bigger picture of biblical theology. Indeed, I think we are destined for continual trouble if we do not start where Paul does: not with isolated statements addressed to contingent situations, but with Paul's theology of the new creation, the coming of God's eschatological rule inaugurated by Christ -- especially through his death and resurrection -- and the gift of the Spirit.

Paul's theology of a new creation is a baptismal theology, Fee suggests. Because Christ died and rose again, as we "assume our own role in that death and resurrection" (Romans 6:3-10), we are clothed in Christ, that we "might walk in newness of life" (Romans 6:4). As our sins are appropriated to Christ, he dies on our behalf and we thus receive a spiritual rebirth -- a new life fueled by the Holy Spirit (p. 57).

Unlike the old life, which was governed by the flesh with its hatred of difference and its oppression of "other," our newness of life in Christ embraces unity. It creates oneness between groups of people who were enemies before their rebirth in Christ (Jews and Greeks), or whose relationships were characterized by prejudice, exclusion, and oppression (e.g. males and females, slaves and free). This welcome and reconciliation of all people in Christ, by the power of the Holy Spirit, attracted significant numbers of slaves, women, and Gentiles to the gospel. They not only became Christians, but they also occupied all levels of service and leadership in the church. As the focus of human significance shifted from the world's values to those esteemed by Christ, change could occur. As Fee notes, the "all-embracing nature of this affirmation, its counter-cultural significance, the fact that it equally disadvantages all by equally advantaging all -- these stab at the very heart of a culture sustained by people maintaining right and position" (p. 61).

How does our newness of life as God's people impact gender, class, or ethnic relations? The answer is seen not by assessing the limitations Paul places on those women who domineered over men in 1 Timothy 2:11-12, or those women who were distracting worship in 1 Corinthians 14:34, but by the numerous biblical accounts of Christ's newness of life active in women's shared leadership and service with men. Romans 16 is but one example of the gospel's social impact as it redeems human relations within the church. Here we note the vast number of women, slaves, and Gentiles who served the church as leaders. Those who believe that women are excluded from positions of leadership are reading scripture through isolated passages and miss the inauguration of Christ's kingdom, which thankfully cannot be stopped.

Mimi Haddad

Mimi Haddad is president of Christians for Biblical Equality.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: RachelK

09-23-2009 @ 6:26pm

vinzclortho,
No offense but, woman o woman, what planet do you live on? Sexism is no more erased from the church -- let alone the culture -- than racism is. Even those of us who agree with Ms Haddad can benefit from her well-thought expositions, not only in our own thinking but also (especially) in encounters with those who miss the point of the Gospel for the sake of keeping women in their place. I am grateful for her voice of sanity every time I read her blog.

by: kansasmennonite

09-23-2009 @ 9:42pm

Hopefully, someone from my home church will read this article and change their heart on women. They just voted to prevent women from teaching high school age on up classes when men (or boys at the high school level)
are present!

by: vinzclortho

09-23-2009 @ 5:49pm

Dear Mimi,
You are a good writer and I think just about everyone who reads this blog (hopefully) is in full agreement with your stand on Biblical (gender) equality. But man o man, you are beating a dead horse. The point has been made, very well and very repeatedly. Are you preaching to the converted?

by: RachelK

09-23-2009 @ 6:26pm

vinzclortho,
No offense but, woman o woman, what planet do you live on? Sexism is no more erased from the church -- let alone the culture -- than racism is. Even those of us who agree with Ms Haddad can benefit from her well-thought expositions, not only in our own thinking but also (especially) in encounters with those who miss the point of the Gospel for the sake of keeping women in their place. I am grateful for her voice of sanity every time I read her blog.

by: SisterMarie

09-24-2009 @ 9:21am

Mimi,

Thanks for your post. I would encourage you to continue beating this horse until it is really dead and buried. You have identified an issue in which fundamentalists of all faiths are united - the unequal treatment of women.

by: kansasmennonite

09-24-2009 @ 10:06am

Sis, I don't think you meant fundamentalists did you? Did you not read my post on my fundamentalist home church? There's not a lot of difference between fundamentalist christian and muslim and we know how the muslims treat women. (some exageration there but you get the point)

by: kansasmennonite

09-23-2009 @ 9:42pm

Hopefully, someone from my home church will read this article and change their heart on women. They just voted to prevent women from teaching high school age on up classes when men (or boys at the high school level)
are present!

by: SisterMarie

09-24-2009 @ 11:17am

Sorry that my point was not clear. What I meant to say was that both groups are committed to the unequal treatment of women. I'm not optimistic that this problem will be rectified in my lifetime, but hopefully at some point into the future, gender equality will be recognized by all Christians.

by: SisterMarie

09-24-2009 @ 9:21am

Mimi,

Thanks for your post. I would encourage you to continue beating this horse until it is really dead and buried. You have identified an issue in which fundamentalists of all faiths are united - the unequal treatment of women.

by: kansasmennonite

09-24-2009 @ 10:06am

Sis, I don't think you meant fundamentalists did you? Did you not read my post on my fundamentalist home church? There's not a lot of difference between fundamentalist christian and muslim and we know how the muslims treat women. (some exageration there but you get the point)

by: SisterMarie

09-24-2009 @ 11:17am

Sorry that my point was not clear. What I meant to say was that both groups are committed to the unequal treatment of women. I'm not optimistic that this problem will be rectified in my lifetime, but hopefully at some point into the future, gender equality will be recognized by all Christians.

by: Beevo

09-24-2009 @ 6:51pm

You might also ask,"how does our new life in Christ impact our view of sexual orirentation and our acceptance of Gays and Lesbians?"

by: Beevo

09-24-2009 @ 6:51pm

You might also ask,"how does our new life in Christ impact our view of sexual orirentation and our acceptance of Gays and Lesbians?"

by: Gentle Lamb

09-26-2009 @ 3:51pm

Paul had a real problems with women. He did not like them. Reminds me of Gay men.
http://www.psa91.com

by: gentlelamb

09-26-2009 @ 1:51pm

Paul had a real problems with women. He did not like them. Reminds me of Gay men.
http://www.psa91.com

by: gentlelamb

09-26-2009 @ 1:51pm

Paul had a real problems with women. He did not like them. Reminds me of Gay men.
http://www.psa91.com

by: Gentle Lamb

09-26-2009 @ 3:51pm

Paul had a real problems with women. He did not like them. Reminds me of Gay men.
http://www.psa91.com

by: vinzclortho

09-23-2009 @ 5:49pm

Dear Mimi,
You are a good writer and I think just about everyone who reads this blog (hopefully) is in full agreement with your stand on Biblical (gender) equality. But man o man, you are beating a dead horse. The point has been made, very well and very repeatedly. Are you preaching to the converted?

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: vinzclortho

09-23-2009 @ 5:49pm

Dear Mimi,
You are a good writer and I think just about everyone who reads this blog (hopefully) is in full agreement with your stand on Biblical (gender) equality. But man o man, you are beating a dead horse. The point has been made, very well and very repeatedly. Are you preaching to the converted?

by: vinzclortho

09-23-2009 @ 5:49pm

Dear Mimi,
You are a good writer and I think just about everyone who reads this blog (hopefully) is in full agreement with your stand on Biblical (gender) equality. But man o man, you are beating a dead horse. The point has been made, very well and very repeatedly. Are you preaching to the converted?

by: RachelK

09-23-2009 @ 6:26pm

vinzclortho,
No offense but, woman o woman, what planet do you live on? Sexism is no more erased from the church -- let alone the culture -- than racism is. Even those of us who agree with Ms Haddad can benefit from her well-thought expositions, not only in our own thinking but also (especially) in encounters with those who miss the point of the Gospel for the sake of keeping women in their place. I am grateful for her voice of sanity every time I read her blog.

by: RachelK

09-23-2009 @ 6:26pm

vinzclortho,
No offense but, woman o woman, what planet do you live on? Sexism is no more erased from the church -- let alone the culture -- than racism is. Even those of us who agree with Ms Haddad can benefit from her well-thought expositions, not only in our own thinking but also (especially) in encounters with those who miss the point of the Gospel for the sake of keeping women in their place. I am grateful for her voice of sanity every time I read her blog.

by: kansasmennonite

09-23-2009 @ 9:42pm

Hopefully, someone from my home church will read this article and change their heart on women. They just voted to prevent women from teaching high school age on up classes when men (or boys at the high school level)
are present!

by: kansasmennonite

09-23-2009 @ 9:42pm

Hopefully, someone from my home church will read this article and change their heart on women. They just voted to prevent women from teaching high school age on up classes when men (or boys at the high school level)
are present!

by: SisterMarie

09-24-2009 @ 9:21am

Mimi,

Thanks for your post. I would encourage you to continue beating this horse until it is really dead and buried. You have identified an issue in which fundamentalists of all faiths are united - the unequal treatment of women.

by: SisterMarie

09-24-2009 @ 9:21am

Mimi,

Thanks for your post. I would encourage you to continue beating this horse until it is really dead and buried. You have identified an issue in which fundamentalists of all faiths are united - the unequal treatment of women.

by: kansasmennonite

09-24-2009 @ 10:06am

Sis, I don't think you meant fundamentalists did you? Did you not read my post on my fundamentalist home church? There's not a lot of difference between fundamentalist christian and muslim and we know how the muslims treat women. (some exageration there but you get the point)

by: kansasmennonite

09-24-2009 @ 10:06am

Sis, I don't think you meant fundamentalists did you? Did you not read my post on my fundamentalist home church? There's not a lot of difference between fundamentalist christian and muslim and we know how the muslims treat women. (some exageration there but you get the point)

by: SisterMarie

09-24-2009 @ 11:17am

Sorry that my point was not clear. What I meant to say was that both groups are committed to the unequal treatment of women. I'm not optimistic that this problem will be rectified in my lifetime, but hopefully at some point into the future, gender equality will be recognized by all Christians.

by: SisterMarie

09-24-2009 @ 11:17am

Sorry that my point was not clear. What I meant to say was that both groups are committed to the unequal treatment of women. I'm not optimistic that this problem will be rectified in my lifetime, but hopefully at some point into the future, gender equality will be recognized by all Christians.

by: Beevo

09-24-2009 @ 6:51pm

You might also ask,"how does our new life in Christ impact our view of sexual orirentation and our acceptance of Gays and Lesbians?"

by: Beevo

09-24-2009 @ 6:51pm

You might also ask,"how does our new life in Christ impact our view of sexual orirentation and our acceptance of Gays and Lesbians?"

by: gentlelamb

09-26-2009 @ 1:51pm

Paul had a real problems with women. He did not like them. Reminds me of Gay men.
http://www.psa91.com

by: gentlelamb

09-26-2009 @ 1:51pm

Paul had a real problems with women. He did not like them. Reminds me of Gay men.
http://www.psa91.com

by: Gentle Lamb

09-26-2009 @ 3:51pm

Paul had a real problems with women. He did not like them. Reminds me of Gay men.
http://www.psa91.com

by: Gentle Lamb

09-26-2009 @ 3:51pm

Paul had a real problems with women. He did not like them. Reminds me of Gay men.
http://www.psa91.com