Get E-Mail Updates

Confronting Urban Violence with Jesus' Nonviolence

This morning as I was running on the treadmill, I was also watching CNN. A story came on about a shooting in Washington, D.C. The police chief was speaking, with the mayor of D.C looking on. She stated, "people are just ready for acts like this to stop." I didn't get a chance to see who was involved in this latest incident of urban violence, but it led me to reflect on the violent acts committed in my own city of Minneapolis involving young African-Americans in most cases. This statement raises the question, "How do we stop the violence in our inner-cities?"

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

On one level we must address this issue from the standpoint of individual responsibility. As the primary means for solving conflict, churches and other ministries must develop ministry initiatives that deal head-on with the issue of violence. Peace and nonviolence cannot be seen as an outdated strategy of hippies and those who participated in the part of the civil rights movement directed by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Many young people in the city lack a strategy free of violence to deal with loss, anger, stress, and not being able to have what they want immediately. Ministries to children, youth, and families must contain initiatives for conflict resolution rooted in the teachings of Jesus.

Jesus has something to say in Matthew chapters 5-7 about conflict resolution and specifically on how to deal with enemies. These biblical principles must be contextualized for today. We can also look at chapter 3 of 1 John. By pointing back to the story of Cain and Abel in this chapter, John reminds us what happens if our souls are not being driven by the love of God. What led to Cain killing his own brother is today at the root of violence in the city as well as the suburbs. The lack of being filled with God's love through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit is a major factor in a person's ability to attempt to take the life of another human being. Such actions are also also easier when you don't see the other person as just as much God's beloved as you are. Sometimes the ability to attempt to take the life of another begins with not seeing oneself as the beloved of God.

The second factor that must be considered in order to deal with violence in the city is a willingness to acknowledge the realities of class and race. What is behind so much violence in the city among so many African-Americans? There is a connection among poverty, race, relationships, and violence. To deny this is to ignore some root causes that go along with individual responsibility. Inner cities are the way they are on purpose. The White Flight of the '60s and '70s played a role. The Educated Black Flight of the '80s played a role as well.

This is not a guilt trip for those in the suburbs, for I live in the suburbs myself. The issue is figuring out how to live in the suburbs and still have a heart for the city. This was the place of Nehemiah in the Old Testament. It broke his heart to know the city of Jerusalem was in ruins and he took some of the responsibility for why this was the case. We must acknowledge the systemic issues behind urban violence and take responsibility as well. Those living outside the city must take responsibility and work with those in the city to be salt and light.

Nonviolence cannot be an ancient social strategy that was just good for a season. We must raise up a generation who are able to experience "a peace that passes all understanding" so that it might "guard our hearts and minds."

Efrem Smith is the senior pastor of The Sanctuary Covenant Church, with the vision to be an urban, multi-ethnic, relevant, holistic, and Christ-centered community. He has held leadership positions in organizations such as the Boys and Girls Club of America and Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and is the author of numerous articles and books, including The Hip-Hop Church. He blogs at efremsmith.com.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: BlueDeacon

10-30-2009 @ 7:12pm

That's not where I'm going with it. The mitigating circumstances are fairly
similar in more ways than we like to admit.

by: BlueDeacon

10-30-2009 @ 5:12pm

That's not where I'm going with it. The mitigating circumstances are fairly
similar in more ways than we like to admit.

by: BlueDeacon

10-30-2009 @ 5:12pm

That's not where I'm going with it. The mitigating circumstances are fairly
similar in more ways than we like to admit.

by: Jesdisciple

10-27-2009 @ 5:06pm

Thanks for the article. While I strongly disagree with other readers about political solutions to these problems, I cannot imagine anyone but a blatant racist (or just a general bigot) opposing voluntary charity. I have a personal battle to fight against my own introversion, but I hope raw pride is not also a hidden issue.

One of my long-held ambitions is to secure a job with decent pay and move to a slum somewhere, supporting residents in every way I can. But I have several personal issues I should solve first, including the one I mentioned above. It doesn't make any sense to be a leader of any kind if you don't get out at relate. But maybe I don't need to be the leader; maybe someone else with a more fitting personality can fill that role.

However, I don't understand Pastor Smith's perspective:
Inner cities are the way they are on purpose. The White Flight of the '60s and '70s played a role. The Educated Black Flight of the '80s played a role as well.
How is that on purpose? The members of those flights had personal reasons to leave, and they did. No one said, "Let's strip these poor people of all economy."

by: BlueDeacon

10-27-2009 @ 5:52pm

To answer your question: It became an issue of property values and resources. In the case of the former, the desirability of a neighborhood is inversely proportional to its access -- that is to say, if anyone with modest means can live someplace, the wealthy certainly won't because they see the poor as "beneath" them. And when they leave they take their financial clout with them so that the business districts suffer in the places they left behind.

That really puts the poor in a bind. A number of people blame "welfare" for their plight, but when you can't get a good job because there no longer are any in your neighborhood you start to get frustrated; if you lack your own set of wheels (to get to one) you're often screwed.

by: Jesdisciple

10-27-2009 @ 5:06pm

Thanks for the article. While I strongly disagree with other readers about political solutions to these problems, I cannot imagine anyone but a blatant racist (or just a general bigot) opposing voluntary charity. I have a personal battle to fight against my own introversion, but I hope raw pride is not also a hidden issue.

One of my long-held ambitions is to secure a job with decent pay and move to a slum somewhere, supporting residents in every way I can. But I have several personal issues I should solve first, including the one I mentioned above. It doesn't make any sense to be a leader of any kind if you don't get out at relate. But maybe I don't need to be the leader; maybe someone else with a more fitting personality can fill that role.

However, I don't understand Pastor Smith's perspective:
Inner cities are the way they are on purpose. The White Flight of the '60s and '70s played a role. The Educated Black Flight of the '80s played a role as well.
How is that on purpose? The members of those flights had personal reasons to leave, and they did. No one said, "Let's strip these poor people of all economy."

by: BlueDeacon

10-27-2009 @ 5:52pm

To answer your question: It became an issue of property values and resources. In the case of the former, the desirability of a neighborhood is inversely proportional to its access -- that is to say, if anyone with modest means can live someplace, the wealthy certainly won't because they see the poor as "beneath" them. And when they leave they take their financial clout with them so that the business districts suffer in the places they left behind.

That really puts the poor in a bind. A number of people blame "welfare" for their plight, but when you can't get a good job because there no longer are any in your neighborhood you start to get frustrated; if you lack your own set of wheels (to get to one) you're often screwed.

by: Jesdisciple

10-27-2009 @ 9:26pm

Eh... You don't think they ran from the violent crime of the area? (White-collar crime would introduce a pharisaic element...)

by: BlueDeacon

10-27-2009 @ 9:31pm

Originally, no (at least, the whites who left didn't). The violence didn't begin until later.

by: ando

10-27-2009 @ 10:28pm

I am heartened by Brother Efrem's balanced approach and view of this profound problem. Too many on the Left see all sin as structural or societal, while those on the Right see sin as essentially personal. We need to view this problem as multi-faceted and complex.
Over the past two years I've had close to a dozen African-Americans in my fifth grade classroom (The great majority have been Latino). I don't think there's been one of the 12 who lives in a two-parent family. When I occasionally ride the bus to work often times there are MF-bombs thrown out like it's part of normal speech, both by teens and occasionally adults. It all seems hopeless at times, and I often feel a great sorrow. OTOH, I am heartened by the ministries in our area that are trying to change lives, spiritually, economically and socially.

by: Jesdisciple

10-27-2009 @ 9:26pm

Eh... You don't think they ran from the violent crime of the area? (White-collar crime would introduce a pharisaic element...)

by: BlueDeacon

10-27-2009 @ 9:31pm

Originally, no (at least, the whites who left didn't). The violence didn't begin until later.

by: ando

10-27-2009 @ 10:28pm

I am heartened by Brother Efrem's balanced approach and view of this profound problem. Too many on the Left see all sin as structural or societal, while those on the Right see sin as essentially personal. We need to view this problem as multi-faceted and complex.
Over the past two years I've had close to a dozen African-Americans in my fifth grade classroom (The great majority have been Latino). I don't think there's been one of the 12 who lives in a two-parent family. When I occasionally ride the bus to work often times there are MF-bombs thrown out like it's part of normal speech, both by teens and occasionally adults. It all seems hopeless at times, and I often feel a great sorrow. OTOH, I am heartened by the ministries in our area that are trying to change lives, spiritually, economically and socially.

by: krbg

10-27-2009 @ 11:37pm

Poverty and hopelessness are what cause violent crime. Wealth and greed cause white collar crime. CEOs involved in risky derivative trading should be sentenced to living in poor urban neighborhoods as community service. That way those that prey on society equally (drug dealers and investment bank managers) can put their entrepreneurial skills to work for something good, for a change.

by: ando

10-28-2009 @ 12:13am

"Poverty and hopelessness are what cause violent crime."

Ah, but what causes poverty here in America? I'd say it's far different than the causes of poverty in Africa, Asia or Latin America.

by: krbg

10-27-2009 @ 11:37pm

Poverty and hopelessness are what cause violent crime. Wealth and greed cause white collar crime. CEOs involved in risky derivative trading should be sentenced to living in poor urban neighborhoods as community service. That way those that prey on society equally (drug dealers and investment bank managers) can put their entrepreneurial skills to work for something good, for a change.

by: kansasmennonite

10-28-2009 @ 1:02am

I hear the f bomb all the time at work. I'm here in the heartland. Unfortunately, Frank Schaeffer likes to use that word a lot also. Don't know why but he does.

by: kansasmennonite

10-28-2009 @ 1:04am

Who said on this forum that if you help someone in poverty you're a christian but if you question why they're in poverty you're labeled a communist.

by: ando

10-28-2009 @ 12:13am

"Poverty and hopelessness are what cause violent crime."

Ah, but what causes poverty here in America? I'd say it's far different than the causes of poverty in Africa, Asia or Latin America.

by: kansasmennonite

10-28-2009 @ 1:02am

I hear the f bomb all the time at work. I'm here in the heartland. Unfortunately, Frank Schaeffer likes to use that word a lot also. Don't know why but he does.

by: BlueDeacon

10-28-2009 @ 2:22am

Sounds good to me.

by: kansasmennonite

10-28-2009 @ 1:04am

Who said on this forum that if you help someone in poverty you're a christian but if you question why they're in poverty you're labeled a communist.

by: BlueDeacon

10-28-2009 @ 2:25am

I'd say it's far different than the causes of poverty in Africa, Asia or Latin America.

Not much. My pastor is fond of saying, "God is a good provider but man is a poor divider." The only real difference is that there is a higher percentage of wealthy people in this country

by: facebook-9411565

10-28-2009 @ 9:55am

Are there any recent historical instances of nonviolent responses to urban violence? I'm not up on the history of it, nor am I sure where to begin looking...

by: BlueDeacon

10-28-2009 @ 2:22am

Sounds good to me.

by: BlueDeacon

10-28-2009 @ 2:25am

I'd say it's far different than the causes of poverty in Africa, Asia or Latin America.

Not much. My pastor is fond of saying, "God is a good provider but man is a poor divider." The only real difference is that there is a higher percentage of wealthy people in this country

by: facebook-9411565

10-28-2009 @ 9:55am

Are there any recent historical instances of nonviolent responses to urban violence? I'm not up on the history of it, nor am I sure where to begin looking...

by: BlueDeacon

10-30-2009 @ 7:12pm

That's not where I'm going with it. The mitigating circumstances are fairly
similar in more ways than we like to admit.

by: ando

10-28-2009 @ 6:00pm

Having spent two years in Honduras and spending time in Guatemala, Ecuador and Ethiopia, I can tell you the poverty in those regions is by far greater than the majority of poverty experienced in this country. Almost anyone who's spent time in other parts of the world will tell you the same thing

by: ando

10-28-2009 @ 6:00pm

Having spent two years in Honduras and spending time in Guatemala, Ecuador and Ethiopia, I can tell you the poverty in those regions is by far greater than the majority of poverty experienced in this country. Almost anyone who's spent time in other parts of the world will tell you the same thing

by: krbg

10-29-2009 @ 2:52pm

"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist."

by: krbg

10-29-2009 @ 2:52pm

"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist."

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: Jesdisciple

10-27-2009 @ 5:06pm

Thanks for the article. While I strongly disagree with other readers about political solutions to these problems, I cannot imagine anyone but a blatant racist (or just a general bigot) opposing voluntary charity. I have a personal battle to fight against my own introversion, but I hope raw pride is not also a hidden issue.

One of my long-held ambitions is to secure a job with decent pay and move to a slum somewhere, supporting residents in every way I can. But I have several personal issues I should solve first, including the one I mentioned above. It doesn't make any sense to be a leader of any kind if you don't get out at relate. But maybe I don't need to be the leader; maybe someone else with a more fitting personality can fill that role.

However, I don't understand Pastor Smith's perspective:
Inner cities are the way they are on purpose. The White Flight of the '60s and '70s played a role. The Educated Black Flight of the '80s played a role as well.
How is that on purpose? The members of those flights had personal reasons to leave, and they did. No one said, "Let's strip these poor people of all economy."

by: BlueDeacon

10-27-2009 @ 5:52pm

To answer your question: It became an issue of property values and resources. In the case of the former, the desirability of a neighborhood is inversely proportional to its access -- that is to say, if anyone with modest means can live someplace, the wealthy certainly won't because they see the poor as "beneath" them. And when they leave they take their financial clout with them so that the business districts suffer in the places they left behind.

That really puts the poor in a bind. A number of people blame "welfare" for their plight, but when you can't get a good job because there no longer are any in your neighborhood you start to get frustrated; if you lack your own set of wheels (to get to one) you're often screwed.

by: Jesdisciple

10-27-2009 @ 9:26pm

Eh... You don't think they ran from the violent crime of the area? (White-collar crime would introduce a pharisaic element...)

by: BlueDeacon

10-27-2009 @ 9:31pm

Originally, no (at least, the whites who left didn't). The violence didn't begin until later.

by: krbg

10-27-2009 @ 11:37pm

Poverty and hopelessness are what cause violent crime. Wealth and greed cause white collar crime. CEOs involved in risky derivative trading should be sentenced to living in poor urban neighborhoods as community service. That way those that prey on society equally (drug dealers and investment bank managers) can put their entrepreneurial skills to work for something good, for a change.

by: krbg

10-27-2009 @ 11:37pm

Poverty and hopelessness are what cause violent crime. Wealth and greed cause white collar crime. CEOs involved in risky derivative trading should be sentenced to living in poor urban neighborhoods as community service. That way those that prey on society equally (drug dealers and investment bank managers) can put their entrepreneurial skills to work for something good, for a change.

by: kansasmennonite

10-28-2009 @ 1:02am

I hear the f bomb all the time at work. I'm here in the heartland. Unfortunately, Frank Schaeffer likes to use that word a lot also. Don't know why but he does.

by: kansasmennonite

10-28-2009 @ 1:04am

Who said on this forum that if you help someone in poverty you're a christian but if you question why they're in poverty you're labeled a communist.

by: facebook-9411565

10-28-2009 @ 9:55am

Are there any recent historical instances of nonviolent responses to urban violence? I'm not up on the history of it, nor am I sure where to begin looking...

by: BlueDeacon

10-30-2009 @ 5:12pm

That's not where I'm going with it. The mitigating circumstances are fairly
similar in more ways than we like to admit.

by: Jesdisciple

10-27-2009 @ 5:06pm

Thanks for the article. While I strongly disagree with other readers about political solutions to these problems, I cannot imagine anyone but a blatant racist (or just a general bigot) opposing voluntary charity. I have a personal battle to fight against my own introversion, but I hope raw pride is not also a hidden issue.

One of my long-held ambitions is to secure a job with decent pay and move to a slum somewhere, supporting residents in every way I can. But I have several personal issues I should solve first, including the one I mentioned above. It doesn't make any sense to be a leader of any kind if you don't get out at relate. But maybe I don't need to be the leader; maybe someone else with a more fitting personality can fill that role.

However, I don't understand Pastor Smith's perspective:
Inner cities are the way they are on purpose. The White Flight of the '60s and '70s played a role. The Educated Black Flight of the '80s played a role as well.
How is that on purpose? The members of those flights had personal reasons to leave, and they did. No one said, "Let's strip these poor people of all economy."

by: Jesdisciple

10-27-2009 @ 9:26pm

Eh... You don't think they ran from the violent crime of the area? (White-collar crime would introduce a pharisaic element...)

by: ando

10-27-2009 @ 10:28pm

I am heartened by Brother Efrem's balanced approach and view of this profound problem. Too many on the Left see all sin as structural or societal, while those on the Right see sin as essentially personal. We need to view this problem as multi-faceted and complex.
Over the past two years I've had close to a dozen African-Americans in my fifth grade classroom (The great majority have been Latino). I don't think there's been one of the 12 who lives in a two-parent family. When I occasionally ride the bus to work often times there are MF-bombs thrown out like it's part of normal speech, both by teens and occasionally adults. It all seems hopeless at times, and I often feel a great sorrow. OTOH, I am heartened by the ministries in our area that are trying to change lives, spiritually, economically and socially.

by: ando

10-28-2009 @ 12:13am

"Poverty and hopelessness are what cause violent crime."

Ah, but what causes poverty here in America? I'd say it's far different than the causes of poverty in Africa, Asia or Latin America.

by: kansasmennonite

10-28-2009 @ 1:04am

Who said on this forum that if you help someone in poverty you're a christian but if you question why they're in poverty you're labeled a communist.

by: BlueDeacon

10-28-2009 @ 2:22am

Sounds good to me.

by: BlueDeacon

10-28-2009 @ 2:22am

Sounds good to me.

by: BlueDeacon

10-28-2009 @ 2:25am

I'd say it's far different than the causes of poverty in Africa, Asia or Latin America.

Not much. My pastor is fond of saying, "God is a good provider but man is a poor divider." The only real difference is that there is a higher percentage of wealthy people in this country

by: BlueDeacon

10-28-2009 @ 2:25am

I'd say it's far different than the causes of poverty in Africa, Asia or Latin America.

Not much. My pastor is fond of saying, "God is a good provider but man is a poor divider." The only real difference is that there is a higher percentage of wealthy people in this country

by: facebook-9411565

10-28-2009 @ 9:55am

Are there any recent historical instances of nonviolent responses to urban violence? I'm not up on the history of it, nor am I sure where to begin looking...

by: ando

10-28-2009 @ 6:00pm

Having spent two years in Honduras and spending time in Guatemala, Ecuador and Ethiopia, I can tell you the poverty in those regions is by far greater than the majority of poverty experienced in this country. Almost anyone who's spent time in other parts of the world will tell you the same thing

by: ando

10-28-2009 @ 6:00pm

Having spent two years in Honduras and spending time in Guatemala, Ecuador and Ethiopia, I can tell you the poverty in those regions is by far greater than the majority of poverty experienced in this country. Almost anyone who's spent time in other parts of the world will tell you the same thing

by: krbg

10-29-2009 @ 2:52pm

"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist."

by: krbg

10-29-2009 @ 2:52pm

"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist."

by: BlueDeacon

10-30-2009 @ 5:12pm

That's not where I'm going with it. The mitigating circumstances are fairly
similar in more ways than we like to admit.

by: BlueDeacon

10-27-2009 @ 5:52pm

To answer your question: It became an issue of property values and resources. In the case of the former, the desirability of a neighborhood is inversely proportional to its access -- that is to say, if anyone with modest means can live someplace, the wealthy certainly won't because they see the poor as "beneath" them. And when they leave they take their financial clout with them so that the business districts suffer in the places they left behind.

That really puts the poor in a bind. A number of people blame "welfare" for their plight, but when you can't get a good job because there no longer are any in your neighborhood you start to get frustrated; if you lack your own set of wheels (to get to one) you're often screwed.

by: BlueDeacon

10-27-2009 @ 9:31pm

Originally, no (at least, the whites who left didn't). The violence didn't begin until later.

by: ando

10-27-2009 @ 10:28pm

I am heartened by Brother Efrem's balanced approach and view of this profound problem. Too many on the Left see all sin as structural or societal, while those on the Right see sin as essentially personal. We need to view this problem as multi-faceted and complex.
Over the past two years I've had close to a dozen African-Americans in my fifth grade classroom (The great majority have been Latino). I don't think there's been one of the 12 who lives in a two-parent family. When I occasionally ride the bus to work often times there are MF-bombs thrown out like it's part of normal speech, both by teens and occasionally adults. It all seems hopeless at times, and I often feel a great sorrow. OTOH, I am heartened by the ministries in our area that are trying to change lives, spiritually, economically and socially.

by: ando

10-28-2009 @ 12:13am

"Poverty and hopelessness are what cause violent crime."

Ah, but what causes poverty here in America? I'd say it's far different than the causes of poverty in Africa, Asia or Latin America.

by: kansasmennonite

10-28-2009 @ 1:02am

I hear the f bomb all the time at work. I'm here in the heartland. Unfortunately, Frank Schaeffer likes to use that word a lot also. Don't know why but he does.

by: BlueDeacon

10-30-2009 @ 7:12pm

That's not where I'm going with it. The mitigating circumstances are fairly
similar in more ways than we like to admit.

by: BlueDeacon

10-30-2009 @ 7:12pm

That's not where I'm going with it. The mitigating circumstances are fairly
similar in more ways than we like to admit.