Get E-Mail Updates

The Elections You May Not Have Noticed

Most of the country probably didn't notice. Unless you live in Virginia, New Jersey, a couple areas in New York, or maybe even Maine or Washington state, it's quite possible you heard little about Tuesday's elections. But to the chattering class of D.C., it is likely that the rest of the week, maybe even longer, will be spent reading the entrails of this off-year election.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

To save you some time, let me sum up all the coverage for you. Republicans won gubernatorial seats in Virginia and New Jersey by quite a bit. Republican Mayor Bloomberg kept his seat in New York City, but it was a lot closer than most expected. In New York's 23rd Congressional District, a Democrat won even though polls had consistently shown the Conservative (a third party candidate) with a solid lead. Maine rejected a gay marriage law and Washington expanded domestic partnership rights for gay couples.

What does it all mean? Republicans are declaring a comeback -- proof that the nation has turned on Obama, his policies, and the role of government in almost anything. They see a resounding referendum that the country is tired of Democratic leadership. Democrats are excusing the losses due to weak candidates and historical precedents in those states of poor performance in off-years; they're also touting the 23rd Congressional District and Bloomberg's weaker than expected performance as proof that the president and the Democrats still get it and have public support, or at least most of them.

I think there is a different lesson here -- one I have been thinking about a lot lately.

People don't care about Washington, D.C. as much Washington, D.C. thinks people care about it.

In fact, I think as people continue to see so much of politics as usual in this town -- partisan bickering and big money buying votes -- they are increasingly likely to vote against whatever represents the old politics for them. Obama campaign rallies in Virginia and New Jersey were not enough to convince the people there that the candidate with a "D" beside the name would be the best choice for their state. New York's 23rd District went to a Democrat for the first time since the Civil War despite support for the Conservative, including an aggressive cable news campaign from Glenn Beck, a radio campaign from Rush Limbaugh and a visit from Sarah Palin. But high profile visits and endorsements from right wing luminaries and Republican presidential hopefuls were not enough to win a Congressional seat in one of the most conservative districts in New York state. Mayor Bloomberg is estimated to have spent over $100 million during the campaign (I saw it broken down to $170 per voter!) to win by just five points while his nearest challenger only spent one-tenth of that amount. Democrat Jon Corzine spent 25 million of his own dollars to outspend the Republican candidate in New Jersey, but it wasn't enough to counter the popular reaction to another Wall Street tycoon wanting to keep buying political power.

I think people are tired of the power of money and the grip of power in politics. After 30 years in Washington, D.C., I know I'm tired of seeing the kind of influence money has in politics and was glad to see it resisted in several of the election results. I am sick of hearing the rants and raves of talk show hosts and demagoguery in politics, and the people of New York's 23rd District showed quite clearly that they were not going to be steamrolled by it. One year ago, the majority of the people in this country voted for "a change they could believe in," and many are still waiting.

The importance and impact of a very few elections this week have already been greatly exaggerated. But the signs of discontent go far beyond the preference for one party over another; they indicate a deeper rejection of old politics. That discontent will soon turn into more cynical withdrawal unless people begin to see a "new politics" worth their energy and involvement. But that new politics will never exist if we simply wait for it to come from Washington; we must create it and help it grow by the social movements we build. And the voters who turned out in Virginia and New Jersey just demonstrated that they aren't convinced yet that a new politics is coming from Washington, D.C.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: marsjm

11-05-2009 @ 4:27pm

We have a BINGO here......

by: marsjm

11-05-2009 @ 4:27pm

We have a BINGO here......

by: jdchandler

11-05-2009 @ 5:13pm

I wholeheartedly agree with you, Rev. Wallis. I truly believe that when we have our hearts and minds set on the purpose of government and "politics," we will suddenly see that those purposes can be espoused and accomplished by politicians and citizen of every conceivable affiliation. If we have a mutually agreed upon, community-supported mission, government becomes about governance and not about party affiliation. We are currently so blind to that concept.

by: jdchandler

11-05-2009 @ 5:13pm

I wholeheartedly agree with you, Rev. Wallis. I truly believe that when we have our hearts and minds set on the purpose of government and "politics," we will suddenly see that those purposes can be espoused and accomplished by politicians and citizen of every conceivable affiliation. If we have a mutually agreed upon, community-supported mission, government becomes about governance and not about party affiliation. We are currently so blind to that concept.

by: Jesdisciple

11-05-2009 @ 5:25pm

I actually just started, on Tuesday, a conservative forum for what I've been talking about the last week. There's not much use giving an address here unless you're just curious, but I'll take any suggestions you have.

But yeah, I really want to reform the political system so the wealthy have no advantage... This is one area where the free market must be absent.

by: Jesdisciple

11-05-2009 @ 5:25pm

I actually just started, on Tuesday, a conservative forum for what I've been talking about the last week. There's not much use giving an address here unless you're just curious, but I'll take any suggestions you have.

But yeah, I really want to reform the political system so the wealthy have no advantage... This is one area where the free market must be absent.

by: owlofminervaatdusk

11-13-2009 @ 7:02pm

I completely agree with this post-election analysis---the best one I've heard! What scares me is the paradoxical position that Americans are in: we prudently distrust government, and have learned this disturst from past experiences. Yet we have also learned the hard way that the Siren song of Alan Greenspan and all the other free market ideologues will lead us to utter destruction! Where do we go from here?

A politics worth caring about is required for survival. We cannot continue to allow Pelosi, Reid, and every other corrupt pol in Washington, DC, to give our corporate bankers and brokerage carte blanche to do as they choose. So far, it looks like that is the longer-range outcome of this recent economic warning. Will we learn during the second and third repeat of this catastrophe that we either must trust in government or allow corporate greed to destroy us all?

by: DHFabian

11-08-2009 @ 8:44pm

My concern is that those with the money also control the message, and thereby control the public discussion. 30 years ago, I couldn't imagine living in a country where we punished people for being homeless, and where basic humanitarian aid would be transferred into paying the tax bills of the rich. I didn't think America would abandon it's poorest. But by controlling the public forum, the impossible happened: We reached the point of believing that a family on under $4,500 per year of AFDC was living in lazy comfort, while the family with four times that income lived in poverty, etc., etc.

by: BlueDeacon

11-08-2009 @ 6:06pm

How do we know, for example, that this isn't actually started by conservatives who lean Republicans?

by: River Sims

11-05-2009 @ 7:07pm

amen and amen! river sims

by: River Sims

11-05-2009 @ 7:07pm

amen and amen! river sims

by: PeterfromMI

11-05-2009 @ 7:31pm

I'm waiting for someone to say "Republicans say it is a referendum on Obama, Democrats say it isn't a referendum, and therefore Sojourners must be in the pocket of the Democratic Party."

At least that is what listening to the corporate media would lead one to believe. They've been hyping the so-called implications of all this for weeks, ad nauseum.

by: PeterfromMI

11-05-2009 @ 7:31pm

I'm waiting for someone to say "Republicans say it is a referendum on Obama, Democrats say it isn't a referendum, and therefore Sojourners must be in the pocket of the Democratic Party."

At least that is what listening to the corporate media would lead one to believe. They've been hyping the so-called implications of all this for weeks, ad nauseum.

by: junglecat

11-05-2009 @ 7:43pm

Michael Bloomberg isn't a Republican.

by: junglecat

11-05-2009 @ 7:43pm

Michael Bloomberg isn't a Republican.

by: letjusticerolldown

11-05-2009 @ 9:08pm

"People don't care about Washington, D.C. as much Washington, D.C. thinks people care about it."

Jim might finally get run out of town with the full honor that prophets receive -- for noticing the elephant in the room.

by: letjusticerolldown

11-05-2009 @ 9:08pm

"People don't care about Washington, D.C. as much Washington, D.C. thinks people care about it."

Jim might finally get run out of town with the full honor that prophets receive -- for noticing the elephant in the room.

by: brookr

11-05-2009 @ 9:22pm

Thanks for the analysis; it certainly rings true.

For the record, Referendum 71 herein WA state wasn't expanding any rights, it was keeping what was already put into place by the voters a while ago. Apparently, the voice of the voters setting that up in the first place wasn't enough, so we did it again!

by: brookr

11-05-2009 @ 9:22pm

Thanks for the analysis; it certainly rings true.

For the record, Referendum 71 herein WA state wasn't expanding any rights, it was keeping what was already put into place by the voters a while ago. Apparently, the voice of the voters setting that up in the first place wasn't enough, so we did it again!

by: letjusticerolldown

11-05-2009 @ 9:23pm

I think the issue is deeper Jim, than you make it. I don't think it is simply a rejection of "politics as usual."

I think we have a lost society with a lost government. People see a government not being able to cope and respond to a world--or respond to our own lostness.

The need is not simply for a new politics from social movements attempting to exercise political influence.

I watch how the society responds to crises such as 9/11; global climate; global financial collapse. We look to DC, a place we don't trust, to save us from a world of our making, that we don't trust.

Research usually shows we actually feel pretty positive about our selves and those we love; but are pessimistic about the world and bureaucracies and institutions.

I have confidence Obama is willing to take on almost any foe or issue; save one. The DC system. It is sacred.

We need to envision not only a different politics but a different DC and different Federal structure. If we continue the same reactions to escalating crises we will not change until there is a very severe collapse in which half the global population perishes.

I wish this was an overstatement.

I think it imperative we get beyond the DC frameworks. Some people who sense the same thing are going to come across with very rough, confused, and questionable motives and methods. We really need to listen well and understand that even very dysfunctional persons are just being formed in reaction to a very twisted world.

by: letjusticerolldown

11-05-2009 @ 9:23pm

I think the issue is deeper Jim, than you make it. I don't think it is simply a rejection of "politics as usual."

I think we have a lost society with a lost government. People see a government not being able to cope and respond to a world--or respond to our own lostness.

The need is not simply for a new politics from social movements attempting to exercise political influence.

I watch how the society responds to crises such as 9/11; global climate; global financial collapse. We look to DC, a place we don't trust, to save us from a world of our making, that we don't trust.

Research usually shows we actually feel pretty positive about our selves and those we love; but are pessimistic about the world and bureaucracies and institutions.

I have confidence Obama is willing to take on almost any foe or issue; save one. The DC system. It is sacred.

We need to envision not only a different politics but a different DC and different Federal structure. If we continue the same reactions to escalating crises we will not change until there is a very severe collapse in which half the global population perishes.

I wish this was an overstatement.

I think it imperative we get beyond the DC frameworks. Some people who sense the same thing are going to come across with very rough, confused, and questionable motives and methods. We really need to listen well and understand that even very dysfunctional persons are just being formed in reaction to a very twisted world.

by: anastasiap

11-05-2009 @ 10:12pm

I agree with you, and after this Tuesday, when we saw three big chunks of our democracy here in Ohio purchased away from us by big-money special interests, I don't believe this country can survive without serious campaign-finance reform. Massive money was spent here on a constitutional amendment that puts big agra firmly in the driver's seat of livestock and poultry famring, one assigned monopoly casino franchises to two wealthy business interests at laughably low returns to the taxpayers, and on convincing cuyahoga county voters that a vote for a charter cooked up behind closed doors by a handful of wealthy business interests was going to clean up "corruption." Instead it most likely will funnel more of our scarce resources - in the county that houses one of the nation's poorest cities - to the wealthy interests and away from human services. Yet $30,000 and $40,000 and $50,000 donations from corporations jusr purchased our government, leaving us with very little input anymore. There's pkenty else that is discouraging me about this particular issue, but we HAVE to get the money out of the process, even if it takes repealing corporate personhood to do it, and returning corporations to the original function of protecting resources.

by: anastasiap

11-05-2009 @ 10:12pm

I agree with you, and after this Tuesday, when we saw three big chunks of our democracy here in Ohio purchased away from us by big-money special interests, I don't believe this country can survive without serious campaign-finance reform. Massive money was spent here on a constitutional amendment that puts big agra firmly in the driver's seat of livestock and poultry famring, one assigned monopoly casino franchises to two wealthy business interests at laughably low returns to the taxpayers, and on convincing cuyahoga county voters that a vote for a charter cooked up behind closed doors by a handful of wealthy business interests was going to clean up "corruption." Instead it most likely will funnel more of our scarce resources - in the county that houses one of the nation's poorest cities - to the wealthy interests and away from human services. Yet $30,000 and $40,000 and $50,000 donations from corporations jusr purchased our government, leaving us with very little input anymore. There's pkenty else that is discouraging me about this particular issue, but we HAVE to get the money out of the process, even if it takes repealing corporate personhood to do it, and returning corporations to the original function of protecting resources.

by: cindylou2

11-05-2009 @ 10:36pm

"But the signs of discontent go far beyond the preference for one party over another; they indicate a deeper rejection of old politics."

And as much as Obama touts "hope" and "change," he's same 'ol, same 'ol but yet worse because he disregards the Constitution and is creating programs with far more massive "D.C." intrustion than ever before! And I think a lot of people are rejecting it.

And by same 'ol, same 'ol, I'm talking about catering to special interest groups, breaking promises, raising taxes, etc. But then on top of it, he also scolds people, starts "wars" with cable news stations because they fail to support him, and the list goes on, but in the future I DEFINITELY without hesitation will be voting for any and all politicians who REJECT Obama's ideals of government expansion and intrustion!!!!

by: cindylou2

11-05-2009 @ 10:36pm

"But the signs of discontent go far beyond the preference for one party over another; they indicate a deeper rejection of old politics."

And as much as Obama touts "hope" and "change," he's same 'ol, same 'ol but yet worse because he disregards the Constitution and is creating programs with far more massive "D.C." intrustion than ever before! And I think a lot of people are rejecting it.

And by same 'ol, same 'ol, I'm talking about catering to special interest groups, breaking promises, raising taxes, etc. But then on top of it, he also scolds people, starts "wars" with cable news stations because they fail to support him, and the list goes on, but in the future I DEFINITELY without hesitation will be voting for any and all politicians who REJECT Obama's ideals of government expansion and intrustion!!!!

by: dcchap

11-05-2009 @ 10:50pm

I disagree about people not caring about D.C. It's D.C. politicians who are mispending us into trillions of dollars of debt, who are about to take over our health care system, who are buying our banks and indebting our car companies. More than ever before in my life, this administration is making decisions that are enslaving us and our future generations, who will be the ones who will have to repay all the debt being racked up in D.C.

A lot of people care tremendously, and it took an Obama administration for many of them to start caring! Many people realized that by not caring and by being silent, they have ended up with a socialist-leaning President who is remaking this nation in a way that most sane and moral people do not want it to be remade.

Of course Democrats are gooing to dismiss the victories of Republicans in N.J. and Virginia, but they are in for a real awakening in 2010. They would rather be in denial and push their agendas than to face the conerns of their constitutients and the citizens of America, and it will only bite them in the butt in the long run as they are voted out of office.

by: dcchap

11-05-2009 @ 10:50pm

I disagree about people not caring about D.C. It's D.C. politicians who are mispending us into trillions of dollars of debt, who are about to take over our health care system, who are buying our banks and indebting our car companies. More than ever before in my life, this administration is making decisions that are enslaving us and our future generations, who will be the ones who will have to repay all the debt being racked up in D.C.

A lot of people care tremendously, and it took an Obama administration for many of them to start caring! Many people realized that by not caring and by being silent, they have ended up with a socialist-leaning President who is remaking this nation in a way that most sane and moral people do not want it to be remade.

Of course Democrats are gooing to dismiss the victories of Republicans in N.J. and Virginia, but they are in for a real awakening in 2010. They would rather be in denial and push their agendas than to face the conerns of their constitutients and the citizens of America, and it will only bite them in the butt in the long run as they are voted out of office.

by: stfinmich

11-05-2009 @ 11:06pm

WOW! What a biased article! How about something in the middle, at least.

by: stfinmich

11-05-2009 @ 11:06pm

WOW! What a biased article! How about something in the middle, at least.

by: kansasmennonite

11-06-2009 @ 12:43am

I love it when people talk about repentence when they really mean is "if these people would just think like me they would be holy like me".

I thought Jim's article was fairly unbiased!

by: kansasmennonite

11-06-2009 @ 12:43am

I love it when people talk about repentence when they really mean is "if these people would just think like me they would be holy like me".

I thought Jim's article was fairly unbiased!

by: facebook-1378781656

11-06-2009 @ 12:46am

And to add one more level of accuracy, the existing law was created in the legislature, signed by the governor, then challenged by (some of) the people. Referendum 71 was, in fact, the first time the expanded rights and responsibilities for domestic partners was presented for a popular vote.

by: facebook-1378781656

11-06-2009 @ 12:46am

And to add one more level of accuracy, the existing law was created in the legislature, signed by the governor, then challenged by (some of) the people. Referendum 71 was, in fact, the first time the expanded rights and responsibilities for domestic partners was presented for a popular vote.

by: kansasmennonite

11-06-2009 @ 12:48am

"Many people realized that by not caring and by being silent, they have ended up with a socialist-leaning President who is remaking this nation in a way that most sane and moral people do not want it to be remade."

Not caring about the environment, health care, the poor, immigrants? We've had enough of the republicans who can't care.

by: kansasmennonite

11-06-2009 @ 12:48am

"Many people realized that by not caring and by being silent, they have ended up with a socialist-leaning President who is remaking this nation in a way that most sane and moral people do not want it to be remade."

Not caring about the environment, health care, the poor, immigrants? We've had enough of the republicans who can't care.

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:15am

I'm with Kansas here... Mind pointing out the bias? This is the first one of Wallis' I haven't seen any in.

Your second paragraph is right until you draw the parallel with Saul. Talk about bias (or are you Samuel?).

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:15am

I'm with Kansas here... Mind pointing out the bias? This is the first one of Wallis' I haven't seen any in.

Your second paragraph is right until you draw the parallel with Saul. Talk about bias (or are you Samuel?).

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:20am

If you're interested, I'd love to link a list of my grievances against the Republican Party. And I'm definitely not a liberal; take a peek at my posts.

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:20am

If you're interested, I'd love to link a list of my grievances against the Republican Party. And I'm definitely not a liberal; take a peek at my posts.

by: jonabark

11-06-2009 @ 1:21am

dcchap, stfinmich, cindylou2
Please point me to the well known "conservative" Christian blog with many writers where I as a progressive can speak my mind freely and criticize the evangelical conservative ideas I don't like. I have asked this of republicans since I first participated here and have never once gotten a reference. It seems that tolerance of differing views is something conservative Christians demand but do not offer. And bias is something that only exists among those you disagree with.

I disagree with Jim and the sojo writers often and agree just as often , but basically I respect him and them and the work that goes into this blog as a civil conversation with give and take. Jim has earned a voice, and if you have no respect for that voice you really are in the wrong place for the give and take of a meaningful conversation.

by: jonabark

11-06-2009 @ 1:21am

dcchap, stfinmich, cindylou2
Please point me to the well known "conservative" Christian blog with many writers where I as a progressive can speak my mind freely and criticize the evangelical conservative ideas I don't like. I have asked this of republicans since I first participated here and have never once gotten a reference. It seems that tolerance of differing views is something conservative Christians demand but do not offer. And bias is something that only exists among those you disagree with.

I disagree with Jim and the sojo writers often and agree just as often , but basically I respect him and them and the work that goes into this blog as a civil conversation with give and take. Jim has earned a voice, and if you have no respect for that voice you really are in the wrong place for the give and take of a meaningful conversation.

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:21am

If you're interested, I'd love to link a list of my grievances against the Republican Party. And I'm definitely not a liberal; take a peek at my posts.

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:21am

If you're interested, I'd love to link a list of my grievances against the Republican Party. And I'm definitely not a liberal; take a peek at my posts.

by: uberVU - social comments

11-06-2009 @ 6:32am

Social comments and analytics for this post...

This post was mentioned on Twitter by isepherim: READ- Sojourners: The Elections You May Not Have Noticed by Jim Wallis http://ow.ly/zF1z...

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:44am

Well, given that Sojourners willingly points out right-wing connections, but deliberately ignores plausible left-wing connections, it's an easy thing to say about Sojourners. This article doesn't really demonstrate it, but it's easy to observe that conservative-bashing is a favorite pastime of writers on this blog. I don't blame them, of course. But if my wife serves the same meal every night, I'd get a little tired of it.

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:44am

Well, given that Sojourners willingly points out right-wing connections, but deliberately ignores plausible left-wing connections, it's an easy thing to say about Sojourners. This article doesn't really demonstrate it, but it's easy to observe that conservative-bashing is a favorite pastime of writers on this blog. I don't blame them, of course. But if my wife serves the same meal every night, I'd get a little tired of it.

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:46am

Wow, you pretty much echoed what I had in my head, so I won't need to say it myself... but you're absolutely right. Most people try to wield influence or change by changing the driver, but in fact the entire engine needs to be replaced.

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:46am

Wow, you pretty much echoed what I had in my head, so I won't need to say it myself... but you're absolutely right. Most people try to wield influence or change by changing the driver, but in fact the entire engine needs to be replaced.

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:51am

Merely "caring" is not sufficient to doing justice. It has to be done in such a way as to not favor one person over another, or give preference to one bloc of people, or use other people's money. Justice must be done within moral boundaries.

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:51am

Merely "caring" is not sufficient to doing justice. It has to be done in such a way as to not favor one person over another, or give preference to one bloc of people, or use other people's money. Justice must be done within moral boundaries.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: marsjm

11-05-2009 @ 4:27pm

We have a BINGO here......

by: marsjm

11-05-2009 @ 4:27pm

We have a BINGO here......

by: jdchandler

11-05-2009 @ 5:13pm

I wholeheartedly agree with you, Rev. Wallis. I truly believe that when we have our hearts and minds set on the purpose of government and "politics," we will suddenly see that those purposes can be espoused and accomplished by politicians and citizen of every conceivable affiliation. If we have a mutually agreed upon, community-supported mission, government becomes about governance and not about party affiliation. We are currently so blind to that concept.

by: jdchandler

11-05-2009 @ 5:13pm

I wholeheartedly agree with you, Rev. Wallis. I truly believe that when we have our hearts and minds set on the purpose of government and "politics," we will suddenly see that those purposes can be espoused and accomplished by politicians and citizen of every conceivable affiliation. If we have a mutually agreed upon, community-supported mission, government becomes about governance and not about party affiliation. We are currently so blind to that concept.

by: Jesdisciple

11-05-2009 @ 5:25pm

I actually just started, on Tuesday, a conservative forum for what I've been talking about the last week. There's not much use giving an address here unless you're just curious, but I'll take any suggestions you have.

But yeah, I really want to reform the political system so the wealthy have no advantage... This is one area where the free market must be absent.

by: Jesdisciple

11-05-2009 @ 5:25pm

I actually just started, on Tuesday, a conservative forum for what I've been talking about the last week. There's not much use giving an address here unless you're just curious, but I'll take any suggestions you have.

But yeah, I really want to reform the political system so the wealthy have no advantage... This is one area where the free market must be absent.

by: River Sims

11-05-2009 @ 7:07pm

amen and amen! river sims

by: River Sims

11-05-2009 @ 7:07pm

amen and amen! river sims

by: PeterfromMI

11-05-2009 @ 7:31pm

I'm waiting for someone to say "Republicans say it is a referendum on Obama, Democrats say it isn't a referendum, and therefore Sojourners must be in the pocket of the Democratic Party."

At least that is what listening to the corporate media would lead one to believe. They've been hyping the so-called implications of all this for weeks, ad nauseum.

by: PeterfromMI

11-05-2009 @ 7:31pm

I'm waiting for someone to say "Republicans say it is a referendum on Obama, Democrats say it isn't a referendum, and therefore Sojourners must be in the pocket of the Democratic Party."

At least that is what listening to the corporate media would lead one to believe. They've been hyping the so-called implications of all this for weeks, ad nauseum.

by: junglecat

11-05-2009 @ 7:43pm

Michael Bloomberg isn't a Republican.

by: junglecat

11-05-2009 @ 7:43pm

Michael Bloomberg isn't a Republican.

by: letjusticerolldown

11-05-2009 @ 9:08pm

"People don't care about Washington, D.C. as much Washington, D.C. thinks people care about it."

Jim might finally get run out of town with the full honor that prophets receive -- for noticing the elephant in the room.

by: letjusticerolldown

11-05-2009 @ 9:08pm

"People don't care about Washington, D.C. as much Washington, D.C. thinks people care about it."

Jim might finally get run out of town with the full honor that prophets receive -- for noticing the elephant in the room.

by: brookr

11-05-2009 @ 9:22pm

Thanks for the analysis; it certainly rings true.

For the record, Referendum 71 herein WA state wasn't expanding any rights, it was keeping what was already put into place by the voters a while ago. Apparently, the voice of the voters setting that up in the first place wasn't enough, so we did it again!

by: brookr

11-05-2009 @ 9:22pm

Thanks for the analysis; it certainly rings true.

For the record, Referendum 71 herein WA state wasn't expanding any rights, it was keeping what was already put into place by the voters a while ago. Apparently, the voice of the voters setting that up in the first place wasn't enough, so we did it again!

by: letjusticerolldown

11-05-2009 @ 9:23pm

I think the issue is deeper Jim, than you make it. I don't think it is simply a rejection of "politics as usual."

I think we have a lost society with a lost government. People see a government not being able to cope and respond to a world--or respond to our own lostness.

The need is not simply for a new politics from social movements attempting to exercise political influence.

I watch how the society responds to crises such as 9/11; global climate; global financial collapse. We look to DC, a place we don't trust, to save us from a world of our making, that we don't trust.

Research usually shows we actually feel pretty positive about our selves and those we love; but are pessimistic about the world and bureaucracies and institutions.

I have confidence Obama is willing to take on almost any foe or issue; save one. The DC system. It is sacred.

We need to envision not only a different politics but a different DC and different Federal structure. If we continue the same reactions to escalating crises we will not change until there is a very severe collapse in which half the global population perishes.

I wish this was an overstatement.

I think it imperative we get beyond the DC frameworks. Some people who sense the same thing are going to come across with very rough, confused, and questionable motives and methods. We really need to listen well and understand that even very dysfunctional persons are just being formed in reaction to a very twisted world.

by: letjusticerolldown

11-05-2009 @ 9:23pm

I think the issue is deeper Jim, than you make it. I don't think it is simply a rejection of "politics as usual."

I think we have a lost society with a lost government. People see a government not being able to cope and respond to a world--or respond to our own lostness.

The need is not simply for a new politics from social movements attempting to exercise political influence.

I watch how the society responds to crises such as 9/11; global climate; global financial collapse. We look to DC, a place we don't trust, to save us from a world of our making, that we don't trust.

Research usually shows we actually feel pretty positive about our selves and those we love; but are pessimistic about the world and bureaucracies and institutions.

I have confidence Obama is willing to take on almost any foe or issue; save one. The DC system. It is sacred.

We need to envision not only a different politics but a different DC and different Federal structure. If we continue the same reactions to escalating crises we will not change until there is a very severe collapse in which half the global population perishes.

I wish this was an overstatement.

I think it imperative we get beyond the DC frameworks. Some people who sense the same thing are going to come across with very rough, confused, and questionable motives and methods. We really need to listen well and understand that even very dysfunctional persons are just being formed in reaction to a very twisted world.

by: anastasiap

11-05-2009 @ 10:12pm

I agree with you, and after this Tuesday, when we saw three big chunks of our democracy here in Ohio purchased away from us by big-money special interests, I don't believe this country can survive without serious campaign-finance reform. Massive money was spent here on a constitutional amendment that puts big agra firmly in the driver's seat of livestock and poultry famring, one assigned monopoly casino franchises to two wealthy business interests at laughably low returns to the taxpayers, and on convincing cuyahoga county voters that a vote for a charter cooked up behind closed doors by a handful of wealthy business interests was going to clean up "corruption." Instead it most likely will funnel more of our scarce resources - in the county that houses one of the nation's poorest cities - to the wealthy interests and away from human services. Yet $30,000 and $40,000 and $50,000 donations from corporations jusr purchased our government, leaving us with very little input anymore. There's pkenty else that is discouraging me about this particular issue, but we HAVE to get the money out of the process, even if it takes repealing corporate personhood to do it, and returning corporations to the original function of protecting resources.

by: anastasiap

11-05-2009 @ 10:12pm

I agree with you, and after this Tuesday, when we saw three big chunks of our democracy here in Ohio purchased away from us by big-money special interests, I don't believe this country can survive without serious campaign-finance reform. Massive money was spent here on a constitutional amendment that puts big agra firmly in the driver's seat of livestock and poultry famring, one assigned monopoly casino franchises to two wealthy business interests at laughably low returns to the taxpayers, and on convincing cuyahoga county voters that a vote for a charter cooked up behind closed doors by a handful of wealthy business interests was going to clean up "corruption." Instead it most likely will funnel more of our scarce resources - in the county that houses one of the nation's poorest cities - to the wealthy interests and away from human services. Yet $30,000 and $40,000 and $50,000 donations from corporations jusr purchased our government, leaving us with very little input anymore. There's pkenty else that is discouraging me about this particular issue, but we HAVE to get the money out of the process, even if it takes repealing corporate personhood to do it, and returning corporations to the original function of protecting resources.

by: cindylou2

11-05-2009 @ 10:36pm

"But the signs of discontent go far beyond the preference for one party over another; they indicate a deeper rejection of old politics."

And as much as Obama touts "hope" and "change," he's same 'ol, same 'ol but yet worse because he disregards the Constitution and is creating programs with far more massive "D.C." intrustion than ever before! And I think a lot of people are rejecting it.

And by same 'ol, same 'ol, I'm talking about catering to special interest groups, breaking promises, raising taxes, etc. But then on top of it, he also scolds people, starts "wars" with cable news stations because they fail to support him, and the list goes on, but in the future I DEFINITELY without hesitation will be voting for any and all politicians who REJECT Obama's ideals of government expansion and intrustion!!!!

by: cindylou2

11-05-2009 @ 10:36pm

"But the signs of discontent go far beyond the preference for one party over another; they indicate a deeper rejection of old politics."

And as much as Obama touts "hope" and "change," he's same 'ol, same 'ol but yet worse because he disregards the Constitution and is creating programs with far more massive "D.C." intrustion than ever before! And I think a lot of people are rejecting it.

And by same 'ol, same 'ol, I'm talking about catering to special interest groups, breaking promises, raising taxes, etc. But then on top of it, he also scolds people, starts "wars" with cable news stations because they fail to support him, and the list goes on, but in the future I DEFINITELY without hesitation will be voting for any and all politicians who REJECT Obama's ideals of government expansion and intrustion!!!!

by: dcchap

11-05-2009 @ 10:50pm

I disagree about people not caring about D.C. It's D.C. politicians who are mispending us into trillions of dollars of debt, who are about to take over our health care system, who are buying our banks and indebting our car companies. More than ever before in my life, this administration is making decisions that are enslaving us and our future generations, who will be the ones who will have to repay all the debt being racked up in D.C.

A lot of people care tremendously, and it took an Obama administration for many of them to start caring! Many people realized that by not caring and by being silent, they have ended up with a socialist-leaning President who is remaking this nation in a way that most sane and moral people do not want it to be remade.

Of course Democrats are gooing to dismiss the victories of Republicans in N.J. and Virginia, but they are in for a real awakening in 2010. They would rather be in denial and push their agendas than to face the conerns of their constitutients and the citizens of America, and it will only bite them in the butt in the long run as they are voted out of office.

by: dcchap

11-05-2009 @ 10:50pm

I disagree about people not caring about D.C. It's D.C. politicians who are mispending us into trillions of dollars of debt, who are about to take over our health care system, who are buying our banks and indebting our car companies. More than ever before in my life, this administration is making decisions that are enslaving us and our future generations, who will be the ones who will have to repay all the debt being racked up in D.C.

A lot of people care tremendously, and it took an Obama administration for many of them to start caring! Many people realized that by not caring and by being silent, they have ended up with a socialist-leaning President who is remaking this nation in a way that most sane and moral people do not want it to be remade.

Of course Democrats are gooing to dismiss the victories of Republicans in N.J. and Virginia, but they are in for a real awakening in 2010. They would rather be in denial and push their agendas than to face the conerns of their constitutients and the citizens of America, and it will only bite them in the butt in the long run as they are voted out of office.

by: stfinmich

11-05-2009 @ 11:06pm

WOW! What a biased article! How about something in the middle, at least.

by: stfinmich

11-05-2009 @ 11:06pm

WOW! What a biased article! How about something in the middle, at least.

by: kansasmennonite

11-06-2009 @ 12:43am

I love it when people talk about repentence when they really mean is "if these people would just think like me they would be holy like me".

I thought Jim's article was fairly unbiased!

by: kansasmennonite

11-06-2009 @ 12:43am

I love it when people talk about repentence when they really mean is "if these people would just think like me they would be holy like me".

I thought Jim's article was fairly unbiased!

by: facebook-1378781656

11-06-2009 @ 12:46am

And to add one more level of accuracy, the existing law was created in the legislature, signed by the governor, then challenged by (some of) the people. Referendum 71 was, in fact, the first time the expanded rights and responsibilities for domestic partners was presented for a popular vote.

by: facebook-1378781656

11-06-2009 @ 12:46am

And to add one more level of accuracy, the existing law was created in the legislature, signed by the governor, then challenged by (some of) the people. Referendum 71 was, in fact, the first time the expanded rights and responsibilities for domestic partners was presented for a popular vote.

by: kansasmennonite

11-06-2009 @ 12:48am

"Many people realized that by not caring and by being silent, they have ended up with a socialist-leaning President who is remaking this nation in a way that most sane and moral people do not want it to be remade."

Not caring about the environment, health care, the poor, immigrants? We've had enough of the republicans who can't care.

by: kansasmennonite

11-06-2009 @ 12:48am

"Many people realized that by not caring and by being silent, they have ended up with a socialist-leaning President who is remaking this nation in a way that most sane and moral people do not want it to be remade."

Not caring about the environment, health care, the poor, immigrants? We've had enough of the republicans who can't care.

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:15am

I'm with Kansas here... Mind pointing out the bias? This is the first one of Wallis' I haven't seen any in.

Your second paragraph is right until you draw the parallel with Saul. Talk about bias (or are you Samuel?).

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:15am

I'm with Kansas here... Mind pointing out the bias? This is the first one of Wallis' I haven't seen any in.

Your second paragraph is right until you draw the parallel with Saul. Talk about bias (or are you Samuel?).

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:20am

If you're interested, I'd love to link a list of my grievances against the Republican Party. And I'm definitely not a liberal; take a peek at my posts.

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:20am

If you're interested, I'd love to link a list of my grievances against the Republican Party. And I'm definitely not a liberal; take a peek at my posts.

by: jonabark

11-06-2009 @ 1:21am

dcchap, stfinmich, cindylou2
Please point me to the well known "conservative" Christian blog with many writers where I as a progressive can speak my mind freely and criticize the evangelical conservative ideas I don't like. I have asked this of republicans since I first participated here and have never once gotten a reference. It seems that tolerance of differing views is something conservative Christians demand but do not offer. And bias is something that only exists among those you disagree with.

I disagree with Jim and the sojo writers often and agree just as often , but basically I respect him and them and the work that goes into this blog as a civil conversation with give and take. Jim has earned a voice, and if you have no respect for that voice you really are in the wrong place for the give and take of a meaningful conversation.

by: jonabark

11-06-2009 @ 1:21am

dcchap, stfinmich, cindylou2
Please point me to the well known "conservative" Christian blog with many writers where I as a progressive can speak my mind freely and criticize the evangelical conservative ideas I don't like. I have asked this of republicans since I first participated here and have never once gotten a reference. It seems that tolerance of differing views is something conservative Christians demand but do not offer. And bias is something that only exists among those you disagree with.

I disagree with Jim and the sojo writers often and agree just as often , but basically I respect him and them and the work that goes into this blog as a civil conversation with give and take. Jim has earned a voice, and if you have no respect for that voice you really are in the wrong place for the give and take of a meaningful conversation.

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:21am

If you're interested, I'd love to link a list of my grievances against the Republican Party. And I'm definitely not a liberal; take a peek at my posts.

by: Jesdisciple

11-06-2009 @ 1:21am

If you're interested, I'd love to link a list of my grievances against the Republican Party. And I'm definitely not a liberal; take a peek at my posts.

by: uberVU - social comments

11-06-2009 @ 6:32am

Social comments and analytics for this post...

This post was mentioned on Twitter by isepherim: READ- Sojourners: The Elections You May Not Have Noticed by Jim Wallis http://ow.ly/zF1z...

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:44am

Well, given that Sojourners willingly points out right-wing connections, but deliberately ignores plausible left-wing connections, it's an easy thing to say about Sojourners. This article doesn't really demonstrate it, but it's easy to observe that conservative-bashing is a favorite pastime of writers on this blog. I don't blame them, of course. But if my wife serves the same meal every night, I'd get a little tired of it.

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:44am

Well, given that Sojourners willingly points out right-wing connections, but deliberately ignores plausible left-wing connections, it's an easy thing to say about Sojourners. This article doesn't really demonstrate it, but it's easy to observe that conservative-bashing is a favorite pastime of writers on this blog. I don't blame them, of course. But if my wife serves the same meal every night, I'd get a little tired of it.

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:46am

Wow, you pretty much echoed what I had in my head, so I won't need to say it myself... but you're absolutely right. Most people try to wield influence or change by changing the driver, but in fact the entire engine needs to be replaced.

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:46am

Wow, you pretty much echoed what I had in my head, so I won't need to say it myself... but you're absolutely right. Most people try to wield influence or change by changing the driver, but in fact the entire engine needs to be replaced.

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:51am

Merely "caring" is not sufficient to doing justice. It has to be done in such a way as to not favor one person over another, or give preference to one bloc of people, or use other people's money. Justice must be done within moral boundaries.

by: xfree9

11-06-2009 @ 10:51am

Merely "caring" is not sufficient to doing justice. It has to be done in such a way as to not favor one person over another, or give preference to one bloc of people, or use other people's money. Justice must be done within moral boundaries.

by: BlueDeacon

11-06-2009 @ 6:48pm

In the future I DEFINITELY without hesitation will be voting for any and all politicians who REJECT Obama's ideals of government expansion and intrustion!!!!

Last time we did that we ended up with GWB as president. I don't need to say any more.

by: BlueDeacon

11-06-2009 @ 6:48pm

In the future I DEFINITELY without hesitation will be voting for any and all politicians who REJECT Obama's ideals of government expansion and intrustion!!!!

Last time we did that we ended up with GWB as president. I don't need to say any more.

by: BlueDeacon

11-06-2009 @ 6:50pm

Well, given that Sojourners willingly points out right-wing connections, but deliberately ignores plausible left-wing connections, it's an easy thing to say about Sojourners.

Because, truth be told, there aren't really any. If there were the conservatives themselves would give chapter-and-verse.