Get E-Mail Updates

The Charter for Compassion

Compassion is, by one definition, "a deep awareness and sympathy for another's suffering."

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Karen Armstrong, the former Roman Catholic nun and one of the foremost writers on religion of our generation, and the renowned African spiritual leader and peacemaker Archbishop Desmond Tutu, in launching what they have called the "Charter for Compassion," are not saying anything new.

The basis for their call to action -- for a worldwide and individual movement of simple and radical compassion -- is based in what we collectively know as the Golden Rule.

Five hundred years before the birth of Jesus Christ, Confucius said: "Do not do unto others what you would not like them to do to you."

Jesus himself, scripture tells us, said, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" and "Love your enemies."

The great Jewish scholar Rabbi Hillel, a contemporary of Jesus, when summing up the whole of Judaism's teaching, put it this way: "That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor -- that is the Torah. The rest is commentary. Go and study it."

St. Augustine echoed Hillel's sentiments, saying that scripture "teaches nothing but charity, and we must not leave an interpretation of scripture until we have found a compassionate interpretation of it."

Religion need not be the force for division that it unfortunately often is. The three sister Abrahamic religions -- Judaism, Islam and Christianity -- share the Golden Rule as a central teaching. In fact, every religion at its core demands compassion not only for our own family, co-religionists and community but more importantly for those we consider "other" or "enemy."

On Thursday, Armstrong, Tutu, and a host of other religious leaders from around the world launched the Charter for Compassion, charterforcompassion.org, to try to turn the tide of religious division toward its true center of compassion.

To some, it may seem a facile idea. But to me, it is perhaps the only thing that can conquer suffering, disease, unthinkable poverty and unending cycles of war, discrimination, hatred, and oppression.

Those of us who consider ourselves spiritual, if not "religious," have a choice to make. And it's an individual choice.

In her speech last year accepting the TED (Technology, Entertainment, Development) award, which is given annually "to three exceptional individuals who each receive $100,000" (as well as the opportunity to voice their one wish for the world), Armstrong challenged us by saying that "a lot of religious people prefer to be right, rather than compassionate.

"People want to be religious, and religion should be made to be a force for harmony in the world, which it can and should be -- because of the Golden Rule ... an ethos that should now be applied globally," Armstrong continued. "We should not treat other nations as we would not wish to be treated ourselves. And this -- whatever our wretched beliefs -- is a religious matter, is a spiritual matter. It's a profound moral matter that engages and should engage us all."

Think about that.

What would our world look like if we made deliberate choices, large and small, to be compassionate and kind rather than, simply, right?

It is possible to reclaim religion and, more importantly, belief as a force of good, harmony and unity.

The word "belief," Armstrong reminded us in her TED speech, originally meant "to love, to prize, to hold dear."

In that light, religion, the institutions of belief, should be built around charity, not supremacy.

Put someone else in front of yourself.

Choose kindness.

Be compassionate.

Cathleen Falsani blogs at The Dude Abides. The Kindle versions of her books, The Dude Abides: The Gospel According to the Coen Brothers, and Sin Boldly, are available FREE for a limited time on Amazon.com.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:46am

After thinking on my above two posts, I think I noticed something that is missed by this meta-ideology. In all three of the Abrahamic faiths, God's holiness comes before His compassion. He is compassionate and wills than none would perish, but He is also holy and cannot allow sin into His presence. Remove holiness from any of these faiths and all you have is Buddhism.

by: ckgmail

11-17-2009 @ 11:46am

It's interesting that in Matthew 25 (red letter words)it is the compassionate who enter the kingdom. It is also interesting that both groups are surprised. "Lord, when did we see thee . . .? etc. And "Lord, when did we not . . .? etc. Also James, "Faith without works is dead."

by: ckgmail

11-17-2009 @ 11:46am

It's interesting that in Matthew 25 (red letter words)it is the compassionate who enter the kingdom. It is also interesting that both groups are surprised. "Lord, when did we see thee . . .? etc. And "Lord, when did we not . . .? etc. Also James, "Faith without works is dead."

by: suril

12-29-2009 @ 12:09pm

I would like to read more of your blogs and to share my thoughts with you

by: beckycarr

11-17-2009 @ 8:03pm

It often bothers me that so many who profess these faiths are so lacking in compassion and so quick to heap condemnation on others, and it seems that often these are the most fundamentalist, conservative members of these faiths. Could they be so caught up in the letter of the law and maintaining 'holiness' (I don't mean God's, I mean their own or their culture's) that they forget the spirit of God's grace and God's overarching command to love one another and treat one another justly? "If anyone hates his brother, how can the spirit of God be in him?" if I remember the passage correctly.

by: suril

12-29-2009 @ 10:09am

I would like to read more of your blogs and to share my thoughts with you

by: beckycarr

11-17-2009 @ 8:03pm

It often bothers me that so many who profess these faiths are so lacking in compassion and so quick to heap condemnation on others, and it seems that often these are the most fundamentalist, conservative members of these faiths. Could they be so caught up in the letter of the law and maintaining 'holiness' (I don't mean God's, I mean their own or their culture's) that they forget the spirit of God's grace and God's overarching command to love one another and treat one another justly? "If anyone hates his brother, how can the spirit of God be in him?" if I remember the passage correctly.

by: suril

12-29-2009 @ 10:09am

I would like to read more of your blogs and to share my thoughts with you

by: suril

12-29-2009 @ 12:09pm

I would like to read more of your blogs and to share my thoughts with you

by: Ngchen

11-16-2009 @ 5:27pm

True, true. While it's always tempting, and sometimes proper, to point out heresies for what they are, it does seem that oftentimes it matters more not what we believe in the abstract, but rather in what we end up doing. I mean, who's the more effective witness? Someone who has or seems to have all the answers, who speaks without doing, or someone who actually puts faith into action?

by: Ngchen

11-16-2009 @ 5:27pm

True, true. While it's always tempting, and sometimes proper, to point out heresies for what they are, it does seem that oftentimes it matters more not what we believe in the abstract, but rather in what we end up doing. I mean, who's the more effective witness? Someone who has or seems to have all the answers, who speaks without doing, or someone who actually puts faith into action?

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:24am

Just so long as this doesn't result in throwing passages out because no compassion can be found in them. Compassion is more important than being right on the personal level, but it is not worth altering Scripture itself. Scripture must be right, and interpretations must attempt compassion. And living a faith is more important than knowing it.

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:31am

In the search for compassion, I think all parties must be examined. Who is this compassionate toward? For example, Israel's invasion of Canaan might be compassionate toward Abraham, or maybe the Messiah must for some reason emerge from that region. I think looking for compassion toward the Canaanites is a futile attempt; however, as noted above this doesn't mean God didn't command the invasion.

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:46am

After thinking on my above two posts, I think I noticed something that is missed by this meta-ideology. In all three of the Abrahamic faiths, God's holiness comes before His compassion. He is compassionate and wills than none would perish, but He is also holy and cannot allow sin into His presence. Remove holiness from any of these faiths and all you have is Buddhism.

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:24am

Just so long as this doesn't result in throwing passages out because no compassion can be found in them. Compassion is more important than being right on the personal level, but it is not worth altering Scripture itself. Scripture must be right, and interpretations must attempt compassion. And living a faith is more important than knowing it.

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:31am

In the search for compassion, I think all parties must be examined. Who is this compassionate toward? For example, Israel's invasion of Canaan might be compassionate toward Abraham, or maybe the Messiah must for some reason emerge from that region. I think looking for compassion toward the Canaanites is a futile attempt; however, as noted above this doesn't mean God didn't command the invasion.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: Ngchen

11-16-2009 @ 5:27pm

True, true. While it's always tempting, and sometimes proper, to point out heresies for what they are, it does seem that oftentimes it matters more not what we believe in the abstract, but rather in what we end up doing. I mean, who's the more effective witness? Someone who has or seems to have all the answers, who speaks without doing, or someone who actually puts faith into action?

by: Ngchen

11-16-2009 @ 5:27pm

True, true. While it's always tempting, and sometimes proper, to point out heresies for what they are, it does seem that oftentimes it matters more not what we believe in the abstract, but rather in what we end up doing. I mean, who's the more effective witness? Someone who has or seems to have all the answers, who speaks without doing, or someone who actually puts faith into action?

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:24am

Just so long as this doesn't result in throwing passages out because no compassion can be found in them. Compassion is more important than being right on the personal level, but it is not worth altering Scripture itself. Scripture must be right, and interpretations must attempt compassion. And living a faith is more important than knowing it.

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:24am

Just so long as this doesn't result in throwing passages out because no compassion can be found in them. Compassion is more important than being right on the personal level, but it is not worth altering Scripture itself. Scripture must be right, and interpretations must attempt compassion. And living a faith is more important than knowing it.

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:31am

In the search for compassion, I think all parties must be examined. Who is this compassionate toward? For example, Israel's invasion of Canaan might be compassionate toward Abraham, or maybe the Messiah must for some reason emerge from that region. I think looking for compassion toward the Canaanites is a futile attempt; however, as noted above this doesn't mean God didn't command the invasion.

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:31am

In the search for compassion, I think all parties must be examined. Who is this compassionate toward? For example, Israel's invasion of Canaan might be compassionate toward Abraham, or maybe the Messiah must for some reason emerge from that region. I think looking for compassion toward the Canaanites is a futile attempt; however, as noted above this doesn't mean God didn't command the invasion.

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:46am

After thinking on my above two posts, I think I noticed something that is missed by this meta-ideology. In all three of the Abrahamic faiths, God's holiness comes before His compassion. He is compassionate and wills than none would perish, but He is also holy and cannot allow sin into His presence. Remove holiness from any of these faiths and all you have is Buddhism.

by: Chris "Jesdisciple"

11-17-2009 @ 1:46am

After thinking on my above two posts, I think I noticed something that is missed by this meta-ideology. In all three of the Abrahamic faiths, God's holiness comes before His compassion. He is compassionate and wills than none would perish, but He is also holy and cannot allow sin into His presence. Remove holiness from any of these faiths and all you have is Buddhism.

by: ckgmail

11-17-2009 @ 11:46am

It's interesting that in Matthew 25 (red letter words)it is the compassionate who enter the kingdom. It is also interesting that both groups are surprised. "Lord, when did we see thee . . .? etc. And "Lord, when did we not . . .? etc. Also James, "Faith without works is dead."

by: ckgmail

11-17-2009 @ 11:46am

It's interesting that in Matthew 25 (red letter words)it is the compassionate who enter the kingdom. It is also interesting that both groups are surprised. "Lord, when did we see thee . . .? etc. And "Lord, when did we not . . .? etc. Also James, "Faith without works is dead."

by: beckycarr

11-17-2009 @ 8:03pm

It often bothers me that so many who profess these faiths are so lacking in compassion and so quick to heap condemnation on others, and it seems that often these are the most fundamentalist, conservative members of these faiths. Could they be so caught up in the letter of the law and maintaining 'holiness' (I don't mean God's, I mean their own or their culture's) that they forget the spirit of God's grace and God's overarching command to love one another and treat one another justly? "If anyone hates his brother, how can the spirit of God be in him?" if I remember the passage correctly.

by: beckycarr

11-17-2009 @ 8:03pm

It often bothers me that so many who profess these faiths are so lacking in compassion and so quick to heap condemnation on others, and it seems that often these are the most fundamentalist, conservative members of these faiths. Could they be so caught up in the letter of the law and maintaining 'holiness' (I don't mean God's, I mean their own or their culture's) that they forget the spirit of God's grace and God's overarching command to love one another and treat one another justly? "If anyone hates his brother, how can the spirit of God be in him?" if I remember the passage correctly.

by: suril

12-29-2009 @ 10:09am

I would like to read more of your blogs and to share my thoughts with you

by: suril

12-29-2009 @ 10:09am

I would like to read more of your blogs and to share my thoughts with you

by: suril

12-29-2009 @ 12:09pm

I would like to read more of your blogs and to share my thoughts with you

by: suril

12-29-2009 @ 12:09pm

I would like to read more of your blogs and to share my thoughts with you