Get E-Mail Updates

Attacking Our Mental Programming on Race

I'll tell you up front -- I'm going to talk about race. I know some are tired of hearing about it, and I think that's mainly because we've been hearing about it in the same ways for so long.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

There's surely no dearth of conversation about race among Christians. Web sites, blogs, church initiatives, parachurch programs, forums, symposia, conferences, retreats, speeches, books, magazine articles, and everything in between are singing the same song: We have a race problem in the church. And it's not a "problem" in the same way that dwindling attendance or a string of boring sermons is a problem. It's a blight, a stain, and a hindrance to others coming to Christ, and to current disciples growing in their knowledge of and obedience to Christ. So the subject does warrant discussion; we just need to deal with the real problem and stop trying to address only the outward symptoms.

The Bible shows us that people's behavior is a result of what's in their heart and mind. So rather than keep trying to only manage our behavior, we need to first roll up our sleeves and seriously examine what we think and believe about race. For example, what does the fact that we still have church congregations that are predominantly one ethnic group say about what we believe about the kingdom of God, our fellow sojourners, and Jesus Christ himself? These are some possibilities:

  • Our comfort is more important than our witness to the watching world.
  • The outward characteristics of a person are the appropriate determinants of how we should view and interact with them.
  • Ethnic considerations supersede spiritual realities and obligations.
  • Our worship and our relationships with fellow believers are separate and not interrelated.

There's one belief in particular that bears special emphasis. Christians, along with the rest of the world, are stubbornly holding on to the concept of race as a legitimate label by which to categorize people. Race, as we understand and accept it, is a social illusion.

Ken Ham, founder of the Answers in Genesis apologetics ministry, explains in his Answers to the 4 Big Questions! booklet that if we take two people from anywhere in the world, the basic genetic differences between them would be around 0.2 percent, even if they come from the same ethnic group. And genetic markers that determine what we call racial characteristics like skin color, eye color, etc., "account for only .012 percent of human biological variation."

In other words, the things we use to determine who we marry, where we go to church, where we live, who we hire, who we vote for, where our kids go to school, what kind of music plays on our Christian radio stations, and practically everything else, stems from a minuscule part of our biological makeup. We are not nearly as different as we insist on believing.

Our behavior as Christians shows emphatically that we believe in the concept of race, and its attendant perceived differences. But scientists, biologists, and a very few Christian sociologists and apologists tell us that it's not race that separates us. "The criteria that people use for race are based entirely on external features that we are programmed to recognize," said Douglas Wallace, a professor of molecular genetics at Emory University, in a 1998 ABC News report.

Years and years of social programming have taught us to respond and give sway to skin color, hair texture, nose width, lip thickness, and other racial characteristics. But the Bible stands in stark contrast to our belief system. Nowhere in the Bible do we find a word that we translate as "race," unless we consider the words translated "humanity" or "humankind." Rather, the Word speaks of nations or people groups. In a clear and stunning statement, it even says in no uncertain terms that we all come from the same ancestry:

From one man He created all the nations throughout the whole earth. He decided beforehand when they should rise and fall, and he determined their boundaries" (Acts 17:26, NLT).

Do we as Christians really believe this? What are the practical implications of this truth? At the very minimum, it means that we are all one race, not multiple races. We need to educate one another with this fact, and teach one another how to live according to it.

So if it's not really race that determines our differences, what is it? Even secular sources acknowledge the answer. "What the facts show is that there are differences among us, but they stem from culture, not race," said Professor Wallace in that ABC report. Differences in language, socialization customs, dress, food, and family dynamics have conditioned us to focus on how we are unlike one another. But these are all temporal distinctions. The kingdom of God is intended to be transcendent, with its own culture of language, socialization, symbols, and family dynamics.

Why haven't we internalized the kingdom culture? We must first commit ourselves to internalizing at a heart and faith level what the Word of God teaches us about our origins and our priorities. Other Christians are our family, our brothers and sisters. That's the truth. In fact, if my blood brother is not a Christian, then the law of the Kingdom says he is less my family than someone who is regenerated into the family of God by the blood of Christ. It is that blood that joins us together in a new society, a new culture.

Let's attack our mental programming and see what lies are lodged there. Let's change our terminology and see each other differently. I'll get the ball rolling: I have an older brother, Chris Rice, who is a member of the Caucasoid people group. He is a gifted student of reconciliation and a prophetic voice of our Dad's to our family on how we should be relating to each other. I encourage you to read his article "The Future is Mestizo." I'm sure once you get to know more about him, you'll love him with our Lord's love as I do.

Your turn.

portrait-chandra-white-cummingsChandra White-Cummings is a columnist for UrbanFaith and director of the Black Life Issues & Action Network, in Dayton, Ohio, a nonprofit program that works to educate, empower, and engage the African American community concerning issues that impact Black women, children, and families. She blogs at Life As We Know It. This article appears courtesy of a partnership with UrbanFaith.com.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 7:34pm

Okay. I agree with your point, and the deal on the 0.2% difference is probably correct, but why oh why are you quoting from Ken Ham?!?! He is roundly and justifiably laughed at by the scientific community because he is a gigantic quack. He has absolutely *no* understanding of science and peddles, well, pretty much the opposite of everything Sojourners stands for. *Please*, next time you are going to use scientific references, use a credible source.

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 5:34pm

Okay. I agree with your point, and the deal on the 0.2% difference is probably correct, but why oh why are you quoting from Ken Ham?!?! He is roundly and justifiably laughed at by the scientific community because he is a gigantic quack. He has absolutely *no* understanding of science and peddles, well, pretty much the opposite of everything Sojourners stands for. *Please*, next time you are going to use scientific references, use a credible source.

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 5:34pm

Okay. I agree with your point, and the deal on the 0.2% difference is probably correct, but why oh why are you quoting from Ken Ham?!?! He is roundly and justifiably laughed at by the scientific community because he is a gigantic quack. He has absolutely *no* understanding of science and peddles, well, pretty much the opposite of everything Sojourners stands for. *Please*, next time you are going to use scientific references, use a credible source.

by: letjusticerolldown

12-03-2009 @ 4:19pm

Chandra--I fully agree with you. I want to take a different slant.

You deconstruct race as a meaningful concept. I agree.

My daughters are 7,9 and 10. They are racially mixed--or in the words of the 9-yr-old--"a mix of ten different things." 18 mos ago we moved from MN to Alabama. Up to that point they lived free of the "black-white" categories. Virtually the minute they arrived they started trying to make sense of the categories and how they fit. e.g. "What would have happened with our family if we were on the bus with Rosa Parks?" etc. etc. etc.

I wish with all my heart I could simply reject the categories. But the categories are being given meaning around them everyday. They are reacted to and formed based on those categories. The categories are a mental construct. The consequences are real. How does one deal with real life (i.e. real consequences)? One can't say--"You didn't experience that becuase the categorization which led to it is not real."

All of language is a construct. All of culture is a construct. The amazing thing about God's revelation is that it actually manifests in cultural forms: in language--in person--in history. We can deconstruct every cultural form as meaningless.

We conceive of humanity as a species that walks upright. The genetics of that are likely smaller than the genetics of race. It ought mean nothing to me if a woman walks on all fours instead of twos. Why would I not consider such a person for marriage?

Much of the spiritual journey is being stripped of all the meaningless stuff we assign as having meaning. We give up status, identity, goods, physical function, etc. etc. We give up "Being Baptist" as having eternal significance. We give up being white or black. We give up the cultural forms that paralyze the journey.

Yet at the same time we are creating forms and giving them meaning. If we fail to give form to our lives and faith in relation to others (i.e. society) and to God (i.e. religion) we mishandle our very humanity.

by: letjusticerolldown

12-03-2009 @ 4:19pm

Chandra--I fully agree with you. I want to take a different slant.

You deconstruct race as a meaningful concept. I agree.

My daughters are 7,9 and 10. They are racially mixed--or in the words of the 9-yr-old--"a mix of ten different things." 18 mos ago we moved from MN to Alabama. Up to that point they lived free of the "black-white" categories. Virtually the minute they arrived they started trying to make sense of the categories and how they fit. e.g. "What would have happened with our family if we were on the bus with Rosa Parks?" etc. etc. etc.

I wish with all my heart I could simply reject the categories. But the categories are being given meaning around them everyday. They are reacted to and formed based on those categories. The categories are a mental construct. The consequences are real. How does one deal with real life (i.e. real consequences)? One can't say--"You didn't experience that becuase the categorization which led to it is not real."

All of language is a construct. All of culture is a construct. The amazing thing about God's revelation is that it actually manifests in cultural forms: in language--in person--in history. We can deconstruct every cultural form as meaningless.

We conceive of humanity as a species that walks upright. The genetics of that are likely smaller than the genetics of race. It ought mean nothing to me if a woman walks on all fours instead of twos. Why would I not consider such a person for marriage?

Much of the spiritual journey is being stripped of all the meaningless stuff we assign as having meaning. We give up status, identity, goods, physical function, etc. etc. We give up "Being Baptist" as having eternal significance. We give up being white or black. We give up the cultural forms that paralyze the journey.

Yet at the same time we are creating forms and giving them meaning. If we fail to give form to our lives and faith in relation to others (i.e. society) and to God (i.e. religion) we mishandle our very humanity.

by: privelegeslayer

12-03-2009 @ 6:11pm

Race as a concept is obviously problematic. But will ending "race" as a concept end inequality? When has there EVER been equality in the human race amongst groups? Even when there was no concept of race, most societies were stratified some sort of way. Maybe it was culture, religion, language,etc.

It doesn't matter if you live in a society where everyone is the same color (IE: English vs. Irish) culture or language , there will still be someone at the "bottom" who is discriminated against. It just so happens that here in America, phenotype was the MAIN way used to stratify society with those perceived as White benefiting from this system.

There are those who believe that "race" is THE problem(not racism) and ending race will bring about a Utopian society. Sadly, some of the more ignorant people who subscribe to this belief go on to say that "mixing" races or mixed race people are the solution(mixed race people of European decent have been known to hold racist beliefs towards non-Europeans ). How could anyone believe that? Once again, inequality is the problem, not race. Race is just a smoke screen to mask what is really going on. Diversity, Mixing Races, learning about a different culture is not wrong, but I fail to see what good any of this would do to help groups who have been disenfranchised.

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 7:34pm

Okay. I agree with your point, and the deal on the 0.2% difference is probably correct, but why oh why are you quoting from Ken Ham?!?! He is roundly and justifiably laughed at by the scientific community because he is a gigantic quack. He has absolutely *no* understanding of science and peddles, well, pretty much the opposite of everything Sojourners stands for. *Please*, next time you are going to use scientific references, use a credible source.

by: privelegeslayer

12-03-2009 @ 6:11pm

Race as a concept is obviously problematic. But will ending "race" as a concept end inequality? When has there EVER been equality in the human race amongst groups? Even when there was no concept of race, most societies were stratified some sort of way. Maybe it was culture, religion, language,etc.

It doesn't matter if you live in a society where everyone is the same color (IE: English vs. Irish) culture or language , there will still be someone at the "bottom" who is discriminated against. It just so happens that here in America, phenotype was the MAIN way used to stratify society with those perceived as White benefiting from this system.

There are those who believe that "race" is THE problem(not racism) and ending race will bring about a Utopian society. Sadly, some of the more ignorant people who subscribe to this belief go on to say that "mixing" races or mixed race people are the solution(mixed race people of European decent have been known to hold racist beliefs towards non-Europeans ). How could anyone believe that? Once again, inequality is the problem, not race. Race is just a smoke screen to mask what is really going on. Diversity, Mixing Races, learning about a different culture is not wrong, but I fail to see what good any of this would do to help groups who have been disenfranchised.

by: MarKatJac

12-04-2009 @ 2:29am

Many have said that Green is the only color that matters. Once we Christians have appropriately dealt with our baggage of racial classifications, and stopped inventing interpretations of the Bible to justify our fear of 'other,' we will still have to deal with the problem of the wealth exhibited by North American church goers. Today, much of the way Protestant Churches have been organized is as much a function of green, as black and white. Parishoners who have absolutely nothing to speak of, are enticed by sermons that allude to pearly gates, and a future life in heaven that is free of pain and worldly cares. Such sermons mean little to wealthier Christians who could probably have their own pearly gates installed tomorrow. They might gravitate to a sermon on some more intellectual discussion on how Jesus used metaphors, similes, and other allegories to teach to the masses. A service that is high energy might be off putting, to certain people of a higher social strata, no matter where they fall in the melanin hue.

by: Kim Shimer

12-04-2009 @ 1:21pm

Chandra, I appreciated your article and I think you would appreciate a new book by Curtiss Paul DeYoung. Coming Together in the 21st Century: The Bible's Message in an Age of Diversity offers an in-depth study of multiculturalism and diversity in Scripture. It features contributions from ethnically and culturally diverse men and women, including Brenda Salter-McNeil, Richard Twiss, Jean Zaru, Mimi Haddad, and Allan Boesak. If you'd like a review copy, I'd be happy to send you one (I work for the publisher, Judson Press).

by: MarKatJac

12-04-2009 @ 2:29am

Many have said that Green is the only color that matters. Once we Christians have appropriately dealt with our baggage of racial classifications, and stopped inventing interpretations of the Bible to justify our fear of 'other,' we will still have to deal with the problem of the wealth exhibited by North American church goers. Today, much of the way Protestant Churches have been organized is as much a function of green, as black and white. Parishoners who have absolutely nothing to speak of, are enticed by sermons that allude to pearly gates, and a future life in heaven that is free of pain and worldly cares. Such sermons mean little to wealthier Christians who could probably have their own pearly gates installed tomorrow. They might gravitate to a sermon on some more intellectual discussion on how Jesus used metaphors, similes, and other allegories to teach to the masses. A service that is high energy might be off putting, to certain people of a higher social strata, no matter where they fall in the melanin hue.

by: Kim Shimer

12-04-2009 @ 1:21pm

Chandra, I appreciated your article and I think you would appreciate a new book by Curtiss Paul DeYoung. Coming Together in the 21st Century: The Bible's Message in an Age of Diversity offers an in-depth study of multiculturalism and diversity in Scripture. It features contributions from ethnically and culturally diverse men and women, including Brenda Salter-McNeil, Richard Twiss, Jean Zaru, Mimi Haddad, and Allan Boesak. If you'd like a review copy, I'd be happy to send you one (I work for the publisher, Judson Press).

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: letjusticerolldown

12-03-2009 @ 4:19pm

Chandra--I fully agree with you. I want to take a different slant.

You deconstruct race as a meaningful concept. I agree.

My daughters are 7,9 and 10. They are racially mixed--or in the words of the 9-yr-old--"a mix of ten different things." 18 mos ago we moved from MN to Alabama. Up to that point they lived free of the "black-white" categories. Virtually the minute they arrived they started trying to make sense of the categories and how they fit. e.g. "What would have happened with our family if we were on the bus with Rosa Parks?" etc. etc. etc.

I wish with all my heart I could simply reject the categories. But the categories are being given meaning around them everyday. They are reacted to and formed based on those categories. The categories are a mental construct. The consequences are real. How does one deal with real life (i.e. real consequences)? One can't say--"You didn't experience that becuase the categorization which led to it is not real."

All of language is a construct. All of culture is a construct. The amazing thing about God's revelation is that it actually manifests in cultural forms: in language--in person--in history. We can deconstruct every cultural form as meaningless.

We conceive of humanity as a species that walks upright. The genetics of that are likely smaller than the genetics of race. It ought mean nothing to me if a woman walks on all fours instead of twos. Why would I not consider such a person for marriage?

Much of the spiritual journey is being stripped of all the meaningless stuff we assign as having meaning. We give up status, identity, goods, physical function, etc. etc. We give up "Being Baptist" as having eternal significance. We give up being white or black. We give up the cultural forms that paralyze the journey.

Yet at the same time we are creating forms and giving them meaning. If we fail to give form to our lives and faith in relation to others (i.e. society) and to God (i.e. religion) we mishandle our very humanity.

by: letjusticerolldown

12-03-2009 @ 4:19pm

Chandra--I fully agree with you. I want to take a different slant.

You deconstruct race as a meaningful concept. I agree.

My daughters are 7,9 and 10. They are racially mixed--or in the words of the 9-yr-old--"a mix of ten different things." 18 mos ago we moved from MN to Alabama. Up to that point they lived free of the "black-white" categories. Virtually the minute they arrived they started trying to make sense of the categories and how they fit. e.g. "What would have happened with our family if we were on the bus with Rosa Parks?" etc. etc. etc.

I wish with all my heart I could simply reject the categories. But the categories are being given meaning around them everyday. They are reacted to and formed based on those categories. The categories are a mental construct. The consequences are real. How does one deal with real life (i.e. real consequences)? One can't say--"You didn't experience that becuase the categorization which led to it is not real."

All of language is a construct. All of culture is a construct. The amazing thing about God's revelation is that it actually manifests in cultural forms: in language--in person--in history. We can deconstruct every cultural form as meaningless.

We conceive of humanity as a species that walks upright. The genetics of that are likely smaller than the genetics of race. It ought mean nothing to me if a woman walks on all fours instead of twos. Why would I not consider such a person for marriage?

Much of the spiritual journey is being stripped of all the meaningless stuff we assign as having meaning. We give up status, identity, goods, physical function, etc. etc. We give up "Being Baptist" as having eternal significance. We give up being white or black. We give up the cultural forms that paralyze the journey.

Yet at the same time we are creating forms and giving them meaning. If we fail to give form to our lives and faith in relation to others (i.e. society) and to God (i.e. religion) we mishandle our very humanity.

by: privelegeslayer

12-03-2009 @ 6:11pm

Race as a concept is obviously problematic. But will ending "race" as a concept end inequality? When has there EVER been equality in the human race amongst groups? Even when there was no concept of race, most societies were stratified some sort of way. Maybe it was culture, religion, language,etc.

It doesn't matter if you live in a society where everyone is the same color (IE: English vs. Irish) culture or language , there will still be someone at the "bottom" who is discriminated against. It just so happens that here in America, phenotype was the MAIN way used to stratify society with those perceived as White benefiting from this system.

There are those who believe that "race" is THE problem(not racism) and ending race will bring about a Utopian society. Sadly, some of the more ignorant people who subscribe to this belief go on to say that "mixing" races or mixed race people are the solution(mixed race people of European decent have been known to hold racist beliefs towards non-Europeans ). How could anyone believe that? Once again, inequality is the problem, not race. Race is just a smoke screen to mask what is really going on. Diversity, Mixing Races, learning about a different culture is not wrong, but I fail to see what good any of this would do to help groups who have been disenfranchised.

by: privelegeslayer

12-03-2009 @ 6:11pm

Race as a concept is obviously problematic. But will ending "race" as a concept end inequality? When has there EVER been equality in the human race amongst groups? Even when there was no concept of race, most societies were stratified some sort of way. Maybe it was culture, religion, language,etc.

It doesn't matter if you live in a society where everyone is the same color (IE: English vs. Irish) culture or language , there will still be someone at the "bottom" who is discriminated against. It just so happens that here in America, phenotype was the MAIN way used to stratify society with those perceived as White benefiting from this system.

There are those who believe that "race" is THE problem(not racism) and ending race will bring about a Utopian society. Sadly, some of the more ignorant people who subscribe to this belief go on to say that "mixing" races or mixed race people are the solution(mixed race people of European decent have been known to hold racist beliefs towards non-Europeans ). How could anyone believe that? Once again, inequality is the problem, not race. Race is just a smoke screen to mask what is really going on. Diversity, Mixing Races, learning about a different culture is not wrong, but I fail to see what good any of this would do to help groups who have been disenfranchised.

by: MarKatJac

12-04-2009 @ 2:29am

Many have said that Green is the only color that matters. Once we Christians have appropriately dealt with our baggage of racial classifications, and stopped inventing interpretations of the Bible to justify our fear of 'other,' we will still have to deal with the problem of the wealth exhibited by North American church goers. Today, much of the way Protestant Churches have been organized is as much a function of green, as black and white. Parishoners who have absolutely nothing to speak of, are enticed by sermons that allude to pearly gates, and a future life in heaven that is free of pain and worldly cares. Such sermons mean little to wealthier Christians who could probably have their own pearly gates installed tomorrow. They might gravitate to a sermon on some more intellectual discussion on how Jesus used metaphors, similes, and other allegories to teach to the masses. A service that is high energy might be off putting, to certain people of a higher social strata, no matter where they fall in the melanin hue.

by: MarKatJac

12-04-2009 @ 2:29am

Many have said that Green is the only color that matters. Once we Christians have appropriately dealt with our baggage of racial classifications, and stopped inventing interpretations of the Bible to justify our fear of 'other,' we will still have to deal with the problem of the wealth exhibited by North American church goers. Today, much of the way Protestant Churches have been organized is as much a function of green, as black and white. Parishoners who have absolutely nothing to speak of, are enticed by sermons that allude to pearly gates, and a future life in heaven that is free of pain and worldly cares. Such sermons mean little to wealthier Christians who could probably have their own pearly gates installed tomorrow. They might gravitate to a sermon on some more intellectual discussion on how Jesus used metaphors, similes, and other allegories to teach to the masses. A service that is high energy might be off putting, to certain people of a higher social strata, no matter where they fall in the melanin hue.

by: Kim Shimer

12-04-2009 @ 1:21pm

Chandra, I appreciated your article and I think you would appreciate a new book by Curtiss Paul DeYoung. Coming Together in the 21st Century: The Bible's Message in an Age of Diversity offers an in-depth study of multiculturalism and diversity in Scripture. It features contributions from ethnically and culturally diverse men and women, including Brenda Salter-McNeil, Richard Twiss, Jean Zaru, Mimi Haddad, and Allan Boesak. If you'd like a review copy, I'd be happy to send you one (I work for the publisher, Judson Press).

by: Kim Shimer

12-04-2009 @ 1:21pm

Chandra, I appreciated your article and I think you would appreciate a new book by Curtiss Paul DeYoung. Coming Together in the 21st Century: The Bible's Message in an Age of Diversity offers an in-depth study of multiculturalism and diversity in Scripture. It features contributions from ethnically and culturally diverse men and women, including Brenda Salter-McNeil, Richard Twiss, Jean Zaru, Mimi Haddad, and Allan Boesak. If you'd like a review copy, I'd be happy to send you one (I work for the publisher, Judson Press).

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 5:34pm

Okay. I agree with your point, and the deal on the 0.2% difference is probably correct, but why oh why are you quoting from Ken Ham?!?! He is roundly and justifiably laughed at by the scientific community because he is a gigantic quack. He has absolutely *no* understanding of science and peddles, well, pretty much the opposite of everything Sojourners stands for. *Please*, next time you are going to use scientific references, use a credible source.

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 5:34pm

Okay. I agree with your point, and the deal on the 0.2% difference is probably correct, but why oh why are you quoting from Ken Ham?!?! He is roundly and justifiably laughed at by the scientific community because he is a gigantic quack. He has absolutely *no* understanding of science and peddles, well, pretty much the opposite of everything Sojourners stands for. *Please*, next time you are going to use scientific references, use a credible source.

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 7:34pm

Okay. I agree with your point, and the deal on the 0.2% difference is probably correct, but why oh why are you quoting from Ken Ham?!?! He is roundly and justifiably laughed at by the scientific community because he is a gigantic quack. He has absolutely *no* understanding of science and peddles, well, pretty much the opposite of everything Sojourners stands for. *Please*, next time you are going to use scientific references, use a credible source.

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 7:34pm

Okay. I agree with your point, and the deal on the 0.2% difference is probably correct, but why oh why are you quoting from Ken Ham?!?! He is roundly and justifiably laughed at by the scientific community because he is a gigantic quack. He has absolutely *no* understanding of science and peddles, well, pretty much the opposite of everything Sojourners stands for. *Please*, next time you are going to use scientific references, use a credible source.