Get E-Mail Updates

Christmas Toy Drives Bring Protests of Anti-Immigrant Discrimination

Last week we received word from Houston, Texas, that some charitable organizations would screen out the children of undocumented residents of the city when it comes time to distribute toys and other Christmas gifts. You can read the original report published by The Houston Chronicle ( "Some toy drives check immigration status," Nov. 30, 2009, by Jeannie Kever) here.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

The original story reported that the Salvation Army and a toy drive associated with the city's fire department would be requiring various forms of identification, including social security cards, birth certificates, and proof of income, to qualify families and children to receive toys and Christmas gifts this year. The report set off reaction from groups working with immigrants in the city.

Last Thursday, the paper published a follow-up story that reported the decision by the Salvation Army not to require social security cards.

"It was never our intention to offend anyone with our registration requirement to provide a Social Security number, or to give the impression that we were discriminating against those individuals and families who do not have a Social Security number," Major Chris Flanagan, Area Commander for The Salvation Army Greater Houston Area Command, said in a statement.

To read the entire report, click here.

My reading of the stories leads me to believe that the original intention was to eliminate the children of "illegal" immigrants from the Christmas gift program. Thankfully, the organizations involved reconsidered the hurtful policy. As usual when a community rises up and cries out, things change for the better.

Still, the entire affair points up once again the intense hatred and the unapologetic discrimination lurking just beneath the surface of many of our communities that can be so quickly directed toward our immigrant neighbors. Reading the reports and considering the attitudes that informed these policy decisions in the first place, I'm wondering if our faith communities and their leaders don't need to do some work with us on just how God regards the "aliens" and the "strangers" among us.

Clearly, we need to remember and reconsider the clarity of our faith tradition regarding residents from other places, regardless of how they made their way to us. I'm thinking of words like these:

"Do not mistreat an alien or oppress him, for you were aliens in Egypt." Exodus 22:21

"Do not oppress an alien; you yourselves know how it feels to be aliens, because you were aliens in Egypt." Exodus 23:9

"The alien living with you must be treated as one of your native-born. Love him as yourself, for you were aliens in Egypt. I am the LORD your God." Leviticus 19:34

"And you are to love those who are aliens, for you yourselves were aliens in Egypt." Deuteronomy 10:19

"For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in ...." Matthew 25:35

In view of the clarity of our faith traditions, I'd say we need to reflect clearly and carefully on our attitudes and our actions. Maybe it's just me, but this seems especially true during the Advent waiting as we consider the arrival of the Child who, himself an immigrant in more ways than one, comes to set us free.

Larry James is president and CEO of Central Dallas Ministries.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: bushworlda

12-05-2009 @ 1:33am

by: bushworlda

12-05-2009 @ 1:35am

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-05-2009 @ 3:35pm

I'm sorry, but this just doesn't bother me all that much.

If we were sentencing illegal immigrants who had committed no other crimes to long prison sentences, that would be oppression.

Routine but consistent enforcement of immigration law? Not oppression IMHO, though I can understand why others might come to different opinions.

Not giving kids toys? Oppression? Sorry, that doesn't even pass the giggle test.

Robben Island was oppression. The Cuban gulags are oppression. Santa Claus not showing up is a disappointment.

LV

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 6:30pm

"Never our attention to offend"?!? Forget offense! How could the Army do this? It flies in the face of all they stand for, and all of their origins!

by: Morna

12-05-2009 @ 5:21pm

Discrimination need not qualify as oppression to be wrong.

by: WaveTossed

12-05-2009 @ 9:41pm

I wonder if Mary and Joseph's immigration papers were checked at the inn before they came to the stable.

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-05-2009 @ 3:35pm

I'm sorry, but this just doesn't bother me all that much.

If we were sentencing illegal immigrants who had committed no other crimes to long prison sentences, that would be oppression.

Routine but consistent enforcement of immigration law? Not oppression IMHO, though I can understand why others might come to different opinions.

Not giving kids toys? Oppression? Sorry, that doesn't even pass the giggle test.

Robben Island was oppression. The Cuban gulags are oppression. Santa Claus not showing up is a disappointment.

LV

by: kansasmennonite

12-06-2009 @ 11:47am

You're pretty cold this time of year-eh?

by: Morna

12-05-2009 @ 5:21pm

Discrimination need not qualify as oppression to be wrong.

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 6:30pm

"Never our attention to offend"?!? Forget offense! How could the Army do this? It flies in the face of all they stand for, and all of their origins!

by: codyhuf

12-06-2009 @ 6:57pm

I have to say that I must agree with He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named to an extent.

I do not like discrimination based on immigration status. Especially, for kids. In most cases, kids have no choice in the matter.

However, I find it much more important that we make sure people are not discriminating when food/shelter/clothing are concerned. I would much rather make sure that these little children are fed than fight with someone so they can have toys. I work with homeless and formerly homeless families and still have mixed feelings about the overwhelming generosity when it comes to giving toys at Christmas time, while children often go hungry during the rest of the year.

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-07-2009 @ 1:45pm

Ah, the "Joseph and Mary were immigrants too" meme. Comes up this every Christmas season. Please allow me to debunk this for the umpteenth time. It's been a whole year, maybe you forgot that:

1. Joseph and Mary's trip from Bethlehem to Jerusalem wasn't immigration, it was in effect a business trip, one that they were forced into by a ham-handed Roman tax bureaucracy.

2. Later on Mary and Joseph went to Egypt for a spell. that wasn't really immigration either. Remember the Roman Empire? It was big. Mary and Joseph didn't cross the border between sovereign countries, but between provinces within the empire. The equivalent would be if they moved from Michigan to Texas, which a lot of people are doing without a peep from anyone.

3. Even if you ignore all that, Mary and Joseph were not motivated by economics but by fear that their child would be killed by Herod. They returned when the danger subsided. In that sense they were temporary refugees rather than immigrants.

That's the story that's in the Bible, at least. If you don't like it feel free to write your own.

Look, I think the US should be relatively open to legal immigration, but that's not the same thing as mass illegal immigration.

LV

by: WaveTossed

12-05-2009 @ 9:41pm

I wonder if Mary and Joseph's immigration papers were checked at the inn before they came to the stable.

by: Ngchen

12-07-2009 @ 5:38pm

The issue, IMHO, is not so much the toys or lack thereof, as opposed to the de facto segregation that would take place. To clarify, imagine kids A and B. Kid A looks "native," so gets his stuff with no further questions asked. Kid B looks different, so IDs and so forth are demanded. It's not the toys as the treating of kids A and B differently that inevitably occurs under any sort of check scheme here.

by: kansasmennonite

12-06-2009 @ 11:47am

You're pretty cold this time of year-eh?

by: irish_annie

12-07-2009 @ 7:40pm

i don't particularly like certain folks being treated differently from others... seems that james warned against being 'respecters of persons' and Jesus affirmed that our Father sends his rain on all equally. i'm thrilled that the SA amended their policy - one initially not well thought out evidently.

however, the flip side: is this really helpful? to train children to have an entitlement mentality, as if somehow they are OWED christmas presents? selah.

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 8:30pm

"Never our attention to offend"?!? Forget offense! How could the Army do this? It flies in the face of all they stand for, and all of their origins!

by: codyhuf

12-06-2009 @ 6:57pm

I have to say that I must agree with He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named to an extent.

I do not like discrimination based on immigration status. Especially, for kids. In most cases, kids have no choice in the matter.

However, I find it much more important that we make sure people are not discriminating when food/shelter/clothing are concerned. I would much rather make sure that these little children are fed than fight with someone so they can have toys. I work with homeless and formerly homeless families and still have mixed feelings about the overwhelming generosity when it comes to giving toys at Christmas time, while children often go hungry during the rest of the year.

by: uberVU - social comments

12-06-2009 @ 10:12pm

Social comments and analytics for this post...

This post was mentioned on Twitter by BeatitudesSoc: Christmas Toy Drives Bring Protests of Anti-Immigrant Discrimination http://bit.ly/6Su8o5...

by: rockstarlizzy

12-08-2009 @ 2:27am

Let's not complicate something so simple. The real question here, is how would Jesus treat people coming to him for free gifts? I don't think He'd be telling Little Timmy the Samaritan, "Sorry, kid, you don't qualify for a blessing today. Go home so I can give the Judeans these cool toys."

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-07-2009 @ 1:45pm

Ah, the "Joseph and Mary were immigrants too" meme. Comes up this every Christmas season. Please allow me to debunk this for the umpteenth time. It's been a whole year, maybe you forgot that:

1. Joseph and Mary's trip from Bethlehem to Jerusalem wasn't immigration, it was in effect a business trip, one that they were forced into by a ham-handed Roman tax bureaucracy.

2. Later on Mary and Joseph went to Egypt for a spell. that wasn't really immigration either. Remember the Roman Empire? It was big. Mary and Joseph didn't cross the border between sovereign countries, but between provinces within the empire. The equivalent would be if they moved from Michigan to Texas, which a lot of people are doing without a peep from anyone.

3. Even if you ignore all that, Mary and Joseph were not motivated by economics but by fear that their child would be killed by Herod. They returned when the danger subsided. In that sense they were temporary refugees rather than immigrants.

That's the story that's in the Bible, at least. If you don't like it feel free to write your own.

Look, I think the US should be relatively open to legal immigration, but that's not the same thing as mass illegal immigration.

LV

by: WaveTossed

12-08-2009 @ 5:07pm

Actually, I wasn't trying to say that Mary and Joseph were immigrants, because you are correct; they weren't. They were going to pay their taxes.

However, the craze for checking out each and everyone's immigration status before performing acts of Christian charity to celebrate the Birth of Jesus left me wondering: were people of the day concerned with checking immigration status of those coming in, including that of Mary and Joseph, as they were preparing for the birth of our Savior? Or perhaps people were more concerned with more important issues, such as the miracle that was to happen that night.

As for immigration in the modern age in the U.S. check out some of the free-market sites, especially the Cato Institute.

by: Ngchen

12-07-2009 @ 5:38pm

The issue, IMHO, is not so much the toys or lack thereof, as opposed to the de facto segregation that would take place. To clarify, imagine kids A and B. Kid A looks "native," so gets his stuff with no further questions asked. Kid B looks different, so IDs and so forth are demanded. It's not the toys as the treating of kids A and B differently that inevitably occurs under any sort of check scheme here.

by: irish_annie

12-07-2009 @ 7:40pm

i don't particularly like certain folks being treated differently from others... seems that james warned against being 'respecters of persons' and Jesus affirmed that our Father sends his rain on all equally. i'm thrilled that the SA amended their policy - one initially not well thought out evidently.

however, the flip side: is this really helpful? to train children to have an entitlement mentality, as if somehow they are OWED christmas presents? selah.

by: rockstarlizzy

12-08-2009 @ 2:27am

Let's not complicate something so simple. The real question here, is how would Jesus treat people coming to him for free gifts? I don't think He'd be telling Little Timmy the Samaritan, "Sorry, kid, you don't qualify for a blessing today. Go home so I can give the Judeans these cool toys."

by: WaveTossed

12-08-2009 @ 5:07pm

Actually, I wasn't trying to say that Mary and Joseph were immigrants, because you are correct; they weren't. They were going to pay their taxes.

However, the craze for checking out each and everyone's immigration status before performing acts of Christian charity to celebrate the Birth of Jesus left me wondering: were people of the day concerned with checking immigration status of those coming in, including that of Mary and Joseph, as they were preparing for the birth of our Savior? Or perhaps people were more concerned with more important issues, such as the miracle that was to happen that night.

As for immigration in the modern age in the U.S. check out some of the free-market sites, especially the Cato Institute.

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 8:30pm

"Never our attention to offend"?!? Forget offense! How could the Army do this? It flies in the face of all they stand for, and all of their origins!

by: bushworlda

12-05-2009 @ 1:33am

by: bushworlda

12-05-2009 @ 1:35am

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: bushworlda

12-05-2009 @ 1:33am

by: bushworlda

12-05-2009 @ 1:33am

by: bushworlda

12-05-2009 @ 1:35am

by: bushworlda

12-05-2009 @ 1:35am

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-05-2009 @ 3:35pm

I'm sorry, but this just doesn't bother me all that much.

If we were sentencing illegal immigrants who had committed no other crimes to long prison sentences, that would be oppression.

Routine but consistent enforcement of immigration law? Not oppression IMHO, though I can understand why others might come to different opinions.

Not giving kids toys? Oppression? Sorry, that doesn't even pass the giggle test.

Robben Island was oppression. The Cuban gulags are oppression. Santa Claus not showing up is a disappointment.

LV

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-05-2009 @ 3:35pm

I'm sorry, but this just doesn't bother me all that much.

If we were sentencing illegal immigrants who had committed no other crimes to long prison sentences, that would be oppression.

Routine but consistent enforcement of immigration law? Not oppression IMHO, though I can understand why others might come to different opinions.

Not giving kids toys? Oppression? Sorry, that doesn't even pass the giggle test.

Robben Island was oppression. The Cuban gulags are oppression. Santa Claus not showing up is a disappointment.

LV

by: Morna

12-05-2009 @ 5:21pm

Discrimination need not qualify as oppression to be wrong.

by: Morna

12-05-2009 @ 5:21pm

Discrimination need not qualify as oppression to be wrong.

by: WaveTossed

12-05-2009 @ 9:41pm

I wonder if Mary and Joseph's immigration papers were checked at the inn before they came to the stable.

by: WaveTossed

12-05-2009 @ 9:41pm

I wonder if Mary and Joseph's immigration papers were checked at the inn before they came to the stable.

by: kansasmennonite

12-06-2009 @ 11:47am

You're pretty cold this time of year-eh?

by: kansasmennonite

12-06-2009 @ 11:47am

You're pretty cold this time of year-eh?

by: codyhuf

12-06-2009 @ 6:57pm

I have to say that I must agree with He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named to an extent.

I do not like discrimination based on immigration status. Especially, for kids. In most cases, kids have no choice in the matter.

However, I find it much more important that we make sure people are not discriminating when food/shelter/clothing are concerned. I would much rather make sure that these little children are fed than fight with someone so they can have toys. I work with homeless and formerly homeless families and still have mixed feelings about the overwhelming generosity when it comes to giving toys at Christmas time, while children often go hungry during the rest of the year.

by: codyhuf

12-06-2009 @ 6:57pm

I have to say that I must agree with He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named to an extent.

I do not like discrimination based on immigration status. Especially, for kids. In most cases, kids have no choice in the matter.

However, I find it much more important that we make sure people are not discriminating when food/shelter/clothing are concerned. I would much rather make sure that these little children are fed than fight with someone so they can have toys. I work with homeless and formerly homeless families and still have mixed feelings about the overwhelming generosity when it comes to giving toys at Christmas time, while children often go hungry during the rest of the year.

by: uberVU - social comments

12-06-2009 @ 10:12pm

Social comments and analytics for this post...

This post was mentioned on Twitter by BeatitudesSoc: Christmas Toy Drives Bring Protests of Anti-Immigrant Discrimination http://bit.ly/6Su8o5...

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-07-2009 @ 1:45pm

Ah, the "Joseph and Mary were immigrants too" meme. Comes up this every Christmas season. Please allow me to debunk this for the umpteenth time. It's been a whole year, maybe you forgot that:

1. Joseph and Mary's trip from Bethlehem to Jerusalem wasn't immigration, it was in effect a business trip, one that they were forced into by a ham-handed Roman tax bureaucracy.

2. Later on Mary and Joseph went to Egypt for a spell. that wasn't really immigration either. Remember the Roman Empire? It was big. Mary and Joseph didn't cross the border between sovereign countries, but between provinces within the empire. The equivalent would be if they moved from Michigan to Texas, which a lot of people are doing without a peep from anyone.

3. Even if you ignore all that, Mary and Joseph were not motivated by economics but by fear that their child would be killed by Herod. They returned when the danger subsided. In that sense they were temporary refugees rather than immigrants.

That's the story that's in the Bible, at least. If you don't like it feel free to write your own.

Look, I think the US should be relatively open to legal immigration, but that's not the same thing as mass illegal immigration.

LV

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-07-2009 @ 1:45pm

Ah, the "Joseph and Mary were immigrants too" meme. Comes up this every Christmas season. Please allow me to debunk this for the umpteenth time. It's been a whole year, maybe you forgot that:

1. Joseph and Mary's trip from Bethlehem to Jerusalem wasn't immigration, it was in effect a business trip, one that they were forced into by a ham-handed Roman tax bureaucracy.

2. Later on Mary and Joseph went to Egypt for a spell. that wasn't really immigration either. Remember the Roman Empire? It was big. Mary and Joseph didn't cross the border between sovereign countries, but between provinces within the empire. The equivalent would be if they moved from Michigan to Texas, which a lot of people are doing without a peep from anyone.

3. Even if you ignore all that, Mary and Joseph were not motivated by economics but by fear that their child would be killed by Herod. They returned when the danger subsided. In that sense they were temporary refugees rather than immigrants.

That's the story that's in the Bible, at least. If you don't like it feel free to write your own.

Look, I think the US should be relatively open to legal immigration, but that's not the same thing as mass illegal immigration.

LV

by: Ngchen

12-07-2009 @ 5:38pm

The issue, IMHO, is not so much the toys or lack thereof, as opposed to the de facto segregation that would take place. To clarify, imagine kids A and B. Kid A looks "native," so gets his stuff with no further questions asked. Kid B looks different, so IDs and so forth are demanded. It's not the toys as the treating of kids A and B differently that inevitably occurs under any sort of check scheme here.

by: Ngchen

12-07-2009 @ 5:38pm

The issue, IMHO, is not so much the toys or lack thereof, as opposed to the de facto segregation that would take place. To clarify, imagine kids A and B. Kid A looks "native," so gets his stuff with no further questions asked. Kid B looks different, so IDs and so forth are demanded. It's not the toys as the treating of kids A and B differently that inevitably occurs under any sort of check scheme here.

by: irish_annie

12-07-2009 @ 7:40pm

i don't particularly like certain folks being treated differently from others... seems that james warned against being 'respecters of persons' and Jesus affirmed that our Father sends his rain on all equally. i'm thrilled that the SA amended their policy - one initially not well thought out evidently.

however, the flip side: is this really helpful? to train children to have an entitlement mentality, as if somehow they are OWED christmas presents? selah.

by: irish_annie

12-07-2009 @ 7:40pm

i don't particularly like certain folks being treated differently from others... seems that james warned against being 'respecters of persons' and Jesus affirmed that our Father sends his rain on all equally. i'm thrilled that the SA amended their policy - one initially not well thought out evidently.

however, the flip side: is this really helpful? to train children to have an entitlement mentality, as if somehow they are OWED christmas presents? selah.

by: rockstarlizzy

12-08-2009 @ 2:27am

Let's not complicate something so simple. The real question here, is how would Jesus treat people coming to him for free gifts? I don't think He'd be telling Little Timmy the Samaritan, "Sorry, kid, you don't qualify for a blessing today. Go home so I can give the Judeans these cool toys."

by: rockstarlizzy

12-08-2009 @ 2:27am

Let's not complicate something so simple. The real question here, is how would Jesus treat people coming to him for free gifts? I don't think He'd be telling Little Timmy the Samaritan, "Sorry, kid, you don't qualify for a blessing today. Go home so I can give the Judeans these cool toys."

by: WaveTossed

12-08-2009 @ 5:07pm

Actually, I wasn't trying to say that Mary and Joseph were immigrants, because you are correct; they weren't. They were going to pay their taxes.

However, the craze for checking out each and everyone's immigration status before performing acts of Christian charity to celebrate the Birth of Jesus left me wondering: were people of the day concerned with checking immigration status of those coming in, including that of Mary and Joseph, as they were preparing for the birth of our Savior? Or perhaps people were more concerned with more important issues, such as the miracle that was to happen that night.

As for immigration in the modern age in the U.S. check out some of the free-market sites, especially the Cato Institute.

by: WaveTossed

12-08-2009 @ 5:07pm

Actually, I wasn't trying to say that Mary and Joseph were immigrants, because you are correct; they weren't. They were going to pay their taxes.

However, the craze for checking out each and everyone's immigration status before performing acts of Christian charity to celebrate the Birth of Jesus left me wondering: were people of the day concerned with checking immigration status of those coming in, including that of Mary and Joseph, as they were preparing for the birth of our Savior? Or perhaps people were more concerned with more important issues, such as the miracle that was to happen that night.

As for immigration in the modern age in the U.S. check out some of the free-market sites, especially the Cato Institute.

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 6:30pm

"Never our attention to offend"?!? Forget offense! How could the Army do this? It flies in the face of all they stand for, and all of their origins!

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 6:30pm

"Never our attention to offend"?!? Forget offense! How could the Army do this? It flies in the face of all they stand for, and all of their origins!

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 8:30pm

"Never our attention to offend"?!? Forget offense! How could the Army do this? It flies in the face of all they stand for, and all of their origins!

by: Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari

12-20-2009 @ 8:30pm

"Never our attention to offend"?!? Forget offense! How could the Army do this? It flies in the face of all they stand for, and all of their origins!