Get E-Mail Updates

Congressman Luis Gutierrez Introduces a Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill

091217-gutierrez-billThe room was hot and stifling and overcrowded, but the excitement was palpable as people gathered to witness the introduction of a new comprehensive immigration reform bill. I barely managed to squeeze in, edging through the throng of people who spilled into the hallways. And just in time.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

A few moments later, a parade of Members of Congress filed in to cheers of "Yes, we can!" and "Sí, se puede!" from the immigrant families and members of clergy gathered behind the podium. And a few minutes later, flanked by members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Black Caucus, Asian Pacific American Caucus, and Progressive Caucus, Congressman Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) introduced the Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America's Security and Prosperity (CIR ASAP) Act of 2009.

In my involvement with Christians for Comprehensive Immigration Reform, I've heard many stories of the fallout of a broken immigration system: families separated, seemingly endless waiting periods for legal immigration, undocumented immigrants afraid to report a crime for fear of being detained and deported. This is not what it looks like to love our neighbors or to care for the strangers among us.

As the son of naturalized American citizens, I've benefited from the rights and freedoms that my parents earned for me with years of their lives. I played no part in the process of their naturalization, but I've been able to appreciate and enjoy the blessings. And so I feel the added weight of responsibility that comes with privilege: knowing that any blessing that is bestowed is for the purpose that others may be blessed, and remembering that God will hold us accountable for what we do with what we have received (Luke 12:48).

In response to the introduction of CIR ASAP, CCIR issued a press release, including statements of support from national and local Christian leaders for the principles guiding the bill. While there remain many hurdles before comprehensive immigration reform is finally passed, for me this bill marks one more encouraging step in the journey toward fulfilling our biblical mandates to love our neighbors as ourselves and to care for the stranger among us.

Let's hope we see the destination in 2010.

portrait-justin-fungJustin Fung is the policy and organizing assistant for Sojourners. A graduate of Fuller Theological Seminary, he also tweets and blogs regularly at Gershom's Journal.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: GlenPeterson

12-18-2009 @ 7:38pm

Thank you, Justin, for sharing a bit about your personal story. I, too, have benefited from when and how my forebears migrated. This morning, I had breakfast with a dear friend, who after 16 years or so, got his papers just last month. For me, it is what I have learned about faith, trust in God, hospitality, tenacity, and more that has blessed me with the honor of being friend to sojourners, strangers, travelers, migrants. May God speed the work of Congress for CIR ASAP.

by: SamHamilton

12-19-2009 @ 7:15pm

Nancy Pelosi recently said she will not ask her House caucus to vote on any controversial bills in 2010 to lessen the the number of Democrats getting defeated in November. This bill definitely falls under the category of "controversial". The ironic thing is, 2010 is probably the best chance to pass this or any other bill we'll see in a while. Democrat numbers in Congress are at a high point.

Even some pro-legalization Members of Congress don't like what Gutierrez is doing because they're working towards a bipartisan solution and he, in their mind, is throwing a wrench into the works. For what it's worth, this bill is going nowhere soon. The Democrats will continue to string those who want earned legalization along for electoral reasons, but it'll be a while before they actually sign something into law.

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 8:03pm

"IIRC, the INS hasn't existed for 6 years and nine months."

Huh??

"their wait times would be increased since it would take years to process all those illegal aliens;"

Not if more INS agents were hired to deal with the backlog. However, the political will to hire more agents to deal with the backlog isn't there. It's a lot easier for too many people (who oppose immigration in general) to blame "illegal" immigrants for "breaking the law" than it is to hire more INS agents.

Read this from the Cato Institute (a free market site):

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3638

by: SamHamilton

12-19-2009 @ 7:20pm

I agree it's hard to muster up a lot of sympathy for people who are in a tough situation solely because of their own doing (for vast majority of undocumented immigrants). But there is a point where the American people have to ask themselves, what is the most realistic and just policy solution.

I think we need to increase the avenues for legal immigration and give people who are here illegally a way to gain some sort of legal status that allows them to work and participate in our society without fear of deportation. Obviously, immigrants who have broken laws other than immigration laws should be immediately deported.

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-18-2009 @ 8:26pm

I'd be happy to support the hiring of more INS agents to speed the processing of legal immigration applications, in exchange for stronger enforcement of immigration law generally.

LV

by: WaveTossed

12-19-2009 @ 8:00pm

"It is that there are simply not enough legal channels for people to immigrate legally."

Good point. That's also what the Cato Institute's Griswold has said. He advocates that this be corrected.

Unforunately, there is too much racism and xenophobia present here in the U.S. for most politicians to consider raising the number of legal immigration channels. Any politician who even thinks about proposing this solution ends up getting mired with all of the "they're breaking the law; they brought this situation on themselves; they will all go on welfare" types of objections. They probably will face a tough time getting re-elected without a lot more education.

by: WaveTossed

12-19-2009 @ 8:05pm

"I think we need to increase the avenues for legal immigration and give people who are here illegally a way to gain some sort of legal status that allows them to work and participate in our society without fear of deportation."

I said earlier in this thread: this is exactly what the Cato Institute's Griswold said. Allowing more low-skill people in so that employers can fill these positions with legal people who have the protection of the law on their side -- and employers can get their work done. This makes sense.

Unfortunately, this makes too much sense for the anti-legal-immigration xenophobes who fill too much of the "stop illegal immigration" campaigns.

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 8:46pm

I wouldn't mind that exchange. However, when legal immigration is being processed more quickly, then there will be a lot less enforcement needed.

by: Mennoman

12-19-2009 @ 10:08am

USCIS hired a ton of people over the past two years. Applications are being processed at a record speed. The problem (for the most part) is not the processing of applications now. It is that there are simply not enough legal channels for people to immigrate legally. Your choice of stronger enforcement and the hiring of more adjudications officers to process the few (as opposed to the many who cannot) people who can qualify for immigration benefits is simply more of the same stonewalling that many on the right have engaged in for years. It really brings nothing of value or substance to the debate. At best it offers a false dichotomy.

by: Mennoman

12-19-2009 @ 10:13am

The link you posted 24Head is a right-wing propaganda rag.

by: BuckeyeDon

12-19-2009 @ 12:32pm

Mennoman, it's HIS right-wing propaganda rag.

by: BuckeyeDon

12-19-2009 @ 3:28pm

The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was under the Justice Department. After the Department of Homeland Security was created, the INS ceased to exist. Its functions were given to departments within Homeland Security, most notably U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

by: SamHamilton

12-19-2009 @ 7:15pm

Nancy Pelosi recently said she will not ask her House caucus to vote on any controversial bills in 2010 to lessen the the number of Democrats getting defeated in November. This bill definitely falls under the category of "controversial". The ironic thing is, 2010 is probably the best chance to pass this or any other bill we'll see in a while. Democrat numbers in Congress are at a high point.

Even some pro-legalization Members of Congress don't like what Gutierrez is doing because they're working towards a bipartisan solution and he, in their mind, is throwing a wrench into the works. For what it's worth, this bill is going nowhere soon. The Democrats will continue to string those who want earned legalization along for electoral reasons, but it'll be a while before they actually sign something into law.

by: SamHamilton

12-19-2009 @ 7:20pm

I agree it's hard to muster up a lot of sympathy for people who are in a tough situation solely because of their own doing (for vast majority of undocumented immigrants). But there is a point where the American people have to ask themselves, what is the most realistic and just policy solution.

I think we need to increase the avenues for legal immigration and give people who are here illegally a way to gain some sort of legal status that allows them to work and participate in our society without fear of deportation. Obviously, immigrants who have broken laws other than immigration laws should be immediately deported.

by: WaveTossed

12-19-2009 @ 8:00pm

"It is that there are simply not enough legal channels for people to immigrate legally."

Good point. That's also what the Cato Institute's Griswold has said. He advocates that this be corrected.

Unforunately, there is too much racism and xenophobia present here in the U.S. for most politicians to consider raising the number of legal immigration channels. Any politician who even thinks about proposing this solution ends up getting mired with all of the "they're breaking the law; they brought this situation on themselves; they will all go on welfare" types of objections. They probably will face a tough time getting re-elected without a lot more education.

by: WaveTossed

12-19-2009 @ 8:05pm

"I think we need to increase the avenues for legal immigration and give people who are here illegally a way to gain some sort of legal status that allows them to work and participate in our society without fear of deportation."

I said earlier in this thread: this is exactly what the Cato Institute's Griswold said. Allowing more low-skill people in so that employers can fill these positions with legal people who have the protection of the law on their side -- and employers can get their work done. This makes sense.

Unfortunately, this makes too much sense for the anti-legal-immigration xenophobes who fill too much of the "stop illegal immigration" campaigns.

by: Mennoman

12-20-2009 @ 7:29pm

Thanks for that clarification, Don.

by: Mennoman

12-20-2009 @ 9:29pm

Thanks for that clarification, Don.

by: Mennoman

12-20-2009 @ 7:29pm

Thanks for that clarification, Don.

by: Mennoman

12-20-2009 @ 9:29pm

Thanks for that clarification, Don.

by: 24AheadDotCom

12-18-2009 @ 5:54pm

The "broken immigration system" is a stock talking point; the problem isn't with our laws but with the enforcement of those laws, with the enforcement being blocked due to various forms of corruption. As for "families separated" and the rest, that's certainly unfortunate but no one kidnapped them and brought them here against their own will. Doesn't the Bible say things about personal responsibility, not putting your children in harm's way, and the like?

I look at some of the provisions of the bill here. Compare that to anything Justin Fung would tell you about the bill.

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 6:06pm

Do you have a problem with lessening the huge backlog at the INS that is splitting up families and preventing people from getting legal entry?

by: 24AheadDotCom

12-18-2009 @ 6:55pm

IIRC, the INS hasn't existed for 6 years and nine months. Those who are familiar with these topics know that.

And, what SoJo is promoting would make things much worse for legal immigrants; their wait times would be increased since it would take years to process all those illegal aliens; details on that here.

by: GlenPeterson

12-18-2009 @ 7:38pm

Thank you, Justin, for sharing a bit about your personal story. I, too, have benefited from when and how my forebears migrated. This morning, I had breakfast with a dear friend, who after 16 years or so, got his papers just last month. For me, it is what I have learned about faith, trust in God, hospitality, tenacity, and more that has blessed me with the honor of being friend to sojourners, strangers, travelers, migrants. May God speed the work of Congress for CIR ASAP.

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 8:03pm

"IIRC, the INS hasn't existed for 6 years and nine months."

Huh??

"their wait times would be increased since it would take years to process all those illegal aliens;"

Not if more INS agents were hired to deal with the backlog. However, the political will to hire more agents to deal with the backlog isn't there. It's a lot easier for too many people (who oppose immigration in general) to blame "illegal" immigrants for "breaking the law" than it is to hire more INS agents.

Read this from the Cato Institute (a free market site):

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3638

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-18-2009 @ 8:26pm

I'd be happy to support the hiring of more INS agents to speed the processing of legal immigration applications, in exchange for stronger enforcement of immigration law generally.

LV

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 8:46pm

I wouldn't mind that exchange. However, when legal immigration is being processed more quickly, then there will be a lot less enforcement needed.

by: Mennoman

12-19-2009 @ 10:08am

USCIS hired a ton of people over the past two years. Applications are being processed at a record speed. The problem (for the most part) is not the processing of applications now. It is that there are simply not enough legal channels for people to immigrate legally. Your choice of stronger enforcement and the hiring of more adjudications officers to process the few (as opposed to the many who cannot) people who can qualify for immigration benefits is simply more of the same stonewalling that many on the right have engaged in for years. It really brings nothing of value or substance to the debate. At best it offers a false dichotomy.

by: Mennoman

12-19-2009 @ 10:13am

The link you posted 24Head is a right-wing propaganda rag.

by: 24AheadDotCom

12-18-2009 @ 5:54pm

The "broken immigration system" is a stock talking point; the problem isn't with our laws but with the enforcement of those laws, with the enforcement being blocked due to various forms of corruption. As for "families separated" and the rest, that's certainly unfortunate but no one kidnapped them and brought them here against their own will. Doesn't the Bible say things about personal responsibility, not putting your children in harm's way, and the like?

I look at some of the provisions of the bill here. Compare that to anything Justin Fung would tell you about the bill.

by: BuckeyeDon

12-19-2009 @ 12:32pm

Mennoman, it's HIS right-wing propaganda rag.

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 6:06pm

Do you have a problem with lessening the huge backlog at the INS that is splitting up families and preventing people from getting legal entry?

by: uberVU - social comments

12-18-2009 @ 8:54pm

Social comments and analytics for this post...

This post was mentioned on Twitter by CCIR: Congressman Luis Gutierrez Introduces a Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill: The room was hot and stifling and ov... http://bit.ly/7i7xO8...

by: BuckeyeDon

12-19-2009 @ 3:28pm

The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was under the Justice Department. After the Department of Homeland Security was created, the INS ceased to exist. Its functions were given to departments within Homeland Security, most notably U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

by: 24AheadDotCom

12-18-2009 @ 6:55pm

IIRC, the INS hasn't existed for 6 years and nine months. Those who are familiar with these topics know that.

And, what SoJo is promoting would make things much worse for legal immigrants; their wait times would be increased since it would take years to process all those illegal aliens; details on that here.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: 24AheadDotCom

12-18-2009 @ 5:54pm

The "broken immigration system" is a stock talking point; the problem isn't with our laws but with the enforcement of those laws, with the enforcement being blocked due to various forms of corruption. As for "families separated" and the rest, that's certainly unfortunate but no one kidnapped them and brought them here against their own will. Doesn't the Bible say things about personal responsibility, not putting your children in harm's way, and the like?

I look at some of the provisions of the bill here. Compare that to anything Justin Fung would tell you about the bill.

by: 24AheadDotCom

12-18-2009 @ 5:54pm

The "broken immigration system" is a stock talking point; the problem isn't with our laws but with the enforcement of those laws, with the enforcement being blocked due to various forms of corruption. As for "families separated" and the rest, that's certainly unfortunate but no one kidnapped them and brought them here against their own will. Doesn't the Bible say things about personal responsibility, not putting your children in harm's way, and the like?

I look at some of the provisions of the bill here. Compare that to anything Justin Fung would tell you about the bill.

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 6:06pm

Do you have a problem with lessening the huge backlog at the INS that is splitting up families and preventing people from getting legal entry?

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 6:06pm

Do you have a problem with lessening the huge backlog at the INS that is splitting up families and preventing people from getting legal entry?

by: 24AheadDotCom

12-18-2009 @ 6:55pm

IIRC, the INS hasn't existed for 6 years and nine months. Those who are familiar with these topics know that.

And, what SoJo is promoting would make things much worse for legal immigrants; their wait times would be increased since it would take years to process all those illegal aliens; details on that here.

by: 24AheadDotCom

12-18-2009 @ 6:55pm

IIRC, the INS hasn't existed for 6 years and nine months. Those who are familiar with these topics know that.

And, what SoJo is promoting would make things much worse for legal immigrants; their wait times would be increased since it would take years to process all those illegal aliens; details on that here.

by: GlenPeterson

12-18-2009 @ 7:38pm

Thank you, Justin, for sharing a bit about your personal story. I, too, have benefited from when and how my forebears migrated. This morning, I had breakfast with a dear friend, who after 16 years or so, got his papers just last month. For me, it is what I have learned about faith, trust in God, hospitality, tenacity, and more that has blessed me with the honor of being friend to sojourners, strangers, travelers, migrants. May God speed the work of Congress for CIR ASAP.

by: GlenPeterson

12-18-2009 @ 7:38pm

Thank you, Justin, for sharing a bit about your personal story. I, too, have benefited from when and how my forebears migrated. This morning, I had breakfast with a dear friend, who after 16 years or so, got his papers just last month. For me, it is what I have learned about faith, trust in God, hospitality, tenacity, and more that has blessed me with the honor of being friend to sojourners, strangers, travelers, migrants. May God speed the work of Congress for CIR ASAP.

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 8:03pm

"IIRC, the INS hasn't existed for 6 years and nine months."

Huh??

"their wait times would be increased since it would take years to process all those illegal aliens;"

Not if more INS agents were hired to deal with the backlog. However, the political will to hire more agents to deal with the backlog isn't there. It's a lot easier for too many people (who oppose immigration in general) to blame "illegal" immigrants for "breaking the law" than it is to hire more INS agents.

Read this from the Cato Institute (a free market site):

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3638

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 8:03pm

"IIRC, the INS hasn't existed for 6 years and nine months."

Huh??

"their wait times would be increased since it would take years to process all those illegal aliens;"

Not if more INS agents were hired to deal with the backlog. However, the political will to hire more agents to deal with the backlog isn't there. It's a lot easier for too many people (who oppose immigration in general) to blame "illegal" immigrants for "breaking the law" than it is to hire more INS agents.

Read this from the Cato Institute (a free market site):

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3638

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-18-2009 @ 8:26pm

I'd be happy to support the hiring of more INS agents to speed the processing of legal immigration applications, in exchange for stronger enforcement of immigration law generally.

LV

by: Lord_Voldemort

12-18-2009 @ 8:26pm

I'd be happy to support the hiring of more INS agents to speed the processing of legal immigration applications, in exchange for stronger enforcement of immigration law generally.

LV

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 8:46pm

I wouldn't mind that exchange. However, when legal immigration is being processed more quickly, then there will be a lot less enforcement needed.

by: WaveTossed

12-18-2009 @ 8:46pm

I wouldn't mind that exchange. However, when legal immigration is being processed more quickly, then there will be a lot less enforcement needed.

by: uberVU - social comments

12-18-2009 @ 8:54pm

Social comments and analytics for this post...

This post was mentioned on Twitter by CCIR: Congressman Luis Gutierrez Introduces a Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill: The room was hot and stifling and ov... http://bit.ly/7i7xO8...

by: Mennoman

12-19-2009 @ 10:08am

USCIS hired a ton of people over the past two years. Applications are being processed at a record speed. The problem (for the most part) is not the processing of applications now. It is that there are simply not enough legal channels for people to immigrate legally. Your choice of stronger enforcement and the hiring of more adjudications officers to process the few (as opposed to the many who cannot) people who can qualify for immigration benefits is simply more of the same stonewalling that many on the right have engaged in for years. It really brings nothing of value or substance to the debate. At best it offers a false dichotomy.

by: Mennoman

12-19-2009 @ 10:08am

USCIS hired a ton of people over the past two years. Applications are being processed at a record speed. The problem (for the most part) is not the processing of applications now. It is that there are simply not enough legal channels for people to immigrate legally. Your choice of stronger enforcement and the hiring of more adjudications officers to process the few (as opposed to the many who cannot) people who can qualify for immigration benefits is simply more of the same stonewalling that many on the right have engaged in for years. It really brings nothing of value or substance to the debate. At best it offers a false dichotomy.

by: Mennoman

12-19-2009 @ 10:13am

The link you posted 24Head is a right-wing propaganda rag.

by: Mennoman

12-19-2009 @ 10:13am

The link you posted 24Head is a right-wing propaganda rag.

by: BuckeyeDon

12-19-2009 @ 12:32pm

Mennoman, it's HIS right-wing propaganda rag.

by: BuckeyeDon

12-19-2009 @ 12:32pm

Mennoman, it's HIS right-wing propaganda rag.

by: BuckeyeDon

12-19-2009 @ 3:28pm

The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was under the Justice Department. After the Department of Homeland Security was created, the INS ceased to exist. Its functions were given to departments within Homeland Security, most notably U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

by: BuckeyeDon

12-19-2009 @ 3:28pm

The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was under the Justice Department. After the Department of Homeland Security was created, the INS ceased to exist. Its functions were given to departments within Homeland Security, most notably U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

by: SamHamilton

12-19-2009 @ 7:15pm

Nancy Pelosi recently said she will not ask her House caucus to vote on any controversial bills in 2010 to lessen the the number of Democrats getting defeated in November. This bill definitely falls under the category of "controversial". The ironic thing is, 2010 is probably the best chance to pass this or any other bill we'll see in a while. Democrat numbers in Congress are at a high point.

Even some pro-legalization Members of Congress don't like what Gutierrez is doing because they're working towards a bipartisan solution and he, in their mind, is throwing a wrench into the works. For what it's worth, this bill is going nowhere soon. The Democrats will continue to string those who want earned legalization along for electoral reasons, but it'll be a while before they actually sign something into law.

by: SamHamilton

12-19-2009 @ 7:15pm

Nancy Pelosi recently said she will not ask her House caucus to vote on any controversial bills in 2010 to lessen the the number of Democrats getting defeated in November. This bill definitely falls under the category of "controversial". The ironic thing is, 2010 is probably the best chance to pass this or any other bill we'll see in a while. Democrat numbers in Congress are at a high point.

Even some pro-legalization Members of Congress don't like what Gutierrez is doing because they're working towards a bipartisan solution and he, in their mind, is throwing a wrench into the works. For what it's worth, this bill is going nowhere soon. The Democrats will continue to string those who want earned legalization along for electoral reasons, but it'll be a while before they actually sign something into law.

by: SamHamilton

12-19-2009 @ 7:20pm

I agree it's hard to muster up a lot of sympathy for people who are in a tough situation solely because of their own doing (for vast majority of undocumented immigrants). But there is a point where the American people have to ask themselves, what is the most realistic and just policy solution.

I think we need to increase the avenues for legal immigration and give people who are here illegally a way to gain some sort of legal status that allows them to work and participate in our society without fear of deportation. Obviously, immigrants who have broken laws other than immigration laws should be immediately deported.

by: SamHamilton

12-19-2009 @ 7:20pm

I agree it's hard to muster up a lot of sympathy for people who are in a tough situation solely because of their own doing (for vast majority of undocumented immigrants). But there is a point where the American people have to ask themselves, what is the most realistic and just policy solution.

I think we need to increase the avenues for legal immigration and give people who are here illegally a way to gain some sort of legal status that allows them to work and participate in our society without fear of deportation. Obviously, immigrants who have broken laws other than immigration laws should be immediately deported.

by: WaveTossed

12-19-2009 @ 8:00pm

"It is that there are simply not enough legal channels for people to immigrate legally."

Good point. That's also what the Cato Institute's Griswold has said. He advocates that this be corrected.

Unforunately, there is too much racism and xenophobia present here in the U.S. for most politicians to consider raising the number of legal immigration channels. Any politician who even thinks about proposing this solution ends up getting mired with all of the "they're breaking the law; they brought this situation on themselves; they will all go on welfare" types of objections. They probably will face a tough time getting re-elected without a lot more education.

by: WaveTossed

12-19-2009 @ 8:00pm

"It is that there are simply not enough legal channels for people to immigrate legally."

Good point. That's also what the Cato Institute's Griswold has said. He advocates that this be corrected.

Unforunately, there is too much racism and xenophobia present here in the U.S. for most politicians to consider raising the number of legal immigration channels. Any politician who even thinks about proposing this solution ends up getting mired with all of the "they're breaking the law; they brought this situation on themselves; they will all go on welfare" types of objections. They probably will face a tough time getting re-elected without a lot more education.

by: WaveTossed

12-19-2009 @ 8:05pm

"I think we need to increase the avenues for legal immigration and give people who are here illegally a way to gain some sort of legal status that allows them to work and participate in our society without fear of deportation."

I said earlier in this thread: this is exactly what the Cato Institute's Griswold said. Allowing more low-skill people in so that employers can fill these positions with legal people who have the protection of the law on their side -- and employers can get their work done. This makes sense.

Unfortunately, this makes too much sense for the anti-legal-immigration xenophobes who fill too much of the "stop illegal immigration" campaigns.

by: WaveTossed

12-19-2009 @ 8:05pm

"I think we need to increase the avenues for legal immigration and give people who are here illegally a way to gain some sort of legal status that allows them to work and participate in our society without fear of deportation."

I said earlier in this thread: this is exactly what the Cato Institute's Griswold said. Allowing more low-skill people in so that employers can fill these positions with legal people who have the protection of the law on their side -- and employers can get their work done. This makes sense.

Unfortunately, this makes too much sense for the anti-legal-immigration xenophobes who fill too much of the "stop illegal immigration" campaigns.

by: Mennoman

12-20-2009 @ 7:29pm

Thanks for that clarification, Don.

by: Mennoman

12-20-2009 @ 7:29pm

Thanks for that clarification, Don.

by: Mennoman

12-20-2009 @ 9:29pm

Thanks for that clarification, Don.

by: Mennoman

12-20-2009 @ 9:29pm

Thanks for that clarification, Don.