Get E-Mail Updates

You Shall Know the Truth

banner-Finding-Your-Way-in-the-New-Economy

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." Those are the words of Jesus, and they couldn't be more relevant that they are today on Wall Street. Some very large financial giants triggered a massive economic crisis that has caused suffering for millions of people, and we still don't know exactly what happened. It's time to learn the truth behind the irresponsible, risky and selfish behaviors that plunged our nation and so many families into this painful mess. Today, I joined one effort to do that; and I invite you to join with me. Here's the story.

One of the giants whose practices led to the 2008 financial crisis was AIG

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: carlcopas

12-24-2009 @ 4:54pm

Because pcnot4me couldn't think of any other way to be snotty to Jim Wallis.

by: Mortgage Comparison

01-30-2010 @ 5:39am

nice blog, and your opinions are agreed to all of persons and I too.
your blog's title is very quote. and i like it.

by: thebootedone

12-28-2009 @ 4:03pm

amazing to speak of truth then get all this whos to blame. greed is to blame. which starts with you and me and goes all the way up. including our president and congress and senate and republicans and democrates. truth seems to be relative to your understanding of it anymnore. what about morals, THE REAL PROBLEM today not wall street. Jesus came to help us through the spirit in us to be like christ. thats what we should teach. MORALS. I think sojo should think of this if they wish to include God in there political thinking. Why they think they can make our politica religious and moral is beyond me, just makes them look silly and just another group to argue with, which I do sadly becasue I honestly disagree with them most of the time, I am conservative and my political and religious views are just different. So I am the bad wrong guy. SEE the problem. Jesus wasnt sent here for this. Its a PERSONAL relationship, someday we will be shown the real truth.

by: ricky1966

12-28-2009 @ 2:17am

Again, as I stated in my post, the blog post is silent about the people who wanted and purchased houses they could not afford. It is also silent about government policies that encouraged irresponsible lending. It is dishonest to only focus on one part of the problem. I seem to remember that the Bible also says things about greed, coveting, envy, paying your debts, etc. All of this applies to the people who wanted homes they could not afford. This financial crisis was caused by many groups including the government and the people who purchased homes they could not afford. Your failure to respond to that point speaks volumes about your "faith."

by: duhsciple

12-26-2009 @ 12:16am

Read the prophets. They were vicious in attacking unjust "profits." So yes this is about God's Politics.

by: ricky1966

12-25-2009 @ 7:10am

I thought this blog was about "God's Politics." This blog entry has very little to do with God and Christianity and seems to be more about left-wing politics and blaming Wall Street for problems created by politicians, Wall Street and the general public. It was clever the way you put a quote from Jesus at the beginning to disguise the fact that you are just promoting your left-wing views.

I think it is interesting how people are so quick to blame "big business" and "Wall Street" but very few blame the large number of greedy people who purchased houses they could not afford. They didn't care what type of mortage they were signing and they didn't care about the risks. They just wanted that big fancy house. The banks didn't create this mess alone. It takes two to execute a mortgage, a lender and a borrower.

by: DHFabian

12-25-2009 @ 3:04am

$180 billion for the rich, and the people grumble a little. Imagine the reaction if it were announced that $180 billion would go into establishing real (non-punitive) welfare for our poor! We do have our priorities...

by: ford49

12-24-2009 @ 6:55pm

If you think you can make physicians, hospitals and insurance companies accept that paradigm, lot's of luck...

by: carlcopas

12-24-2009 @ 4:59pm

"Modern economists, most of whom aren't Christians, consider it a miracle."

Please cite 5 who do so, with sufficient bibliographical info.

by: pcnot4me

12-21-2009 @ 7:32pm

Eliot Spitzer? Are you kidding me? Was one of his prostitutes quoted in the article? She was paid with public funds after all.

And will you be calling for an investigation of Barney Frank in this entire mess? Since he is 100% funded by public funds??? How about Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac????

by: hammerud

12-21-2009 @ 7:49pm

"with tens of millions of people unemployed and home foreclosures growing, we deserve to know how and by whose decisions this happened in order to hold them accountable" -- Look primarily to the Democratic Party with Barney Frank and a host of senators who received huge political contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which they had directed to begin providing bad loans. For blame, look there. Also, then Senator Obama, from what I understand, was one of the biggest recipients of contributions from Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac. It seems that those on the take would not address the unfolding calamity that was just around the corner, a calamity that the Bush administration tried to address, but was shot down. I think there is something in the Bible about "the love of money being the root of all evil." I get the feeling that unless God pours out some serious mercy on our nation, we are toast. God help us.

by: Ted Voth Jr

12-21-2009 @ 8:10pm

Hammerud, normally you on the right attack Obama and the 'democrats' for the wrong reasons; this time you're attacking them for the right reasons, that he's staying George Bush's course

by: NC77

12-21-2009 @ 8:44pm

The federal government should have let AIG fail, along with any other institution failing at the time the TARP bailout fund was passed by Congress. TARP was and still is unconstitutional.

Too many former Goldman Sachs people are entrenched in the fedreal government. Hank Paulsen should be the first one investigated in this whole mess.

by: shirley2010

12-21-2009 @ 8:59pm

You really took this verse out of context... completely. "You shall know the truth" refers to the truth of Jesus Christ being God in flesh. And it is that truth that will set all of us "free." If you read the verse in context (John 8), you'll see that it has NOTHING to do with accountability or the law of reaping and sowing, which is what you are talking about.

The way you have used this verse in order to point a finger at Wall Street "evil" is almost sacreligious consideirng what the verse really refers to.

by: fundamentalist

12-21-2009 @ 9:02pm

The best book on the causes of the crisis is "Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed" byThomas E. Woods Jr.

Here are some other links to articles by economists on the causes of the crisis:

http://fee.org/videos/financial-crisis-part-1-p...

and "Credit Crunch: the Anatomy of a Crisis" at

http://www.adamsmith.org/images/stories/credit-...

by: Mortgage Comparison

01-30-2010 @ 7:39am

nice blog, and your opinions are agreed to all of persons and I too.
your blog's title is very quote. and i like it.

by: judithod

12-21-2009 @ 10:37pm

The U.S. government was equally complicit via Fannie, Freddie, and HUD. Look to the Community Reinvestment Act initiated under Carter and the strengthening of that act under Clinton. Banks that red-lined were threatened with penalties.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:41am

Exactly! See Dr. Kling's article on the Harvard-Goldman filter at econlib.org.

by: pooch

12-22-2009 @ 12:47am

Blaming AIG for this economic crisis is like blaming a runny nose for a cold.

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:47am

Inappropriate. No prostitute was mentioned in the article.

Yes, we know about Mr. Spitzer's transgressions. How does that impact the injustice, or not, of ongoing AIG actions?

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:51am

Ah, finding people to blame. Count me as one of the guilty ones when you put together your list. I was an "idol worshiper" in the Washington/Wall Street/Main Street financial system and now I'm drinking golden-calf-Tang stirred into my drink for breakfast. Yes, you've listed the names. Don't forget to add Duhsciple's name!

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:54am

The Truth is the Person, Jesus Christ.

In this Person I meet Someone who shines in the darkness, including the darkness of our financial system where robber barons continue to roam free. May the Truth shine the Light on our demonic system!

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:55am

Are you a free market fundamentalist or a Jesus economics (Matthew 25 sheep and the goats) fundamentalist?

by: letjusticerolldown

12-22-2009 @ 2:58am

If the government pays for all my healthcare costs--does that entitle it to investigate and reveal alll my actions that have impacted the health of me or others??

by: pcnot4me

12-21-2009 @ 7:32pm

Eliot Spitzer? Are you kidding me? Was one of his prostitutes quoted in the article? She was paid with public funds after all.

And will you be calling for an investigation of Barney Frank in this entire mess? Since he is 100% funded by public funds??? How about Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac????

by: hammerud

12-21-2009 @ 7:49pm

"with tens of millions of people unemployed and home foreclosures growing, we deserve to know how and by whose decisions this happened in order to hold them accountable" -- Look primarily to the Democratic Party with Barney Frank and a host of senators who received huge political contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which they had directed to begin providing bad loans. For blame, look there. Also, then Senator Obama, from what I understand, was one of the biggest recipients of contributions from Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac. It seems that those on the take would not address the unfolding calamity that was just around the corner, a calamity that the Bush administration tried to address, but was shot down. I think there is something in the Bible about "the love of money being the root of all evil." I get the feeling that unless God pours out some serious mercy on our nation, we are toast. God help us.

by: Ted Voth Jr

12-21-2009 @ 8:10pm

Hammerud, normally you on the right attack Obama and the 'democrats' for the wrong reasons; this time you're attacking them for the right reasons, that he's staying George Bush's course

by: BuckeyeDon

12-22-2009 @ 10:08am

You're trying to defend AIG?

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:26pm

Both! I believe in the fundamentals of the faith (Virgin birth, Jesus is God, etc.), fundamental investing, emphasizing the fundamentals in football (blocking and tackling) and the fundamentals of economics. I definately believe that giving to the poor should be a major commitment of Christians. However, economic science has discovered a better way to help the poor by creating jobs that pay well. That's how China has lifted hundreds of millions out of abject poverty. Charity had nothing to do with it.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:27pm

Exactly! Also, blaming greed for economic crises is like blaming gravity for airplane crashes.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:31pm

Someone needs to defend AIG. It and the banks that failed followed the rules. Anyone who says they didn't is just ignorant or lying. They invested in top grade securities, AAA and AA rated. And they followed all of the state regulations and banking regulations. The guv forced banks to switch to the Basel accords on banking for the very reason that everyone thought that they prevented risk. So how did all of these "safe" investments go bad? The price of housing collapsed when the Feds quit pumping huge amounts of money into the economy. It's econ 101.

by: NC77

12-21-2009 @ 8:44pm

The federal government should have let AIG fail, along with any other institution failing at the time the TARP bailout fund was passed by Congress. TARP was and still is unconstitutional.

Too many former Goldman Sachs people are entrenched in the fedreal government. Hank Paulsen should be the first one investigated in this whole mess.

by: shirley2010

12-21-2009 @ 8:59pm

You really took this verse out of context... completely. "You shall know the truth" refers to the truth of Jesus Christ being God in flesh. And it is that truth that will set all of us "free." If you read the verse in context (John 8), you'll see that it has NOTHING to do with accountability or the law of reaping and sowing, which is what you are talking about.

The way you have used this verse in order to point a finger at Wall Street "evil" is almost sacreligious consideirng what the verse really refers to.

by: pcnot4me

12-22-2009 @ 12:42pm

Someone who while he was Gov. and being paid by the people of New York was spending his work time with $5000 an hour call girls. Forgive me for questioning his character and discerning that he might not be the best person to be speaking out about public trust. What was I thinking?

by: fundamentalist

12-21-2009 @ 9:02pm

The best book on the causes of the crisis is "Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed" byThomas E. Woods Jr.

Here are some other links to articles by economists on the causes of the crisis:

http://fee.org/videos/financial-crisis-part-1-p...

and "Credit Crunch: the Anatomy of a Crisis" at

http://www.adamsmith.org/images/stories/credit-...

by: BlueDeacon

12-22-2009 @ 1:00pm

Well, do you believe in changing attitudes (as well as the system) so that the poor can make their own way and not depend on charity? And BTW, the majority of mainland Chinese, especially in rural areas, are still poor; the reforms haven't touched them at all.

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 2:13pm

To clarify.

Spitzer's character is questionable, yes. He was the public figure.

The prostitutes' character, no. Your words were, "Was one of his prostitutes quoted in the article?" Why bring them into it?

by: judithod

12-21-2009 @ 10:37pm

The U.S. government was equally complicit via Fannie, Freddie, and HUD. Look to the Community Reinvestment Act initiated under Carter and the strengthening of that act under Clinton. Banks that red-lined were threatened with penalties.

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 2:14pm

Not me, defending AIG!

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:41am

Exactly! See Dr. Kling's article on the Harvard-Goldman filter at econlib.org.

by: BuckeyeDon

12-22-2009 @ 2:26pm

What you were doing was engaging in the logical fallacy known as ad hominem. What that means is you were using Spitzer's questionable morals as an argument for ignoring AIG's alleged shady activities. You can't do that if you want to argue logically and convincingly. Spitzer's personal bad behavior has no bearing on whether AIG behaved badly. If you want to argue that AIG is not blameworthy, you may do so, but base it on what you know of AIG and their activities.

by: pooch

12-22-2009 @ 12:47am

Blaming AIG for this economic crisis is like blaming a runny nose for a cold.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 2:26pm

I believe that God can change attitudes, but neither I nor the state can. The poor, by definition, cannot make it on their own; they will always require charity. We cannot eliminate poverty; even Jesus admitted that.

What I find really interesting about people who claim to love the poor and are working to eliminate poverty is that they have nothing but contempt for the Chinese miracle. China has lifted more people out of poverty than any charity or state-forced redistribution, but so-called defenders of the poor can't see it. I think that's because charity had nothing to do with it and freer markets did. The hatred of free markets blinds people to the Chinese miracle. We should be praising God for those lifted out of poverty in China, not castigating them.

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:47am

Inappropriate. No prostitute was mentioned in the article.

Yes, we know about Mr. Spitzer's transgressions. How does that impact the injustice, or not, of ongoing AIG actions?

by: BuckeyeDon

12-22-2009 @ 2:27pm

My comment was addressed to shirley2010, not to you.

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:51am

Ah, finding people to blame. Count me as one of the guilty ones when you put together your list. I was an "idol worshiper" in the Washington/Wall Street/Main Street financial system and now I'm drinking golden-calf-Tang stirred into my drink for breakfast. Yes, you've listed the names. Don't forget to add Duhsciple's name!

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:54am

The Truth is the Person, Jesus Christ.

In this Person I meet Someone who shines in the darkness, including the darkness of our financial system where robber barons continue to roam free. May the Truth shine the Light on our demonic system!

by: bill pence

12-22-2009 @ 3:10pm

I think full trasnperancy is needed, and there will be plenty of 'guilty'.. i go after false idols too, i'm not saying i'm blameless, but i haven't exactly orchestrated economic collapse either..

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:55am

Are you a free market fundamentalist or a Jesus economics (Matthew 25 sheep and the goats) fundamentalist?

by: bill pence

12-22-2009 @ 3:12pm

can we please stop accusing each other of blasphemy and sacreligious ideas when we we disagree with people??

good grief.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: pcnot4me

12-21-2009 @ 7:32pm

Eliot Spitzer? Are you kidding me? Was one of his prostitutes quoted in the article? She was paid with public funds after all.

And will you be calling for an investigation of Barney Frank in this entire mess? Since he is 100% funded by public funds??? How about Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac????

by: pcnot4me

12-21-2009 @ 7:32pm

Eliot Spitzer? Are you kidding me? Was one of his prostitutes quoted in the article? She was paid with public funds after all.

And will you be calling for an investigation of Barney Frank in this entire mess? Since he is 100% funded by public funds??? How about Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac????

by: hammerud

12-21-2009 @ 7:49pm

"with tens of millions of people unemployed and home foreclosures growing, we deserve to know how and by whose decisions this happened in order to hold them accountable" -- Look primarily to the Democratic Party with Barney Frank and a host of senators who received huge political contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which they had directed to begin providing bad loans. For blame, look there. Also, then Senator Obama, from what I understand, was one of the biggest recipients of contributions from Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac. It seems that those on the take would not address the unfolding calamity that was just around the corner, a calamity that the Bush administration tried to address, but was shot down. I think there is something in the Bible about "the love of money being the root of all evil." I get the feeling that unless God pours out some serious mercy on our nation, we are toast. God help us.

by: hammerud

12-21-2009 @ 7:49pm

"with tens of millions of people unemployed and home foreclosures growing, we deserve to know how and by whose decisions this happened in order to hold them accountable" -- Look primarily to the Democratic Party with Barney Frank and a host of senators who received huge political contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which they had directed to begin providing bad loans. For blame, look there. Also, then Senator Obama, from what I understand, was one of the biggest recipients of contributions from Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac. It seems that those on the take would not address the unfolding calamity that was just around the corner, a calamity that the Bush administration tried to address, but was shot down. I think there is something in the Bible about "the love of money being the root of all evil." I get the feeling that unless God pours out some serious mercy on our nation, we are toast. God help us.

by: Ted Voth Jr

12-21-2009 @ 8:10pm

Hammerud, normally you on the right attack Obama and the 'democrats' for the wrong reasons; this time you're attacking them for the right reasons, that he's staying George Bush's course

by: Ted Voth Jr

12-21-2009 @ 8:10pm

Hammerud, normally you on the right attack Obama and the 'democrats' for the wrong reasons; this time you're attacking them for the right reasons, that he's staying George Bush's course

by: NC77

12-21-2009 @ 8:44pm

The federal government should have let AIG fail, along with any other institution failing at the time the TARP bailout fund was passed by Congress. TARP was and still is unconstitutional.

Too many former Goldman Sachs people are entrenched in the fedreal government. Hank Paulsen should be the first one investigated in this whole mess.

by: NC77

12-21-2009 @ 8:44pm

The federal government should have let AIG fail, along with any other institution failing at the time the TARP bailout fund was passed by Congress. TARP was and still is unconstitutional.

Too many former Goldman Sachs people are entrenched in the fedreal government. Hank Paulsen should be the first one investigated in this whole mess.

by: shirley2010

12-21-2009 @ 8:59pm

You really took this verse out of context... completely. "You shall know the truth" refers to the truth of Jesus Christ being God in flesh. And it is that truth that will set all of us "free." If you read the verse in context (John 8), you'll see that it has NOTHING to do with accountability or the law of reaping and sowing, which is what you are talking about.

The way you have used this verse in order to point a finger at Wall Street "evil" is almost sacreligious consideirng what the verse really refers to.

by: shirley2010

12-21-2009 @ 8:59pm

You really took this verse out of context... completely. "You shall know the truth" refers to the truth of Jesus Christ being God in flesh. And it is that truth that will set all of us "free." If you read the verse in context (John 8), you'll see that it has NOTHING to do with accountability or the law of reaping and sowing, which is what you are talking about.

The way you have used this verse in order to point a finger at Wall Street "evil" is almost sacreligious consideirng what the verse really refers to.

by: fundamentalist

12-21-2009 @ 9:02pm

The best book on the causes of the crisis is "Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed" byThomas E. Woods Jr.

Here are some other links to articles by economists on the causes of the crisis:

http://fee.org/videos/financial-crisis-part-1-p...

and "Credit Crunch: the Anatomy of a Crisis" at

http://www.adamsmith.org/images/stories/credit-...

by: fundamentalist

12-21-2009 @ 9:02pm

The best book on the causes of the crisis is "Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed" byThomas E. Woods Jr.

Here are some other links to articles by economists on the causes of the crisis:

http://fee.org/videos/financial-crisis-part-1-p...

and "Credit Crunch: the Anatomy of a Crisis" at

http://www.adamsmith.org/images/stories/credit-...

by: judithod

12-21-2009 @ 10:37pm

The U.S. government was equally complicit via Fannie, Freddie, and HUD. Look to the Community Reinvestment Act initiated under Carter and the strengthening of that act under Clinton. Banks that red-lined were threatened with penalties.

by: judithod

12-21-2009 @ 10:37pm

The U.S. government was equally complicit via Fannie, Freddie, and HUD. Look to the Community Reinvestment Act initiated under Carter and the strengthening of that act under Clinton. Banks that red-lined were threatened with penalties.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:41am

Exactly! See Dr. Kling's article on the Harvard-Goldman filter at econlib.org.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:41am

Exactly! See Dr. Kling's article on the Harvard-Goldman filter at econlib.org.

by: pooch

12-22-2009 @ 12:47am

Blaming AIG for this economic crisis is like blaming a runny nose for a cold.

by: pooch

12-22-2009 @ 12:47am

Blaming AIG for this economic crisis is like blaming a runny nose for a cold.

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:47am

Inappropriate. No prostitute was mentioned in the article.

Yes, we know about Mr. Spitzer's transgressions. How does that impact the injustice, or not, of ongoing AIG actions?

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:47am

Inappropriate. No prostitute was mentioned in the article.

Yes, we know about Mr. Spitzer's transgressions. How does that impact the injustice, or not, of ongoing AIG actions?

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:51am

Ah, finding people to blame. Count me as one of the guilty ones when you put together your list. I was an "idol worshiper" in the Washington/Wall Street/Main Street financial system and now I'm drinking golden-calf-Tang stirred into my drink for breakfast. Yes, you've listed the names. Don't forget to add Duhsciple's name!

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:51am

Ah, finding people to blame. Count me as one of the guilty ones when you put together your list. I was an "idol worshiper" in the Washington/Wall Street/Main Street financial system and now I'm drinking golden-calf-Tang stirred into my drink for breakfast. Yes, you've listed the names. Don't forget to add Duhsciple's name!

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:54am

The Truth is the Person, Jesus Christ.

In this Person I meet Someone who shines in the darkness, including the darkness of our financial system where robber barons continue to roam free. May the Truth shine the Light on our demonic system!

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:54am

The Truth is the Person, Jesus Christ.

In this Person I meet Someone who shines in the darkness, including the darkness of our financial system where robber barons continue to roam free. May the Truth shine the Light on our demonic system!

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:55am

Are you a free market fundamentalist or a Jesus economics (Matthew 25 sheep and the goats) fundamentalist?

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 12:55am

Are you a free market fundamentalist or a Jesus economics (Matthew 25 sheep and the goats) fundamentalist?

by: letjusticerolldown

12-22-2009 @ 2:58am

If the government pays for all my healthcare costs--does that entitle it to investigate and reveal alll my actions that have impacted the health of me or others??

by: letjusticerolldown

12-22-2009 @ 2:58am

If the government pays for all my healthcare costs--does that entitle it to investigate and reveal alll my actions that have impacted the health of me or others??

by: BuckeyeDon

12-22-2009 @ 10:08am

You're trying to defend AIG?

by: BuckeyeDon

12-22-2009 @ 10:08am

You're trying to defend AIG?

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:26pm

Both! I believe in the fundamentals of the faith (Virgin birth, Jesus is God, etc.), fundamental investing, emphasizing the fundamentals in football (blocking and tackling) and the fundamentals of economics. I definately believe that giving to the poor should be a major commitment of Christians. However, economic science has discovered a better way to help the poor by creating jobs that pay well. That's how China has lifted hundreds of millions out of abject poverty. Charity had nothing to do with it.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:26pm

Both! I believe in the fundamentals of the faith (Virgin birth, Jesus is God, etc.), fundamental investing, emphasizing the fundamentals in football (blocking and tackling) and the fundamentals of economics. I definately believe that giving to the poor should be a major commitment of Christians. However, economic science has discovered a better way to help the poor by creating jobs that pay well. That's how China has lifted hundreds of millions out of abject poverty. Charity had nothing to do with it.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:27pm

Exactly! Also, blaming greed for economic crises is like blaming gravity for airplane crashes.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:27pm

Exactly! Also, blaming greed for economic crises is like blaming gravity for airplane crashes.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:31pm

Someone needs to defend AIG. It and the banks that failed followed the rules. Anyone who says they didn't is just ignorant or lying. They invested in top grade securities, AAA and AA rated. And they followed all of the state regulations and banking regulations. The guv forced banks to switch to the Basel accords on banking for the very reason that everyone thought that they prevented risk. So how did all of these "safe" investments go bad? The price of housing collapsed when the Feds quit pumping huge amounts of money into the economy. It's econ 101.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 12:31pm

Someone needs to defend AIG. It and the banks that failed followed the rules. Anyone who says they didn't is just ignorant or lying. They invested in top grade securities, AAA and AA rated. And they followed all of the state regulations and banking regulations. The guv forced banks to switch to the Basel accords on banking for the very reason that everyone thought that they prevented risk. So how did all of these "safe" investments go bad? The price of housing collapsed when the Feds quit pumping huge amounts of money into the economy. It's econ 101.

by: pcnot4me

12-22-2009 @ 12:42pm

Someone who while he was Gov. and being paid by the people of New York was spending his work time with $5000 an hour call girls. Forgive me for questioning his character and discerning that he might not be the best person to be speaking out about public trust. What was I thinking?

by: pcnot4me

12-22-2009 @ 12:42pm

Someone who while he was Gov. and being paid by the people of New York was spending his work time with $5000 an hour call girls. Forgive me for questioning his character and discerning that he might not be the best person to be speaking out about public trust. What was I thinking?

by: BlueDeacon

12-22-2009 @ 1:00pm

Well, do you believe in changing attitudes (as well as the system) so that the poor can make their own way and not depend on charity? And BTW, the majority of mainland Chinese, especially in rural areas, are still poor; the reforms haven't touched them at all.

by: BlueDeacon

12-22-2009 @ 1:00pm

Well, do you believe in changing attitudes (as well as the system) so that the poor can make their own way and not depend on charity? And BTW, the majority of mainland Chinese, especially in rural areas, are still poor; the reforms haven't touched them at all.

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 2:13pm

To clarify.

Spitzer's character is questionable, yes. He was the public figure.

The prostitutes' character, no. Your words were, "Was one of his prostitutes quoted in the article?" Why bring them into it?

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 2:13pm

To clarify.

Spitzer's character is questionable, yes. He was the public figure.

The prostitutes' character, no. Your words were, "Was one of his prostitutes quoted in the article?" Why bring them into it?

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 2:14pm

Not me, defending AIG!

by: duhsciple

12-22-2009 @ 2:14pm

Not me, defending AIG!

by: BuckeyeDon

12-22-2009 @ 2:26pm

What you were doing was engaging in the logical fallacy known as ad hominem. What that means is you were using Spitzer's questionable morals as an argument for ignoring AIG's alleged shady activities. You can't do that if you want to argue logically and convincingly. Spitzer's personal bad behavior has no bearing on whether AIG behaved badly. If you want to argue that AIG is not blameworthy, you may do so, but base it on what you know of AIG and their activities.

by: BuckeyeDon

12-22-2009 @ 2:26pm

What you were doing was engaging in the logical fallacy known as ad hominem. What that means is you were using Spitzer's questionable morals as an argument for ignoring AIG's alleged shady activities. You can't do that if you want to argue logically and convincingly. Spitzer's personal bad behavior has no bearing on whether AIG behaved badly. If you want to argue that AIG is not blameworthy, you may do so, but base it on what you know of AIG and their activities.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 2:26pm

I believe that God can change attitudes, but neither I nor the state can. The poor, by definition, cannot make it on their own; they will always require charity. We cannot eliminate poverty; even Jesus admitted that.

What I find really interesting about people who claim to love the poor and are working to eliminate poverty is that they have nothing but contempt for the Chinese miracle. China has lifted more people out of poverty than any charity or state-forced redistribution, but so-called defenders of the poor can't see it. I think that's because charity had nothing to do with it and freer markets did. The hatred of free markets blinds people to the Chinese miracle. We should be praising God for those lifted out of poverty in China, not castigating them.

by: fundamentalist

12-22-2009 @ 2:26pm

I believe that God can change attitudes, but neither I nor the state can. The poor, by definition, cannot make it on their own; they will always require charity. We cannot eliminate poverty; even Jesus admitted that.

What I find really interesting about people who claim to love the poor and are working to eliminate poverty is that they have nothing but contempt for the Chinese miracle. China has lifted more people out of poverty than any charity or state-forced redistribution, but so-called defenders of the poor can't see it. I think that's because charity had nothing to do with it and freer markets did. The hatred of free markets blinds people to the Chinese miracle. We should be praising God for those lifted out of poverty in China, not castigating them.

by: BuckeyeDon

12-22-2009 @ 2:27pm

My comment was addressed to shirley2010, not to you.

by: BuckeyeDon

12-22-2009 @ 2:27pm

My comment was addressed to shirley2010, not to you.