Get E-Mail Updates

The (Second) Worst Religious Idea of the Decade

100106-wwjd-bearEarlier this month, the nice folks over at The Washington Post's Outlook section asked me to write an essay about what I thought the worst religious idea of the past decade was. I ended up giving them two essays, as I couldn't quite decide which I thought was "worse."

They chose my essay on the so-called Prosperity Gospel. (You can read that one HERE.) I thought I'd share my other essay with you in this space. My other vote for worst religious idea of the decade?

WWJD (aka Using Jesus as a Marketing Tool)

What would Jesus do?

Probably not what we would do.

That's because we're not Jesus. And, frankly, that's the point of Christianity last time I checked.

Jesus was God come to Earth to redeem it and us. He was, the Bible says, perfect. Sinless. Holy. He always made loving choices. He always did the right thing. He always had the right answer.

More often than not, we don't do the right thing or have the right answer because we're imperfect, driven by our appetites and desires; selfish and wounded.

The answers we give to the WWJD question say much more about us than they do about the Son of God. We project our ideas about the world and stamp them with a four-letter divine imprimatur.

I'm pretty sure Jesus wouldn't relish having his message reduced to a bumper sticker, or worse -- a marketing scheme to sell rubber bracelets, trucker hats, or sweatshop-produced cotton-blend t-shirts.

The WWJD movement turns the gospel into a slogan and makes Christianity a brand rather than a radical idea that can change the world.

The word "Christian" was meant to be a noun, not an adjective.

There is no such thing as "Christian rock music," or a "Christian novel," or a "Christian retail."

My friend Rob Bell, pastor of Mars Hill Church in Michigan and author of the book Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith, puts it this way:

The problem with turning the noun into an adjective and then tacking it onto words is that it can create categories that limit the truth. Something can be labeled Christian and not be true or good.

WWJD turns a noun into an adjective and then makes it into a label that can be applied to anything and everything, reflecting nothing about what Jesus actually said or did.

We don't know what Jesus would drive, or who he would bomb, or how he would vote. We don't know whether he'd be a vegetarian, a libertarian, or a Luddite. We don't know whether Jesus would listen to rock music, watch HBO, or prefer a Mac to a PC.

What would Jesus do?

The prophet Micah from Hebrew scripture had the best answer I know of when he said, "This and only this is what the Lord God asks of you: to act justly, to love tenderly, and to walk humbly with your God."

But that's hard to fit onto a refrigerator magnet.

The better question is "What did Jesus tell us to do?"

For that we have answers:

Love unconditionally.

Judge not.

Feed the hungry.

Clothe the naked.

Visit the prisoners in jail.

Take care of the poor, the orphaned, the widowed.

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

Cathleen Falsani is the author of the new book The Dude Abides: The Gospel According to the Coen Brothers. She blogs at The Dude Abides.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: zounds

01-13-2010 @ 1:48am

not to detract from the point of the article--which i wholly agree with--but did we just get told not to market jesus from someone with a book on "the gospel according to the coen bros"?! (i'm pretty sure "the dude abides" is a bumper sticker...oh wait: http://bit.ly/5nPWgQ)

by: xocll

01-12-2010 @ 5:39pm

Wow ... I am shocked by the comments. We can disagree but I am not sure that we should be tearing one another down for writing an article or a comment. We can disagree and still respect one another.

by: John Mulholland

01-06-2010 @ 2:14pm

Oh...I'm pretty confident that He'd be using a Mac.

I never cease to be amazed at the consistency of God's demands. In Zechariah 8, He says, "Speak the truth to each others, and render true and sound judgment in your courts; do not plot evil against your neighbor and do not love to swear falsely. I hate all this."

Thoughtful and appropriate post.

by: Ian Matthews

01-10-2010 @ 6:15am

What would Jesus Do? Not create more and more marketing crap with the sole intention of making money for a start. No matter where it started WWJD has turned into a cynical money-grabbing exercise.

by: ckgmail

01-06-2010 @ 2:44pm

Rob Bell, "Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith." Does not Pastor Bell here do what we are told in this post we should not do, that is, use "Christian" as an adjective?

by: Ian Matthews

01-10-2010 @ 6:19am

You miss the point. It isn't the people wearing them (whose intention is between them and God), but the marketing machine that is only producing the junk to make money, and devaluing the whole message of the Gospel - and perhaps if people imitated Jesus by washing feet, eating with sinners, loving those suffering injustice and sacrificing all for the Kingdom of Heaven then that would be more convincing to the rest of the world than wearing a piece of plastic made in a sweatshop in the far-east.

by: tmamone

01-06-2010 @ 2:46pm

Okay, I'll admit it, I had a WWJD bracelet at one time. *Runs and hides in shame*

by: zounds

01-13-2010 @ 3:48am

not to detract from the point of the article--which i wholly agree with--but did we just get told not to market jesus from someone with a book on "the gospel according to the coen bros"?! (i'm pretty sure "the dude abides" is a bumper sticker...oh wait: http://bit.ly/5nPWgQ)

by: PDBurns

01-06-2010 @ 2:53pm

I would agree that Christian Marketing has really ticked me off as well and I really want to agree with the author on this issue. Still, I know a number of individuals who wore the WWJD bracelets and it was a reminder to them that they are an ambassador of Christ and it was a positive tool as they followed Christ. Was it simply a fashion statement for some?

by: Faydine

01-06-2010 @ 3:04pm

I have many issues with this post and the ignorance with which it is written. Using Christian as an adjective isn't a problem. I am a Christian woman. That means I am not a Muslim or Jew or Hindu woman.
Jesus was NOT a vegetarian. We know that because he serves fish on several occasions, once even after he was glorified. Why make this any harder than it already is? But no, I don't think that it's wrong for a Christian to be a vegetarian. Paul goes into long discussions about eating meat is up to you.
Finally, I'm against Jesus junk as much as anybody

by: LadyJess78

01-06-2010 @ 3:37pm

Kudos. I couldn't agree more.

by: Tom Richards

01-06-2010 @ 5:41pm

Cathleen Falsani should read Charles Sheldon's 'In His Steps,' the source of the phrase 'what would Jesus do?' before commenting on it. Sheldon is very clear that what Jesus would do is to work tirelessly for the poor and the oppressed - living among them, giving up the trappings of wealth, taking sick prostitutes into his home to be healed, sharing the gospel, and refusing to profit from the wreckage and misery of other people's ruined lives. Sheldon would laugh at the thought that we can't know what Jesus would do - all we have to do is follow his example, and love the outcast as much as he did.

Sheldon did tackle Falsani's dilemma head on - Jesus did not live in a modern, industrial democracy, so we don't know exactly how he would vote, what his bank account balance would be, or whether he would join a union or not. That did not stop Sheldon from trying to wrestle with the question of how a Christian seeks to imitate Christ in the modern world, and it should not stop us. Bumper stickers that appear tacky to us shouldn't stop us either. I commend anyone who decides to wrestle with the gospels and truly try to live their life as they believe Jesus would, even if they wear a cheesy neon bracelet to help keep them on track.

by: letjusticerolldown

01-06-2010 @ 5:50pm

I liked WWJD.

Seek first the Kingdom............

I know of no better way to encourage a priority on continued seeking than a good question.

I won't defend all the marketing--but a good question cannot be dismissed. And I think this is a worthy question.

by: Amy_Sojo

01-06-2010 @ 6:13pm

I work in the Christian Retail Industry, for a gift wholesaler. You know what? I don't personally care much for rubber bracelets or trucker hats either. It's really tempting sometimes to become frustrated with the concept of marketing Jesus and the word of God, with mundane or uncreative product design (which is not exclusive to the Christian market), and to become jaded from years of analyzing Bible verses to determine which will sell better on a Bible cover. But you know what else? Almost everyone I've met in the decade I've been in this industry views their profession as a ministry and a calling from God. I'd say this is particularly true of the retailers who run the Mom & Pop shops.

"There is no Christian retail"

by: Lord_Voldemort

01-06-2010 @ 6:15pm

I liked WWJD when it first came out, but it's become something of a banality. Would Jesus jump the shark? I only ask because WWJD sure did.

LV

by: Naomi 'Reynolds' Brodock

01-06-2010 @ 6:45pm

Let me start by saying I am not against rubber bracelets. I own and wear one, not a WWJD bracelet, but along the same lines. I bought it in support of a local girl who has made it her personal mission to raise enough money to build one well for people without clean drinking water. I love the reminder it is to me of this girl, this mission, of the work of the Church. I also am not against everything "Christian" adjective. I was close friends with the owner of our local Christian gift store growing up, and have known several people in the Christian music/ Christian book industries. For the most part, I have seen these people as people of purpose, and people of kindness and generosity. In the case of my hometown, we have almost 100 churches, but only one Christian bookstore. It became a unifying place, where different denominations gathered. The owner often allowed people of different traditions than hers set up drives for various causes, and it was a way of networking otherwise separate groups together. It was great place to get materials for Sunday school, find important books about our faith, pick up periodicals, ect. I have nothing against my local Christian bookstore.

But, I still have this beef with the Christian marketing. The whole Christian subculture movement is not inclusive. The messages and the words are not for people outside the church. I'm sorry if this pains anyone else, but I think in a lot of ways it closes us off from the world. I spent most of my young life thinking Sears was evil purely because it was "secular" and that the Christian bookstore was okay because it was stamped Christian. I don't suppose that is the fault of the entire Christian culture, maybe had more to do with my church in specific. But I still maintain that is creates a separatist culture. I think it is a waste for Christians to market things to Christians, because if that is your life's work then it should be spent marketing things to the people who need to hear the message. If the marketing is good, if it's doing it's self-declared mission, it will not create a subculture, but impact the greater culture. There are some Christian marketers that are doing that, but for the most part I simply don't see it.

by: drstevehighlander

01-06-2010 @ 7:30pm

While I do detest much of the marketing of the gospel (stick a fish on it and call it christian) and I do agree with the statement that the word Christian should remain an noun, I have to disagree with the notion that WWJD is just a marketing concept. I also have to disagree with the mindset that we can't know what Jesus would do. That is quite ridiculous. Since God's stated PREDESTINATION for us is to be "conformed to the image of Christ." Romans 8:29 The word IMAGE conveys the idea of look alike - or act alike. Seems like God is interested in us Doing "What Jesus Would Do!"

by: Peter Faur

01-06-2010 @ 7:46pm

My answer to "What Would Jesus Do?" has always been, "Whatever it is, it would be better than anything I'd think of." Kinder, smarter, more just, and sometimes a whole lot gutsier.

I would never have thought to tell the Pharisees that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. Of course, it wouldn't be my place to do so, which gets back to the point of the article. He is God, we're not. It's our job to try to do justice, love mercy and walk humbly with God - and to trust that when we fail to do so, there is forgiveness.

by: WB123

01-06-2010 @ 7:50pm

So we can expect SOJO to immediately stop marketing T-shirts, tote bags, mugs and other merchandise?

http://store.sojo.net/category_s/147.htm

by: hammerud

01-06-2010 @ 8:19pm

"judge not" You have to make a judgment to do that. "Judge not" scripturally has to do with opposition to hypocritical and self righteous judgment, not with the idea of judging. Judgment is required in the Christian life, and Jesus was judgmental. In 2 Corinthians Paul states, "I have judged already," concerning an infidelity in the Church.

by: NC77

01-06-2010 @ 9:03pm

People wearing a cross on a necklace is just as bad.

by: ford49

01-06-2010 @ 10:10pm

The problem with WWJD bracelets is not the book from whence the idea comes, or the bracelets themselves; WWJD? is a great question. The problem is the people who wear the bracelets who demonstrate there flagrant ignorance of all things associated with Jesus by their utterances and behavior...sort of like Tigers Woods and ATT and Accenture...these businesses acted to "protect the brand". Outward identification with following Jesus comes with no small measure accountability to not harm "the brand".

by: ford49

01-06-2010 @ 10:14pm

I think SoJo has been very thoughtful and tasteful in its merchandising and its behavior as an organization has not compromised the Gospel.

by: Ragan65

01-06-2010 @ 10:47pm

I was made to think after reading Ms. Falsani's article. Sojourner's authors often open my eyes and move me to new ideas. So I joined this group of readers to look at their responses and I had to laugh. Cathleen Falsani's provocative idea stirred up a lot of emotion and I felt that I was flipping the TV channel back and forth between MSNBC and Fox.

I encourage more insightful observations for our community. Now I will read another article and see how we all respond. This is better than network TV!

by: SisterMarie

01-06-2010 @ 11:00pm

Look, this is not a new fad. As long as I can remember, organizations and preachers have been marketing holy water that they retrieved from Israel, prayer cloths, and various other trinkets. Each of us must judge for ourselves what kind of message that we want to send by the clothing and jewelry that we wear. At the same time, the source of our purchases reveals our value judgments of the ministries hawking these items. Everyone is out to make a buck and they cannot be faulted for devising ways to compete in the "Christian market." The burden is on us to make wise decisions before we buy. (The only thing that is on my bracelet is a message to EMTs that this person is taking a blood thinner - could save my life.)

by: John Mulholland

01-06-2010 @ 2:14pm

Oh...I'm pretty confident that He'd be using a Mac.

I never cease to be amazed at the consistency of God's demands. In Zechariah 8, He says, "Speak the truth to each others, and render true and sound judgment in your courts; do not plot evil against your neighbor and do not love to swear falsely. I hate all this."

Thoughtful and appropriate post.

by: Ian Matthews

01-10-2010 @ 6:15am

What would Jesus Do? Not create more and more marketing crap with the sole intention of making money for a start. No matter where it started WWJD has turned into a cynical money-grabbing exercise.

by: ckgmail

01-06-2010 @ 2:44pm

Rob Bell, "Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith." Does not Pastor Bell here do what we are told in this post we should not do, that is, use "Christian" as an adjective?

by: tmamone

01-06-2010 @ 2:46pm

Okay, I'll admit it, I had a WWJD bracelet at one time. *Runs and hides in shame*

by: Ian Matthews

01-10-2010 @ 6:19am

You miss the point. It isn't the people wearing them (whose intention is between them and God), but the marketing machine that is only producing the junk to make money, and devaluing the whole message of the Gospel - and perhaps if people imitated Jesus by washing feet, eating with sinners, loving those suffering injustice and sacrificing all for the Kingdom of Heaven then that would be more convincing to the rest of the world than wearing a piece of plastic made in a sweatshop in the far-east.

by: PDBurns

01-06-2010 @ 2:53pm

I would agree that Christian Marketing has really ticked me off as well and I really want to agree with the author on this issue. Still, I know a number of individuals who wore the WWJD bracelets and it was a reminder to them that they are an ambassador of Christ and it was a positive tool as they followed Christ. Was it simply a fashion statement for some?

by: Minnesotan

01-07-2010 @ 3:01am

Yes, this is totally correct. Frequently, what people mean when they invoke "judge not" is "don't make more judgments that I don't agree with." If Jesus really meant that we can never make moral evaluations about people or situations then we could not say that Mother Teresa was good and Hitler was evil. In Sojourners Magazine and on this website, I see a lot of condemning of those who promote the war in Iraq, corporate leaders who harm the poor, polluters, etc. That sounds like "judging" to me.

by: Faydine

01-06-2010 @ 3:04pm

I have many issues with this post and the ignorance with which it is written. Using Christian as an adjective isn't a problem. I am a Christian woman. That means I am not a Muslim or Jew or Hindu woman.
Jesus was NOT a vegetarian. We know that because he serves fish on several occasions, once even after he was glorified. Why make this any harder than it already is? But no, I don't think that it's wrong for a Christian to be a vegetarian. Paul goes into long discussions about eating meat is up to you.
Finally, I'm against Jesus junk as much as anybody

by: squeaky

01-07-2010 @ 5:58am

"Judge not" to me means "I'm a knucklehead. If I truly recognize my own knuckleheadedness and understand how God sees said knuckleheadedness, and how He has redeemed me from said knuckleheadedness by absolutely nothing I could have ever earned, then I will also recognize others are also knuckleheads and remember that I am a knucklehead whenever I start to complain about their knuckleheadedness." In short, none of us have the right to judge the heart of another. Only God can do that. And none of us can judge another as not worthy of redemption or God's grace.

by: facebook-648755054

01-07-2010 @ 9:06am

I love the way you put that. Well said!

by: LadyJess78

01-06-2010 @ 3:37pm

Kudos. I couldn't agree more.

by: Tom Richards

01-06-2010 @ 5:41pm

Cathleen Falsani should read Charles Sheldon's 'In His Steps,' the source of the phrase 'what would Jesus do?' before commenting on it. Sheldon is very clear that what Jesus would do is to work tirelessly for the poor and the oppressed - living among them, giving up the trappings of wealth, taking sick prostitutes into his home to be healed, sharing the gospel, and refusing to profit from the wreckage and misery of other people's ruined lives. Sheldon would laugh at the thought that we can't know what Jesus would do - all we have to do is follow his example, and love the outcast as much as he did.

Sheldon did tackle Falsani's dilemma head on - Jesus did not live in a modern, industrial democracy, so we don't know exactly how he would vote, what his bank account balance would be, or whether he would join a union or not. That did not stop Sheldon from trying to wrestle with the question of how a Christian seeks to imitate Christ in the modern world, and it should not stop us. Bumper stickers that appear tacky to us shouldn't stop us either. I commend anyone who decides to wrestle with the gospels and truly try to live their life as they believe Jesus would, even if they wear a cheesy neon bracelet to help keep them on track.

by: letjusticerolldown

01-06-2010 @ 5:50pm

I liked WWJD.

Seek first the Kingdom............

I know of no better way to encourage a priority on continued seeking than a good question.

I won't defend all the marketing--but a good question cannot be dismissed. And I think this is a worthy question.

by: John Mulholland

01-07-2010 @ 2:34pm

The problem with this thinking, "I think SoJo has been very thoughtful and tasteful in its merchandising and its behavior as an organization has not compromised the Gospel." is that every organization would say the same thing.

by: Amy_Sojo

01-06-2010 @ 6:13pm

I work in the Christian Retail Industry, for a gift wholesaler. You know what? I don't personally care much for rubber bracelets or trucker hats either. It's really tempting sometimes to become frustrated with the concept of marketing Jesus and the word of God, with mundane or uncreative product design (which is not exclusive to the Christian market), and to become jaded from years of analyzing Bible verses to determine which will sell better on a Bible cover. But you know what else? Almost everyone I've met in the decade I've been in this industry views their profession as a ministry and a calling from God. I'd say this is particularly true of the retailers who run the Mom & Pop shops.

"There is no Christian retail"

by: Lord_Voldemort

01-06-2010 @ 6:15pm

I liked WWJD when it first came out, but it's become something of a banality. Would Jesus jump the shark? I only ask because WWJD sure did.

LV

by: Naomi 'Reynolds' Brodock

01-06-2010 @ 6:45pm

Let me start by saying I am not against rubber bracelets. I own and wear one, not a WWJD bracelet, but along the same lines. I bought it in support of a local girl who has made it her personal mission to raise enough money to build one well for people without clean drinking water. I love the reminder it is to me of this girl, this mission, of the work of the Church. I also am not against everything "Christian" adjective. I was close friends with the owner of our local Christian gift store growing up, and have known several people in the Christian music/ Christian book industries. For the most part, I have seen these people as people of purpose, and people of kindness and generosity. In the case of my hometown, we have almost 100 churches, but only one Christian bookstore. It became a unifying place, where different denominations gathered. The owner often allowed people of different traditions than hers set up drives for various causes, and it was a way of networking otherwise separate groups together. It was great place to get materials for Sunday school, find important books about our faith, pick up periodicals, ect. I have nothing against my local Christian bookstore.

But, I still have this beef with the Christian marketing. The whole Christian subculture movement is not inclusive. The messages and the words are not for people outside the church. I'm sorry if this pains anyone else, but I think in a lot of ways it closes us off from the world. I spent most of my young life thinking Sears was evil purely because it was "secular" and that the Christian bookstore was okay because it was stamped Christian. I don't suppose that is the fault of the entire Christian culture, maybe had more to do with my church in specific. But I still maintain that is creates a separatist culture. I think it is a waste for Christians to market things to Christians, because if that is your life's work then it should be spent marketing things to the people who need to hear the message. If the marketing is good, if it's doing it's self-declared mission, it will not create a subculture, but impact the greater culture. There are some Christian marketers that are doing that, but for the most part I simply don't see it.

by: drstevehighlander

01-06-2010 @ 7:30pm

While I do detest much of the marketing of the gospel (stick a fish on it and call it christian) and I do agree with the statement that the word Christian should remain an noun, I have to disagree with the notion that WWJD is just a marketing concept. I also have to disagree with the mindset that we can't know what Jesus would do. That is quite ridiculous. Since God's stated PREDESTINATION for us is to be "conformed to the image of Christ." Romans 8:29 The word IMAGE conveys the idea of look alike - or act alike. Seems like God is interested in us Doing "What Jesus Would Do!"

by: Peter Faur

01-06-2010 @ 7:46pm

My answer to "What Would Jesus Do?" has always been, "Whatever it is, it would be better than anything I'd think of." Kinder, smarter, more just, and sometimes a whole lot gutsier.

I would never have thought to tell the Pharisees that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. Of course, it wouldn't be my place to do so, which gets back to the point of the article. He is God, we're not. It's our job to try to do justice, love mercy and walk humbly with God - and to trust that when we fail to do so, there is forgiveness.

by: WB123

01-06-2010 @ 7:50pm

So we can expect SOJO to immediately stop marketing T-shirts, tote bags, mugs and other merchandise?

http://store.sojo.net/category_s/147.htm

by: hammerud

01-06-2010 @ 8:19pm

"judge not" You have to make a judgment to do that. "Judge not" scripturally has to do with opposition to hypocritical and self righteous judgment, not with the idea of judging. Judgment is required in the Christian life, and Jesus was judgmental. In 2 Corinthians Paul states, "I have judged already," concerning an infidelity in the Church.

by: NC77

01-06-2010 @ 9:03pm

People wearing a cross on a necklace is just as bad.

by: ford49

01-06-2010 @ 10:10pm

The problem with WWJD bracelets is not the book from whence the idea comes, or the bracelets themselves; WWJD? is a great question. The problem is the people who wear the bracelets who demonstrate there flagrant ignorance of all things associated with Jesus by their utterances and behavior...sort of like Tigers Woods and ATT and Accenture...these businesses acted to "protect the brand". Outward identification with following Jesus comes with no small measure accountability to not harm "the brand".

by: ford49

01-06-2010 @ 10:14pm

I think SoJo has been very thoughtful and tasteful in its merchandising and its behavior as an organization has not compromised the Gospel.

by: Ragan65

01-06-2010 @ 10:47pm

I was made to think after reading Ms. Falsani's article. Sojourner's authors often open my eyes and move me to new ideas. So I joined this group of readers to look at their responses and I had to laugh. Cathleen Falsani's provocative idea stirred up a lot of emotion and I felt that I was flipping the TV channel back and forth between MSNBC and Fox.

I encourage more insightful observations for our community. Now I will read another article and see how we all respond. This is better than network TV!

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: John Mulholland

01-06-2010 @ 2:14pm

Oh...I'm pretty confident that He'd be using a Mac.

I never cease to be amazed at the consistency of God's demands. In Zechariah 8, He says, "Speak the truth to each others, and render true and sound judgment in your courts; do not plot evil against your neighbor and do not love to swear falsely. I hate all this."

Thoughtful and appropriate post.

by: John Mulholland

01-06-2010 @ 2:14pm

Oh...I'm pretty confident that He'd be using a Mac.

I never cease to be amazed at the consistency of God's demands. In Zechariah 8, He says, "Speak the truth to each others, and render true and sound judgment in your courts; do not plot evil against your neighbor and do not love to swear falsely. I hate all this."

Thoughtful and appropriate post.

by: ckgmail

01-06-2010 @ 2:44pm

Rob Bell, "Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith." Does not Pastor Bell here do what we are told in this post we should not do, that is, use "Christian" as an adjective?

by: ckgmail

01-06-2010 @ 2:44pm

Rob Bell, "Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith." Does not Pastor Bell here do what we are told in this post we should not do, that is, use "Christian" as an adjective?

by: tmamone

01-06-2010 @ 2:46pm

Okay, I'll admit it, I had a WWJD bracelet at one time. *Runs and hides in shame*

by: tmamone

01-06-2010 @ 2:46pm

Okay, I'll admit it, I had a WWJD bracelet at one time. *Runs and hides in shame*

by: PDBurns

01-06-2010 @ 2:53pm

I would agree that Christian Marketing has really ticked me off as well and I really want to agree with the author on this issue. Still, I know a number of individuals who wore the WWJD bracelets and it was a reminder to them that they are an ambassador of Christ and it was a positive tool as they followed Christ. Was it simply a fashion statement for some?

by: PDBurns

01-06-2010 @ 2:53pm

I would agree that Christian Marketing has really ticked me off as well and I really want to agree with the author on this issue. Still, I know a number of individuals who wore the WWJD bracelets and it was a reminder to them that they are an ambassador of Christ and it was a positive tool as they followed Christ. Was it simply a fashion statement for some?

by: Faydine

01-06-2010 @ 3:04pm

I have many issues with this post and the ignorance with which it is written. Using Christian as an adjective isn't a problem. I am a Christian woman. That means I am not a Muslim or Jew or Hindu woman.
Jesus was NOT a vegetarian. We know that because he serves fish on several occasions, once even after he was glorified. Why make this any harder than it already is? But no, I don't think that it's wrong for a Christian to be a vegetarian. Paul goes into long discussions about eating meat is up to you.
Finally, I'm against Jesus junk as much as anybody

by: Faydine

01-06-2010 @ 3:04pm

I have many issues with this post and the ignorance with which it is written. Using Christian as an adjective isn't a problem. I am a Christian woman. That means I am not a Muslim or Jew or Hindu woman.
Jesus was NOT a vegetarian. We know that because he serves fish on several occasions, once even after he was glorified. Why make this any harder than it already is? But no, I don't think that it's wrong for a Christian to be a vegetarian. Paul goes into long discussions about eating meat is up to you.
Finally, I'm against Jesus junk as much as anybody

by: LadyJess78

01-06-2010 @ 3:37pm

Kudos. I couldn't agree more.

by: LadyJess78

01-06-2010 @ 3:37pm

Kudos. I couldn't agree more.

by: Tom Richards

01-06-2010 @ 5:41pm

Cathleen Falsani should read Charles Sheldon's 'In His Steps,' the source of the phrase 'what would Jesus do?' before commenting on it. Sheldon is very clear that what Jesus would do is to work tirelessly for the poor and the oppressed - living among them, giving up the trappings of wealth, taking sick prostitutes into his home to be healed, sharing the gospel, and refusing to profit from the wreckage and misery of other people's ruined lives. Sheldon would laugh at the thought that we can't know what Jesus would do - all we have to do is follow his example, and love the outcast as much as he did.

Sheldon did tackle Falsani's dilemma head on - Jesus did not live in a modern, industrial democracy, so we don't know exactly how he would vote, what his bank account balance would be, or whether he would join a union or not. That did not stop Sheldon from trying to wrestle with the question of how a Christian seeks to imitate Christ in the modern world, and it should not stop us. Bumper stickers that appear tacky to us shouldn't stop us either. I commend anyone who decides to wrestle with the gospels and truly try to live their life as they believe Jesus would, even if they wear a cheesy neon bracelet to help keep them on track.

by: Tom Richards

01-06-2010 @ 5:41pm

Cathleen Falsani should read Charles Sheldon's 'In His Steps,' the source of the phrase 'what would Jesus do?' before commenting on it. Sheldon is very clear that what Jesus would do is to work tirelessly for the poor and the oppressed - living among them, giving up the trappings of wealth, taking sick prostitutes into his home to be healed, sharing the gospel, and refusing to profit from the wreckage and misery of other people's ruined lives. Sheldon would laugh at the thought that we can't know what Jesus would do - all we have to do is follow his example, and love the outcast as much as he did.

Sheldon did tackle Falsani's dilemma head on - Jesus did not live in a modern, industrial democracy, so we don't know exactly how he would vote, what his bank account balance would be, or whether he would join a union or not. That did not stop Sheldon from trying to wrestle with the question of how a Christian seeks to imitate Christ in the modern world, and it should not stop us. Bumper stickers that appear tacky to us shouldn't stop us either. I commend anyone who decides to wrestle with the gospels and truly try to live their life as they believe Jesus would, even if they wear a cheesy neon bracelet to help keep them on track.

by: letjusticerolldown

01-06-2010 @ 5:50pm

I liked WWJD.

Seek first the Kingdom............

I know of no better way to encourage a priority on continued seeking than a good question.

I won't defend all the marketing--but a good question cannot be dismissed. And I think this is a worthy question.

by: letjusticerolldown

01-06-2010 @ 5:50pm

I liked WWJD.

Seek first the Kingdom............

I know of no better way to encourage a priority on continued seeking than a good question.

I won't defend all the marketing--but a good question cannot be dismissed. And I think this is a worthy question.

by: Amy_Sojo

01-06-2010 @ 6:13pm

I work in the Christian Retail Industry, for a gift wholesaler. You know what? I don't personally care much for rubber bracelets or trucker hats either. It's really tempting sometimes to become frustrated with the concept of marketing Jesus and the word of God, with mundane or uncreative product design (which is not exclusive to the Christian market), and to become jaded from years of analyzing Bible verses to determine which will sell better on a Bible cover. But you know what else? Almost everyone I've met in the decade I've been in this industry views their profession as a ministry and a calling from God. I'd say this is particularly true of the retailers who run the Mom & Pop shops.

"There is no Christian retail"

by: Amy_Sojo

01-06-2010 @ 6:13pm

I work in the Christian Retail Industry, for a gift wholesaler. You know what? I don't personally care much for rubber bracelets or trucker hats either. It's really tempting sometimes to become frustrated with the concept of marketing Jesus and the word of God, with mundane or uncreative product design (which is not exclusive to the Christian market), and to become jaded from years of analyzing Bible verses to determine which will sell better on a Bible cover. But you know what else? Almost everyone I've met in the decade I've been in this industry views their profession as a ministry and a calling from God. I'd say this is particularly true of the retailers who run the Mom & Pop shops.

"There is no Christian retail"

by: Lord_Voldemort

01-06-2010 @ 6:15pm

I liked WWJD when it first came out, but it's become something of a banality. Would Jesus jump the shark? I only ask because WWJD sure did.

LV

by: Lord_Voldemort

01-06-2010 @ 6:15pm

I liked WWJD when it first came out, but it's become something of a banality. Would Jesus jump the shark? I only ask because WWJD sure did.

LV

by: Naomi 'Reynolds' Brodock

01-06-2010 @ 6:45pm

Let me start by saying I am not against rubber bracelets. I own and wear one, not a WWJD bracelet, but along the same lines. I bought it in support of a local girl who has made it her personal mission to raise enough money to build one well for people without clean drinking water. I love the reminder it is to me of this girl, this mission, of the work of the Church. I also am not against everything "Christian" adjective. I was close friends with the owner of our local Christian gift store growing up, and have known several people in the Christian music/ Christian book industries. For the most part, I have seen these people as people of purpose, and people of kindness and generosity. In the case of my hometown, we have almost 100 churches, but only one Christian bookstore. It became a unifying place, where different denominations gathered. The owner often allowed people of different traditions than hers set up drives for various causes, and it was a way of networking otherwise separate groups together. It was great place to get materials for Sunday school, find important books about our faith, pick up periodicals, ect. I have nothing against my local Christian bookstore.

But, I still have this beef with the Christian marketing. The whole Christian subculture movement is not inclusive. The messages and the words are not for people outside the church. I'm sorry if this pains anyone else, but I think in a lot of ways it closes us off from the world. I spent most of my young life thinking Sears was evil purely because it was "secular" and that the Christian bookstore was okay because it was stamped Christian. I don't suppose that is the fault of the entire Christian culture, maybe had more to do with my church in specific. But I still maintain that is creates a separatist culture. I think it is a waste for Christians to market things to Christians, because if that is your life's work then it should be spent marketing things to the people who need to hear the message. If the marketing is good, if it's doing it's self-declared mission, it will not create a subculture, but impact the greater culture. There are some Christian marketers that are doing that, but for the most part I simply don't see it.

by: Naomi 'Reynolds' Brodock

01-06-2010 @ 6:45pm

Let me start by saying I am not against rubber bracelets. I own and wear one, not a WWJD bracelet, but along the same lines. I bought it in support of a local girl who has made it her personal mission to raise enough money to build one well for people without clean drinking water. I love the reminder it is to me of this girl, this mission, of the work of the Church. I also am not against everything "Christian" adjective. I was close friends with the owner of our local Christian gift store growing up, and have known several people in the Christian music/ Christian book industries. For the most part, I have seen these people as people of purpose, and people of kindness and generosity. In the case of my hometown, we have almost 100 churches, but only one Christian bookstore. It became a unifying place, where different denominations gathered. The owner often allowed people of different traditions than hers set up drives for various causes, and it was a way of networking otherwise separate groups together. It was great place to get materials for Sunday school, find important books about our faith, pick up periodicals, ect. I have nothing against my local Christian bookstore.

But, I still have this beef with the Christian marketing. The whole Christian subculture movement is not inclusive. The messages and the words are not for people outside the church. I'm sorry if this pains anyone else, but I think in a lot of ways it closes us off from the world. I spent most of my young life thinking Sears was evil purely because it was "secular" and that the Christian bookstore was okay because it was stamped Christian. I don't suppose that is the fault of the entire Christian culture, maybe had more to do with my church in specific. But I still maintain that is creates a separatist culture. I think it is a waste for Christians to market things to Christians, because if that is your life's work then it should be spent marketing things to the people who need to hear the message. If the marketing is good, if it's doing it's self-declared mission, it will not create a subculture, but impact the greater culture. There are some Christian marketers that are doing that, but for the most part I simply don't see it.

by: drstevehighlander

01-06-2010 @ 7:30pm

While I do detest much of the marketing of the gospel (stick a fish on it and call it christian) and I do agree with the statement that the word Christian should remain an noun, I have to disagree with the notion that WWJD is just a marketing concept. I also have to disagree with the mindset that we can't know what Jesus would do. That is quite ridiculous. Since God's stated PREDESTINATION for us is to be "conformed to the image of Christ." Romans 8:29 The word IMAGE conveys the idea of look alike - or act alike. Seems like God is interested in us Doing "What Jesus Would Do!"

by: drstevehighlander

01-06-2010 @ 7:30pm

While I do detest much of the marketing of the gospel (stick a fish on it and call it christian) and I do agree with the statement that the word Christian should remain an noun, I have to disagree with the notion that WWJD is just a marketing concept. I also have to disagree with the mindset that we can't know what Jesus would do. That is quite ridiculous. Since God's stated PREDESTINATION for us is to be "conformed to the image of Christ." Romans 8:29 The word IMAGE conveys the idea of look alike - or act alike. Seems like God is interested in us Doing "What Jesus Would Do!"

by: Peter Faur

01-06-2010 @ 7:46pm

My answer to "What Would Jesus Do?" has always been, "Whatever it is, it would be better than anything I'd think of." Kinder, smarter, more just, and sometimes a whole lot gutsier.

I would never have thought to tell the Pharisees that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. Of course, it wouldn't be my place to do so, which gets back to the point of the article. He is God, we're not. It's our job to try to do justice, love mercy and walk humbly with God - and to trust that when we fail to do so, there is forgiveness.

by: Peter Faur

01-06-2010 @ 7:46pm

My answer to "What Would Jesus Do?" has always been, "Whatever it is, it would be better than anything I'd think of." Kinder, smarter, more just, and sometimes a whole lot gutsier.

I would never have thought to tell the Pharisees that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. Of course, it wouldn't be my place to do so, which gets back to the point of the article. He is God, we're not. It's our job to try to do justice, love mercy and walk humbly with God - and to trust that when we fail to do so, there is forgiveness.

by: WB123

01-06-2010 @ 7:50pm

So we can expect SOJO to immediately stop marketing T-shirts, tote bags, mugs and other merchandise?

http://store.sojo.net/category_s/147.htm

by: WB123

01-06-2010 @ 7:50pm

So we can expect SOJO to immediately stop marketing T-shirts, tote bags, mugs and other merchandise?

http://store.sojo.net/category_s/147.htm

by: hammerud

01-06-2010 @ 8:19pm

"judge not" You have to make a judgment to do that. "Judge not" scripturally has to do with opposition to hypocritical and self righteous judgment, not with the idea of judging. Judgment is required in the Christian life, and Jesus was judgmental. In 2 Corinthians Paul states, "I have judged already," concerning an infidelity in the Church.

by: hammerud

01-06-2010 @ 8:19pm

"judge not" You have to make a judgment to do that. "Judge not" scripturally has to do with opposition to hypocritical and self righteous judgment, not with the idea of judging. Judgment is required in the Christian life, and Jesus was judgmental. In 2 Corinthians Paul states, "I have judged already," concerning an infidelity in the Church.

by: NC77

01-06-2010 @ 9:03pm

People wearing a cross on a necklace is just as bad.

by: NC77

01-06-2010 @ 9:03pm

People wearing a cross on a necklace is just as bad.

by: ford49

01-06-2010 @ 10:10pm

The problem with WWJD bracelets is not the book from whence the idea comes, or the bracelets themselves; WWJD? is a great question. The problem is the people who wear the bracelets who demonstrate there flagrant ignorance of all things associated with Jesus by their utterances and behavior...sort of like Tigers Woods and ATT and Accenture...these businesses acted to "protect the brand". Outward identification with following Jesus comes with no small measure accountability to not harm "the brand".

by: ford49

01-06-2010 @ 10:10pm

The problem with WWJD bracelets is not the book from whence the idea comes, or the bracelets themselves; WWJD? is a great question. The problem is the people who wear the bracelets who demonstrate there flagrant ignorance of all things associated with Jesus by their utterances and behavior...sort of like Tigers Woods and ATT and Accenture...these businesses acted to "protect the brand". Outward identification with following Jesus comes with no small measure accountability to not harm "the brand".

by: ford49

01-06-2010 @ 10:14pm

I think SoJo has been very thoughtful and tasteful in its merchandising and its behavior as an organization has not compromised the Gospel.

by: ford49

01-06-2010 @ 10:14pm

I think SoJo has been very thoughtful and tasteful in its merchandising and its behavior as an organization has not compromised the Gospel.

by: Ragan65

01-06-2010 @ 10:47pm

I was made to think after reading Ms. Falsani's article. Sojourner's authors often open my eyes and move me to new ideas. So I joined this group of readers to look at their responses and I had to laugh. Cathleen Falsani's provocative idea stirred up a lot of emotion and I felt that I was flipping the TV channel back and forth between MSNBC and Fox.

I encourage more insightful observations for our community. Now I will read another article and see how we all respond. This is better than network TV!

by: Ragan65

01-06-2010 @ 10:47pm

I was made to think after reading Ms. Falsani's article. Sojourner's authors often open my eyes and move me to new ideas. So I joined this group of readers to look at their responses and I had to laugh. Cathleen Falsani's provocative idea stirred up a lot of emotion and I felt that I was flipping the TV channel back and forth between MSNBC and Fox.

I encourage more insightful observations for our community. Now I will read another article and see how we all respond. This is better than network TV!

by: SisterMarie

01-06-2010 @ 11:00pm

Look, this is not a new fad. As long as I can remember, organizations and preachers have been marketing holy water that they retrieved from Israel, prayer cloths, and various other trinkets. Each of us must judge for ourselves what kind of message that we want to send by the clothing and jewelry that we wear. At the same time, the source of our purchases reveals our value judgments of the ministries hawking these items. Everyone is out to make a buck and they cannot be faulted for devising ways to compete in the "Christian market." The burden is on us to make wise decisions before we buy. (The only thing that is on my bracelet is a message to EMTs that this person is taking a blood thinner - could save my life.)

by: SisterMarie

01-06-2010 @ 11:00pm

Look, this is not a new fad. As long as I can remember, organizations and preachers have been marketing holy water that they retrieved from Israel, prayer cloths, and various other trinkets. Each of us must judge for ourselves what kind of message that we want to send by the clothing and jewelry that we wear. At the same time, the source of our purchases reveals our value judgments of the ministries hawking these items. Everyone is out to make a buck and they cannot be faulted for devising ways to compete in the "Christian market." The burden is on us to make wise decisions before we buy. (The only thing that is on my bracelet is a message to EMTs that this person is taking a blood thinner - could save my life.)

by: Minnesotan

01-07-2010 @ 3:01am

Yes, this is totally correct. Frequently, what people mean when they invoke "judge not" is "don't make more judgments that I don't agree with." If Jesus really meant that we can never make moral evaluations about people or situations then we could not say that Mother Teresa was good and Hitler was evil. In Sojourners Magazine and on this website, I see a lot of condemning of those who promote the war in Iraq, corporate leaders who harm the poor, polluters, etc. That sounds like "judging" to me.

by: Minnesotan

01-07-2010 @ 3:01am

Yes, this is totally correct. Frequently, what people mean when they invoke "judge not" is "don't make more judgments that I don't agree with." If Jesus really meant that we can never make moral evaluations about people or situations then we could not say that Mother Teresa was good and Hitler was evil. In Sojourners Magazine and on this website, I see a lot of condemning of those who promote the war in Iraq, corporate leaders who harm the poor, polluters, etc. That sounds like "judging" to me.

by: squeaky

01-07-2010 @ 5:58am

"Judge not" to me means "I'm a knucklehead. If I truly recognize my own knuckleheadedness and understand how God sees said knuckleheadedness, and how He has redeemed me from said knuckleheadedness by absolutely nothing I could have ever earned, then I will also recognize others are also knuckleheads and remember that I am a knucklehead whenever I start to complain about their knuckleheadedness." In short, none of us have the right to judge the heart of another. Only God can do that. And none of us can judge another as not worthy of redemption or God's grace.

by: squeaky

01-07-2010 @ 5:58am

"Judge not" to me means "I'm a knucklehead. If I truly recognize my own knuckleheadedness and understand how God sees said knuckleheadedness, and how He has redeemed me from said knuckleheadedness by absolutely nothing I could have ever earned, then I will also recognize others are also knuckleheads and remember that I am a knucklehead whenever I start to complain about their knuckleheadedness." In short, none of us have the right to judge the heart of another. Only God can do that. And none of us can judge another as not worthy of redemption or God's grace.

by: facebook-648755054

01-07-2010 @ 9:06am

I love the way you put that. Well said!

by: facebook-648755054

01-07-2010 @ 9:06am

I love the way you put that. Well said!

by: John Mulholland

01-07-2010 @ 2:34pm

The problem with this thinking, "I think SoJo has been very thoughtful and tasteful in its merchandising and its behavior as an organization has not compromised the Gospel." is that every organization would say the same thing.

by: John Mulholland

01-07-2010 @ 2:34pm

The problem with this thinking, "I think SoJo has been very thoughtful and tasteful in its merchandising and its behavior as an organization has not compromised the Gospel." is that every organization would say the same thing.

by: ford49

01-07-2010 @ 5:51pm

John,

I think SOJo has done more than talk but they like any other entity representing the interests of Christ have an obligation not to sully the "brand".

by: ford49

01-07-2010 @ 5:51pm

John,

I think SOJo has done more than talk but they like any other entity representing the interests of Christ have an obligation not to sully the "brand".