Get E-Mail Updates

Glenn Beck Responds: Social Justice 'Is a Perversion of the Gospel'

BREAKING UPDATE: Our message to Glenn Beck is getting through. This morning on his radio show he responded to our challenge to his with further distortions of the Gospel as well as personal smears against Jim Wallis. Rather than respond to personal accusations, Jim would like to invite Glenn to a conversation about whether or not social justice is, as Glenn claims, "a perversion of the Gospel."

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Here are some key quotes, with longer audio clips following each (courtesy of Media Matters):

Where I go to church, there are members that preach social justice as members--my faith doesn't--but the members preach social justice all the time. It is a perversion of the gospel. ... You want to help out? You help out. It changes you. That's what the gospel is all about: You.

Social justice was the rallying cry-economic justice and social justice-the rallying cry on both the communist front and the fascist front. That is not an American idea. And if we don't get off the social justice economic justice bandwagon, if you are not aware of what this is, you are in grave danger. All of our faiths--my faith your faith--whatever your church is, this is infecting all of them.

Beck also attacks Jim Wallis as, among other things, a "dedicated foe of capitalism":

To help set the record straight about what Beck did or didn't say previously, here are some quotes and audio from last week:

I beg you, look for the words 'social justice' or 'economic justice' on your church Web site. If you find it, run as fast as you can. Social justice and economic justice, they are code words. Now, am I advising people to leave their church? Yes! ...

If you have a priest that is pushing social justice, go find another parish. Go alert your bishop and tell them, "Excuse me are you down with this whole social justice thing?" If it's my church, I'm alerting the church authorities: "Excuse me, what's this social justice thing?" And if they say, "yeah, we're all in that social justice thing"-I'm in the wrong place.

+ Click here to tell Glenn Beck: I'm a social justice Christian.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: WJRichardson9

03-11-2010 @ 4:35pm

"You want to help out? You help out. It changes you. That's what the gospel is all about: You."

This is way more than a "you-know-what" contest. This goes to the root of all that is wrong with the politically-tinged discourse among Christians! The notion that the Gospel is an individualist, self-centered endeavor is as wrong as 2 left shoes, and anyone that posits such a dangerous idea needs to be called on it, and quickly!

by: BlueDeacon

03-12-2010 @ 2:17am

That's not really the point. Would you support, say, the right to vote? That's a bigger issue than people realize.

by: mamarea

03-12-2010 @ 10:28pm

What about Lydia? Phoebe? They welcomed the infant church into their homes. Jesus doesn't tell everyone to sell everything, he does something that may be more radical: he changes the whole concept, the very DNA of how those who "have" are in relationship with the poor. Give, support, strengthen, feed, clothe, all without benefit to the giver, without kickback or expectation of return.

The US government or any government is not the means by which society is created. When the government "gives" there is a hefty price paid in dependence, in lost dignity, and lost opportunity.

The government cannot be our -the church's- agent in society, and we cannot be the government's handmaid.

by: PASTOR JEFF

03-12-2010 @ 10:26pm

I sit on the board of a local community action agency which administers millions of dollars of government grants. At least half of these grants are awarded in the Request for Proposal format. Look into which ones you think your church could run and then have at it.

by: MsPeel

03-12-2010 @ 2:35am

I am not only tired of anyone even bothering to speak of glenn beck, who is not worth seeing/listening to, but also of people who think that because they declare themselves 'christians' they are right about everything and the bible is something besides a lot of stories elaborated on by people who were told the stories as children. The church has rewritten those stories so many times that no ancient would have any idea what modern versions of the stories mean at all.

Further, I am weary of the so-called 'christians' thinking that war and greed, etc. are good. Have any of you/them ever READ the New Testament? Using the old testament and its stories has little to do with 'christianity.' READ the very few things that Jesus was supposed to have said and you will find: He did not condone WAR!!! He felt that we should take CARE of the POOR. He didn't want any of you religious nuts trying to run the government either. I, an un-believer, have probably read the bible...both testaments... more than any of you, and I know whereof I speak. I also know that the stories passed down have been changed, tossed out, added to, rummaged with, etc. over a long, long period of time. Take a look at the Dead Sea Scrolls. They tell different stories. Then go get a group of about 25-30 people, seat them in a large circle, tell one person a story and tell him/her to whisper it to the next person, and on around the circle. Then have the LAST person tell the group the story. It will bear no relation to the original story... believe me! This I know and have seen. And you think the stories in the old testament are TRUE. Come on... they were retold too many time, and originally they were used by the OLD MEN of tribes to keep their people in line.

Just like the stories that the OLD WHITE MEN (largely republicans) in the Senate are telling you now about the health bill. The Senate is made up of rotten old men who are elected not by a majority, but by groups of wealthy people in the LESS POPULATED states... and they are in it for themselves. Note how much they PAY to get elected. SO, go ahead and be suckers and believe the OLD MEN. Me, I'm going back to the 60s and not trusting anyone over 30 (and I am in my LATE 70s). get rid of the OLD republicans in the Senate and you will get rid of the sewer rats like glenn beck.

by: christerhudson

03-24-2010 @ 1:09am

This born-again, theologically conservative believer encourages all Christians to avoid having anything to do with the "theological" rantings of Glenn Beck. It's one thing to support a political party or a political pundit, but quite another to contort the Gospel of Jesus to the point that it fits our political stance. It seems that the Jesus promoted by Beck and his followers is not the same Prince of Peace to whom I dedicated my life as a child over 30 years ago. Pray for Peace!

by: kansasmennonite

03-12-2010 @ 2:33am

If you're going to keep saying that christians aren't supposed to give other people's money list all of the social programs that the gov't provides you wish to do away with. Making blanket statements like you just did get you nowhere. I can tell by looking at your blog what you think like and it aint pretty.

by: christerhudson

03-24-2010 @ 1:04am

This born-again, theologically conservative Christian is urging all in the Christian community to avoid having anything to do with the "theological" rantings of Glenn Beck. So many have forsaken the Gospel of Jesus for a political stance, practically making that political stance their god. Supporting a political party or a political pundit is one thing---screwing with the Gospel and cntorting it to fit one's political standing is another. Pray for Peace!

by: lschultz1

09-02-2010 @ 7:29pm

I certainly agree with Glen Beck's comment that it is our individual calling to help others in need (to share what we are blessed with) and I don't see scripturally how the government is called to enforce this. Scripture is all about "you," in the sense that it is about the decisions you make personally to care for others at least as much as yourself, and to live according to what you are called to do. And no one is accountable for "your" decisions except "you," and ultimately that accountability is to the Lord.

by: debnun

03-17-2010 @ 11:46pm

I agree. Glenn Beck is a Rush Linbaugh wannabe who has nothing to say unless it starts or continues a spitting contest. It is a waste of time and energy to argue with him, and it gives him exactly what he's after-an audience. The only thing I will give GB from now on is a [rayer for God to bless him, and the time it takes me to shut him off. If Jim Wallis is still wasting his time on this...I'll miss him.

by: ckgmail

03-11-2010 @ 5:12pm

really as dangerous as two right shoes!

by: Patricia

03-11-2010 @ 5:11pm

The reason people have to waste time and energy with this giant "you know what", and with other giant "you know whats" is because if they are not forcefully countered, their distortions will become the norm.

This giant "you know what" holds sway over the opinions of millions of easily-deceived sheep - we cannot willingly stand by and allow the wolf shepherd the flock.

by: ckgmail

03-11-2010 @ 5:14pm

So now Glen Beck is raised to canonical status?

by: Christine Watson

03-12-2010 @ 7:03pm

Not so Blue Deacon.

The Greek Concordance tells us that the word "dikaiosune" means "justification - righteousness."

Justification is not the same as the term "justice."

The term justification means:

4. Also called justification by faith. Theology. the act of God whereby humankind is made or accounted just, or free from guilt or penalty of sin.

When you compare the dictionary meaning of the term "justice", with what each of the commentary authors describe for the term "righteousness," you can see that it doesn't even come close to the true meaning of what Jesus was referring to in this particular Beatitude.

by: ckgmail

03-11-2010 @ 5:14pm

So now Glen Beck is raised to canonical status?

by: Simpletruths

03-16-2010 @ 6:02am

The Jim Wallis entry at http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Jim_Wallis might be enlightening here.

by: ourfoundingtruth

03-11-2010 @ 5:23pm

Whatever is thought of Mr. Beck, I tend to disagree with him. The Book of Deuteronomy has God providing for the poor, obviously Beck doesn't know the scriptures, which is a familiar scene around here.

by: PASTOR JEFF

03-16-2010 @ 2:42am

"The books that contain the origins of Christianity show that Christ did not perform miraculous healings on unbelievers, He healed the faithful, and that God did not extend the blessings of His prophets to the unfaithful widows or the unbelieving lepers. He saves the sheep, but not the goats."

Exactly my argument that the church should not be in charge of charity. Thank you

by: rshin11

03-11-2010 @ 5:20pm

"The reason people have to waste time and energy with this giant "you know what", and with other giant "you know whats" is because if they are not forcefully countered, their distortions will become the norm."

Then where are the forceful rebuttals against homosexuality, abortion and all the other twisted unbiblical things that many of our other radio and news hosts believe are ok? Or do we only get to choose which non biblical issues are of real importance.

by: Patricia

03-16-2010 @ 1:58am

The purpose of the comparative effectiveness board is to "compare" the "effectiveness" of different medical treatments and procedures - more simply put, to study which treatments and procedures work and which do not. It has nothing to do with rationing care, or with death panels. Senator Coburn's assertions otherwise are false and misleading.

Sarah Palin IS knowingly distorting and deceiving. The majority of her statements are easily demonstrated to be false. Therefore what has been spoken to her is truth, not character impugnment.

The truth is hard, sometimes, but it must be proclaimed.

by: rshin11

03-11-2010 @ 5:18pm

The Gospel is very indivisualistic in many ways. We should not take out the specks in others until we have removed the planks in our eyes. We should not cast stones less we forget that we are sinners. We must all individually decide to die to ourselves, we cannot be forced or coereced into such a decision. And we individually pay a reward or face punsihment for that decision. The communal aspect of our faith is in how we love each other not in how we lambast each other on blog posts. If God himself felt our freedom of individual will too important as not to impose himself on us why then should subjugate that same free will to man made government?

by: Patricia

03-12-2010 @ 6:58pm

Exactly which God-given freedoms is the government usurping? Please be specific.

by: fundamentalist

03-15-2010 @ 7:42pm

But Federal courts trump state law and courts.

by: Grace|Truth

03-12-2010 @ 6:56pm

He was talking to ACORN and promising them they would influence
policy. Ignore that if you like, but it makes it hard to take your
opinions on media seriously.

by: kevinpittsburgh

03-15-2010 @ 7:32pm

I pray that Glenn Beck will come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ.

by: PASTOR JEFF

03-12-2010 @ 11:13pm

Scenarios for the "Let me or my church do it"

1. A latino woman (undocumented/uninsured) goes in to labor and is about to deliver. Who does she call?

2. A dad working at Wal-Mart must choose whether to buy food or fuel for his family of 5 this month. Who does he call?

by: kevinpittsburgh

03-15-2010 @ 7:29pm

Why do so many Christians let Glenn Beck shape their worldview? He is a Mormon who believes the writings of radical thinker Cleon Skousen are divinely inspired. LDS teaching promotes a different gospel that cannot be reconciled with traditional Christianity. Skousen's teachings mix a strident political message with LDS theology.

As far as social justice goes: Jesus proclaimed a social justice message when he read the Isaiah Scroll in Luke 4:14-21. He also healed the sick and fed the poor, and comforted the weary during his earthly ministry.

by: dorileblanc

03-12-2010 @ 6:51pm

Is that why Nathan refers to Beck as "Brother Beck" and why there is confusion with the term 'canonical' (I think the word meant is 'canonized' as in reference to a saint)? Googling "LDS social justice" brings up several sites including one for MESJ, Mormons for Equality and Social Justice. Maybe this is not a mainstream Mormon organization and Beck would not give it recognition. However in the LDS church is an organization, the "Relief Society", made up of women of the church, which has as a part of its mission "welfare". Quoted from the LDS website:

"The purpose of welfare is to help members of the Church to become self-reliant and to care for the poor and needy. President Joseph F. Smith taught that the purpose of Relief Society is "to look after the spiritual welfare and salvation . . . of all the female members of the Church" (Gospel Doctrine, 5th ed. [1939], 385)."

There are all kinds of ways that Mormons practice "social justice" even if they (or Beck) don't call it that and even if its primary recipiants are members of their church. Beyond that, social justice is so Biblical and taught by Jesus (the story of the good Samaritan, for example) that I am surprised that Beck just doesn't get it. It's a puzzle to me!

by: Tiho

03-19-2010 @ 2:43pm

It seems that the terms "social justice", "social activism", "humanism", "social democracy", "government" ... are scary concepts for many in the inwardly looking evangelical circles. Due to the imposing propaganda by the political and religious right they are immediately confused for socialism, communism, Bolshevism, even fascism. How come Glenn and alike, as they describe the current health reform debate, never make comparisons with use well functioning democracies based on the principles of social democracy, such as the Scandinavian countries, Canada, Australia. There the poorest are taken care of in an expletory way, and yet none of those countires have become a pray of communist or any form of fascist ideology. And yet in each one of them the government plays more significant role that in the US. On the other hand, it is surprising that many of our Christian brethren in the US know very well that a born again Christian is called to love his/her neighbor as oneself. And that this invitation is not just a cosmetic and soft invitation to be kind to only those who are like us, but that in it there is a radical call to love practically and caringly those across all ethnic, national, racial, class group, social class, immigration groups, religious etc lines. And loving all of those does not mean giving them the leftover scraps from our tables, but much more. Call to social justice is nothing more that a call to apply Jesus' command to "love our neighbors" at a societal level, and it represents just as legitimate charge of the Gospel as the calls to human rights, religious freedom, protection of human life represent. Do not worry friends, America is far away form ever becoming a communist country.

by: letjusticerolldown

03-12-2010 @ 11:02pm

Did anyone stop to listen to each other before the shouting?

by: Nathan Bedford

03-11-2010 @ 5:37pm

"So now Glen Beck is raised to canonical status?"

Neither Amos nor Jeremiah were cannons and they never claimed to be cannons.

by: Grace|Truth

03-12-2010 @ 4:01am

Fox vs. NBC/ABC/CBS/MSNBC/CNN/NY Time/President/Senate/House/Most newspapers/etc.

Yeah, you are outnumbered all right! And many studies show that Fox is as balanced or more so than the MSM.

by: mamarea

03-12-2010 @ 10:56pm

That the church has failed is an indictment on the church, but the solution is not further abrogation of our calling. Government has no heart, no soul, and cannot change the hearts of humanity, or turn them to their neighbor. Social justice is not the heart of the Gospel. Social justice is one aspect of a life lived in Christ. The death and resurrection of Christ is the heart of the Gospel. When we die to sin and rise to new life in Him, our response is to live out that new life, be that new creation by growing in right living, by caring for the vulnerable, the needy, the oppressed. Right and left have bifurcated the Christian life. Flesh OR spirit, social justice OR virtue, compassion OR sexual purity, living the Word OR loving the neighbor. To be vulgar: feeding the poor and screwing around isn't acceptable in the Christian life, but neither is screwing the poor and keeping your pants zipped and skirt down. The Christian life is and always has been a both/and life. The fullness of New Life is in caring for body and spirit in wholeness and holiness, both one's own and one's neighbor.

by: fundamentalist

03-11-2010 @ 5:29pm

You're right. The debate is over whether or not the state is an arm of the church and the church's enforcer. We can witness in the history of the middle ages what happens when the church uses the state to enforce its doctrines. Many Christians want to use the power of the state to enforce their religious beliefs about helping the poor.

Those of us who believe the state is not an branch of the church still believe that we have responsibilities to others, esecially to the poor. We just believe that we are responsible to give of our own wealth and not someone else's. Can you imagine a church in which the poor majority told the wealthy minority how much the wealthy had to contribute to the church and where the church would spend their money (on the poor)? And those who refused were kicked out?

We also know for a scientific and historical fact that there is a better way to help the poor than just charity--higher wages through economic growth.

by: BlueDeacon

03-12-2010 @ 6:48pm

I'm a journalist and thus by temperament very cynical -- I can spot bias in a second, whether left or right --and I stopped subscribing to right-wing media in the 1990s because I knew it to be propaganda; based on what I already know, the videos can only represent such. As I was saying, Obama has NO connections to ACORN, and I have no way of knowing who shot them and pieced them together to make him look bad. (FWIW, I refused to watch "Fahrenheit 9/11" for similar reasons.)

by: BlueDeacon

03-12-2010 @ 3:57am

My point is that Beck, like many radio/TV talkers (and remember, he is on the
Fox News Channel, which has ties to the Republican Party) is completely
one-sided.

As for conservatives being "exposed," the whole anti-Bill Clinton machine was
in 1999, right around his impeachment; one of its own that had left the
movement turned the tables. Remember Hillary's complaint about the "vast
right-wing conspiracy"? Well, she got the goods from that guy, and all the
info checked out.

by: retarichardson

03-12-2010 @ 10:51pm

rshin11, I understand your disgust. However, people who believe that GB is a Fox tool employed solely to mislead, distort, lie, and destroy the last fiber of the USA's moral constitution (lower & upper case) must stand up and be heard--for the sake of our children, if not for ourselves. If not us, who?

by: kansasmennonite

03-12-2010 @ 3:54am

Did you see recently where the video was edited? I believe one of the political comedians did an edited version with Sean Hannity and made Hannity out to be a prositiute. Very funny stuff.

by: BlueDeacon

03-12-2010 @ 10:46pm

What do you then you when you actually have some power but don't use it for the benefit of those less fortunate? That wasn't the case in the early church, which was shut out of the halls of power.

by: Patricia

03-13-2010 @ 4:07am

Now, multiply that by 30 million and see what sort of resources you're going to need to come up with in order to extend that 29,999,999 times out.

Now, for that mom and baby - how many years are they going to need ongoing support? Food? Shelter? Medical care for both? Diapers, supplies, clothing? Education costs? How much is that going to cost? How many moms and babies are out there who need the same sort of support?

I'm not saying what you did wasn't wonderful - it's just not solely workable by small groups and individuals on the scale of the need.

by: kansasmennonite

03-12-2010 @ 3:52am

Did I say anything about helping at crisis centers?

I wish people would read the thread to see how absolute some people are. Clearly you are a black and white type of person. If you need to show your "superiority" to make you feel better-fine.

I still don't get the reason people come here to blog when it's clear this isn't a site they believe in. I personally don't blog somewhere I don't fit in. Doesn't make sense. There must be something interesting here for you.

I apologize if you're not HomerJ but there's reasons I believe you might be and you haven't denied it-what can I say? Now since you've put the blog on your profile I would have to assume you endorse everything written there.

by: squeaky

03-12-2010 @ 11:43pm

Listen? What? Huh? How? Why?

by: Grace|Truth

03-12-2010 @ 3:50am

"He (and a bunch of others) probably rail against the liberals for
doing that. See, that's the hypocrisy for me; it's OK for conservatives to be corrupt but not anyone else."

I would never claim that liberals have a monopoly on hypocrisy. But do you realize that you posed a hypothetical and jumped straight to blaming the conservatives? How about doing the stings first and then pointing out Beck's real hypocrisy, not imagined.

by: smfergus

03-17-2010 @ 6:45am

See the power of buzz words.

Take away the words "social" and "economic" from Beck's speech, and read it again. No one, including Beck, I hope, would endorse those statements - "justice...is a perversion of the gospel"?

Yet if we eliminate social justice, and economic justice, what kind of justice is left? Legal justice? When God says "let justice flow down like a river", did he only mean "don't let innocent people go to jail"?

Of course not. Old and New Testaments tell us over and over to "redistribute wealth", to give to those in need. "Redistributing wealth" is meant to connect social and economic justice with communism, so that Christians will turn away from those goals. which is God didn't dictate a particular economic system to be "Christian". God is not a capitalist. Or a socialist, a communist, a fascist or a libertarian.

Our Christianity must inform our politics, not the other way around.

by: ourfoundingtruth

03-19-2010 @ 10:28pm

I agree. I'm trying to find out if it is in the context of the government.

by: Kolburt Schultz

03-11-2010 @ 5:59pm

It may be helpful to realize that Glenn Beck is a Mormon, so when he talks about perverting the Gospel it may very well be that he is referring to a different gospel than many of the individuals here.

by: VasuMurti

03-12-2010 @ 6:45pm

Not all Christians believe in the godhood of Jesus.
I've heard that fundamentalists derisively refer to the
Unitarians as "Jewnitarians," because the Unitarians
do not accept the godhood of Jesus.

I'm not a follower of any of the Abrahamic faiths
(Judaism, Christianity, Islam), so I don't take offense
at being labeled "Non-Christian."

Jesus' appearance is not listed in the Vedic (Sanskrit)
literatures along with the other incarnations of God,
such as Lord Krishna, Lord Rama, Lord Narasimha,
Lord Chaitanya, etc.

Whether Jesus is God or an empowered representative
serving on God's behalf (which is closer to the Judaic
concept of the messiah) is subject to debate. The
biblical verse about Jesus sitting "at the right hand of God,"
would be meaningless, unless there were two distinct
individuals: God and Jesus, the Lord and His servant.

Christianity remained a part of Judaism even after the
death and resurrection of Jesus. From the Acts of the
Apostles (2:22), we learn that Jesus' followers believed
him to be "a man certified by God..."

It was God who made Jesus Lord and messiah (2:36),
and they hoped Jesus would soon "restore the kingdom
of Israel" (1:6).

The first Jewish Christians went to Temple daily (2:46),
celebrated the festival of Weeks (2:1), observed the Sabbath
(1:12), and continued to worship the "God of Abraham, Isaac,
and Jacob..." (3:13)

These Jewish Christians carried their belief in Jesus as Lord
and messiah from Jerusalem to Judea, Samaria and Galilee
(1:4,8, 8:1, 9:31). Their numbers began to gradually increase.
The initial 120 members of the Pentecostal assembly in
Jerusalem grew to three thousand (2:41), then five thousand (
4:4). Their numbers continued to grow; a great number of
priests embraced the faith (6:7).

The church enjoyed peace as it was being built up. (9:31)
There was a strong community spirit; they broke bread and
said prayers together (2:42). They shared property (2:44,46)
and lived without personal possessions (4:32).

Many Pharisees came to believe in Jesus (15:5) and this
Jewish messianic movement was on friendly terms with
Gamaliel, a powerful and highly respected Pharisee, who
intervened on their behalf (5:33).

The Didache or the Teachings of the Twelve Apostles,
was a manual used by the earliest Christians. Most of the
ethics of Jesus' Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7) are
repeated in the Didache.

This book teaches one to love God with all one's heart,
love one's neighbor as oneself, pray for one's enemies,
"turn the other cheek" if attacked or abused, and share
one's possessions with one's brethren. The Didache
admits that the gospel ethics may be too hard to observe,
because it says, "If thou canst bear the whole yoke of the
Lord, thou wilt be perfect; but if not, do what thou canst."

by: Grace|Truth

03-12-2010 @ 3:47am

Beck didn't create the videos. Perhaps he reported on them, but I don't know because I don't watch him.

Of course it is fair game to sting the conservatives. But who says they haven't tried and failed?

Who said it was OK for conservatives to be corrupt? Are you suggesting that the Liberal media is protecting conservatives from stings?

What we do know is that ACORN employees repeatedly offered to help people posing as pimps for under-aged prostitutes.

We also know that Planned Parenthood has been caught countless times hiding statutory rape, yet their hundreds of millions of dollars in funding continues every year. Where is the outrage?

I do know that pro-legalized abortionists try to sting crisis pregnancy centers but they fail. Why? Because most follow their guidelines so well.

If you can catch bad conservatives the go ahead. I'd love to see them rooted out and exposed.

by: ourfoundingtruth

03-19-2010 @ 10:24pm

I only referenced him

by: Patricia

03-11-2010 @ 5:59pm

What "many of our other radio and news hosts believe are ok" are civil matters - and "many of our other radio and news hosts" confine their disagreements to the civil (as opposed to religious) level. They may disagree with what particular churches are teaching, but they have not presumed to instruct members of those faith communities to leave or "report" their congregations if those congregations disagree with "many of our other radio and news hosts believe are ok."When Rachel Maddow starts exhorting conservative Christians to leave their churches because they don't support equal rights for gay citizens, or if they oppose State interference in womens' health decisions, I will just as forcefully rebut her for attempting to impose her political beliefs on people of faith.

So far, that hasn't been the case - it's only the political "right" that is attempting the imposition of political philosophy onto faith.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: rshin11

03-11-2010 @ 4:20pm

Does Jim Wallis have nothing better to do than this? It is really sad, I have thought very highly of Mr. Wallis but to think that he and his sojourners staff is wasting time and energy with this giant "you know what" contest with Glenn Beck is truely disheartening.

by: rshin11

03-11-2010 @ 4:20pm

Does Jim Wallis have nothing better to do than this? It is really sad, I have thought very highly of Mr. Wallis but to think that he and his sojourners staff is wasting time and energy with this giant "you know what" contest with Glenn Beck is truely disheartening.

by: WJRichardson9

03-11-2010 @ 4:35pm

"You want to help out? You help out. It changes you. That's what the gospel is all about: You."

This is way more than a "you-know-what" contest. This goes to the root of all that is wrong with the politically-tinged discourse among Christians! The notion that the Gospel is an individualist, self-centered endeavor is as wrong as 2 left shoes, and anyone that posits such a dangerous idea needs to be called on it, and quickly!

by: WJRichardson9

03-11-2010 @ 4:35pm

"You want to help out? You help out. It changes you. That's what the gospel is all about: You."

This is way more than a "you-know-what" contest. This goes to the root of all that is wrong with the politically-tinged discourse among Christians! The notion that the Gospel is an individualist, self-centered endeavor is as wrong as 2 left shoes, and anyone that posits such a dangerous idea needs to be called on it, and quickly!

by: ourfoundingtruth

03-11-2010 @ 4:41pm

It's difficult to give this blog the benefit of the doubt. If Wallis is of the same belief as McClaren, you have no basis to defend any opinion founded on the Word of God.

by: ourfoundingtruth

03-11-2010 @ 4:41pm

It's difficult to give this blog the benefit of the doubt. If Wallis is of the same belief as McClaren, you have no basis to defend any opinion founded on the Word of God.

by: Tiho

03-11-2010 @ 4:43pm

Call it whatever you want but the Old Testament prophets were just as much prophets of social righteousness as of the spiritual matters. They prove that one cannot separate one from the other. Read Jeremiah or Amos for example.

by: Tiho

03-11-2010 @ 4:43pm

Call it whatever you want but the Old Testament prophets were just as much prophets of social righteousness as of the spiritual matters. They prove that one cannot separate one from the other. Read Jeremiah or Amos for example.

by: Nathan Bedford

03-11-2010 @ 4:54pm

Jeremiah and Amos might have been communists too. Why should we accept their opinions as carrying more weight than Brother Beck?

by: Nathan Bedford

03-11-2010 @ 4:54pm

Jeremiah and Amos might have been communists too. Why should we accept their opinions as carrying more weight than Brother Beck?

by: Patricia

03-11-2010 @ 5:11pm

The reason people have to waste time and energy with this giant "you know what", and with other giant "you know whats" is because if they are not forcefully countered, their distortions will become the norm.

This giant "you know what" holds sway over the opinions of millions of easily-deceived sheep - we cannot willingly stand by and allow the wolf shepherd the flock.

by: Patricia

03-11-2010 @ 5:11pm

The reason people have to waste time and energy with this giant "you know what", and with other giant "you know whats" is because if they are not forcefully countered, their distortions will become the norm.

This giant "you know what" holds sway over the opinions of millions of easily-deceived sheep - we cannot willingly stand by and allow the wolf shepherd the flock.

by: ckgmail

03-11-2010 @ 5:12pm

really as dangerous as two right shoes!

by: ckgmail

03-11-2010 @ 5:12pm

really as dangerous as two right shoes!

by: ckgmail

03-11-2010 @ 5:14pm

So now Glen Beck is raised to canonical status?

by: ckgmail

03-11-2010 @ 5:14pm

So now Glen Beck is raised to canonical status?

by: ckgmail

03-11-2010 @ 5:14pm

So now Glen Beck is raised to canonical status?

by: ckgmail

03-11-2010 @ 5:14pm

So now Glen Beck is raised to canonical status?

by: rshin11

03-11-2010 @ 5:18pm

The Gospel is very indivisualistic in many ways. We should not take out the specks in others until we have removed the planks in our eyes. We should not cast stones less we forget that we are sinners. We must all individually decide to die to ourselves, we cannot be forced or coereced into such a decision. And we individually pay a reward or face punsihment for that decision. The communal aspect of our faith is in how we love each other not in how we lambast each other on blog posts. If God himself felt our freedom of individual will too important as not to impose himself on us why then should subjugate that same free will to man made government?

by: rshin11

03-11-2010 @ 5:18pm

The Gospel is very indivisualistic in many ways. We should not take out the specks in others until we have removed the planks in our eyes. We should not cast stones less we forget that we are sinners. We must all individually decide to die to ourselves, we cannot be forced or coereced into such a decision. And we individually pay a reward or face punsihment for that decision. The communal aspect of our faith is in how we love each other not in how we lambast each other on blog posts. If God himself felt our freedom of individual will too important as not to impose himself on us why then should subjugate that same free will to man made government?

by: rshin11

03-11-2010 @ 5:20pm

"The reason people have to waste time and energy with this giant "you know what", and with other giant "you know whats" is because if they are not forcefully countered, their distortions will become the norm."

Then where are the forceful rebuttals against homosexuality, abortion and all the other twisted unbiblical things that many of our other radio and news hosts believe are ok? Or do we only get to choose which non biblical issues are of real importance.

by: rshin11

03-11-2010 @ 5:20pm

"The reason people have to waste time and energy with this giant "you know what", and with other giant "you know whats" is because if they are not forcefully countered, their distortions will become the norm."

Then where are the forceful rebuttals against homosexuality, abortion and all the other twisted unbiblical things that many of our other radio and news hosts believe are ok? Or do we only get to choose which non biblical issues are of real importance.

by: ourfoundingtruth

03-11-2010 @ 5:23pm

Whatever is thought of Mr. Beck, I tend to disagree with him. The Book of Deuteronomy has God providing for the poor, obviously Beck doesn't know the scriptures, which is a familiar scene around here.

by: ourfoundingtruth

03-11-2010 @ 5:23pm

Whatever is thought of Mr. Beck, I tend to disagree with him. The Book of Deuteronomy has God providing for the poor, obviously Beck doesn't know the scriptures, which is a familiar scene around here.

by: fundamentalist

03-11-2010 @ 5:29pm

You're right. The debate is over whether or not the state is an arm of the church and the church's enforcer. We can witness in the history of the middle ages what happens when the church uses the state to enforce its doctrines. Many Christians want to use the power of the state to enforce their religious beliefs about helping the poor.

Those of us who believe the state is not an branch of the church still believe that we have responsibilities to others, esecially to the poor. We just believe that we are responsible to give of our own wealth and not someone else's. Can you imagine a church in which the poor majority told the wealthy minority how much the wealthy had to contribute to the church and where the church would spend their money (on the poor)? And those who refused were kicked out?

We also know for a scientific and historical fact that there is a better way to help the poor than just charity--higher wages through economic growth.

by: fundamentalist

03-11-2010 @ 5:29pm

You're right. The debate is over whether or not the state is an arm of the church and the church's enforcer. We can witness in the history of the middle ages what happens when the church uses the state to enforce its doctrines. Many Christians want to use the power of the state to enforce their religious beliefs about helping the poor.

Those of us who believe the state is not an branch of the church still believe that we have responsibilities to others, esecially to the poor. We just believe that we are responsible to give of our own wealth and not someone else's. Can you imagine a church in which the poor majority told the wealthy minority how much the wealthy had to contribute to the church and where the church would spend their money (on the poor)? And those who refused were kicked out?

We also know for a scientific and historical fact that there is a better way to help the poor than just charity--higher wages through economic growth.

by: Nathan Bedford

03-11-2010 @ 5:37pm

"So now Glen Beck is raised to canonical status?"

Neither Amos nor Jeremiah were cannons and they never claimed to be cannons.

by: Nathan Bedford

03-11-2010 @ 5:37pm

"So now Glen Beck is raised to canonical status?"

Neither Amos nor Jeremiah were cannons and they never claimed to be cannons.

by: BlueDeacon

03-11-2010 @ 5:49pm

Many Christians want to use the power of the state to enforce their religious beliefs about helping the poor.

That's a gross overstatement. What many of us have been doing all along is encouraging the state to take action on its own and not actually force things -- that's what prophetic ministry does because it has little interest in political power for its own sake. The trouble is that many on the right want those voices permanently silenced because, frankly, it costs them something.

by: BlueDeacon

03-11-2010 @ 5:49pm

Many Christians want to use the power of the state to enforce their religious beliefs about helping the poor.

That's a gross overstatement. What many of us have been doing all along is encouraging the state to take action on its own and not actually force things -- that's what prophetic ministry does because it has little interest in political power for its own sake. The trouble is that many on the right want those voices permanently silenced because, frankly, it costs them something.

by: gracie815

03-11-2010 @ 5:50pm

"Does Jim Wallis havenothing better to do?" -- Rshin11 what do you think is more important than defending Jesus' message in the Bible? This "contest" is about challenging false and dangerous assumptions that trivialize a central message of the Bible. Jim Wallis has built his life about fighting poverty as a key Biblical message - so of course this very public attack on Justice as a Christian principle needs to be addressed.

by: gracie815

03-11-2010 @ 5:50pm

"Does Jim Wallis havenothing better to do?" -- Rshin11 what do you think is more important than defending Jesus' message in the Bible? This "contest" is about challenging false and dangerous assumptions that trivialize a central message of the Bible. Jim Wallis has built his life about fighting poverty as a key Biblical message - so of course this very public attack on Justice as a Christian principle needs to be addressed.

by: RachelK

03-11-2010 @ 5:51pm

Think of social justice less in terms of the state, and more in terms of society. The Scriptures as I read them talk about a just society, in which the poor are not just given "charity" (in the contemporary sense) but are given the means to survive and thrive. Not because they earn it, but because they deserve it as children of God.

In the U.S., government is the means by which we, as participating citizens, create the society we want / believe in / aspire to. That's why Christians advocate for a society and a state that values everyone and shares the benefits of God's blessings with everyone: the weak, the poor, the marginalized, the outcast, the leper, the widows and orphans -- everyone.

As for a church where the poor tell the rich what to give or be kicked out? Sounds a little like Jesus in Matthew 25 or Luke 16.

by: RachelK

03-11-2010 @ 5:51pm

Think of social justice less in terms of the state, and more in terms of society. The Scriptures as I read them talk about a just society, in which the poor are not just given "charity" (in the contemporary sense) but are given the means to survive and thrive. Not because they earn it, but because they deserve it as children of God.

In the U.S., government is the means by which we, as participating citizens, create the society we want / believe in / aspire to. That's why Christians advocate for a society and a state that values everyone and shares the benefits of God's blessings with everyone: the weak, the poor, the marginalized, the outcast, the leper, the widows and orphans -- everyone.

As for a church where the poor tell the rich what to give or be kicked out? Sounds a little like Jesus in Matthew 25 or Luke 16.

by: BlueDeacon

03-11-2010 @ 5:53pm

Then where are the forceful rebuttals against homosexuality, abortion and all the other twisted unbiblical things that many of our other radio and news hosts believe are ok?

The "religious right" built their houses largely on those two issues, so doing so in these cases is just not necessary. You'll have a hard time finding pro-gay and pro-choice sentiments on Christian radio and TV.

by: BlueDeacon

03-11-2010 @ 5:53pm

Then where are the forceful rebuttals against homosexuality, abortion and all the other twisted unbiblical things that many of our other radio and news hosts believe are ok?

The "religious right" built their houses largely on those two issues, so doing so in these cases is just not necessary. You'll have a hard time finding pro-gay and pro-choice sentiments on Christian radio and TV.

by: Patricia

03-11-2010 @ 5:59pm

What "many of our other radio and news hosts believe are ok" are civil matters - and "many of our other radio and news hosts" confine their disagreements to the civil (as opposed to religious) level. They may disagree with what particular churches are teaching, but they have not presumed to instruct members of those faith communities to leave or "report" their congregations if those congregations disagree with "many of our other radio and news hosts believe are ok."When Rachel Maddow starts exhorting conservative Christians to leave their churches because they don't support equal rights for gay citizens, or if they oppose State interference in womens' health decisions, I will just as forcefully rebut her for attempting to impose her political beliefs on people of faith.

So far, that hasn't been the case - it's only the political "right" that is attempting the imposition of political philosophy onto faith.

by: Patricia

03-11-2010 @ 5:59pm

What "many of our other radio and news hosts believe are ok" are civil matters - and "many of our other radio and news hosts" confine their disagreements to the civil (as opposed to religious) level. They may disagree with what particular churches are teaching, but they have not presumed to instruct members of those faith communities to leave or "report" their congregations if those congregations disagree with "many of our other radio and news hosts believe are ok."When Rachel Maddow starts exhorting conservative Christians to leave their churches because they don't support equal rights for gay citizens, or if they oppose State interference in womens' health decisions, I will just as forcefully rebut her for attempting to impose her political beliefs on people of faith.

So far, that hasn't been the case - it's only the political "right" that is attempting the imposition of political philosophy onto faith.

by: Kolburt Schultz

03-11-2010 @ 5:59pm

It may be helpful to realize that Glenn Beck is a Mormon, so when he talks about perverting the Gospel it may very well be that he is referring to a different gospel than many of the individuals here.

by: Kolburt Schultz

03-11-2010 @ 5:59pm

It may be helpful to realize that Glenn Beck is a Mormon, so when he talks about perverting the Gospel it may very well be that he is referring to a different gospel than many of the individuals here.

by: awareon2u

03-11-2010 @ 6:08pm

I am a Kingdom of God, New Creation, People of God, Resurrection, Eschatological Christian.

Please read Tom Wright's "Surprised by Hope," Stanley Grenz's "Theology for the People of God" and Eugene Peterson's "Practice Resurrection" just as a beginning.

Stop "proof-texting" to prove your point of view Mr. Wallis! Do become acquainted with God's overarching narrative from before the cosmos was created.

And, stop using the term "Social Justice" - look it up online. It does define Socialism/Communism.

Glenn Beck is correct!

by: awareon2u

03-11-2010 @ 6:08pm

I am a Kingdom of God, New Creation, People of God, Resurrection, Eschatological Christian.

Please read Tom Wright's "Surprised by Hope," Stanley Grenz's "Theology for the People of God" and Eugene Peterson's "Practice Resurrection" just as a beginning.

Stop "proof-texting" to prove your point of view Mr. Wallis! Do become acquainted with God's overarching narrative from before the cosmos was created.

And, stop using the term "Social Justice" - look it up online. It does define Socialism/Communism.

Glenn Beck is correct!

by: rshin11

03-11-2010 @ 6:10pm

I find it somewhat strange that people like to assert a distinction between religeous and civil when it suites them. If there is such a distinction then why does Jim Wallis and others constantly refer to our faith as the reason for addressing civil issues such as immigration and health care. Whether they explicitly say christianity in the conversation or not should not determine whether something that is unbiblical should go unchallenged. To only challenge beliefs simply because they had the audactity to mention church in the sentence is nonsense.

by: rshin11

03-11-2010 @ 6:10pm

I find it somewhat strange that people like to assert a distinction between religeous and civil when it suites them. If there is such a distinction then why does Jim Wallis and others constantly refer to our faith as the reason for addressing civil issues such as immigration and health care. Whether they explicitly say christianity in the conversation or not should not determine whether something that is unbiblical should go unchallenged. To only challenge beliefs simply because they had the audactity to mention church in the sentence is nonsense.

by: Ngchen

03-11-2010 @ 6:11pm

Very true. As I mentioned earlier, the gospel has both an individualistic aspect AND a communal aspect to it too. After all, saved people are expected to have fruits of the spirit, and some of these fruits may well involve working toward a better community.

by: Ngchen

03-11-2010 @ 6:11pm

Very true. As I mentioned earlier, the gospel has both an individualistic aspect AND a communal aspect to it too. After all, saved people are expected to have fruits of the spirit, and some of these fruits may well involve working toward a better community.

by: aquaman

03-11-2010 @ 6:12pm

Good point, Kolburt. I'll refrain from judging Mormonism, but it's teachings on key matters such as grace and salvation differ markedly from mainstream Christianity. They may differ on questions of "social justice" too. I don't pretend to know.

Tellingly, Beck's original pronouncement (the subject of the Sojo article on Beck that preceded this one) said that Beck referred to his "pastor." To my knowledge, Mormons don't have pastors. So while he maligns the faith of others, he is being dishonest about his own.

by: aquaman

03-11-2010 @ 6:12pm

Good point, Kolburt. I'll refrain from judging Mormonism, but it's teachings on key matters such as grace and salvation differ markedly from mainstream Christianity. They may differ on questions of "social justice" too. I don't pretend to know.

Tellingly, Beck's original pronouncement (the subject of the Sojo article on Beck that preceded this one) said that Beck referred to his "pastor." To my knowledge, Mormons don't have pastors. So while he maligns the faith of others, he is being dishonest about his own.

by: Ngchen

03-11-2010 @ 6:16pm

Actually, I believe it is dangerous to entrust government with "creat(ing) the society we want / believe in / aspire to." Government certainly has a role to play; however, there are limits on what it can do. Government cannot change hearts (at least not directly), and cannot make anyone choose to love.

With that being said, we should keep in mind that yes there are some things government can and should do such as set up courts of justice, enforcing minimum standards, and so on.

by: Ngchen

03-11-2010 @ 6:16pm

Actually, I believe it is dangerous to entrust government with "creat(ing) the society we want / believe in / aspire to." Government certainly has a role to play; however, there are limits on what it can do. Government cannot change hearts (at least not directly), and cannot make anyone choose to love.

With that being said, we should keep in mind that yes there are some things government can and should do such as set up courts of justice, enforcing minimum standards, and so on.