Get E-Mail Updates

Pastors: Your Kids Are Listening to You on Climate Change

The data is in. Kids these days trust the news media as a source for information on global climate change only slightly more than they trust Sarah "I'm-not-one-who-would-attribute-it-to-being-man-made" Palin. So sayeth the researchers at American, Yale, and George Mason universities in a recent study.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Matthew Nisbet, an assistant professor in AU's School of Communication, writes that "only 33% under the age of 35 trust the news media as a source of information about climate change, a proportion lower than any other age group. This proportion is also only slightly higher than the 27% of those under 35 who trust Sarah Palin on climate change."

Social intuition has told us that "youth" are and should be more concerned about climate change than older adults. After all, the younger you are the more future you have to lose, right? Well, no. It turns out that the under-35ers are less likely than older adults to believe that global warming is already harming people in the United States and elsewhere in the world and are instead more likely to believe that harm will begin 10, 25, or even 50 years in the future. Just 21% of 18 to 34-year-olds believe that people around the world are currently experiencing harm due to global warming, relative to 33% of those 35 to59 and 29% of those 60 and older.

But here's a really interesting part of this study -- when you add religion into the mix. There was no measurable difference across age when it comes to trusting religious leaders on climate change -- except among evangelical Christians. While self-identified evangelicals, who make up roughly 30% of the U.S. population, are more likely to trust religious leaders on global warming than Americans who don't identify as evangelical, this is especially true of young adults.

Eighty-one percent of the under-35 evangelicals trust religious leaders as an information source on global warming, compared to just 36% of non-evangelical young adults.

In contrast, 51% of evangelicals 60 and older trust religious leaders compared to 41% of non-evangelicals. Notably, 66% of evangelicals trust scientists. And a full 77% of young evangelicals says that they trust scientists as an information source on global warming. President Obama is also a trusted source among a majority (52%) of young evangelicals.

This data highlights the critical role religious leaders play in education around global climate change. It is important that the pulpit be a place that provides accurate and trustworthy information on environmental issues within the context of our Christian narrative and moral tradition.

So, pastors out there, here's your three-point sermon: Earthkeeping. Fruitfulness. Sabbath. In other words, "serve and preserve," "foster generative life," "regularly choose being, rather than doing." Or just go straight Bible on this issue: Genesis 2:15; Ezekiel 34:18; Leviticus 25, 26.

Find more climate change and creation-care sermons at Creation Care for Pastors. And get your solid climate science in easy spoonfuls at RealClimate. Your youth (and your old ones) are listening.

Rose Marie Berger, an associate editor at Sojourners, blogs at www.rosemarieberger.com. She's the author of the forthcoming book Who Killed Donte Manning?: The Story of an American Neighborhood (Apprentice House, April 2010).

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: lanita

03-17-2010 @ 4:10pm

Until the people pushing global warming start living their lives like they actually care about it (i.e., smaller houses, smaller cars, videoconferences instead of huge jets to fly places to meet...etc)...I really am not going to listen. I believe in being stewards of this beautiful world that God gave us...but they are all full of themselves. Its about making money off of people...not about the actual cause.

by: jesse3

03-16-2010 @ 4:42pm

"The data is in."
--The data ARE in!

by: ShazamMan

03-19-2010 @ 6:35pm

If kids are actually listening to pastors, then perhaps the pastors ought to tell them not to pay any attention to politicians' nonsense about global warming. Tell them to take care of their environment,
certainly, but don't arrogate to themselves god-like powers to "change climate." I pretty much agree with Lanita. Sojo continues to want to politicize the pulpits.

by: Ngchen

03-16-2010 @ 5:45pm

Of all the lamentable things that took place under the GWB administration, the one that bothers me the most is how nowadays it seems anything and everything has gotten politicized.

So when it comes to global warming, it's not really how much we understand, it's always a partisan plot by the left or right! It appears we've entered the era of the perpetual political campaign. I can only hope that the relative low ratings of GWB can serve as a warning to those who campaign perpetually, and therefore fail to govern.

by: Justin Fung

03-16-2010 @ 5:27pm

@jesse3

"Strictly speaking, data is the plural of datum, and should be used with a plural verb (like facts). However, there has been a growing tendency to use it as an equivalent to the uncountable noun information, followed by a singular verb. This is now regarded as generally acceptable in American use, and in the context of information technology. The traditional usage is still preferable, at least in Britain, but it may soon become a lost cause."
-- AskOxford.com

Looks like we're trending away from the traditional to the colloquial ...

by: Artur

03-29-2010 @ 8:56pm

comment...

??????? ?????? ????...

by: lanita

03-17-2010 @ 4:10pm

Until the people pushing global warming start living their lives like they actually care about it (i.e., smaller houses, smaller cars, videoconferences instead of huge jets to fly places to meet...etc)...I really am not going to listen. I believe in being stewards of this beautiful world that God gave us...but they are all full of themselves. Its about making money off of people...not about the actual cause.

by: jesse3

03-16-2010 @ 4:42pm

"The data is in."
--The data ARE in!

by: ShazamMan

03-19-2010 @ 6:35pm

If kids are actually listening to pastors, then perhaps the pastors ought to tell them not to pay any attention to politicians' nonsense about global warming. Tell them to take care of their environment,
certainly, but don't arrogate to themselves god-like powers to "change climate." I pretty much agree with Lanita. Sojo continues to want to politicize the pulpits.

by: Ngchen

03-16-2010 @ 5:45pm

Of all the lamentable things that took place under the GWB administration, the one that bothers me the most is how nowadays it seems anything and everything has gotten politicized.

So when it comes to global warming, it's not really how much we understand, it's always a partisan plot by the left or right! It appears we've entered the era of the perpetual political campaign. I can only hope that the relative low ratings of GWB can serve as a warning to those who campaign perpetually, and therefore fail to govern.

by: Justin Fung

03-16-2010 @ 5:27pm

@jesse3

"Strictly speaking, data is the plural of datum, and should be used with a plural verb (like facts). However, there has been a growing tendency to use it as an equivalent to the uncountable noun information, followed by a singular verb. This is now regarded as generally acceptable in American use, and in the context of information technology. The traditional usage is still preferable, at least in Britain, but it may soon become a lost cause."
-- AskOxford.com

Looks like we're trending away from the traditional to the colloquial ...

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: jesse3

03-16-2010 @ 4:42pm

"The data is in."
--The data ARE in!

by: jesse3

03-16-2010 @ 4:42pm

"The data is in."
--The data ARE in!

by: Justin Fung

03-16-2010 @ 5:27pm

@jesse3

"Strictly speaking, data is the plural of datum, and should be used with a plural verb (like facts). However, there has been a growing tendency to use it as an equivalent to the uncountable noun information, followed by a singular verb. This is now regarded as generally acceptable in American use, and in the context of information technology. The traditional usage is still preferable, at least in Britain, but it may soon become a lost cause."
-- AskOxford.com

Looks like we're trending away from the traditional to the colloquial ...

by: Justin Fung

03-16-2010 @ 5:27pm

@jesse3

"Strictly speaking, data is the plural of datum, and should be used with a plural verb (like facts). However, there has been a growing tendency to use it as an equivalent to the uncountable noun information, followed by a singular verb. This is now regarded as generally acceptable in American use, and in the context of information technology. The traditional usage is still preferable, at least in Britain, but it may soon become a lost cause."
-- AskOxford.com

Looks like we're trending away from the traditional to the colloquial ...

by: Ngchen

03-16-2010 @ 5:45pm

Of all the lamentable things that took place under the GWB administration, the one that bothers me the most is how nowadays it seems anything and everything has gotten politicized.

So when it comes to global warming, it's not really how much we understand, it's always a partisan plot by the left or right! It appears we've entered the era of the perpetual political campaign. I can only hope that the relative low ratings of GWB can serve as a warning to those who campaign perpetually, and therefore fail to govern.

by: Ngchen

03-16-2010 @ 5:45pm

Of all the lamentable things that took place under the GWB administration, the one that bothers me the most is how nowadays it seems anything and everything has gotten politicized.

So when it comes to global warming, it's not really how much we understand, it's always a partisan plot by the left or right! It appears we've entered the era of the perpetual political campaign. I can only hope that the relative low ratings of GWB can serve as a warning to those who campaign perpetually, and therefore fail to govern.

by: lanita

03-17-2010 @ 4:10pm

Until the people pushing global warming start living their lives like they actually care about it (i.e., smaller houses, smaller cars, videoconferences instead of huge jets to fly places to meet...etc)...I really am not going to listen. I believe in being stewards of this beautiful world that God gave us...but they are all full of themselves. Its about making money off of people...not about the actual cause.

by: lanita

03-17-2010 @ 4:10pm

Until the people pushing global warming start living their lives like they actually care about it (i.e., smaller houses, smaller cars, videoconferences instead of huge jets to fly places to meet...etc)...I really am not going to listen. I believe in being stewards of this beautiful world that God gave us...but they are all full of themselves. Its about making money off of people...not about the actual cause.

by: ShazamMan

03-19-2010 @ 6:35pm

If kids are actually listening to pastors, then perhaps the pastors ought to tell them not to pay any attention to politicians' nonsense about global warming. Tell them to take care of their environment,
certainly, but don't arrogate to themselves god-like powers to "change climate." I pretty much agree with Lanita. Sojo continues to want to politicize the pulpits.

by: ShazamMan

03-19-2010 @ 6:35pm

If kids are actually listening to pastors, then perhaps the pastors ought to tell them not to pay any attention to politicians' nonsense about global warming. Tell them to take care of their environment,
certainly, but don't arrogate to themselves god-like powers to "change climate." I pretty much agree with Lanita. Sojo continues to want to politicize the pulpits.

by: Artur

03-29-2010 @ 8:56pm

comment...

??????? ?????? ????...