Get E-Mail Updates

A Major Victory for the Peace Movement Down Under

Through tears I write this post as breaking news of the Waihopai Plowshares activists have been found by a New Zealand jury "NOT GUILTY!"

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Watch a video news report here.

Many will know the rich Christian tradition of the plowshares actions, and others, like the judge in this case, might be asking, "Someone must have had the idea first -- Who was it?"

My mate Adi Leason with his comic timing answered by simply saying, "Isaiah," sending the court into hysterics.

Others trace the Plowshares tradition to the Berrigan brothers and six others who on the 9th of September 1980 enacted the prophecies of Isaiah and beat swords into plowshares by prophetically "disarming" weapons designed to destroy the Imago Dei -- ending human life. As Australian pioneer of the Plowshares tradition Ciaron O'Reilly often explains: These aren't random acts of vandalism but prayerful, considered, and costly "table-turning actions" where, "Instead of hitting and splitting we stay and pray, being willing to bear the consequences and serve the jail time as a form of monastic retreat."

My friends Sam Land, Adi Leason, and Father Peter Murnane made history by becoming the first Plowshare activists in the southern hemisphere to be found "not guilty" despite confessing to the crime of damaging the Waihopi spy base that gathers information for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Loud and clear from the land of the long white cloud the people have spoken a message of opposition to war and have created a legal precedent for nonviolent activists. This is a major victory for the peace movement down under and Christian nonviolence in general. We all can give thanks, for tonight we glimpse at the reality that Martin Luther King Jr. expressed by saying, "the arc of the universe bends towards justice."

May you be filled with gratitude and praise to the God of Peace for the witness of Adi, Sam, and Peter. And may you take bold grace-filled costly acts that witness to the reality, that in Jesus, the time to beat swords into plowshares has started!

portrait-jarrod-mckennaJarrod McKenna is seeking to live God's love in a world where business as usual is costing us the earth (at the expense of the poor). He is a co-founder of the Peace Tree Community serving with the marginalised in one of the poorest of areas in his city, heads up Together for Humanity in Western Australia (an inter-faith youth initiative working for the common good), and is the founder and creative director of Empowering Peacemakers (EPYC), for which he has received an Australian peace award in his work for in empowering a generation of "eco-evangelists" and "peace prophets."

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: juswhe

03-17-2010 @ 11:21pm

Hi Nathan, there is a growing Australasian chapter of Christian Peacemaker Teams, supporting the CPT group in Iraq. They (and we) are committed to repaying evil (from all sides) with good, as the Apostle Paul commands.

by: sallydunford

03-18-2010 @ 2:21pm

Nathan

My husband was wounded in Viet Nam where he received 3 Bronze Stars - 2 with V's for valor. My son received the joint Services medal with a V. My daughter-in-law received her V for treating Afghani wounded under fire.

We may be slow learners - but our family has learned first hand the price of war - and we, as do many other military families, stand for peace.

You are entitled to your beliefs, (misguided though I believe them to be) but please don't do it the name of military families.

by: NMRod

03-18-2010 @ 12:25am

Mr. Nathan Bedford, "War Jesus" follower:

You believe in repaying evil with evil, but a real Christian - that is, one who follows the Jesus of the Bible (which I get the feeling you seldom consult) returns only good for evil - as Jesus commands us, to love our enemy.

I am afraid that your "War Jesus" idol is one you have made in your own image and bears no resemblance whatsoever to Him.

by: liberalinlove

03-19-2010 @ 1:12am

Yay for victory. Thanks for your commitment to peace. When we all learn we do not repay evil for evil, we will move that much closer to the Lord's intentions for His kingdom on earth.

by: jonabark

03-19-2010 @ 12:33am

Good news Jarrod. I heard it first on Democracy Now. Don't know if it hit MSM in US. Anyone?

Ir response to NB and his objections as a taxpayer.
I am one of many taxpayers who object to the money spent lining the pockets of the military weapons makers, which then goes into the corrupt pockets of people hired to serve the interest of the people who elected them but who find it more lucrative to engage in political prostitution with the war mongers.

Perhaps a little more money should be spent to nab these war profiteer thieves and recover the stolen billions which remain unaccounted for, instead of spying on pacifists who at their most extreme put a dent in some weapon whose only use in my lifetime has been to kill people whose politics we don't like. Vietnam didn't threaten us, Iraq didn't threaten us, Iran didn't threaten us, El Salvador didn't threaten us, Grenada didn't threaten us, Panama didn't threaten us, Haiti didn't threaten us, Afghanistan didn't threaten us, Gaza didn't threaten us, Lebanon didn't threaten us, Nicaragua didn't threaten us. We have killed hundreds of thousands of people since WW2 with no effect but more war, more corruption and an economy built on bullying. What nation is the biggest threat to peace since the end of WW2?

If self government, equal opportunity, the rule of law, and free enterprise are so great , and I think they are or certainly should be; then why can't democratic nations lead and persuade by example and by peaceful means as has most of Europe and Canada.

by: Nathan Bedford

03-17-2010 @ 5:37pm

Mr. McKenna,

How many Australians are standing shoulder-to-shoulder to their Christian brothers in Iraq and Afghanistan to repay the terrorists for what they did to Americans and your British brothers?

by: Ngchen

03-18-2010 @ 6:40pm

One catch in terms of "war Jesus" versus "peace Jesus" is that IMO they both miss the mark.

If by "war Jesus" we're talking about a grow the military and attack everyone for any or no reason mentality, then yes it's very wrong and is far from the true Jesus. But that does not mean that it's wrong for governing authorities to legitimately use force in the defense of innocents! (Otherwise there can never be even a legitimate police force, since the PD can and does use force against lawbreakers all the time.)

OTOH, there is something very wrong with a person if the person ends up liking, or even relishing, the use of force. There is something very wrong with a person who loves conflict. It does not please God to see the doom of the wicked, nor should it please us. Reconciliation should always be sought.

by: uberVU - social comments

03-18-2010 @ 6:54am

Social comments and analytics for this post...

This post was mentioned on Twitter by u_r_epyc: "War is not the way2 become more human, or overcome evil or deepen our spiritual lives" #JohnDear http://bit.ly/cfxRRl #peace #quote #epyc...

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 9:04pm

Nathan, I've been slow to realise your point here. I thought you were being serious, but now I understand that you're being ironic. Complaining about the cost of removing dents and bloodstains from a submarine but not about the cost of the submarine itself. And complaining about the sheer hardship of having to write a few more letters on the front of an envelope.
Keep practising - you could yet become a competent satirist.

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 8:57pm

Nathan, presumably the Christian brothers in Iraq to whom you refer are the thousands who have been fleeing the country for fear of persecution as a result of the changes created by the US invasion.

And presumably the Christian brothers in Afghanistan are the brave disciples who now, under the US-established Karzai regime, find themselves dragged before the courts for converting from Islam.

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 8:51pm

Nathan, if you consult the article again you will see that it refers to New Zealand, not Australia. Did you not even read it carefully enough to notice that in the first paragraph? (Or were you testing Jarrod's capacity for nonviolence? - Kiwis dislike getting confused with Aussies to about the same extent as we Canadians dislike getting lumped in with our noisier neighbour to the south)

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-18-2010 @ 10:54am

Fighting our brothers and sisters in Iraq and Afghanistan doesn't pay back our Saudi extremist brothers. If anything, it creates more extremists, by giving them even more reason to be angry at US imperialism. In any case, Jesus wasn't into payback, he was into grace.

Here's hoping that the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and everywhere see Adi, Peter and Sam's actions as a gesture of solidarity and a sign that we don't all agree with our misguided brothers George and Barack who think bombing them is the answer to anything!

And let this be inspiration for us to keep praying, hoping and living in the Kingdom of forgiveness, peace and love... it IS defeating the world of payback, violence and xenophobia!

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-18-2010 @ 10:53am

Fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan doesn't pay back Saudi extremists. If anything, it creates more extremists, by giving them even more reason to be angry at US imperialism. In any case, Jesus wasn't into payback, he was into grace.

Here's hoping that the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and everywhere see Adi, Peter and Sam's actions as a gesture of solidarity and a sign that we don't all agree with our misguided brothers George and Barack who think bombing them is the answer to anything!

And let this be inspiration for us to keep praying, hoping and living in the Kingdom of forgiveness, peace and love... it IS defeating the world of payback, violence and hate!

by: Nathan Bedford

03-18-2010 @ 12:02pm

We have some of those people who Jarrod is defending right here in the good old USA. Some time ago, some of them managed to get through the gate, and they were down there on board a submarine, pounding on it with hammers, and one of them even poured blood on the hull. As a taxpayer, I object to the cost of removing those dents and painting over the bloodstains.

And that's not all. There was a submarine that they wanted to name USS Corpus Christi. But the peace lobby made so much noise that they had to name it USS City of Corpus Christi because they said that Corpus Christi means "body of Christ". Now how would you like to have a son on that ship and you have to address your letters USS City of Corpus Chrisiti? It would probably run over to the next line.

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-20-2010 @ 11:09pm

The governing authorities will necessarily use violence as it is the very basis for their power, but that doesn't mean we should support it, or them. The violence of the governing authorities killed Jesus, and it's also killed a million civilians in Iraq so far.

Violence, even when used in defense of innocents (which is the minority of violence), compounds and ends up causing even more damage to innocents.

For the world, this is a sad but necessary fact. For Christians, Jesus defeated death/violence in his resurrection - and by defeating the basis of their power, he defeated the governing authorities (see 1 corinthians 15, particularly verses 24-26).

Of course this is only partly inaugurated, Jesus' resurrection was the firstfruits (i'm parrotting that Corinthians chapter again), but nonviolent actions by the powerless against the violence of the powerful governing authorities - like the actions of Adi, Sam and Peter - are witness to the continual outpouring of the resurrection world.

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-20-2010 @ 10:56pm

As a taxpayer don't you also object to almost a trillion dollars being spent on the military by your government every year? You could give everyone in the world clean water, basic healthcare and education ten times over for that price. Literally.

by: davecrampton

03-19-2010 @ 8:36am

I`d just like to add that the crown is considering appealing this decision
http://big-news.blogspot.com/search/label/Waihopai

by: juswhe

03-17-2010 @ 11:21pm

Hi Nathan, there is a growing Australasian chapter of Christian Peacemaker Teams, supporting the CPT group in Iraq. They (and we) are committed to repaying evil (from all sides) with good, as the Apostle Paul commands.

by: NMRod

03-18-2010 @ 12:25am

Mr. Nathan Bedford, "War Jesus" follower:

You believe in repaying evil with evil, but a real Christian - that is, one who follows the Jesus of the Bible (which I get the feeling you seldom consult) returns only good for evil - as Jesus commands us, to love our enemy.

I am afraid that your "War Jesus" idol is one you have made in your own image and bears no resemblance whatsoever to Him.

by: sallydunford

03-18-2010 @ 2:21pm

Nathan

My husband was wounded in Viet Nam where he received 3 Bronze Stars - 2 with V's for valor. My son received the joint Services medal with a V. My daughter-in-law received her V for treating Afghani wounded under fire.

We may be slow learners - but our family has learned first hand the price of war - and we, as do many other military families, stand for peace.

You are entitled to your beliefs, (misguided though I believe them to be) but please don't do it the name of military families.

by: liberalinlove

03-19-2010 @ 1:12am

Yay for victory. Thanks for your commitment to peace. When we all learn we do not repay evil for evil, we will move that much closer to the Lord's intentions for His kingdom on earth.

by: jonabark

03-19-2010 @ 12:33am

Good news Jarrod. I heard it first on Democracy Now. Don't know if it hit MSM in US. Anyone?

Ir response to NB and his objections as a taxpayer.
I am one of many taxpayers who object to the money spent lining the pockets of the military weapons makers, which then goes into the corrupt pockets of people hired to serve the interest of the people who elected them but who find it more lucrative to engage in political prostitution with the war mongers.

Perhaps a little more money should be spent to nab these war profiteer thieves and recover the stolen billions which remain unaccounted for, instead of spying on pacifists who at their most extreme put a dent in some weapon whose only use in my lifetime has been to kill people whose politics we don't like. Vietnam didn't threaten us, Iraq didn't threaten us, Iran didn't threaten us, El Salvador didn't threaten us, Grenada didn't threaten us, Panama didn't threaten us, Haiti didn't threaten us, Afghanistan didn't threaten us, Gaza didn't threaten us, Lebanon didn't threaten us, Nicaragua didn't threaten us. We have killed hundreds of thousands of people since WW2 with no effect but more war, more corruption and an economy built on bullying. What nation is the biggest threat to peace since the end of WW2?

If self government, equal opportunity, the rule of law, and free enterprise are so great , and I think they are or certainly should be; then why can't democratic nations lead and persuade by example and by peaceful means as has most of Europe and Canada.

by: Nathan Bedford

03-17-2010 @ 5:37pm

Mr. McKenna,

How many Australians are standing shoulder-to-shoulder to their Christian brothers in Iraq and Afghanistan to repay the terrorists for what they did to Americans and your British brothers?

by: Ngchen

03-18-2010 @ 6:40pm

One catch in terms of "war Jesus" versus "peace Jesus" is that IMO they both miss the mark.

If by "war Jesus" we're talking about a grow the military and attack everyone for any or no reason mentality, then yes it's very wrong and is far from the true Jesus. But that does not mean that it's wrong for governing authorities to legitimately use force in the defense of innocents! (Otherwise there can never be even a legitimate police force, since the PD can and does use force against lawbreakers all the time.)

OTOH, there is something very wrong with a person if the person ends up liking, or even relishing, the use of force. There is something very wrong with a person who loves conflict. It does not please God to see the doom of the wicked, nor should it please us. Reconciliation should always be sought.

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-18-2010 @ 10:54am

Fighting our brothers and sisters in Iraq and Afghanistan doesn't pay back our Saudi extremist brothers. If anything, it creates more extremists, by giving them even more reason to be angry at US imperialism. In any case, Jesus wasn't into payback, he was into grace.

Here's hoping that the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and everywhere see Adi, Peter and Sam's actions as a gesture of solidarity and a sign that we don't all agree with our misguided brothers George and Barack who think bombing them is the answer to anything!

And let this be inspiration for us to keep praying, hoping and living in the Kingdom of forgiveness, peace and love... it IS defeating the world of payback, violence and xenophobia!

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-20-2010 @ 11:09pm

The governing authorities will necessarily use violence as it is the very basis for their power, but that doesn't mean we should support it, or them. The violence of the governing authorities killed Jesus, and it's also killed a million civilians in Iraq so far.

Violence, even when used in defense of innocents (which is the minority of violence), compounds and ends up causing even more damage to innocents.

For the world, this is a sad but necessary fact. For Christians, Jesus defeated death/violence in his resurrection - and by defeating the basis of their power, he defeated the governing authorities (see 1 corinthians 15, particularly verses 24-26).

Of course this is only partly inaugurated, Jesus' resurrection was the firstfruits (i'm parrotting that Corinthians chapter again), but nonviolent actions by the powerless against the violence of the powerful governing authorities - like the actions of Adi, Sam and Peter - are witness to the continual outpouring of the resurrection world.

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-18-2010 @ 10:53am

Fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan doesn't pay back Saudi extremists. If anything, it creates more extremists, by giving them even more reason to be angry at US imperialism. In any case, Jesus wasn't into payback, he was into grace.

Here's hoping that the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and everywhere see Adi, Peter and Sam's actions as a gesture of solidarity and a sign that we don't all agree with our misguided brothers George and Barack who think bombing them is the answer to anything!

And let this be inspiration for us to keep praying, hoping and living in the Kingdom of forgiveness, peace and love... it IS defeating the world of payback, violence and hate!

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-20-2010 @ 10:56pm

As a taxpayer don't you also object to almost a trillion dollars being spent on the military by your government every year? You could give everyone in the world clean water, basic healthcare and education ten times over for that price. Literally.

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 9:04pm

Nathan, I've been slow to realise your point here. I thought you were being serious, but now I understand that you're being ironic. Complaining about the cost of removing dents and bloodstains from a submarine but not about the cost of the submarine itself. And complaining about the sheer hardship of having to write a few more letters on the front of an envelope.
Keep practising - you could yet become a competent satirist.

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 8:57pm

Nathan, presumably the Christian brothers in Iraq to whom you refer are the thousands who have been fleeing the country for fear of persecution as a result of the changes created by the US invasion.

And presumably the Christian brothers in Afghanistan are the brave disciples who now, under the US-established Karzai regime, find themselves dragged before the courts for converting from Islam.

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 8:51pm

Nathan, if you consult the article again you will see that it refers to New Zealand, not Australia. Did you not even read it carefully enough to notice that in the first paragraph? (Or were you testing Jarrod's capacity for nonviolence? - Kiwis dislike getting confused with Aussies to about the same extent as we Canadians dislike getting lumped in with our noisier neighbour to the south)

by: Nathan Bedford

03-18-2010 @ 12:02pm

We have some of those people who Jarrod is defending right here in the good old USA. Some time ago, some of them managed to get through the gate, and they were down there on board a submarine, pounding on it with hammers, and one of them even poured blood on the hull. As a taxpayer, I object to the cost of removing those dents and painting over the bloodstains.

And that's not all. There was a submarine that they wanted to name USS Corpus Christi. But the peace lobby made so much noise that they had to name it USS City of Corpus Christi because they said that Corpus Christi means "body of Christ". Now how would you like to have a son on that ship and you have to address your letters USS City of Corpus Chrisiti? It would probably run over to the next line.

by: davecrampton

03-19-2010 @ 8:36am

I`d just like to add that the crown is considering appealing this decision
http://big-news.blogspot.com/search/label/Waihopai

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: Nathan Bedford

03-17-2010 @ 5:37pm

Mr. McKenna,

How many Australians are standing shoulder-to-shoulder to their Christian brothers in Iraq and Afghanistan to repay the terrorists for what they did to Americans and your British brothers?

by: Nathan Bedford

03-17-2010 @ 5:37pm

Mr. McKenna,

How many Australians are standing shoulder-to-shoulder to their Christian brothers in Iraq and Afghanistan to repay the terrorists for what they did to Americans and your British brothers?

by: juswhe

03-17-2010 @ 11:21pm

Hi Nathan, there is a growing Australasian chapter of Christian Peacemaker Teams, supporting the CPT group in Iraq. They (and we) are committed to repaying evil (from all sides) with good, as the Apostle Paul commands.

by: juswhe

03-17-2010 @ 11:21pm

Hi Nathan, there is a growing Australasian chapter of Christian Peacemaker Teams, supporting the CPT group in Iraq. They (and we) are committed to repaying evil (from all sides) with good, as the Apostle Paul commands.

by: NMRod

03-18-2010 @ 12:25am

Mr. Nathan Bedford, "War Jesus" follower:

You believe in repaying evil with evil, but a real Christian - that is, one who follows the Jesus of the Bible (which I get the feeling you seldom consult) returns only good for evil - as Jesus commands us, to love our enemy.

I am afraid that your "War Jesus" idol is one you have made in your own image and bears no resemblance whatsoever to Him.

by: NMRod

03-18-2010 @ 12:25am

Mr. Nathan Bedford, "War Jesus" follower:

You believe in repaying evil with evil, but a real Christian - that is, one who follows the Jesus of the Bible (which I get the feeling you seldom consult) returns only good for evil - as Jesus commands us, to love our enemy.

I am afraid that your "War Jesus" idol is one you have made in your own image and bears no resemblance whatsoever to Him.

by: uberVU - social comments

03-18-2010 @ 6:54am

Social comments and analytics for this post...

This post was mentioned on Twitter by u_r_epyc: "War is not the way2 become more human, or overcome evil or deepen our spiritual lives" #JohnDear http://bit.ly/cfxRRl #peace #quote #epyc...

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-18-2010 @ 10:53am

Fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan doesn't pay back Saudi extremists. If anything, it creates more extremists, by giving them even more reason to be angry at US imperialism. In any case, Jesus wasn't into payback, he was into grace.

Here's hoping that the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and everywhere see Adi, Peter and Sam's actions as a gesture of solidarity and a sign that we don't all agree with our misguided brothers George and Barack who think bombing them is the answer to anything!

And let this be inspiration for us to keep praying, hoping and living in the Kingdom of forgiveness, peace and love... it IS defeating the world of payback, violence and hate!

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-18-2010 @ 10:53am

Fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan doesn't pay back Saudi extremists. If anything, it creates more extremists, by giving them even more reason to be angry at US imperialism. In any case, Jesus wasn't into payback, he was into grace.

Here's hoping that the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and everywhere see Adi, Peter and Sam's actions as a gesture of solidarity and a sign that we don't all agree with our misguided brothers George and Barack who think bombing them is the answer to anything!

And let this be inspiration for us to keep praying, hoping and living in the Kingdom of forgiveness, peace and love... it IS defeating the world of payback, violence and hate!

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-18-2010 @ 10:54am

Fighting our brothers and sisters in Iraq and Afghanistan doesn't pay back our Saudi extremist brothers. If anything, it creates more extremists, by giving them even more reason to be angry at US imperialism. In any case, Jesus wasn't into payback, he was into grace.

Here's hoping that the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and everywhere see Adi, Peter and Sam's actions as a gesture of solidarity and a sign that we don't all agree with our misguided brothers George and Barack who think bombing them is the answer to anything!

And let this be inspiration for us to keep praying, hoping and living in the Kingdom of forgiveness, peace and love... it IS defeating the world of payback, violence and xenophobia!

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-18-2010 @ 10:54am

Fighting our brothers and sisters in Iraq and Afghanistan doesn't pay back our Saudi extremist brothers. If anything, it creates more extremists, by giving them even more reason to be angry at US imperialism. In any case, Jesus wasn't into payback, he was into grace.

Here's hoping that the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and everywhere see Adi, Peter and Sam's actions as a gesture of solidarity and a sign that we don't all agree with our misguided brothers George and Barack who think bombing them is the answer to anything!

And let this be inspiration for us to keep praying, hoping and living in the Kingdom of forgiveness, peace and love... it IS defeating the world of payback, violence and xenophobia!

by: Nathan Bedford

03-18-2010 @ 12:02pm

We have some of those people who Jarrod is defending right here in the good old USA. Some time ago, some of them managed to get through the gate, and they were down there on board a submarine, pounding on it with hammers, and one of them even poured blood on the hull. As a taxpayer, I object to the cost of removing those dents and painting over the bloodstains.

And that's not all. There was a submarine that they wanted to name USS Corpus Christi. But the peace lobby made so much noise that they had to name it USS City of Corpus Christi because they said that Corpus Christi means "body of Christ". Now how would you like to have a son on that ship and you have to address your letters USS City of Corpus Chrisiti? It would probably run over to the next line.

by: Nathan Bedford

03-18-2010 @ 12:02pm

We have some of those people who Jarrod is defending right here in the good old USA. Some time ago, some of them managed to get through the gate, and they were down there on board a submarine, pounding on it with hammers, and one of them even poured blood on the hull. As a taxpayer, I object to the cost of removing those dents and painting over the bloodstains.

And that's not all. There was a submarine that they wanted to name USS Corpus Christi. But the peace lobby made so much noise that they had to name it USS City of Corpus Christi because they said that Corpus Christi means "body of Christ". Now how would you like to have a son on that ship and you have to address your letters USS City of Corpus Chrisiti? It would probably run over to the next line.

by: sallydunford

03-18-2010 @ 2:21pm

Nathan

My husband was wounded in Viet Nam where he received 3 Bronze Stars - 2 with V's for valor. My son received the joint Services medal with a V. My daughter-in-law received her V for treating Afghani wounded under fire.

We may be slow learners - but our family has learned first hand the price of war - and we, as do many other military families, stand for peace.

You are entitled to your beliefs, (misguided though I believe them to be) but please don't do it the name of military families.

by: sallydunford

03-18-2010 @ 2:21pm

Nathan

My husband was wounded in Viet Nam where he received 3 Bronze Stars - 2 with V's for valor. My son received the joint Services medal with a V. My daughter-in-law received her V for treating Afghani wounded under fire.

We may be slow learners - but our family has learned first hand the price of war - and we, as do many other military families, stand for peace.

You are entitled to your beliefs, (misguided though I believe them to be) but please don't do it the name of military families.

by: Ngchen

03-18-2010 @ 6:40pm

One catch in terms of "war Jesus" versus "peace Jesus" is that IMO they both miss the mark.

If by "war Jesus" we're talking about a grow the military and attack everyone for any or no reason mentality, then yes it's very wrong and is far from the true Jesus. But that does not mean that it's wrong for governing authorities to legitimately use force in the defense of innocents! (Otherwise there can never be even a legitimate police force, since the PD can and does use force against lawbreakers all the time.)

OTOH, there is something very wrong with a person if the person ends up liking, or even relishing, the use of force. There is something very wrong with a person who loves conflict. It does not please God to see the doom of the wicked, nor should it please us. Reconciliation should always be sought.

by: Ngchen

03-18-2010 @ 6:40pm

One catch in terms of "war Jesus" versus "peace Jesus" is that IMO they both miss the mark.

If by "war Jesus" we're talking about a grow the military and attack everyone for any or no reason mentality, then yes it's very wrong and is far from the true Jesus. But that does not mean that it's wrong for governing authorities to legitimately use force in the defense of innocents! (Otherwise there can never be even a legitimate police force, since the PD can and does use force against lawbreakers all the time.)

OTOH, there is something very wrong with a person if the person ends up liking, or even relishing, the use of force. There is something very wrong with a person who loves conflict. It does not please God to see the doom of the wicked, nor should it please us. Reconciliation should always be sought.

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 8:51pm

Nathan, if you consult the article again you will see that it refers to New Zealand, not Australia. Did you not even read it carefully enough to notice that in the first paragraph? (Or were you testing Jarrod's capacity for nonviolence? - Kiwis dislike getting confused with Aussies to about the same extent as we Canadians dislike getting lumped in with our noisier neighbour to the south)

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 8:51pm

Nathan, if you consult the article again you will see that it refers to New Zealand, not Australia. Did you not even read it carefully enough to notice that in the first paragraph? (Or were you testing Jarrod's capacity for nonviolence? - Kiwis dislike getting confused with Aussies to about the same extent as we Canadians dislike getting lumped in with our noisier neighbour to the south)

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 8:57pm

Nathan, presumably the Christian brothers in Iraq to whom you refer are the thousands who have been fleeing the country for fear of persecution as a result of the changes created by the US invasion.

And presumably the Christian brothers in Afghanistan are the brave disciples who now, under the US-established Karzai regime, find themselves dragged before the courts for converting from Islam.

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 8:57pm

Nathan, presumably the Christian brothers in Iraq to whom you refer are the thousands who have been fleeing the country for fear of persecution as a result of the changes created by the US invasion.

And presumably the Christian brothers in Afghanistan are the brave disciples who now, under the US-established Karzai regime, find themselves dragged before the courts for converting from Islam.

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 9:04pm

Nathan, I've been slow to realise your point here. I thought you were being serious, but now I understand that you're being ironic. Complaining about the cost of removing dents and bloodstains from a submarine but not about the cost of the submarine itself. And complaining about the sheer hardship of having to write a few more letters on the front of an envelope.
Keep practising - you could yet become a competent satirist.

by: meurig

03-18-2010 @ 9:04pm

Nathan, I've been slow to realise your point here. I thought you were being serious, but now I understand that you're being ironic. Complaining about the cost of removing dents and bloodstains from a submarine but not about the cost of the submarine itself. And complaining about the sheer hardship of having to write a few more letters on the front of an envelope.
Keep practising - you could yet become a competent satirist.

by: jonabark

03-19-2010 @ 12:33am

Good news Jarrod. I heard it first on Democracy Now. Don't know if it hit MSM in US. Anyone?

Ir response to NB and his objections as a taxpayer.
I am one of many taxpayers who object to the money spent lining the pockets of the military weapons makers, which then goes into the corrupt pockets of people hired to serve the interest of the people who elected them but who find it more lucrative to engage in political prostitution with the war mongers.

Perhaps a little more money should be spent to nab these war profiteer thieves and recover the stolen billions which remain unaccounted for, instead of spying on pacifists who at their most extreme put a dent in some weapon whose only use in my lifetime has been to kill people whose politics we don't like. Vietnam didn't threaten us, Iraq didn't threaten us, Iran didn't threaten us, El Salvador didn't threaten us, Grenada didn't threaten us, Panama didn't threaten us, Haiti didn't threaten us, Afghanistan didn't threaten us, Gaza didn't threaten us, Lebanon didn't threaten us, Nicaragua didn't threaten us. We have killed hundreds of thousands of people since WW2 with no effect but more war, more corruption and an economy built on bullying. What nation is the biggest threat to peace since the end of WW2?

If self government, equal opportunity, the rule of law, and free enterprise are so great , and I think they are or certainly should be; then why can't democratic nations lead and persuade by example and by peaceful means as has most of Europe and Canada.

by: jonabark

03-19-2010 @ 12:33am

Good news Jarrod. I heard it first on Democracy Now. Don't know if it hit MSM in US. Anyone?

Ir response to NB and his objections as a taxpayer.
I am one of many taxpayers who object to the money spent lining the pockets of the military weapons makers, which then goes into the corrupt pockets of people hired to serve the interest of the people who elected them but who find it more lucrative to engage in political prostitution with the war mongers.

Perhaps a little more money should be spent to nab these war profiteer thieves and recover the stolen billions which remain unaccounted for, instead of spying on pacifists who at their most extreme put a dent in some weapon whose only use in my lifetime has been to kill people whose politics we don't like. Vietnam didn't threaten us, Iraq didn't threaten us, Iran didn't threaten us, El Salvador didn't threaten us, Grenada didn't threaten us, Panama didn't threaten us, Haiti didn't threaten us, Afghanistan didn't threaten us, Gaza didn't threaten us, Lebanon didn't threaten us, Nicaragua didn't threaten us. We have killed hundreds of thousands of people since WW2 with no effect but more war, more corruption and an economy built on bullying. What nation is the biggest threat to peace since the end of WW2?

If self government, equal opportunity, the rule of law, and free enterprise are so great , and I think they are or certainly should be; then why can't democratic nations lead and persuade by example and by peaceful means as has most of Europe and Canada.

by: liberalinlove

03-19-2010 @ 1:12am

Yay for victory. Thanks for your commitment to peace. When we all learn we do not repay evil for evil, we will move that much closer to the Lord's intentions for His kingdom on earth.

by: liberalinlove

03-19-2010 @ 1:12am

Yay for victory. Thanks for your commitment to peace. When we all learn we do not repay evil for evil, we will move that much closer to the Lord's intentions for His kingdom on earth.

by: davecrampton

03-19-2010 @ 8:36am

I`d just like to add that the crown is considering appealing this decision
http://big-news.blogspot.com/search/label/Waihopai

by: davecrampton

03-19-2010 @ 8:36am

I`d just like to add that the crown is considering appealing this decision
http://big-news.blogspot.com/search/label/Waihopai

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-20-2010 @ 10:56pm

As a taxpayer don't you also object to almost a trillion dollars being spent on the military by your government every year? You could give everyone in the world clean water, basic healthcare and education ten times over for that price. Literally.

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-20-2010 @ 10:56pm

As a taxpayer don't you also object to almost a trillion dollars being spent on the military by your government every year? You could give everyone in the world clean water, basic healthcare and education ten times over for that price. Literally.

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-20-2010 @ 11:09pm

The governing authorities will necessarily use violence as it is the very basis for their power, but that doesn't mean we should support it, or them. The violence of the governing authorities killed Jesus, and it's also killed a million civilians in Iraq so far.

Violence, even when used in defense of innocents (which is the minority of violence), compounds and ends up causing even more damage to innocents.

For the world, this is a sad but necessary fact. For Christians, Jesus defeated death/violence in his resurrection - and by defeating the basis of their power, he defeated the governing authorities (see 1 corinthians 15, particularly verses 24-26).

Of course this is only partly inaugurated, Jesus' resurrection was the firstfruits (i'm parrotting that Corinthians chapter again), but nonviolent actions by the powerless against the violence of the powerful governing authorities - like the actions of Adi, Sam and Peter - are witness to the continual outpouring of the resurrection world.

by: Caleb Morgan Anderson

03-20-2010 @ 11:09pm

The governing authorities will necessarily use violence as it is the very basis for their power, but that doesn't mean we should support it, or them. The violence of the governing authorities killed Jesus, and it's also killed a million civilians in Iraq so far.

Violence, even when used in defense of innocents (which is the minority of violence), compounds and ends up causing even more damage to innocents.

For the world, this is a sad but necessary fact. For Christians, Jesus defeated death/violence in his resurrection - and by defeating the basis of their power, he defeated the governing authorities (see 1 corinthians 15, particularly verses 24-26).

Of course this is only partly inaugurated, Jesus' resurrection was the firstfruits (i'm parrotting that Corinthians chapter again), but nonviolent actions by the powerless against the violence of the powerful governing authorities - like the actions of Adi, Sam and Peter - are witness to the continual outpouring of the resurrection world.