Get E-Mail Updates

I Didn't Learn About the Emerging Church From White Males

[Read more of this blog conversation in response to the Sojourners article "Is the 'Emerging Church' for Whites Only?"]

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

This post is for a synchroblog that asks the question, "what is emerging in the church?" This effort is partially in response to the recent Sojourners article by Soong-Chan Rah and Jason Mach alleging that the emerging church conversation has largely been dominated by white male hipsters, and partially just to celebrate all the good things that are in fact emerging. So even though I am a white male (though decidedly un-hip), I did want to contribute and speak to my own experience of being led into this conversation through non-white, non-western voices in the first place.

About 10 years ago I had just finished a degree in philosophy at Wheaton College (where I had my first introduction to postmodernism) and was working toward a Masters in Missions and Intercultural Studies. While I was already beginning to rethink my theology and worldview thanks to those postmodern philosophers, I hadn't yet even heard of names like Brian McLaren, Doug Pagitt or whoever. Instead what I was encountering through my grad studies were the myriad of ways that Christianity gets expressed in indigenous cultures around the world, whether through African Independent Churches, South Asian Christianity, Native American churches, etc. It was here that I began to realize how diverse the Christian faith really is, and how culturally bound my own versions of faith were as well. Thankfully through this exposure I was also introduced to the concept of contextualization -- the idea that just as God chose to incarnate God's self in a particular first-century Jewish culture in order to communicate the gospel to the people of that time and place, so can the gospel be incarnated and re-contextualized to many other times and places and cultures. The fact that African Christians were able to take the gospel and adapt it to their indigenous cultures, or that Native American Christians were able to be Christians and yet still integrate their ancient customs and religious practices, inspired me to think that maybe, just maybe, we white Western Christians could also have the freedom to adapt our received traditions and belief systems to our own emerging postmodern culture.

More than this, it was missiologists working outside of the West, people like David Bosch or Lesslie Newbign, and especially Latin American theologians like C. Rene Padilla and Samuel Escobar, who first developed the "missional" ideas that have become so significant among American emerging church folks as well now. The idea of a holistic, integral mission that addresses both spiritual and physical needs, and doesn't divide the world into "sending" and "receiving" nations, or even into "the church" and "the world," but sees the whole of life as a mission and the kingdom of God at work in the whole world, is something that was being talked about outside the West decades before some of us here in the States started reading about it and being inspired by it.

In other words, for me at least, this idea of creating an emerging, missional, postmodern faith didn't come by listening to a bunch of hip white males, it came by listening to the voices of the non-Western world and learning from their examples. They led the way. Whatever is emerging among white American Christians was pioneered by them first, and we owe them a debt.

This is true for me, and I know it is true for many of the well-known white male emergent leaders as well. Ask most of them who inspired many of these ideas for them in the first place and they'll often point to these same non-Western voices. None of us are trying to claim credit for it, or trying to say that we invented it. We're simply trying to learn from whomever we can, and follow the lead of these global pioneers as the church continues to emerge here in our own context as well.

This is what I see emerging in the church both globally and locally, and it gives me hope.

Mike Clawson is a pastor, a father, and lives in Austin, TX, with his family. He is currently a student at Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary and will start PhD studies in Church History at Baylor University in the fall. He blogs at emergingpensees.blogspot.com.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: Jesusistheway

04-20-2010 @ 10:08pm

It seems to me this "missional church view" actually came out of the Lausanne Covenant in the 1970s. It's John Stott's view of the Church's mission. It's Ron Sider's view of the Church's mission. It's the mission of InterVarsityChristianFellowship. It's the mission of many churches inside and outside the country: connecting faith and deeds. I think what the emergent church serves as is nothing more than young Democratic Christians disgruntled by the Religious Right and wanting to see themselves as part of history. I think it was in Phyllis Tickle who recently wrote in her book that she believes the movement will be the 21st century's equivalent of the Reformation.

by: MikeClawson

04-21-2010 @ 1:41am

The Lausanne Covenant got their "missional" language and ideas from Latin American theologians like Padilla and Escobar who had been talking about it since the mid-sixties.

by: andrewjj

04-21-2010 @ 10:54am

John Stott and Ron Sider???

i think its funny how, no matter where in the world something starts and no matter what color of skin, someone is always going to give the credit to a bunch of white guys who publish books in the West. ahhhhhhhhh.

by: tadesch8

04-21-2010 @ 12:25pm

doesnt everyone tend to focus on their own group where they are comfortable. I m sure if those 700 Asian-American churches had a movement it would Asian centered and based (from the article)...whites or blacks would only hear about it in passing. And if it was not English based others would hear about 20 years later in a book. So, the reality is the weight is always put on the white persons shoulders , why dont we lift up each other together. Finally, the truth i see is if people dont live in the same areas than churches , movements will always tend to be race based in our churches.

by: Jesusistheway

04-20-2010 @ 10:08pm

It seems to me this "missional church view" actually came out of the Lausanne Covenant in the 1970s. It's John Stott's view of the Church's mission. It's Ron Sider's view of the Church's mission. It's the mission of InterVarsityChristianFellowship. It's the mission of many churches inside and outside the country: connecting faith and deeds. I think what the emergent church serves as is nothing more than young Democratic Christians disgruntled by the Religious Right and wanting to see themselves as part of history. I think it was in Phyllis Tickle who recently wrote in her book that she believes the movement will be the 21st century's equivalent of the Reformation.

by: MikeClawson

04-21-2010 @ 1:41am

The Lausanne Covenant got their "missional" language and ideas from Latin American theologians like Padilla and Escobar who had been talking about it since the mid-sixties.

by: andrewjj

04-21-2010 @ 10:54am

John Stott and Ron Sider???

i think its funny how, no matter where in the world something starts and no matter what color of skin, someone is always going to give the credit to a bunch of white guys who publish books in the West. ahhhhhhhhh.

by: tadesch8

04-21-2010 @ 12:25pm

doesnt everyone tend to focus on their own group where they are comfortable. I m sure if those 700 Asian-American churches had a movement it would Asian centered and based (from the article)...whites or blacks would only hear about it in passing. And if it was not English based others would hear about 20 years later in a book. So, the reality is the weight is always put on the white persons shoulders , why dont we lift up each other together. Finally, the truth i see is if people dont live in the same areas than churches , movements will always tend to be race based in our churches.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: Jesusistheway

04-20-2010 @ 10:08pm

It seems to me this "missional church view" actually came out of the Lausanne Covenant in the 1970s. It's John Stott's view of the Church's mission. It's Ron Sider's view of the Church's mission. It's the mission of InterVarsityChristianFellowship. It's the mission of many churches inside and outside the country: connecting faith and deeds. I think what the emergent church serves as is nothing more than young Democratic Christians disgruntled by the Religious Right and wanting to see themselves as part of history. I think it was in Phyllis Tickle who recently wrote in her book that she believes the movement will be the 21st century's equivalent of the Reformation.

by: Jesusistheway

04-20-2010 @ 10:08pm

It seems to me this "missional church view" actually came out of the Lausanne Covenant in the 1970s. It's John Stott's view of the Church's mission. It's Ron Sider's view of the Church's mission. It's the mission of InterVarsityChristianFellowship. It's the mission of many churches inside and outside the country: connecting faith and deeds. I think what the emergent church serves as is nothing more than young Democratic Christians disgruntled by the Religious Right and wanting to see themselves as part of history. I think it was in Phyllis Tickle who recently wrote in her book that she believes the movement will be the 21st century's equivalent of the Reformation.

by: MikeClawson

04-21-2010 @ 1:41am

The Lausanne Covenant got their "missional" language and ideas from Latin American theologians like Padilla and Escobar who had been talking about it since the mid-sixties.

by: MikeClawson

04-21-2010 @ 1:41am

The Lausanne Covenant got their "missional" language and ideas from Latin American theologians like Padilla and Escobar who had been talking about it since the mid-sixties.

by: andrewjj

04-21-2010 @ 10:54am

John Stott and Ron Sider???

i think its funny how, no matter where in the world something starts and no matter what color of skin, someone is always going to give the credit to a bunch of white guys who publish books in the West. ahhhhhhhhh.

by: andrewjj

04-21-2010 @ 10:54am

John Stott and Ron Sider???

i think its funny how, no matter where in the world something starts and no matter what color of skin, someone is always going to give the credit to a bunch of white guys who publish books in the West. ahhhhhhhhh.

by: tadesch8

04-21-2010 @ 12:25pm

doesnt everyone tend to focus on their own group where they are comfortable. I m sure if those 700 Asian-American churches had a movement it would Asian centered and based (from the article)...whites or blacks would only hear about it in passing. And if it was not English based others would hear about 20 years later in a book. So, the reality is the weight is always put on the white persons shoulders , why dont we lift up each other together. Finally, the truth i see is if people dont live in the same areas than churches , movements will always tend to be race based in our churches.

by: tadesch8

04-21-2010 @ 12:25pm

doesnt everyone tend to focus on their own group where they are comfortable. I m sure if those 700 Asian-American churches had a movement it would Asian centered and based (from the article)...whites or blacks would only hear about it in passing. And if it was not English based others would hear about 20 years later in a book. So, the reality is the weight is always put on the white persons shoulders , why dont we lift up each other together. Finally, the truth i see is if people dont live in the same areas than churches , movements will always tend to be race based in our churches.