Get E-Mail Updates

Gulf Oil Spill: Watching a Disaster Unfold with a Log in My Eye

Watching a disaster unfold on the news is always heartbreaking, but when it occurs in your hometown and you are far away, it can be debilitating. I grew up minutes from the Gulf beaches in Florida, and reading about and watching the Gulf of Mexico oil spill from my current home in Washington, D.C., is like a living nightmare with no option to kick myself awake. With little hope of a happy ending, my soul gasps out prayers for the Lord to stop this horrible tragedy before it goes further.

1.6 million gallons of oil have leaked since April 20. Let me say that again. 1.6 million.

People in the surrounding states (I can't speak to Mexico's impact) are watching their livelihoods change forever and are virtually powerless to stop it. Eleven men already lost their lives, and millions of God's creatures, great and small, will be poisoned by this spill. Ecosystems, intricate and diverse, will be disrupted and changed, possibly forever.

What can be said? What shall we do? My God, how can we mourn?

I want to turn away, but my mind is too quick with the memories: tracking sea turtle nesting sites along the beach in the middle of the night with my girl scout troop; watching the return of the osprey population to our neighborhoods as the ban on DDT produced its fruit; the success as each previous attempt to open Florida's coasts to oil exploration were defeated.

We were doing so well! The environmental movement was making progress. Now, in a bitter spirit, I wonder why we even bothered.

Sea turtle nesting season is about to begin on the Gulf Coast and reports of dead turtles washing up on the shore -- partly a response of the oil spill -- turn my stomach. The birds are nesting as well. Have you ever seen a bird with oil on its water-proof feathers?

To all of God's creation we cry out: "We failed you!" We have failed all of God's creatures we were supposed to protect. Lord, forgive us, give us another chance! And Lord, comfort our children, as they, in their innocence, bear the brunt of sorrow for the plants and animals that will die.

Being angry is one option, but not one I find effective in the long run. Should I throw stones at BP, Transocean, Halliburton, or the political leaders who leased the ocean space? Or should I reserve the harshest judgment for myself and my addiction to oil? My AC, my car, my hot water, my laptop, my disposable plastics, the list is endless.

Because while we all can expect companies leasing rights to public land to practice the strictest safety standards, and it is easy and righteous to decry the power of the international corporations to work around national environmental laws -- those businesses would not exist without demand for their product.

My outrage is checked before I can even speak.

Am I the biggest hypocrite when I protest rigs in my backyard but don't mind when they end up in other parts of the world? When I change a stupid light bulb, but won't stop consuming products day in and day out that fuel our unsustainable lifestyles?

Lord hear, Lord forgive.

Don't get me wrong, I plan to fight back! To organize, and donate, and support my family as they clean oil off of birds and help pass state legislation to protect "our" beaches. But unless my lament leads to personal repentance, can I expect to find peace? Unless I acknowledge my own sinfulness, can I work to clean up the rest of world?

I must consider the log in my own eye.

A colleague reminded me of a worthy saying to help put our energy interconnectedness and my resulting guilt and anger in perspective. Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel said, "Above all, the prophets remind us of the moral state of a people: Few are guilty, but all are responsible."

May we take this wisdom and its applicable lesson to heart, and begin now to create a new energy future together: one that consumes less, cares more, and expects the same from our industries and government.

Elizabeth Denlinger Reaves is the deputy director of policy and organizing for Sojourners.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

Related Stories

Resources

Like what you're reading? Get Sojourners E-Mail updates!

by: MommaN

05-06-2010 @ 8:11pm

"I am not sure exactly when the last oil spill was from an off shore platform, but it has been awhile."

Here's a list of the most recent oil spill dates:
April 20, 2010
April 03, 2010
January 23, 2010
July 31, 2009
March 10, 2009
February, 2009
July 28, 2008
December 12, 2007
December 7, 2007
November 11, 2007
November 7, 2007
October 23, 2007
August 11, 2006
July 15, 2006
June 19,2006
March 2, 2006.

Now that's just the last five years, and I'm sure it's not comprehensive because I didn't see many from African nations or Middle Eastern nations on that list. Most of those go undocumented (and in Africa most of them also go without being cleaned up)

Maybe we do get a lot of benefits from oil, I guess the question most of us are asking ourselves is "Do we have to?" Do we have to have use oil for all of this? Can we find alternate forms of energy? Can we use alternate forms of transportation? We understand that we obtain benefits from oil, but we are asking an important question "At what cost?"

by: Justin Fung

05-06-2010 @ 7:55pm

by: mas424

05-05-2010 @ 9:31pm

as Zora Neale Hurston would say "...they seemed to be staring at the dark, but their eyes were watching God."

by: letjusticerolldown

05-06-2010 @ 1:37am

I resonate--but think there are more options than being angry at the energy producers or the consumers.

There has been much accomplished through the use of energy resources (and much lost). It is more an issue of responsible stewardship.

We don't want to set limits--even when we establish limits. e.g. environmental preservation is often defined by a line that is established through a political battle between those who would create no line--and those who would allow no exploitation of resources anywhere anytime. It is not defined by a mutual meeting of the hearts and minds. The same can be said on a thousand issues.

by: John Mulholland

05-06-2010 @ 2:28am

"Should I throw stones at BP, Transocean, Halliburton, or the political leaders who leased the ocean space?"

Halliburton? Really?

by: Minnesotan

05-06-2010 @ 3:52am

The problem with blog posts like this one is that there is no balance. With many things in life, there are risks to using something that brings great benefits to many. Sure, the oil spill is a huge disaster. But think of all of the benefits everyone has gained from the use of petroleum products - transportation, heat, light, and a myriad of products. Many lives have been saved by the use of oil products e.g., being able to rush people to the hospital for emergency medical care, rather than driving them there by horse cart. The U.S. suffers something like 30-40,000 traffic deaths each year. Think of all the lives we would save if we totally banned cars. We would have that many accidents even if every car and truck were solar-powered. People are willing to take the risk because autos bring so many benefits to our society. Wind turbines kill birds, create noise pollution and other harms, yet they are worth pursuing as an alternative form of energy. I am not sure exactly when the last oil spill was from an off shore platform, but it has been awhile. People can catch deadly bacteria from vegetables in rare situations. That doesn't mean that we ban all vegetable-eating. It would be better if the writer would explain what we should ban and see what we would be giving up in order to prevent an occasional oil spill disaster. To point to the oil spill alone gives no perspective to the totality of how oil production benefits billions of people throughout the world today.

by: pilgrimboy

05-05-2010 @ 6:06pm

Thank you for that post.

by: pilgrimboy

05-05-2010 @ 6:06pm

Thank you for that post.

by: john316

05-06-2010 @ 4:30pm

Nothing to worry about here. Rush (the darling of the right wing) says the ocean will clean itself.

by: Ngchen

05-06-2010 @ 6:27pm

I appreciate your call for balance. The fact is that there will always be a need for some quantity of oil, at least in the foreseeable future. With that being said, it's not obvious why oil consumption can't be reduced a substantial amount if there were the will to do it. Being someone who commuted by bike (which actually DOES use oil for lubrication) for several years, if the infrastructure for complete streets were aggressively put in over say the next decade or two, commuting by bike or foot is eminently doable, not to mention healthier. (And potentially time-saving - people learn to combine trips, not to mention the skipping of the gym!)

I'm looking foward to the investigation of why the rig exploded, and learning why the blowout prevention systems failed. Disasters like this one and the coal mine explosions actually have something in common: even from a purely economic perspective, the companies involved actually have a strong interest against explosions since they waste the resource in question, not to mention being crippling production.

Supposedly Norway drills offshore oil quite well, and hasn't had explosions. Maybe their practices are better?

by: ben_david

05-05-2010 @ 7:33pm

crazy. just left a similar post at www.downtowncredo.wordpress.com it's nice to see folks with nuanced sensitivity.

by: ben_david

05-05-2010 @ 7:33pm

crazy. just left a similar post at www.downtowncredo.wordpress.com it's nice to see folks with nuanced sensitivity.

by: MommaN

05-06-2010 @ 8:11pm

"I am not sure exactly when the last oil spill was from an off shore platform, but it has been awhile."

Here's a list of the most recent oil spill dates:
April 20, 2010
April 03, 2010
January 23, 2010
July 31, 2009
March 10, 2009
February, 2009
July 28, 2008
December 12, 2007
December 7, 2007
November 11, 2007
November 7, 2007
October 23, 2007
August 11, 2006
July 15, 2006
June 19,2006
March 2, 2006.

Now that's just the last five years, and I'm sure it's not comprehensive because I didn't see many from African nations or Middle Eastern nations on that list. Most of those go undocumented (and in Africa most of them also go without being cleaned up)

Maybe we do get a lot of benefits from oil, I guess the question most of us are asking ourselves is "Do we have to?" Do we have to have use oil for all of this? Can we find alternate forms of energy? Can we use alternate forms of transportation? We understand that we obtain benefits from oil, but we are asking an important question "At what cost?"

by: Justin Fung

05-06-2010 @ 7:55pm

by: walkanna

05-07-2010 @ 9:20am

MBT Sale.cheap MBT shoes and discount Vibram Five Fingers can be found easily.

fivefingers sprint is versatile line of vibram five fingers. you will find vibram fivefingers is comfortable.

by: walkanna

05-07-2010 @ 9:11am

Reebok Easy Tone sale. You will find discount
Reebok EasyTone at our website.
EasyTone Shoes are popular around the world.

by: pastorcarlos

05-05-2010 @ 7:42pm

I hope and pray that we would take this approach not only to this crisis, but to any situation that we would be quick to criticize. I believe that when we are able to first see our own culpability, we can begin to work towards accord. For it is in our ignorance that we judge and in our haste we hurt. Neither accomplishes anything positive. Thank you for this humble reminder, Elizabeth

by: pastorcarlos

05-05-2010 @ 7:42pm

I hope and pray that we would take this approach not only to this crisis, but to any situation that we would be quick to criticize. I believe that when we are able to first see our own culpability, we can begin to work towards accord. For it is in our ignorance that we judge and in our haste we hurt. Neither accomplishes anything positive. Thank you for this humble reminder, Elizabeth

by: mas424

05-05-2010 @ 9:31pm

as Zora Neale Hurston would say "...they seemed to be staring at the dark, but their eyes were watching God."

by: mas424

05-05-2010 @ 9:31pm

as Zora Neale Hurston would say "...they seemed to be staring at the dark, but their eyes were watching God."

by: letjusticerolldown

05-06-2010 @ 1:37am

I resonate--but think there are more options than being angry at the energy producers or the consumers.

There has been much accomplished through the use of energy resources (and much lost). It is more an issue of responsible stewardship.

We don't want to set limits--even when we establish limits. e.g. environmental preservation is often defined by a line that is established through a political battle between those who would create no line--and those who would allow no exploitation of resources anywhere anytime. It is not defined by a mutual meeting of the hearts and minds. The same can be said on a thousand issues.

by: letjusticerolldown

05-06-2010 @ 1:37am

I resonate--but think there are more options than being angry at the energy producers or the consumers.

There has been much accomplished through the use of energy resources (and much lost). It is more an issue of responsible stewardship.

We don't want to set limits--even when we establish limits. e.g. environmental preservation is often defined by a line that is established through a political battle between those who would create no line--and those who would allow no exploitation of resources anywhere anytime. It is not defined by a mutual meeting of the hearts and minds. The same can be said on a thousand issues.

by: walkanna

05-07-2010 @ 9:20am

MBT Sale.cheap MBT shoes and discount Vibram Five Fingers can be found easily.

fivefingers sprint is versatile line of vibram five fingers. you will find vibram fivefingers is comfortable.

by: walkanna

05-07-2010 @ 9:11am

Reebok Easy Tone sale. You will find discount
Reebok EasyTone at our website.
EasyTone Shoes are popular around the world.

by: John Mulholland

05-06-2010 @ 2:28am

"Should I throw stones at BP, Transocean, Halliburton, or the political leaders who leased the ocean space?"

Halliburton? Really?

by: John Mulholland

05-06-2010 @ 2:28am

"Should I throw stones at BP, Transocean, Halliburton, or the political leaders who leased the ocean space?"

Halliburton? Really?

by: Minnesotan

05-06-2010 @ 3:52am

The problem with blog posts like this one is that there is no balance. With many things in life, there are risks to using something that brings great benefits to many. Sure, the oil spill is a huge disaster. But think of all of the benefits everyone has gained from the use of petroleum products - transportation, heat, light, and a myriad of products. Many lives have been saved by the use of oil products e.g., being able to rush people to the hospital for emergency medical care, rather than driving them there by horse cart. The U.S. suffers something like 30-40,000 traffic deaths each year. Think of all the lives we would save if we totally banned cars. We would have that many accidents even if every car and truck were solar-powered. People are willing to take the risk because autos bring so many benefits to our society. Wind turbines kill birds, create noise pollution and other harms, yet they are worth pursuing as an alternative form of energy. I am not sure exactly when the last oil spill was from an off shore platform, but it has been awhile. People can catch deadly bacteria from vegetables in rare situations. That doesn't mean that we ban all vegetable-eating. It would be better if the writer would explain what we should ban and see what we would be giving up in order to prevent an occasional oil spill disaster. To point to the oil spill alone gives no perspective to the totality of how oil production benefits billions of people throughout the world today.

by: Minnesotan

05-06-2010 @ 3:52am

The problem with blog posts like this one is that there is no balance. With many things in life, there are risks to using something that brings great benefits to many. Sure, the oil spill is a huge disaster. But think of all of the benefits everyone has gained from the use of petroleum products - transportation, heat, light, and a myriad of products. Many lives have been saved by the use of oil products e.g., being able to rush people to the hospital for emergency medical care, rather than driving them there by horse cart. The U.S. suffers something like 30-40,000 traffic deaths each year. Think of all the lives we would save if we totally banned cars. We would have that many accidents even if every car and truck were solar-powered. People are willing to take the risk because autos bring so many benefits to our society. Wind turbines kill birds, create noise pollution and other harms, yet they are worth pursuing as an alternative form of energy. I am not sure exactly when the last oil spill was from an off shore platform, but it has been awhile. People can catch deadly bacteria from vegetables in rare situations. That doesn't mean that we ban all vegetable-eating. It would be better if the writer would explain what we should ban and see what we would be giving up in order to prevent an occasional oil spill disaster. To point to the oil spill alone gives no perspective to the totality of how oil production benefits billions of people throughout the world today.

by: pilgrimboy

05-05-2010 @ 6:06pm

Thank you for that post.

by: john316

05-06-2010 @ 4:30pm

Nothing to worry about here. Rush (the darling of the right wing) says the ocean will clean itself.

by: ben_david

05-05-2010 @ 7:33pm

crazy. just left a similar post at www.downtowncredo.wordpress.com it's nice to see folks with nuanced sensitivity.

by: Ngchen

05-06-2010 @ 6:27pm

I appreciate your call for balance. The fact is that there will always be a need for some quantity of oil, at least in the foreseeable future. With that being said, it's not obvious why oil consumption can't be reduced a substantial amount if there were the will to do it. Being someone who commuted by bike (which actually DOES use oil for lubrication) for several years, if the infrastructure for complete streets were aggressively put in over say the next decade or two, commuting by bike or foot is eminently doable, not to mention healthier. (And potentially time-saving - people learn to combine trips, not to mention the skipping of the gym!)

I'm looking foward to the investigation of why the rig exploded, and learning why the blowout prevention systems failed. Disasters like this one and the coal mine explosions actually have something in common: even from a purely economic perspective, the companies involved actually have a strong interest against explosions since they waste the resource in question, not to mention being crippling production.

Supposedly Norway drills offshore oil quite well, and hasn't had explosions. Maybe their practices are better?

by: pastorcarlos

05-05-2010 @ 7:42pm

I hope and pray that we would take this approach not only to this crisis, but to any situation that we would be quick to criticize. I believe that when we are able to first see our own culpability, we can begin to work towards accord. For it is in our ignorance that we judge and in our haste we hurt. Neither accomplishes anything positive. Thank you for this humble reminder, Elizabeth

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: Ngchen

05-06-2010 @ 6:27pm

I appreciate your call for balance. The fact is that there will always be a need for some quantity of oil, at least in the foreseeable future. With that being said, it's not obvious why oil consumption can't be reduced a substantial amount if there were the will to do it. Being someone who commuted by bike (which actually DOES use oil for lubrication) for several years, if the infrastructure for complete streets were aggressively put in over say the next decade or two, commuting by bike or foot is eminently doable, not to mention healthier. (And potentially time-saving - people learn to combine trips, not to mention the skipping of the gym!)

I'm looking foward to the investigation of why the rig exploded, and learning why the blowout prevention systems failed. Disasters like this one and the coal mine explosions actually have something in common: even from a purely economic perspective, the companies involved actually have a strong interest against explosions since they waste the resource in question, not to mention being crippling production.

Supposedly Norway drills offshore oil quite well, and hasn't had explosions. Maybe their practices are better?

by: Justin Fung

05-06-2010 @ 7:55pm

by: pilgrimboy

05-05-2010 @ 6:06pm

Thank you for that post.

by: pilgrimboy

05-05-2010 @ 6:06pm

Thank you for that post.

by: pilgrimboy

05-05-2010 @ 6:06pm

Thank you for that post.

by: ben_david

05-05-2010 @ 7:33pm

crazy. just left a similar post at www.downtowncredo.wordpress.com it's nice to see folks with nuanced sensitivity.

by: ben_david

05-05-2010 @ 7:33pm

crazy. just left a similar post at www.downtowncredo.wordpress.com it's nice to see folks with nuanced sensitivity.

by: pastorcarlos

05-05-2010 @ 7:42pm

I hope and pray that we would take this approach not only to this crisis, but to any situation that we would be quick to criticize. I believe that when we are able to first see our own culpability, we can begin to work towards accord. For it is in our ignorance that we judge and in our haste we hurt. Neither accomplishes anything positive. Thank you for this humble reminder, Elizabeth

by: pastorcarlos

05-05-2010 @ 7:42pm

I hope and pray that we would take this approach not only to this crisis, but to any situation that we would be quick to criticize. I believe that when we are able to first see our own culpability, we can begin to work towards accord. For it is in our ignorance that we judge and in our haste we hurt. Neither accomplishes anything positive. Thank you for this humble reminder, Elizabeth

by: pastorcarlos

05-05-2010 @ 7:42pm

I hope and pray that we would take this approach not only to this crisis, but to any situation that we would be quick to criticize. I believe that when we are able to first see our own culpability, we can begin to work towards accord. For it is in our ignorance that we judge and in our haste we hurt. Neither accomplishes anything positive. Thank you for this humble reminder, Elizabeth

by: mas424

05-05-2010 @ 9:31pm

as Zora Neale Hurston would say "...they seemed to be staring at the dark, but their eyes were watching God."

by: mas424

05-05-2010 @ 9:31pm

as Zora Neale Hurston would say "...they seemed to be staring at the dark, but their eyes were watching God."

by: mas424

05-05-2010 @ 9:31pm

as Zora Neale Hurston would say "...they seemed to be staring at the dark, but their eyes were watching God."

by: letjusticerolldown

05-06-2010 @ 1:37am

I resonate--but think there are more options than being angry at the energy producers or the consumers.

There has been much accomplished through the use of energy resources (and much lost). It is more an issue of responsible stewardship.

We don't want to set limits--even when we establish limits. e.g. environmental preservation is often defined by a line that is established through a political battle between those who would create no line--and those who would allow no exploitation of resources anywhere anytime. It is not defined by a mutual meeting of the hearts and minds. The same can be said on a thousand issues.

by: letjusticerolldown

05-06-2010 @ 1:37am

I resonate--but think there are more options than being angry at the energy producers or the consumers.

There has been much accomplished through the use of energy resources (and much lost). It is more an issue of responsible stewardship.

We don't want to set limits--even when we establish limits. e.g. environmental preservation is often defined by a line that is established through a political battle between those who would create no line--and those who would allow no exploitation of resources anywhere anytime. It is not defined by a mutual meeting of the hearts and minds. The same can be said on a thousand issues.

by: letjusticerolldown

05-06-2010 @ 1:37am

I resonate--but think there are more options than being angry at the energy producers or the consumers.

There has been much accomplished through the use of energy resources (and much lost). It is more an issue of responsible stewardship.

We don't want to set limits--even when we establish limits. e.g. environmental preservation is often defined by a line that is established through a political battle between those who would create no line--and those who would allow no exploitation of resources anywhere anytime. It is not defined by a mutual meeting of the hearts and minds. The same can be said on a thousand issues.

by: John Mulholland

05-06-2010 @ 2:28am

"Should I throw stones at BP, Transocean, Halliburton, or the political leaders who leased the ocean space?"

Halliburton? Really?

by: John Mulholland

05-06-2010 @ 2:28am

"Should I throw stones at BP, Transocean, Halliburton, or the political leaders who leased the ocean space?"

Halliburton? Really?

by: John Mulholland

05-06-2010 @ 2:28am

"Should I throw stones at BP, Transocean, Halliburton, or the political leaders who leased the ocean space?"

Halliburton? Really?

by: Minnesotan

05-06-2010 @ 3:52am

The problem with blog posts like this one is that there is no balance. With many things in life, there are risks to using something that brings great benefits to many. Sure, the oil spill is a huge disaster. But think of all of the benefits everyone has gained from the use of petroleum products - transportation, heat, light, and a myriad of products. Many lives have been saved by the use of oil products e.g., being able to rush people to the hospital for emergency medical care, rather than driving them there by horse cart. The U.S. suffers something like 30-40,000 traffic deaths each year. Think of all the lives we would save if we totally banned cars. We would have that many accidents even if every car and truck were solar-powered. People are willing to take the risk because autos bring so many benefits to our society. Wind turbines kill birds, create noise pollution and other harms, yet they are worth pursuing as an alternative form of energy. I am not sure exactly when the last oil spill was from an off shore platform, but it has been awhile. People can catch deadly bacteria from vegetables in rare situations. That doesn't mean that we ban all vegetable-eating. It would be better if the writer would explain what we should ban and see what we would be giving up in order to prevent an occasional oil spill disaster. To point to the oil spill alone gives no perspective to the totality of how oil production benefits billions of people throughout the world today.

by: Minnesotan

05-06-2010 @ 3:52am

The problem with blog posts like this one is that there is no balance. With many things in life, there are risks to using something that brings great benefits to many. Sure, the oil spill is a huge disaster. But think of all of the benefits everyone has gained from the use of petroleum products - transportation, heat, light, and a myriad of products. Many lives have been saved by the use of oil products e.g., being able to rush people to the hospital for emergency medical care, rather than driving them there by horse cart. The U.S. suffers something like 30-40,000 traffic deaths each year. Think of all the lives we would save if we totally banned cars. We would have that many accidents even if every car and truck were solar-powered. People are willing to take the risk because autos bring so many benefits to our society. Wind turbines kill birds, create noise pollution and other harms, yet they are worth pursuing as an alternative form of energy. I am not sure exactly when the last oil spill was from an off shore platform, but it has been awhile. People can catch deadly bacteria from vegetables in rare situations. That doesn't mean that we ban all vegetable-eating. It would be better if the writer would explain what we should ban and see what we would be giving up in order to prevent an occasional oil spill disaster. To point to the oil spill alone gives no perspective to the totality of how oil production benefits billions of people throughout the world today.

by: Minnesotan

05-06-2010 @ 3:52am

The problem with blog posts like this one is that there is no balance. With many things in life, there are risks to using something that brings great benefits to many. Sure, the oil spill is a huge disaster. But think of all of the benefits everyone has gained from the use of petroleum products - transportation, heat, light, and a myriad of products. Many lives have been saved by the use of oil products e.g., being able to rush people to the hospital for emergency medical care, rather than driving them there by horse cart. The U.S. suffers something like 30-40,000 traffic deaths each year. Think of all the lives we would save if we totally banned cars. We would have that many accidents even if every car and truck were solar-powered. People are willing to take the risk because autos bring so many benefits to our society. Wind turbines kill birds, create noise pollution and other harms, yet they are worth pursuing as an alternative form of energy. I am not sure exactly when the last oil spill was from an off shore platform, but it has been awhile. People can catch deadly bacteria from vegetables in rare situations. That doesn't mean that we ban all vegetable-eating. It would be better if the writer would explain what we should ban and see what we would be giving up in order to prevent an occasional oil spill disaster. To point to the oil spill alone gives no perspective to the totality of how oil production benefits billions of people throughout the world today.

by: john316

05-06-2010 @ 4:30pm

Nothing to worry about here. Rush (the darling of the right wing) says the ocean will clean itself.

by: john316

05-06-2010 @ 4:30pm

Nothing to worry about here. Rush (the darling of the right wing) says the ocean will clean itself.

by: Ngchen

05-06-2010 @ 6:27pm

I appreciate your call for balance. The fact is that there will always be a need for some quantity of oil, at least in the foreseeable future. With that being said, it's not obvious why oil consumption can't be reduced a substantial amount if there were the will to do it. Being someone who commuted by bike (which actually DOES use oil for lubrication) for several years, if the infrastructure for complete streets were aggressively put in over say the next decade or two, commuting by bike or foot is eminently doable, not to mention healthier. (And potentially time-saving - people learn to combine trips, not to mention the skipping of the gym!)

I'm looking foward to the investigation of why the rig exploded, and learning why the blowout prevention systems failed. Disasters like this one and the coal mine explosions actually have something in common: even from a purely economic perspective, the companies involved actually have a strong interest against explosions since they waste the resource in question, not to mention being crippling production.

Supposedly Norway drills offshore oil quite well, and hasn't had explosions. Maybe their practices are better?

by: Justin Fung

05-06-2010 @ 7:55pm

by: MommaN

05-06-2010 @ 8:11pm

"I am not sure exactly when the last oil spill was from an off shore platform, but it has been awhile."

Here's a list of the most recent oil spill dates:
April 20, 2010
April 03, 2010
January 23, 2010
July 31, 2009
March 10, 2009
February, 2009
July 28, 2008
December 12, 2007
December 7, 2007
November 11, 2007
November 7, 2007
October 23, 2007
August 11, 2006
July 15, 2006
June 19,2006
March 2, 2006.

Now that's just the last five years, and I'm sure it's not comprehensive because I didn't see many from African nations or Middle Eastern nations on that list. Most of those go undocumented (and in Africa most of them also go without being cleaned up)

Maybe we do get a lot of benefits from oil, I guess the question most of us are asking ourselves is "Do we have to?" Do we have to have use oil for all of this? Can we find alternate forms of energy? Can we use alternate forms of transportation? We understand that we obtain benefits from oil, but we are asking an important question "At what cost?"

by: walkanna

05-07-2010 @ 9:11am

Reebok Easy Tone sale. You will find discount
Reebok EasyTone at our website.
EasyTone Shoes are popular around the world.

by: walkanna

05-07-2010 @ 9:11am

Reebok Easy Tone sale. You will find discount
Reebok EasyTone at our website.
EasyTone Shoes are popular around the world.

by: walkanna

05-07-2010 @ 9:20am

MBT Sale.cheap MBT shoes and discount Vibram Five Fingers can be found easily.

fivefingers sprint is versatile line of vibram five fingers. you will find vibram fivefingers is comfortable.

by: walkanna

05-07-2010 @ 9:20am

MBT Sale.cheap MBT shoes and discount Vibram Five Fingers can be found easily.

fivefingers sprint is versatile line of vibram five fingers. you will find vibram fivefingers is comfortable.

by: ben_david

05-05-2010 @ 7:33pm

crazy. just left a similar post at www.downtowncredo.wordpress.com it's nice to see folks with nuanced sensitivity.

by: MommaN

05-06-2010 @ 8:11pm

"I am not sure exactly when the last oil spill was from an off shore platform, but it has been awhile."

Here's a list of the most recent oil spill dates:
April 20, 2010
April 03, 2010
January 23, 2010
July 31, 2009
March 10, 2009
February, 2009
July 28, 2008
December 12, 2007
December 7, 2007
November 11, 2007
November 7, 2007
October 23, 2007
August 11, 2006
July 15, 2006
June 19,2006
March 2, 2006.

Now that's just the last five years, and I'm sure it's not comprehensive because I didn't see many from African nations or Middle Eastern nations on that list. Most of those go undocumented (and in Africa most of them also go without being cleaned up)

Maybe we do get a lot of benefits from oil, I guess the question most of us are asking ourselves is "Do we have to?" Do we have to have use oil for all of this? Can we find alternate forms of energy? Can we use alternate forms of transportation? We understand that we obtain benefits from oil, but we are asking an important question "At what cost?"