Get E-Mail Updates

Mother's Day Challenges

Mother's Day is a challenge. While advertisements evoke misty eyed memories and quaint appreciation for mothers, the truth is that Mother's Day began as a call to action by Julia Ward Howe. Howe is best known as the author of the words for The Battle Hymn of the Republic. She was an abolitionist and a women's suffrage advocate. She wrote the "Mother's Day Proclamation" in 1870 (excerpted below):

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

Arise, then, women of this day! Arise, all women who have hearts. . .

Say firmly:
"We will not have great questions decided by irrelevant agencies,
Our husbands will not come to us, reeking with carnage, for caresses and applause.
Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn all that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy and patience. We, the women of one country, will be too tender of those of another country to allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs."

From the bosom of the devastated Earth a voice goes up with our own.
It says: "Disarm! Disarm! The sword of murder is not the balance of justice."
Blood does not wipe out dishonor, nor violence indicate possession.
As men have often forsaken the plough and the anvil at the summons of war,
Let women now leave all that may be left of home for a great and earnest day of counsel.

Let them meet first, as women, to bewail and commemorate the dead.
Let them solemnly take counsel with each other as to the means whereby the great human family can live in peace,
Each bearing after his own time the sacred impress, not of Caesar,

But of God . . . ."

Her words are underscored by Archbishop Desmond Tutu's words in God Has a Dream (p. 49):

Ending sexism and including women fully in every aspect of society not only ends its own great evil--the oppression of women--but also is part of the solution to the rest of the world's problems. Until women are deeply involved in opposing the violence in the world, we are not going to bring it to an end. All women must be equally at the forefront of the movements for social justice. And they also have a special leverage over the men in their lives, who often perpetuate death while women are left creating life. But women can say, "We have had enough of this business. If you keep going out to fight and kill, we're not going to have anything to do with you." It is tremendous that women are increasingly taking on positions of leadership, but they must not simply settle for business as usual. They have the potential--if they have the courage--to transform the institutions they are inheriting and to make them more humane and more just. Unleashing the power of women has the potential to transform our world in extraordinary and many as yet unimagined ways. . . ."

Something to think about on this weekend . . .

Rev. Ruth Hawley-Lowry is a pastor in Michigan.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 4:45am

You didn't even try to understand a word I said, did you? The sad part is, in your zealousness you stand in the way of finding real solutions to a very real problem.

You didn't empathize with the alcoholic. You only felt sorry for him. There is a major difference. Empathy is not the same as enabling. Empathy is putting yourself in someone else's shoes so that you can understand better where their life's path has taken them and what drives the choices they make. Empathy doesn't provide excuses, it provides understanding so that you are able to walk through a difficult time with someone and help them overcome. When and if you are able to do that, they will be able to see Christ's compassion in you, and you will be better equipped to help them make better choices. And it would be far better and far more effective if you were to walk beside women who face difficult choices than it would be to stand in judgment of them.

"neither do I condemn you, NOW GO, LEAVE YOUR LIFE OF SIN".

You have focused on the second half of that sentence while neglecting the first half. And ironically, the whole point of the parable is that we focus on the first half in our dealings with others. He without sin...

by: phil413

05-12-2010 @ 4:06am

So your sister-in-law would make the SAME gut-wrenching, life-snuffing decision a SECOND time without making the changes she needs to keep it from happening AGAIN? See, this is where you lost me, but you really prove my point. I would like to give the woman ENOUGH CREDIT to believe she would do WHATEVER she needs to do to keep from having a SECOND unwanted pregnancy, while your position says she is too weak to do that so she must be allowed to kill as many fetuses as she needs to. I say NO! Stand up for yourself and what is the right thing to do! Tell me, how many abortions do you think one person should have before the empathy wears off - three, four, ten, unlimited? Because there are women like that you know, don't you? And if we are going to take empathy to the point of absurdity, what about the father? Wouldn't he deserve some empathy? Maybe he had a bad childhood where he didn't get enough love from his mother, so he needs to get it from women, or maybe his father beat him so that would give him license to beat his girlfriend?
Let me tell you about my own real life story. Several years ago I was counseling this guy that I had met thru my jail ministry who had a drinking problem. He had lost a son so I tried to empathize with him. He got a new job but his car wasn't running so I let him borrow mine - well he goes and gets a DUI in MY CAR! Now should I have continued to let him use it so maybe the next time he could kill someone? Of course not! See there is a point where it becomes enabling.
As a Christ-follower I want to model my philosophy ENTIRELY after Him, not just the part that says "Woman, where are your accusers?" but ALSO where He says "neither do I condemn you, NOW GO, LEAVE YOUR LIFE OF SIN". Maybe that sounds heartless to you, but to me the heartless position is to keep allowing for hundreds of thousands of innocent lives to be ended by enabling the situation.

by: phil413

05-12-2010 @ 4:06am

So your sister-in-law would make the SAME gut-wrenching, life-snuffing decision a SECOND time without making the changes she needs to keep it from happening AGAIN? See, this is where you lost me, but you really prove my point. I would like to give the woman ENOUGH CREDIT to believe she would do WHATEVER she needs to do to keep from having a SECOND unwanted pregnancy, while your position says she is too weak to do that so she must be allowed to kill as many fetuses as she needs to. I say NO! Stand up for yourself and what is the right thing to do! Tell me, how many abortions do you think one person should have before the empathy wears off - three, four, ten, unlimited? Because there are women like that you know, don't you? And if we are going to take empathy to the point of absurdity, what about the father? Wouldn't he deserve some empathy? Maybe he had a bad childhood where he didn't get enough love from his mother, so he needs to get it from women, or maybe his father beat him so that would give him license to beat his girlfriend?
Let me tell you about my own real life story. Several years ago I was counseling this guy that I had met thru my jail ministry who had a drinking problem. He had lost a son so I tried to empathize with him. He got a new job but his car wasn't running so I let him borrow mine - well he goes and gets a DUI in MY CAR! Now should I have continued to let him use it so maybe the next time he could kill someone? Of course not! See there is a point where it becomes enabling.
As a Christ-follower I want to model my philosophy ENTIRELY after Him, not just the part that says "Woman, where are your accusers?" but ALSO where He says "neither do I condemn you, NOW GO, LEAVE YOUR LIFE OF SIN". Maybe that sounds heartless to you, but to me the heartless position is to keep allowing for hundreds of thousands of innocent lives to be ended by enabling the situation.

by: squeaky

05-08-2010 @ 5:27am

Well, as a woman, such words lifted my spirit. So I for one appreciate that they were shared in light of the upcoming Mother's Day. And, I have to admit, in light of these words, I will enjoy Mother's Day far more than I usually do.

I find it perplexing when people complain about what God's Politics authors post on *their* blog. FCOL. Do you have a blog? If so, give me the address so I can visit it and complain about what you post on it. FCITB.

by: BlueDeacon

05-12-2010 @ 3:50pm

Some years ago a woman I had an eye for then and who has been involved in crisis pregnancy and anti-abortion work for about as long as I've known her had confided to me that she had had at least one abortion (she was not forthcoming to me about the details), and I told her that she would receive no condemnation from me -- because I didn't know the circumstances of her making that tragic course.

BTW, it's important to remember that, when Jesus said that to the woman caught in adultery, she had been caught in what likely was a sting operation -- they had set her up to put Him in a Catch-22. The trouble is that, in the rush to nail Him on something, they ended up breaking the law themselves (they also had brought a ceremonially unclean woman into the temple area), so they had to withdraw the accusation.

by: BlueDeacon

05-12-2010 @ 3:50pm

Some years ago a woman I had an eye for then and who has been involved in crisis pregnancy and anti-abortion work for about as long as I've known her had confided to me that she had had at least one abortion (she was not forthcoming to me about the details), and I told her that she would receive no condemnation from me -- because I didn't know the circumstances of her making that tragic course.

BTW, it's important to remember that, when Jesus said that to the woman caught in adultery, she had been caught in what likely was a sting operation -- they had set her up to put Him in a Catch-22. The trouble is that, in the rush to nail Him on something, they ended up breaking the law themselves (they also had brought a ceremonially unclean woman into the temple area), so they had to withdraw the accusation.

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 8:15pm

Yes, that and the man caught in the act was not brought before Jesus with the woman, and the law stated both should have been. Perhaps he was used to "set her up." Or perhaps it is just another example of men not being expected to take responsibility for their sexual impulses.

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 8:15pm

Yes, that and the man caught in the act was not brought before Jesus with the woman, and the law stated both should have been. Perhaps he was used to "set her up." Or perhaps it is just another example of men not being expected to take responsibility for their sexual impulses.

by: RuthHL

05-08-2010 @ 10:23pm

"Not until there are people in the world who are not being discriminated against or persecuted" said my husband, who just came into my study. He then opened the door and added, "and we have a hell of a long way to go!"

Dear pcnot4me: You are welcome to enjoy the day! In whatever way you wish!! (Because, indeed, in America some of us have those freedoms.) But those of us who call ourselves "Christian" are challenged to love our neighbors as ourselves, even when that is difficult. This includes Mothers Day. I cherish my children and would give my life for them. But sadly, as I type, women are burying their children in the Sudan because of starvation and in Haiti because of disease. Some women in Chicago will bury their children at some point this month because they were innocent bystanders whose lives were claimed by one more bullet. For me to "just enjoy" Mothers Day without being mindful of my other sisters is idolatry.

That being said, beloved brother/sister in Christ, I hope that you DO enjoy the day. As the psalmist proclaims, "This is the day that the Lord has made! Let us rejoice and be glad in it!"

by: duhsciple

05-09-2010 @ 1:03am

an enjoyable Mother's Day:

women safe from rape
women no longer losing children to war
women treated with respect by men
women safe from domestic violence
end of sex slavery
end of slave labor for chocolate in Africa
when daily bread, enough for the day, is available for all
where forgiving sins as we have been forgiven is practiced widely
where we no longer become demons by demonizing others
where the goodness of the Creator is celebrated by all
where we care for creation as belonging, not to us, but to Creator

What does an enjoyable Mother's Day mean to you?

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 10:00pm

Maybe what Jesus was scratching in the dust was a list of all the violations of the law they enacted to trap him. Or maybe He was counting to ten...

by: BlueDeacon

05-12-2010 @ 9:37pm

Here's another issue to contend with -- for capital crimes there had to be at least two witnesses, plus the accuser had to participate in the execution; however, to watch people "doing the nasty" was also illegal under Mosaic Law. That's probably why it was a set-up.

by: prgrs_ev

05-09-2010 @ 7:45am

You covered it brother...thanks.

by: squeaky

05-08-2010 @ 5:27am

Well, as a woman, such words lifted my spirit. So I for one appreciate that they were shared in light of the upcoming Mother's Day. And, I have to admit, in light of these words, I will enjoy Mother's Day far more than I usually do.

I find it perplexing when people complain about what God's Politics authors post on *their* blog. FCOL. Do you have a blog? If so, give me the address so I can visit it and complain about what you post on it. FCITB.

by: phil413

05-09-2010 @ 10:46pm

To me it would be that all women would respect the sanctity of life enough to allow themselves to become mothers in the first place, no matter what the circumstance. If the circumstance does not allow for raising of the child that they would make the loving choice of adoption. And that especially if they have already had an abortion, which according to the Guttmacher Institute half of all abortions are for at least the second time, that they would have the moral fortitude not to have another unintended pregnancy, or at least if they do they would make the better choice of life.

by: squeaky

05-10-2010 @ 2:47am

Do you not agree with the concerns duhsciple brought up? If not, then perhaps you might want to think about the connections those concerns have with your concern. Work for a world that is more safe for women, and I am pretty sure the issue of abortion will be affected in a positive way for those of us who are pro-life.

And by the way--why are you putting the issue only on the shoulders of women? Pray that FATHERS have the moral fortitude to teach their SONS to take have the moral fortitude to take responsibility for their actions. Your comment shows a pretty blatant lack of concern for the choices women face when they find themselves pregnant. And all too often, it is the WOMAN who has to deal with the ramifications of that poor decision and who most has to live with it and have their lives completely changed by it, regardless of the fact the man is equally culpable (and may even be moreso, given our culture where young women STILL feel they have to "put out" in order to prove their love to their boyfriends). Work to change that dynamic, and I would be willing to wager you would see positive changes in the issue, as well.

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 3:00pm

Oh, I agree 1000% with what you say about men & fatherhood - I would save that part for Father's Day though, but since you brought it up -
The fact is that in their respective unregenerated states women would by their nature be far closer to the Christian ideal of true Agape and respect for Life, especially when it comes to the nurturing of life in the womb. Men (and I am one) without Christ are by and large selfish creatures who are only out for their own self-gratification. I believe it is very ironic that in seeking to make women stronger the Femininst movement has in actuality made them weaker in this area by making them MORE subservient to mens' selfish desires. It brings to mind what Paul observed in Romans 1:22 "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools", but I would say "Professing themselves to be strong, they became weak". If women want to truly be strong, throw off the yoke of slavery to men and act on their own interests, which almost always would be a regard for Life.
With rights come responsibility. If women want to make a Constitutional right of privacy where none exists, then use it responsibly and wisely - choose Life! Happy Mother's Day!

by: BlueDeacon

05-10-2010 @ 4:21pm

With all due respect, I think you missed what Squeaky was saying. One of the biggest mistakes the anti-abortion movement ever did for the sake of political power was to divorce itself from other "sanctity of life" issues, and the ideology assumes that if you oppose abortion you're truly "pro-life."

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 4:56pm

On the contrary, I agree with most of what was said, as I stated in the post. The article was titled "Mother's Day Challenges" and the original question I replied to was "What does an enjoyable Mother's Day mean to you?" I just added to what was stated - I do believe it all starts with the fundamental Truth of repect for Life, which at its' core is what Mothers' Day is all about, isn't it? Again, citing Romans 1, verse 25 says "They exchanged the truth of God for a lie" which is the point I'm trying to make. One of the biggest lies I see of the pro-Choice movement that I never see refuted is that abortion is always an extremely traumatic decision for the woman which is never entered into lightly. Yet the (liberal) Guttmacher Institute states on their website:
"Each year, two percent of women aged 15-44 have an abortion; half have had at least one previous abortion." Clearly that truth contradicts the lie. And yet many women swallow it hook, line, and sinker. This pro-life, pro-Christian feminist would like to see women set free in all areas to be what God wants them to be, for "if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed" John 8:36

by: BlueDeacon

05-10-2010 @ 6:35pm

I just added to what was stated - I do believe it all starts with the fundamental Truth of respect for Life, which at its' core is what Mothers' Day is all about, isn't it?

No, not the way you put it. The verse you quoted doesn't even apply to this situation -- it's about what happens you reject God -- and specifically refers to idolatry, with abortion being tangential at most.

Anyway, it's simply not true that pro-choice groups believe that abortion isn't traumatic for the women involved; I know for a fact that the local office of Planned Parenthood runs support groups for women who have had abortions because it has sent information to the newspaper where I work about them. However, what needs to be understood is that a large part of the abortion issue has to do with the women's relationship with the fathers.

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 10:21pm

OK - not sure if it is deliberate, but you completely misunderstood my point, so let me spell it out -
I'm NOT trying to say that PP or other pro-Choice groups or individuals are trying to say that abortion isn't traumatic for the woman - but exactly the opposite, that it is extremely traumatic. However, the stats would obviously bear out that women themselves who have abortions don't feel it is, simply because 50% are for AT LEAST THE SECOND TIME - in other words over 500,000 abortions are done in the U.S. annually on a woman who has ALREADY HAD at least one other abortion - which would obviously indicate that to her it is not all that traumatic, because if it were she would make SURE she never has to have another one. If you don't think so, how do you account for it? If in fact this is the case, it would belie the "last-resort" canard that is the mainstay of the pro-choice philosophy.
I know that in strict context Romans 1:22 isn't dealing with abortion - my point there is that as the Greeks and Romans of that day sought Wisdom but rather got the opposite, so women of this day seek strength through contraceptive control, yet the very instrument they employ actually has the opposite effect - to make them weaker by giving into the father's selfish desires. By doing so they have exchanged God's Truth of the preciousness of Life for the Lie of abortion on demand. To honor Mother's Day, I would call all women (and men) to have the utmost respect for Life no matter what the cost. And I would say to women:"Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom" Proverbs 4:7, or "WISE UP!"

by: squeaky

05-11-2010 @ 2:13am

Well, you are on to something, at least in terms of asking the question of why else a woman would have a second abortion if the the first one was so traumatic. I would suggest, however, that you think more broadly. If a woman is willing to have an incredibly traumatic medical procedure done not once, but twice, what does that tell you about her outlook for life if she prefers that to an unwanted pregnancy? What does that tell you about the gravity of facing that, if she sees the trauma of a medical procedure as being preferred? It seems to me the first step that pro-life men should take is to try to understand that perspective. As I said before, the bulk of the responsibility for unwanted pregnancy falls on the shoulders of the woman. The person whose life is changed most profoundly for the man's indiscretion is the woman. Empathy. Strive for it, especially if you wish there to be headway made on this issue.

Just a quick story to illustrate this point. This weekend my Mom, Sister-in-Law, and I were talking about how the stigma of single motherhood isn't nearly what it was just a few years ago. Some would decry this, but it is this stigma that leads desperate young women to desperate choices. My Sister-in-Law told us that she was so afraid of her mother that if she and my brother had become pregnant before they were married (they are Christians and they stayed pure until marriage), she would have had an abortion. She's pro-life, but that's how desperate and how much fear would have been involved. And believe me, in her mother, there was much to fear.

So lest you think abortion is an easy choice, or keeping the child is an easy choice, you would do well to try a little empathy and understand what drives women to make that decision. It's not simply selfishness, as many pro-life advocates would claim. Neither is it lack of wisdom. It is fear. What is needed is empathy and understanding, and once that happens, steps can be made to offer the kind of support and love that might cast out the fear and desperation in a young woman's life.

"so women of this day seek strength through contraceptive control"

you are half way there. The question is, why? Why do women feel they need to have that kind of control? Before you answer that, put yourself in a woman's position and think about the place of women throughout history and women's standing in the world today, not just in the US, but all over the world.

"And I would say to women:"Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom" Proverbs 4:7, or "WISE UP!"

This is a pat answer. Pat answers tell me you haven't taken the time to wade into the mess of unwanted pregnancies and tried to see things from the front lines of the women who have to deal with them. Take some time to do that. It is so easy to make such judgments when what you are judging is completely and entirely outside of your experience, and can never be part of your experience. Not truly. Not at the level it is for a woman. If you want to see progress on this issue, jettison the pat answers, dig deeper to empathize, and advocate for WOMEN, in addition to that unwanted child.

Indeed, it is such pat answers that led to my initial response to you. Duhsciple listed off several major issues women in this world face--issues that women have faced for thousands of years. And by diverting to the issue of abortion, you basically told me you don't see those issues as important or even primary. Your response was dismissive of the very real pain and fear women all over the world endure, much of which is at the hands of men. Start wrestling with those, and perhaps you will begin to understand the abortion issue on a much deeper level. And perhaps you will be able to become a far more effective pro-life advocate. Men need to start taking responsibility for abortion, and until you do, you will not see the progress you desire. The answer very likely lies with men more than it does with women.

by: RuthHL

05-08-2010 @ 10:23pm

"Not until there are people in the world who are not being discriminated against or persecuted" said my husband, who just came into my study. He then opened the door and added, "and we have a hell of a long way to go!"

Dear pcnot4me: You are welcome to enjoy the day! In whatever way you wish!! (Because, indeed, in America some of us have those freedoms.) But those of us who call ourselves "Christian" are challenged to love our neighbors as ourselves, even when that is difficult. This includes Mothers Day. I cherish my children and would give my life for them. But sadly, as I type, women are burying their children in the Sudan because of starvation and in Haiti because of disease. Some women in Chicago will bury their children at some point this month because they were innocent bystanders whose lives were claimed by one more bullet. For me to "just enjoy" Mothers Day without being mindful of my other sisters is idolatry.

That being said, beloved brother/sister in Christ, I hope that you DO enjoy the day. As the psalmist proclaims, "This is the day that the Lord has made! Let us rejoice and be glad in it!"

by: RuthHL

05-08-2010 @ 10:23pm

"Not until there are people in the world who are not being discriminated against or persecuted" said my husband, who just came into my study. He then opened the door and added, "and we have a hell of a long way to go!"

Dear pcnot4me: You are welcome to enjoy the day! In whatever way you wish!! (Because, indeed, in America some of us have those freedoms.) But those of us who call ourselves "Christian" are challenged to love our neighbors as ourselves, even when that is difficult. This includes Mothers Day. I cherish my children and would give my life for them. But sadly, as I type, women are burying their children in the Sudan because of starvation and in Haiti because of disease. Some women in Chicago will bury their children at some point this month because they were innocent bystanders whose lives were claimed by one more bullet. For me to "just enjoy" Mothers Day without being mindful of my other sisters is idolatry.

That being said, beloved brother/sister in Christ, I hope that you DO enjoy the day. As the psalmist proclaims, "This is the day that the Lord has made! Let us rejoice and be glad in it!"

by: duhsciple

05-09-2010 @ 1:03am

an enjoyable Mother's Day:

women safe from rape
women no longer losing children to war
women treated with respect by men
women safe from domestic violence
end of sex slavery
end of slave labor for chocolate in Africa
when daily bread, enough for the day, is available for all
where forgiving sins as we have been forgiven is practiced widely
where we no longer become demons by demonizing others
where the goodness of the Creator is celebrated by all
where we care for creation as belonging, not to us, but to Creator

What does an enjoyable Mother's Day mean to you?

by: duhsciple

05-09-2010 @ 1:03am

an enjoyable Mother's Day:

women safe from rape
women no longer losing children to war
women treated with respect by men
women safe from domestic violence
end of sex slavery
end of slave labor for chocolate in Africa
when daily bread, enough for the day, is available for all
where forgiving sins as we have been forgiven is practiced widely
where we no longer become demons by demonizing others
where the goodness of the Creator is celebrated by all
where we care for creation as belonging, not to us, but to Creator

What does an enjoyable Mother's Day mean to you?

by: prgrs_ev

05-09-2010 @ 7:45am

You covered it brother...thanks.

by: prgrs_ev

05-09-2010 @ 7:45am

You covered it brother...thanks.

by: phil413

05-09-2010 @ 10:46pm

To me it would be that all women would respect the sanctity of life enough to allow themselves to become mothers in the first place, no matter what the circumstance. If the circumstance does not allow for raising of the child that they would make the loving choice of adoption. And that especially if they have already had an abortion, which according to the Guttmacher Institute half of all abortions are for at least the second time, that they would have the moral fortitude not to have another unintended pregnancy, or at least if they do they would make the better choice of life.

by: squeaky

05-10-2010 @ 2:47am

Do you not agree with the concerns duhsciple brought up? If not, then perhaps you might want to think about the connections those concerns have with your concern. Work for a world that is more safe for women, and I am pretty sure the issue of abortion will be affected in a positive way for those of us who are pro-life.

And by the way--why are you putting the issue only on the shoulders of women? Pray that FATHERS have the moral fortitude to teach their SONS to take have the moral fortitude to take responsibility for their actions. Your comment shows a pretty blatant lack of concern for the choices women face when they find themselves pregnant. And all too often, it is the WOMAN who has to deal with the ramifications of that poor decision and who most has to live with it and have their lives completely changed by it, regardless of the fact the man is equally culpable (and may even be moreso, given our culture where young women STILL feel they have to "put out" in order to prove their love to their boyfriends). Work to change that dynamic, and I would be willing to wager you would see positive changes in the issue, as well.

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 4:45am

You didn't even try to understand a word I said, did you? The sad part is, in your zealousness you stand in the way of finding real solutions to a very real problem.

You didn't empathize with the alcoholic. You only felt sorry for him. There is a major difference. Empathy is not the same as enabling. Empathy is putting yourself in someone else's shoes so that you can understand better where their life's path has taken them and what drives the choices they make. Empathy doesn't provide excuses, it provides understanding so that you are able to walk through a difficult time with someone and help them overcome. When and if you are able to do that, they will be able to see Christ's compassion in you, and you will be better equipped to help them make better choices. And it would be far better and far more effective if you were to walk beside women who face difficult choices than it would be to stand in judgment of them.

"neither do I condemn you, NOW GO, LEAVE YOUR LIFE OF SIN".

You have focused on the second half of that sentence while neglecting the first half. And ironically, the whole point of the parable is that we focus on the first half in our dealings with others. He without sin...

by: phil413

05-12-2010 @ 4:06am

So your sister-in-law would make the SAME gut-wrenching, life-snuffing decision a SECOND time without making the changes she needs to keep it from happening AGAIN? See, this is where you lost me, but you really prove my point. I would like to give the woman ENOUGH CREDIT to believe she would do WHATEVER she needs to do to keep from having a SECOND unwanted pregnancy, while your position says she is too weak to do that so she must be allowed to kill as many fetuses as she needs to. I say NO! Stand up for yourself and what is the right thing to do! Tell me, how many abortions do you think one person should have before the empathy wears off - three, four, ten, unlimited? Because there are women like that you know, don't you? And if we are going to take empathy to the point of absurdity, what about the father? Wouldn't he deserve some empathy? Maybe he had a bad childhood where he didn't get enough love from his mother, so he needs to get it from women, or maybe his father beat him so that would give him license to beat his girlfriend?
Let me tell you about my own real life story. Several years ago I was counseling this guy that I had met thru my jail ministry who had a drinking problem. He had lost a son so I tried to empathize with him. He got a new job but his car wasn't running so I let him borrow mine - well he goes and gets a DUI in MY CAR! Now should I have continued to let him use it so maybe the next time he could kill someone? Of course not! See there is a point where it becomes enabling.
As a Christ-follower I want to model my philosophy ENTIRELY after Him, not just the part that says "Woman, where are your accusers?" but ALSO where He says "neither do I condemn you, NOW GO, LEAVE YOUR LIFE OF SIN". Maybe that sounds heartless to you, but to me the heartless position is to keep allowing for hundreds of thousands of innocent lives to be ended by enabling the situation.

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 3:00pm

Oh, I agree 1000% with what you say about men & fatherhood - I would save that part for Father's Day though, but since you brought it up -
The fact is that in their respective unregenerated states women would by their nature be far closer to the Christian ideal of true Agape and respect for Life, especially when it comes to the nurturing of life in the womb. Men (and I am one) without Christ are by and large selfish creatures who are only out for their own self-gratification. I believe it is very ironic that in seeking to make women stronger the Femininst movement has in actuality made them weaker in this area by making them MORE subservient to mens' selfish desires. It brings to mind what Paul observed in Romans 1:22 "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools", but I would say "Professing themselves to be strong, they became weak". If women want to truly be strong, throw off the yoke of slavery to men and act on their own interests, which almost always would be a regard for Life.
With rights come responsibility. If women want to make a Constitutional right of privacy where none exists, then use it responsibly and wisely - choose Life! Happy Mother's Day!

by: BlueDeacon

05-10-2010 @ 4:21pm

With all due respect, I think you missed what Squeaky was saying. One of the biggest mistakes the anti-abortion movement ever did for the sake of political power was to divorce itself from other "sanctity of life" issues, and the ideology assumes that if you oppose abortion you're truly "pro-life."

by: BlueDeacon

05-12-2010 @ 3:50pm

Some years ago a woman I had an eye for then and who has been involved in crisis pregnancy and anti-abortion work for about as long as I've known her had confided to me that she had had at least one abortion (she was not forthcoming to me about the details), and I told her that she would receive no condemnation from me -- because I didn't know the circumstances of her making that tragic course.

BTW, it's important to remember that, when Jesus said that to the woman caught in adultery, she had been caught in what likely was a sting operation -- they had set her up to put Him in a Catch-22. The trouble is that, in the rush to nail Him on something, they ended up breaking the law themselves (they also had brought a ceremonially unclean woman into the temple area), so they had to withdraw the accusation.

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 4:56pm

On the contrary, I agree with most of what was said, as I stated in the post. The article was titled "Mother's Day Challenges" and the original question I replied to was "What does an enjoyable Mother's Day mean to you?" I just added to what was stated - I do believe it all starts with the fundamental Truth of repect for Life, which at its' core is what Mothers' Day is all about, isn't it? Again, citing Romans 1, verse 25 says "They exchanged the truth of God for a lie" which is the point I'm trying to make. One of the biggest lies I see of the pro-Choice movement that I never see refuted is that abortion is always an extremely traumatic decision for the woman which is never entered into lightly. Yet the (liberal) Guttmacher Institute states on their website:
"Each year, two percent of women aged 15-44 have an abortion; half have had at least one previous abortion." Clearly that truth contradicts the lie. And yet many women swallow it hook, line, and sinker. This pro-life, pro-Christian feminist would like to see women set free in all areas to be what God wants them to be, for "if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed" John 8:36

by: BlueDeacon

05-10-2010 @ 6:35pm

I just added to what was stated - I do believe it all starts with the fundamental Truth of respect for Life, which at its' core is what Mothers' Day is all about, isn't it?

No, not the way you put it. The verse you quoted doesn't even apply to this situation -- it's about what happens you reject God -- and specifically refers to idolatry, with abortion being tangential at most.

Anyway, it's simply not true that pro-choice groups believe that abortion isn't traumatic for the women involved; I know for a fact that the local office of Planned Parenthood runs support groups for women who have had abortions because it has sent information to the newspaper where I work about them. However, what needs to be understood is that a large part of the abortion issue has to do with the women's relationship with the fathers.

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 8:15pm

Yes, that and the man caught in the act was not brought before Jesus with the woman, and the law stated both should have been. Perhaps he was used to "set her up." Or perhaps it is just another example of men not being expected to take responsibility for their sexual impulses.

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 10:00pm

Maybe what Jesus was scratching in the dust was a list of all the violations of the law they enacted to trap him. Or maybe He was counting to ten...

by: BlueDeacon

05-12-2010 @ 9:37pm

Here's another issue to contend with -- for capital crimes there had to be at least two witnesses, plus the accuser had to participate in the execution; however, to watch people "doing the nasty" was also illegal under Mosaic Law. That's probably why it was a set-up.

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 10:21pm

OK - not sure if it is deliberate, but you completely misunderstood my point, so let me spell it out -
I'm NOT trying to say that PP or other pro-Choice groups or individuals are trying to say that abortion isn't traumatic for the woman - but exactly the opposite, that it is extremely traumatic. However, the stats would obviously bear out that women themselves who have abortions don't feel it is, simply because 50% are for AT LEAST THE SECOND TIME - in other words over 500,000 abortions are done in the U.S. annually on a woman who has ALREADY HAD at least one other abortion - which would obviously indicate that to her it is not all that traumatic, because if it were she would make SURE she never has to have another one. If you don't think so, how do you account for it? If in fact this is the case, it would belie the "last-resort" canard that is the mainstay of the pro-choice philosophy.
I know that in strict context Romans 1:22 isn't dealing with abortion - my point there is that as the Greeks and Romans of that day sought Wisdom but rather got the opposite, so women of this day seek strength through contraceptive control, yet the very instrument they employ actually has the opposite effect - to make them weaker by giving into the father's selfish desires. By doing so they have exchanged God's Truth of the preciousness of Life for the Lie of abortion on demand. To honor Mother's Day, I would call all women (and men) to have the utmost respect for Life no matter what the cost. And I would say to women:"Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom" Proverbs 4:7, or "WISE UP!"

by: squeaky

05-11-2010 @ 2:13am

Well, you are on to something, at least in terms of asking the question of why else a woman would have a second abortion if the the first one was so traumatic. I would suggest, however, that you think more broadly. If a woman is willing to have an incredibly traumatic medical procedure done not once, but twice, what does that tell you about her outlook for life if she prefers that to an unwanted pregnancy? What does that tell you about the gravity of facing that, if she sees the trauma of a medical procedure as being preferred? It seems to me the first step that pro-life men should take is to try to understand that perspective. As I said before, the bulk of the responsibility for unwanted pregnancy falls on the shoulders of the woman. The person whose life is changed most profoundly for the man's indiscretion is the woman. Empathy. Strive for it, especially if you wish there to be headway made on this issue.

Just a quick story to illustrate this point. This weekend my Mom, Sister-in-Law, and I were talking about how the stigma of single motherhood isn't nearly what it was just a few years ago. Some would decry this, but it is this stigma that leads desperate young women to desperate choices. My Sister-in-Law told us that she was so afraid of her mother that if she and my brother had become pregnant before they were married (they are Christians and they stayed pure until marriage), she would have had an abortion. She's pro-life, but that's how desperate and how much fear would have been involved. And believe me, in her mother, there was much to fear.

So lest you think abortion is an easy choice, or keeping the child is an easy choice, you would do well to try a little empathy and understand what drives women to make that decision. It's not simply selfishness, as many pro-life advocates would claim. Neither is it lack of wisdom. It is fear. What is needed is empathy and understanding, and once that happens, steps can be made to offer the kind of support and love that might cast out the fear and desperation in a young woman's life.

"so women of this day seek strength through contraceptive control"

you are half way there. The question is, why? Why do women feel they need to have that kind of control? Before you answer that, put yourself in a woman's position and think about the place of women throughout history and women's standing in the world today, not just in the US, but all over the world.

"And I would say to women:"Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom" Proverbs 4:7, or "WISE UP!"

This is a pat answer. Pat answers tell me you haven't taken the time to wade into the mess of unwanted pregnancies and tried to see things from the front lines of the women who have to deal with them. Take some time to do that. It is so easy to make such judgments when what you are judging is completely and entirely outside of your experience, and can never be part of your experience. Not truly. Not at the level it is for a woman. If you want to see progress on this issue, jettison the pat answers, dig deeper to empathize, and advocate for WOMEN, in addition to that unwanted child.

Indeed, it is such pat answers that led to my initial response to you. Duhsciple listed off several major issues women in this world face--issues that women have faced for thousands of years. And by diverting to the issue of abortion, you basically told me you don't see those issues as important or even primary. Your response was dismissive of the very real pain and fear women all over the world endure, much of which is at the hands of men. Start wrestling with those, and perhaps you will begin to understand the abortion issue on a much deeper level. And perhaps you will be able to become a far more effective pro-life advocate. Men need to start taking responsibility for abortion, and until you do, you will not see the progress you desire. The answer very likely lies with men more than it does with women.

by: BlueDeacon

05-07-2010 @ 8:57pm

Why do you ask?

by: BlueDeacon

05-07-2010 @ 8:57pm

Why do you ask?

by: pcnot4me

05-07-2010 @ 8:26pm

Is there a day of the year that those who post on Sojo will be ok with the rest of us just enjoying?

by: pcnot4me

05-07-2010 @ 8:26pm

Is there a day of the year that those who post on Sojo will be ok with the rest of us just enjoying?

by: BlueDeacon

05-07-2010 @ 8:57pm

Why do you ask?

by: pcnot4me

05-07-2010 @ 8:26pm

Is there a day of the year that those who post on Sojo will be ok with the rest of us just enjoying?

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: pcnot4me

05-07-2010 @ 8:26pm

Is there a day of the year that those who post on Sojo will be ok with the rest of us just enjoying?

by: pcnot4me

05-07-2010 @ 8:26pm

Is there a day of the year that those who post on Sojo will be ok with the rest of us just enjoying?

by: pcnot4me

05-07-2010 @ 8:26pm

Is there a day of the year that those who post on Sojo will be ok with the rest of us just enjoying?

by: BlueDeacon

05-07-2010 @ 8:57pm

Why do you ask?

by: BlueDeacon

05-07-2010 @ 8:57pm

Why do you ask?

by: BlueDeacon

05-07-2010 @ 8:57pm

Why do you ask?

by: squeaky

05-08-2010 @ 5:27am

Well, as a woman, such words lifted my spirit. So I for one appreciate that they were shared in light of the upcoming Mother's Day. And, I have to admit, in light of these words, I will enjoy Mother's Day far more than I usually do.

I find it perplexing when people complain about what God's Politics authors post on *their* blog. FCOL. Do you have a blog? If so, give me the address so I can visit it and complain about what you post on it. FCITB.

by: squeaky

05-08-2010 @ 5:27am

Well, as a woman, such words lifted my spirit. So I for one appreciate that they were shared in light of the upcoming Mother's Day. And, I have to admit, in light of these words, I will enjoy Mother's Day far more than I usually do.

I find it perplexing when people complain about what God's Politics authors post on *their* blog. FCOL. Do you have a blog? If so, give me the address so I can visit it and complain about what you post on it. FCITB.

by: RuthHL

05-08-2010 @ 10:23pm

"Not until there are people in the world who are not being discriminated against or persecuted" said my husband, who just came into my study. He then opened the door and added, "and we have a hell of a long way to go!"

Dear pcnot4me: You are welcome to enjoy the day! In whatever way you wish!! (Because, indeed, in America some of us have those freedoms.) But those of us who call ourselves "Christian" are challenged to love our neighbors as ourselves, even when that is difficult. This includes Mothers Day. I cherish my children and would give my life for them. But sadly, as I type, women are burying their children in the Sudan because of starvation and in Haiti because of disease. Some women in Chicago will bury their children at some point this month because they were innocent bystanders whose lives were claimed by one more bullet. For me to "just enjoy" Mothers Day without being mindful of my other sisters is idolatry.

That being said, beloved brother/sister in Christ, I hope that you DO enjoy the day. As the psalmist proclaims, "This is the day that the Lord has made! Let us rejoice and be glad in it!"

by: RuthHL

05-08-2010 @ 10:23pm

"Not until there are people in the world who are not being discriminated against or persecuted" said my husband, who just came into my study. He then opened the door and added, "and we have a hell of a long way to go!"

Dear pcnot4me: You are welcome to enjoy the day! In whatever way you wish!! (Because, indeed, in America some of us have those freedoms.) But those of us who call ourselves "Christian" are challenged to love our neighbors as ourselves, even when that is difficult. This includes Mothers Day. I cherish my children and would give my life for them. But sadly, as I type, women are burying their children in the Sudan because of starvation and in Haiti because of disease. Some women in Chicago will bury their children at some point this month because they were innocent bystanders whose lives were claimed by one more bullet. For me to "just enjoy" Mothers Day without being mindful of my other sisters is idolatry.

That being said, beloved brother/sister in Christ, I hope that you DO enjoy the day. As the psalmist proclaims, "This is the day that the Lord has made! Let us rejoice and be glad in it!"

by: RuthHL

05-08-2010 @ 10:23pm

"Not until there are people in the world who are not being discriminated against or persecuted" said my husband, who just came into my study. He then opened the door and added, "and we have a hell of a long way to go!"

Dear pcnot4me: You are welcome to enjoy the day! In whatever way you wish!! (Because, indeed, in America some of us have those freedoms.) But those of us who call ourselves "Christian" are challenged to love our neighbors as ourselves, even when that is difficult. This includes Mothers Day. I cherish my children and would give my life for them. But sadly, as I type, women are burying their children in the Sudan because of starvation and in Haiti because of disease. Some women in Chicago will bury their children at some point this month because they were innocent bystanders whose lives were claimed by one more bullet. For me to "just enjoy" Mothers Day without being mindful of my other sisters is idolatry.

That being said, beloved brother/sister in Christ, I hope that you DO enjoy the day. As the psalmist proclaims, "This is the day that the Lord has made! Let us rejoice and be glad in it!"

by: duhsciple

05-09-2010 @ 1:03am

an enjoyable Mother's Day:

women safe from rape
women no longer losing children to war
women treated with respect by men
women safe from domestic violence
end of sex slavery
end of slave labor for chocolate in Africa
when daily bread, enough for the day, is available for all
where forgiving sins as we have been forgiven is practiced widely
where we no longer become demons by demonizing others
where the goodness of the Creator is celebrated by all
where we care for creation as belonging, not to us, but to Creator

What does an enjoyable Mother's Day mean to you?

by: duhsciple

05-09-2010 @ 1:03am

an enjoyable Mother's Day:

women safe from rape
women no longer losing children to war
women treated with respect by men
women safe from domestic violence
end of sex slavery
end of slave labor for chocolate in Africa
when daily bread, enough for the day, is available for all
where forgiving sins as we have been forgiven is practiced widely
where we no longer become demons by demonizing others
where the goodness of the Creator is celebrated by all
where we care for creation as belonging, not to us, but to Creator

What does an enjoyable Mother's Day mean to you?

by: duhsciple

05-09-2010 @ 1:03am

an enjoyable Mother's Day:

women safe from rape
women no longer losing children to war
women treated with respect by men
women safe from domestic violence
end of sex slavery
end of slave labor for chocolate in Africa
when daily bread, enough for the day, is available for all
where forgiving sins as we have been forgiven is practiced widely
where we no longer become demons by demonizing others
where the goodness of the Creator is celebrated by all
where we care for creation as belonging, not to us, but to Creator

What does an enjoyable Mother's Day mean to you?

by: prgrs_ev

05-09-2010 @ 7:45am

You covered it brother...thanks.

by: prgrs_ev

05-09-2010 @ 7:45am

You covered it brother...thanks.

by: prgrs_ev

05-09-2010 @ 7:45am

You covered it brother...thanks.

by: phil413

05-09-2010 @ 10:46pm

To me it would be that all women would respect the sanctity of life enough to allow themselves to become mothers in the first place, no matter what the circumstance. If the circumstance does not allow for raising of the child that they would make the loving choice of adoption. And that especially if they have already had an abortion, which according to the Guttmacher Institute half of all abortions are for at least the second time, that they would have the moral fortitude not to have another unintended pregnancy, or at least if they do they would make the better choice of life.

by: phil413

05-09-2010 @ 10:46pm

To me it would be that all women would respect the sanctity of life enough to allow themselves to become mothers in the first place, no matter what the circumstance. If the circumstance does not allow for raising of the child that they would make the loving choice of adoption. And that especially if they have already had an abortion, which according to the Guttmacher Institute half of all abortions are for at least the second time, that they would have the moral fortitude not to have another unintended pregnancy, or at least if they do they would make the better choice of life.

by: squeaky

05-10-2010 @ 2:47am

Do you not agree with the concerns duhsciple brought up? If not, then perhaps you might want to think about the connections those concerns have with your concern. Work for a world that is more safe for women, and I am pretty sure the issue of abortion will be affected in a positive way for those of us who are pro-life.

And by the way--why are you putting the issue only on the shoulders of women? Pray that FATHERS have the moral fortitude to teach their SONS to take have the moral fortitude to take responsibility for their actions. Your comment shows a pretty blatant lack of concern for the choices women face when they find themselves pregnant. And all too often, it is the WOMAN who has to deal with the ramifications of that poor decision and who most has to live with it and have their lives completely changed by it, regardless of the fact the man is equally culpable (and may even be moreso, given our culture where young women STILL feel they have to "put out" in order to prove their love to their boyfriends). Work to change that dynamic, and I would be willing to wager you would see positive changes in the issue, as well.

by: squeaky

05-10-2010 @ 2:47am

Do you not agree with the concerns duhsciple brought up? If not, then perhaps you might want to think about the connections those concerns have with your concern. Work for a world that is more safe for women, and I am pretty sure the issue of abortion will be affected in a positive way for those of us who are pro-life.

And by the way--why are you putting the issue only on the shoulders of women? Pray that FATHERS have the moral fortitude to teach their SONS to take have the moral fortitude to take responsibility for their actions. Your comment shows a pretty blatant lack of concern for the choices women face when they find themselves pregnant. And all too often, it is the WOMAN who has to deal with the ramifications of that poor decision and who most has to live with it and have their lives completely changed by it, regardless of the fact the man is equally culpable (and may even be moreso, given our culture where young women STILL feel they have to "put out" in order to prove their love to their boyfriends). Work to change that dynamic, and I would be willing to wager you would see positive changes in the issue, as well.

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 3:00pm

Oh, I agree 1000% with what you say about men & fatherhood - I would save that part for Father's Day though, but since you brought it up -
The fact is that in their respective unregenerated states women would by their nature be far closer to the Christian ideal of true Agape and respect for Life, especially when it comes to the nurturing of life in the womb. Men (and I am one) without Christ are by and large selfish creatures who are only out for their own self-gratification. I believe it is very ironic that in seeking to make women stronger the Femininst movement has in actuality made them weaker in this area by making them MORE subservient to mens' selfish desires. It brings to mind what Paul observed in Romans 1:22 "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools", but I would say "Professing themselves to be strong, they became weak". If women want to truly be strong, throw off the yoke of slavery to men and act on their own interests, which almost always would be a regard for Life.
With rights come responsibility. If women want to make a Constitutional right of privacy where none exists, then use it responsibly and wisely - choose Life! Happy Mother's Day!

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 3:00pm

Oh, I agree 1000% with what you say about men & fatherhood - I would save that part for Father's Day though, but since you brought it up -
The fact is that in their respective unregenerated states women would by their nature be far closer to the Christian ideal of true Agape and respect for Life, especially when it comes to the nurturing of life in the womb. Men (and I am one) without Christ are by and large selfish creatures who are only out for their own self-gratification. I believe it is very ironic that in seeking to make women stronger the Femininst movement has in actuality made them weaker in this area by making them MORE subservient to mens' selfish desires. It brings to mind what Paul observed in Romans 1:22 "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools", but I would say "Professing themselves to be strong, they became weak". If women want to truly be strong, throw off the yoke of slavery to men and act on their own interests, which almost always would be a regard for Life.
With rights come responsibility. If women want to make a Constitutional right of privacy where none exists, then use it responsibly and wisely - choose Life! Happy Mother's Day!

by: BlueDeacon

05-10-2010 @ 4:21pm

With all due respect, I think you missed what Squeaky was saying. One of the biggest mistakes the anti-abortion movement ever did for the sake of political power was to divorce itself from other "sanctity of life" issues, and the ideology assumes that if you oppose abortion you're truly "pro-life."

by: BlueDeacon

05-10-2010 @ 4:21pm

With all due respect, I think you missed what Squeaky was saying. One of the biggest mistakes the anti-abortion movement ever did for the sake of political power was to divorce itself from other "sanctity of life" issues, and the ideology assumes that if you oppose abortion you're truly "pro-life."

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 4:56pm

On the contrary, I agree with most of what was said, as I stated in the post. The article was titled "Mother's Day Challenges" and the original question I replied to was "What does an enjoyable Mother's Day mean to you?" I just added to what was stated - I do believe it all starts with the fundamental Truth of repect for Life, which at its' core is what Mothers' Day is all about, isn't it? Again, citing Romans 1, verse 25 says "They exchanged the truth of God for a lie" which is the point I'm trying to make. One of the biggest lies I see of the pro-Choice movement that I never see refuted is that abortion is always an extremely traumatic decision for the woman which is never entered into lightly. Yet the (liberal) Guttmacher Institute states on their website:
"Each year, two percent of women aged 15-44 have an abortion; half have had at least one previous abortion." Clearly that truth contradicts the lie. And yet many women swallow it hook, line, and sinker. This pro-life, pro-Christian feminist would like to see women set free in all areas to be what God wants them to be, for "if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed" John 8:36

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 4:56pm

On the contrary, I agree with most of what was said, as I stated in the post. The article was titled "Mother's Day Challenges" and the original question I replied to was "What does an enjoyable Mother's Day mean to you?" I just added to what was stated - I do believe it all starts with the fundamental Truth of repect for Life, which at its' core is what Mothers' Day is all about, isn't it? Again, citing Romans 1, verse 25 says "They exchanged the truth of God for a lie" which is the point I'm trying to make. One of the biggest lies I see of the pro-Choice movement that I never see refuted is that abortion is always an extremely traumatic decision for the woman which is never entered into lightly. Yet the (liberal) Guttmacher Institute states on their website:
"Each year, two percent of women aged 15-44 have an abortion; half have had at least one previous abortion." Clearly that truth contradicts the lie. And yet many women swallow it hook, line, and sinker. This pro-life, pro-Christian feminist would like to see women set free in all areas to be what God wants them to be, for "if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed" John 8:36

by: BlueDeacon

05-10-2010 @ 6:35pm

I just added to what was stated - I do believe it all starts with the fundamental Truth of respect for Life, which at its' core is what Mothers' Day is all about, isn't it?

No, not the way you put it. The verse you quoted doesn't even apply to this situation -- it's about what happens you reject God -- and specifically refers to idolatry, with abortion being tangential at most.

Anyway, it's simply not true that pro-choice groups believe that abortion isn't traumatic for the women involved; I know for a fact that the local office of Planned Parenthood runs support groups for women who have had abortions because it has sent information to the newspaper where I work about them. However, what needs to be understood is that a large part of the abortion issue has to do with the women's relationship with the fathers.

by: BlueDeacon

05-10-2010 @ 6:35pm

I just added to what was stated - I do believe it all starts with the fundamental Truth of respect for Life, which at its' core is what Mothers' Day is all about, isn't it?

No, not the way you put it. The verse you quoted doesn't even apply to this situation -- it's about what happens you reject God -- and specifically refers to idolatry, with abortion being tangential at most.

Anyway, it's simply not true that pro-choice groups believe that abortion isn't traumatic for the women involved; I know for a fact that the local office of Planned Parenthood runs support groups for women who have had abortions because it has sent information to the newspaper where I work about them. However, what needs to be understood is that a large part of the abortion issue has to do with the women's relationship with the fathers.

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 10:21pm

OK - not sure if it is deliberate, but you completely misunderstood my point, so let me spell it out -
I'm NOT trying to say that PP or other pro-Choice groups or individuals are trying to say that abortion isn't traumatic for the woman - but exactly the opposite, that it is extremely traumatic. However, the stats would obviously bear out that women themselves who have abortions don't feel it is, simply because 50% are for AT LEAST THE SECOND TIME - in other words over 500,000 abortions are done in the U.S. annually on a woman who has ALREADY HAD at least one other abortion - which would obviously indicate that to her it is not all that traumatic, because if it were she would make SURE she never has to have another one. If you don't think so, how do you account for it? If in fact this is the case, it would belie the "last-resort" canard that is the mainstay of the pro-choice philosophy.
I know that in strict context Romans 1:22 isn't dealing with abortion - my point there is that as the Greeks and Romans of that day sought Wisdom but rather got the opposite, so women of this day seek strength through contraceptive control, yet the very instrument they employ actually has the opposite effect - to make them weaker by giving into the father's selfish desires. By doing so they have exchanged God's Truth of the preciousness of Life for the Lie of abortion on demand. To honor Mother's Day, I would call all women (and men) to have the utmost respect for Life no matter what the cost. And I would say to women:"Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom" Proverbs 4:7, or "WISE UP!"

by: phil413

05-10-2010 @ 10:21pm

OK - not sure if it is deliberate, but you completely misunderstood my point, so let me spell it out -
I'm NOT trying to say that PP or other pro-Choice groups or individuals are trying to say that abortion isn't traumatic for the woman - but exactly the opposite, that it is extremely traumatic. However, the stats would obviously bear out that women themselves who have abortions don't feel it is, simply because 50% are for AT LEAST THE SECOND TIME - in other words over 500,000 abortions are done in the U.S. annually on a woman who has ALREADY HAD at least one other abortion - which would obviously indicate that to her it is not all that traumatic, because if it were she would make SURE she never has to have another one. If you don't think so, how do you account for it? If in fact this is the case, it would belie the "last-resort" canard that is the mainstay of the pro-choice philosophy.
I know that in strict context Romans 1:22 isn't dealing with abortion - my point there is that as the Greeks and Romans of that day sought Wisdom but rather got the opposite, so women of this day seek strength through contraceptive control, yet the very instrument they employ actually has the opposite effect - to make them weaker by giving into the father's selfish desires. By doing so they have exchanged God's Truth of the preciousness of Life for the Lie of abortion on demand. To honor Mother's Day, I would call all women (and men) to have the utmost respect for Life no matter what the cost. And I would say to women:"Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom" Proverbs 4:7, or "WISE UP!"

by: squeaky

05-11-2010 @ 2:13am

Well, you are on to something, at least in terms of asking the question of why else a woman would have a second abortion if the the first one was so traumatic. I would suggest, however, that you think more broadly. If a woman is willing to have an incredibly traumatic medical procedure done not once, but twice, what does that tell you about her outlook for life if she prefers that to an unwanted pregnancy? What does that tell you about the gravity of facing that, if she sees the trauma of a medical procedure as being preferred? It seems to me the first step that pro-life men should take is to try to understand that perspective. As I said before, the bulk of the responsibility for unwanted pregnancy falls on the shoulders of the woman. The person whose life is changed most profoundly for the man's indiscretion is the woman. Empathy. Strive for it, especially if you wish there to be headway made on this issue.

Just a quick story to illustrate this point. This weekend my Mom, Sister-in-Law, and I were talking about how the stigma of single motherhood isn't nearly what it was just a few years ago. Some would decry this, but it is this stigma that leads desperate young women to desperate choices. My Sister-in-Law told us that she was so afraid of her mother that if she and my brother had become pregnant before they were married (they are Christians and they stayed pure until marriage), she would have had an abortion. She's pro-life, but that's how desperate and how much fear would have been involved. And believe me, in her mother, there was much to fear.

So lest you think abortion is an easy choice, or keeping the child is an easy choice, you would do well to try a little empathy and understand what drives women to make that decision. It's not simply selfishness, as many pro-life advocates would claim. Neither is it lack of wisdom. It is fear. What is needed is empathy and understanding, and once that happens, steps can be made to offer the kind of support and love that might cast out the fear and desperation in a young woman's life.

"so women of this day seek strength through contraceptive control"

you are half way there. The question is, why? Why do women feel they need to have that kind of control? Before you answer that, put yourself in a woman's position and think about the place of women throughout history and women's standing in the world today, not just in the US, but all over the world.

"And I would say to women:"Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom" Proverbs 4:7, or "WISE UP!"

This is a pat answer. Pat answers tell me you haven't taken the time to wade into the mess of unwanted pregnancies and tried to see things from the front lines of the women who have to deal with them. Take some time to do that. It is so easy to make such judgments when what you are judging is completely and entirely outside of your experience, and can never be part of your experience. Not truly. Not at the level it is for a woman. If you want to see progress on this issue, jettison the pat answers, dig deeper to empathize, and advocate for WOMEN, in addition to that unwanted child.

Indeed, it is such pat answers that led to my initial response to you. Duhsciple listed off several major issues women in this world face--issues that women have faced for thousands of years. And by diverting to the issue of abortion, you basically told me you don't see those issues as important or even primary. Your response was dismissive of the very real pain and fear women all over the world endure, much of which is at the hands of men. Start wrestling with those, and perhaps you will begin to understand the abortion issue on a much deeper level. And perhaps you will be able to become a far more effective pro-life advocate. Men need to start taking responsibility for abortion, and until you do, you will not see the progress you desire. The answer very likely lies with men more than it does with women.

by: squeaky

05-11-2010 @ 2:13am

Well, you are on to something, at least in terms of asking the question of why else a woman would have a second abortion if the the first one was so traumatic. I would suggest, however, that you think more broadly. If a woman is willing to have an incredibly traumatic medical procedure done not once, but twice, what does that tell you about her outlook for life if she prefers that to an unwanted pregnancy? What does that tell you about the gravity of facing that, if she sees the trauma of a medical procedure as being preferred? It seems to me the first step that pro-life men should take is to try to understand that perspective. As I said before, the bulk of the responsibility for unwanted pregnancy falls on the shoulders of the woman. The person whose life is changed most profoundly for the man's indiscretion is the woman. Empathy. Strive for it, especially if you wish there to be headway made on this issue.

Just a quick story to illustrate this point. This weekend my Mom, Sister-in-Law, and I were talking about how the stigma of single motherhood isn't nearly what it was just a few years ago. Some would decry this, but it is this stigma that leads desperate young women to desperate choices. My Sister-in-Law told us that she was so afraid of her mother that if she and my brother had become pregnant before they were married (they are Christians and they stayed pure until marriage), she would have had an abortion. She's pro-life, but that's how desperate and how much fear would have been involved. And believe me, in her mother, there was much to fear.

So lest you think abortion is an easy choice, or keeping the child is an easy choice, you would do well to try a little empathy and understand what drives women to make that decision. It's not simply selfishness, as many pro-life advocates would claim. Neither is it lack of wisdom. It is fear. What is needed is empathy and understanding, and once that happens, steps can be made to offer the kind of support and love that might cast out the fear and desperation in a young woman's life.

"so women of this day seek strength through contraceptive control"

you are half way there. The question is, why? Why do women feel they need to have that kind of control? Before you answer that, put yourself in a woman's position and think about the place of women throughout history and women's standing in the world today, not just in the US, but all over the world.

"And I would say to women:"Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom" Proverbs 4:7, or "WISE UP!"

This is a pat answer. Pat answers tell me you haven't taken the time to wade into the mess of unwanted pregnancies and tried to see things from the front lines of the women who have to deal with them. Take some time to do that. It is so easy to make such judgments when what you are judging is completely and entirely outside of your experience, and can never be part of your experience. Not truly. Not at the level it is for a woman. If you want to see progress on this issue, jettison the pat answers, dig deeper to empathize, and advocate for WOMEN, in addition to that unwanted child.

Indeed, it is such pat answers that led to my initial response to you. Duhsciple listed off several major issues women in this world face--issues that women have faced for thousands of years. And by diverting to the issue of abortion, you basically told me you don't see those issues as important or even primary. Your response was dismissive of the very real pain and fear women all over the world endure, much of which is at the hands of men. Start wrestling with those, and perhaps you will begin to understand the abortion issue on a much deeper level. And perhaps you will be able to become a far more effective pro-life advocate. Men need to start taking responsibility for abortion, and until you do, you will not see the progress you desire. The answer very likely lies with men more than it does with women.

by: phil413

05-12-2010 @ 4:06am

So your sister-in-law would make the SAME gut-wrenching, life-snuffing decision a SECOND time without making the changes she needs to keep it from happening AGAIN? See, this is where you lost me, but you really prove my point. I would like to give the woman ENOUGH CREDIT to believe she would do WHATEVER she needs to do to keep from having a SECOND unwanted pregnancy, while your position says she is too weak to do that so she must be allowed to kill as many fetuses as she needs to. I say NO! Stand up for yourself and what is the right thing to do! Tell me, how many abortions do you think one person should have before the empathy wears off - three, four, ten, unlimited? Because there are women like that you know, don't you? And if we are going to take empathy to the point of absurdity, what about the father? Wouldn't he deserve some empathy? Maybe he had a bad childhood where he didn't get enough love from his mother, so he needs to get it from women, or maybe his father beat him so that would give him license to beat his girlfriend?
Let me tell you about my own real life story. Several years ago I was counseling this guy that I had met thru my jail ministry who had a drinking problem. He had lost a son so I tried to empathize with him. He got a new job but his car wasn't running so I let him borrow mine - well he goes and gets a DUI in MY CAR! Now should I have continued to let him use it so maybe the next time he could kill someone? Of course not! See there is a point where it becomes enabling.
As a Christ-follower I want to model my philosophy ENTIRELY after Him, not just the part that says "Woman, where are your accusers?" but ALSO where He says "neither do I condemn you, NOW GO, LEAVE YOUR LIFE OF SIN". Maybe that sounds heartless to you, but to me the heartless position is to keep allowing for hundreds of thousands of innocent lives to be ended by enabling the situation.

by: phil413

05-12-2010 @ 4:06am

So your sister-in-law would make the SAME gut-wrenching, life-snuffing decision a SECOND time without making the changes she needs to keep it from happening AGAIN? See, this is where you lost me, but you really prove my point. I would like to give the woman ENOUGH CREDIT to believe she would do WHATEVER she needs to do to keep from having a SECOND unwanted pregnancy, while your position says she is too weak to do that so she must be allowed to kill as many fetuses as she needs to. I say NO! Stand up for yourself and what is the right thing to do! Tell me, how many abortions do you think one person should have before the empathy wears off - three, four, ten, unlimited? Because there are women like that you know, don't you? And if we are going to take empathy to the point of absurdity, what about the father? Wouldn't he deserve some empathy? Maybe he had a bad childhood where he didn't get enough love from his mother, so he needs to get it from women, or maybe his father beat him so that would give him license to beat his girlfriend?
Let me tell you about my own real life story. Several years ago I was counseling this guy that I had met thru my jail ministry who had a drinking problem. He had lost a son so I tried to empathize with him. He got a new job but his car wasn't running so I let him borrow mine - well he goes and gets a DUI in MY CAR! Now should I have continued to let him use it so maybe the next time he could kill someone? Of course not! See there is a point where it becomes enabling.
As a Christ-follower I want to model my philosophy ENTIRELY after Him, not just the part that says "Woman, where are your accusers?" but ALSO where He says "neither do I condemn you, NOW GO, LEAVE YOUR LIFE OF SIN". Maybe that sounds heartless to you, but to me the heartless position is to keep allowing for hundreds of thousands of innocent lives to be ended by enabling the situation.

by: phil413

05-12-2010 @ 4:06am

So your sister-in-law would make the SAME gut-wrenching, life-snuffing decision a SECOND time without making the changes she needs to keep it from happening AGAIN? See, this is where you lost me, but you really prove my point. I would like to give the woman ENOUGH CREDIT to believe she would do WHATEVER she needs to do to keep from having a SECOND unwanted pregnancy, while your position says she is too weak to do that so she must be allowed to kill as many fetuses as she needs to. I say NO! Stand up for yourself and what is the right thing to do! Tell me, how many abortions do you think one person should have before the empathy wears off - three, four, ten, unlimited? Because there are women like that you know, don't you? And if we are going to take empathy to the point of absurdity, what about the father? Wouldn't he deserve some empathy? Maybe he had a bad childhood where he didn't get enough love from his mother, so he needs to get it from women, or maybe his father beat him so that would give him license to beat his girlfriend?
Let me tell you about my own real life story. Several years ago I was counseling this guy that I had met thru my jail ministry who had a drinking problem. He had lost a son so I tried to empathize with him. He got a new job but his car wasn't running so I let him borrow mine - well he goes and gets a DUI in MY CAR! Now should I have continued to let him use it so maybe the next time he could kill someone? Of course not! See there is a point where it becomes enabling.
As a Christ-follower I want to model my philosophy ENTIRELY after Him, not just the part that says "Woman, where are your accusers?" but ALSO where He says "neither do I condemn you, NOW GO, LEAVE YOUR LIFE OF SIN". Maybe that sounds heartless to you, but to me the heartless position is to keep allowing for hundreds of thousands of innocent lives to be ended by enabling the situation.

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 4:45am

You didn't even try to understand a word I said, did you? The sad part is, in your zealousness you stand in the way of finding real solutions to a very real problem.

You didn't empathize with the alcoholic. You only felt sorry for him. There is a major difference. Empathy is not the same as enabling. Empathy is putting yourself in someone else's shoes so that you can understand better where their life's path has taken them and what drives the choices they make. Empathy doesn't provide excuses, it provides understanding so that you are able to walk through a difficult time with someone and help them overcome. When and if you are able to do that, they will be able to see Christ's compassion in you, and you will be better equipped to help them make better choices. And it would be far better and far more effective if you were to walk beside women who face difficult choices than it would be to stand in judgment of them.

"neither do I condemn you, NOW GO, LEAVE YOUR LIFE OF SIN".

You have focused on the second half of that sentence while neglecting the first half. And ironically, the whole point of the parable is that we focus on the first half in our dealings with others. He without sin...

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 4:45am

You didn't even try to understand a word I said, did you? The sad part is, in your zealousness you stand in the way of finding real solutions to a very real problem.

You didn't empathize with the alcoholic. You only felt sorry for him. There is a major difference. Empathy is not the same as enabling. Empathy is putting yourself in someone else's shoes so that you can understand better where their life's path has taken them and what drives the choices they make. Empathy doesn't provide excuses, it provides understanding so that you are able to walk through a difficult time with someone and help them overcome. When and if you are able to do that, they will be able to see Christ's compassion in you, and you will be better equipped to help them make better choices. And it would be far better and far more effective if you were to walk beside women who face difficult choices than it would be to stand in judgment of them.

"neither do I condemn you, NOW GO, LEAVE YOUR LIFE OF SIN".

You have focused on the second half of that sentence while neglecting the first half. And ironically, the whole point of the parable is that we focus on the first half in our dealings with others. He without sin...

by: BlueDeacon

05-12-2010 @ 3:50pm

Some years ago a woman I had an eye for then and who has been involved in crisis pregnancy and anti-abortion work for about as long as I've known her had confided to me that she had had at least one abortion (she was not forthcoming to me about the details), and I told her that she would receive no condemnation from me -- because I didn't know the circumstances of her making that tragic course.

BTW, it's important to remember that, when Jesus said that to the woman caught in adultery, she had been caught in what likely was a sting operation -- they had set her up to put Him in a Catch-22. The trouble is that, in the rush to nail Him on something, they ended up breaking the law themselves (they also had brought a ceremonially unclean woman into the temple area), so they had to withdraw the accusation.

by: BlueDeacon

05-12-2010 @ 3:50pm

Some years ago a woman I had an eye for then and who has been involved in crisis pregnancy and anti-abortion work for about as long as I've known her had confided to me that she had had at least one abortion (she was not forthcoming to me about the details), and I told her that she would receive no condemnation from me -- because I didn't know the circumstances of her making that tragic course.

BTW, it's important to remember that, when Jesus said that to the woman caught in adultery, she had been caught in what likely was a sting operation -- they had set her up to put Him in a Catch-22. The trouble is that, in the rush to nail Him on something, they ended up breaking the law themselves (they also had brought a ceremonially unclean woman into the temple area), so they had to withdraw the accusation.

by: BlueDeacon

05-12-2010 @ 3:50pm

Some years ago a woman I had an eye for then and who has been involved in crisis pregnancy and anti-abortion work for about as long as I've known her had confided to me that she had had at least one abortion (she was not forthcoming to me about the details), and I told her that she would receive no condemnation from me -- because I didn't know the circumstances of her making that tragic course.

BTW, it's important to remember that, when Jesus said that to the woman caught in adultery, she had been caught in what likely was a sting operation -- they had set her up to put Him in a Catch-22. The trouble is that, in the rush to nail Him on something, they ended up breaking the law themselves (they also had brought a ceremonially unclean woman into the temple area), so they had to withdraw the accusation.

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 8:15pm

Yes, that and the man caught in the act was not brought before Jesus with the woman, and the law stated both should have been. Perhaps he was used to "set her up." Or perhaps it is just another example of men not being expected to take responsibility for their sexual impulses.

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 8:15pm

Yes, that and the man caught in the act was not brought before Jesus with the woman, and the law stated both should have been. Perhaps he was used to "set her up." Or perhaps it is just another example of men not being expected to take responsibility for their sexual impulses.

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 8:15pm

Yes, that and the man caught in the act was not brought before Jesus with the woman, and the law stated both should have been. Perhaps he was used to "set her up." Or perhaps it is just another example of men not being expected to take responsibility for their sexual impulses.

by: BlueDeacon

05-12-2010 @ 9:37pm

Here's another issue to contend with -- for capital crimes there had to be at least two witnesses, plus the accuser had to participate in the execution; however, to watch people "doing the nasty" was also illegal under Mosaic Law. That's probably why it was a set-up.

by: BlueDeacon

05-12-2010 @ 9:37pm

Here's another issue to contend with -- for capital crimes there had to be at least two witnesses, plus the accuser had to participate in the execution; however, to watch people "doing the nasty" was also illegal under Mosaic Law. That's probably why it was a set-up.

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 10:00pm

Maybe what Jesus was scratching in the dust was a list of all the violations of the law they enacted to trap him. Or maybe He was counting to ten...

by: squeaky

05-12-2010 @ 10:00pm

Maybe what Jesus was scratching in the dust was a list of all the violations of the law they enacted to trap him. Or maybe He was counting to ten...