Get E-Mail Updates

Pro-Democracy Forces in Bahrain Face Unique Challenges

After a month of largely peaceful pro-democracy protests in Bahrain, the situation has taken a dramatic turn for the worse this week. On Monday, 2,000 soldiers from Saudi Arabia and other allies in the region entered Bahrain at the request of King Hamad al-Khalifa. The king then announced a three-month state of emergency and yesterday his security forces moved on Pearl Roundabout, where the protesters have been encamped since the movement began on February 14. At least 6 people were killed and more than 1,000 were injured. The violent crackdown has continued today, with the arrest of six leading opposition figures.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Tell the Senate: Don't Cut International Aid

Please join us in telling the Senate: Protect foreign aid programs that help the poor and the needy. 

The pro-democracy movement in Bahrain faces challenges that those in Egypt and Tunisia did not. The Sunni-controlled Bahraini government systematically discriminates against Shiites, who make up more than 70 percent of the country's population. And as last week's very insightful episode of Al Jazeera's People & Power explains, virtually no Shiites are not allowed in the police or army, and the "king brings Sunni immigrants from abroad to police the streets, giving them citizenship and housing."

This makes dividing the loyalty of the security apparatus -- which is often a key to the success of any nonviolent movement -- in Bahrain far more difficult than it was in Egypt. While they are all Muslim, because of the sectarian split, Bahrainis will have a harder time appealing to the army and police on religious grounds.

Moreover, since many are brought in from other Sunni countries, the opposition can't even appeal to them as citizens of Bahrain. This fact makes them in some ways comparable to mercenaries, in that the financial motive is likely more central to their thinking than anything else. They are totally dependent on the current regime for their livelihoods, which would potentially be jeopardized if the predominately Shiite pro-democracy movement emerges victorious.

Given this reality, and the presence now of Saudi troops in the country, the opposition may want to consider changing gears. While the police and military are always an important pillar of support to any regime, in this case it would appear to not be very vulnerable. Therefore, the pro-democracy movement may want to consider focusing on undermining other sources of the ruling family's power. Rather than focusing on mass demonstrations to register their dissent, for example, Bahrainis could shift towards tactics -- like strikes, boycotts, and tax refusal -- that will put economic pressure on the regime and disrupt the day-to-day functioning of the state without providing such an easy target for repression.

Eric Stoner is a writer based in New York, and an adjunct professor at St. Peter's College. His articles have appeared in The Guardian, Mother Jones, The Nation, In These Times, and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. He is on the national board of the War Resisters League, and the advisory board of the Center for Peacemaking at Marquette University. He travelled to Afghanistan in December with Voices for Creative Nonviolence. He wrote a feature article in Sojourners March 2011 issue.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: ley6224

03-18-2011 @ 10:04pm

and now they've torn down the national symbol, the pearl roundabout. so sad.

by: Dave

03-21-2011 @ 5:11pm

This article refers to the protesters as a pro-democracy movement but intelligence reports from non-political sources such as STRATFOR indicate that the protest is backed by Iran which is certainly not pro-democracy. There is certainly the Shiite vs. Sunni issue and the deaths are tragic but the Iran dimension makes it problematic for Western intervention.

by: clocks2003

03-22-2011 @ 10:27am

Quite apart, Dave, from the fact that we have been supporting them with loads of weaponry, and that we get a huge amount of oil from them! That supply would certainly be interrupted if not turned off in the event of the rebels being more successful... lets face it, will they want to do business with the very people who supplied the means for their repression?
I strongly suspect that this is a far more potent reason for our lack of support for the rebels than the intel you refer to which other sources do not support, resulting in mixed messages.

by: captainplanet

03-22-2011 @ 1:56pm

The DOE website seems to show that we actually get very little oil from them. Do you have another source that says otherwise?

I only bring that up because I think there is a disconnect between people's perception of how much oil we get from the Middle East, versus the reality.

by: Dave

03-21-2011 @ 5:11pm

This article refers to the protesters as a pro-democracy movement but intelligence reports from non-political sources such as STRATFOR indicate that the protest is backed by Iran which is certainly not pro-democracy. There is certainly the Shiite vs. Sunni issue and the deaths are tragic but the Iran dimension makes it problematic for Western intervention.

by: clocks2003

03-22-2011 @ 9:52pm

I stand corrected! - It seems that the import of oil from the Middle East to the UK peaked (in volume terms) in ~1975 and in %age terms ~1980. You are right - we now import very little from them, with our major supplier being Norway. In '06 the Middle East & Africa combined only amounted to 9% - and 7 of that 9 was from Africa (though where Africa stops & the middle East starts is anyone's guess!)
I had not appreciated the size of the drop after OPEC did its thing in the mid 70's.

by: clocks2003

03-22-2011 @ 10:27am

Quite apart, Dave, from the fact that we have been supporting them with loads of weaponry, and that we get a huge amount of oil from them! That supply would certainly be interrupted if not turned off in the event of the rebels being more successful... lets face it, will they want to do business with the very people who supplied the means for their repression?
I strongly suspect that this is a far more potent reason for our lack of support for the rebels than the intel you refer to which other sources do not support, resulting in mixed messages.

by: captainplanet

03-22-2011 @ 1:56pm

The DOE website seems to show that we actually get very little oil from them. Do you have another source that says otherwise?

I only bring that up because I think there is a disconnect between people's perception of how much oil we get from the Middle East, versus the reality.

by: clocks2003

03-22-2011 @ 9:52pm

I stand corrected! - It seems that the import of oil from the Middle East to the UK peaked (in volume terms) in ~1975 and in %age terms ~1980. You are right - we now import very little from them, with our major supplier being Norway. In '06 the Middle East & Africa combined only amounted to 9% - and 7 of that 9 was from Africa (though where Africa stops & the middle East starts is anyone's guess!)
I had not appreciated the size of the drop after OPEC did its thing in the mid 70's.

by: ley6224

03-18-2011 @ 10:04pm

and now they've torn down the national symbol, the pearl roundabout. so sad.

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

by: ley6224

03-18-2011 @ 10:04pm

and now they've torn down the national symbol, the pearl roundabout. so sad.

by: ley6224

03-18-2011 @ 10:04pm

and now they've torn down the national symbol, the pearl roundabout. so sad.

by: Dave

03-21-2011 @ 5:11pm

This article refers to the protesters as a pro-democracy movement but intelligence reports from non-political sources such as STRATFOR indicate that the protest is backed by Iran which is certainly not pro-democracy. There is certainly the Shiite vs. Sunni issue and the deaths are tragic but the Iran dimension makes it problematic for Western intervention.

by: Dave

03-21-2011 @ 5:11pm

This article refers to the protesters as a pro-democracy movement but intelligence reports from non-political sources such as STRATFOR indicate that the protest is backed by Iran which is certainly not pro-democracy. There is certainly the Shiite vs. Sunni issue and the deaths are tragic but the Iran dimension makes it problematic for Western intervention.

by: clocks2003

03-22-2011 @ 10:27am

Quite apart, Dave, from the fact that we have been supporting them with loads of weaponry, and that we get a huge amount of oil from them! That supply would certainly be interrupted if not turned off in the event of the rebels being more successful... lets face it, will they want to do business with the very people who supplied the means for their repression?
I strongly suspect that this is a far more potent reason for our lack of support for the rebels than the intel you refer to which other sources do not support, resulting in mixed messages.

by: clocks2003

03-22-2011 @ 10:27am

Quite apart, Dave, from the fact that we have been supporting them with loads of weaponry, and that we get a huge amount of oil from them! That supply would certainly be interrupted if not turned off in the event of the rebels being more successful... lets face it, will they want to do business with the very people who supplied the means for their repression?
I strongly suspect that this is a far more potent reason for our lack of support for the rebels than the intel you refer to which other sources do not support, resulting in mixed messages.

by: captainplanet

03-22-2011 @ 1:56pm

The DOE website seems to show that we actually get very little oil from them. Do you have another source that says otherwise?

I only bring that up because I think there is a disconnect between people's perception of how much oil we get from the Middle East, versus the reality.

by: captainplanet

03-22-2011 @ 1:56pm

The DOE website seems to show that we actually get very little oil from them. Do you have another source that says otherwise?

I only bring that up because I think there is a disconnect between people's perception of how much oil we get from the Middle East, versus the reality.

by: clocks2003

03-22-2011 @ 9:52pm

I stand corrected! - It seems that the import of oil from the Middle East to the UK peaked (in volume terms) in ~1975 and in %age terms ~1980. You are right - we now import very little from them, with our major supplier being Norway. In '06 the Middle East & Africa combined only amounted to 9% - and 7 of that 9 was from Africa (though where Africa stops & the middle East starts is anyone's guess!)
I had not appreciated the size of the drop after OPEC did its thing in the mid 70's.

by: clocks2003

03-22-2011 @ 9:52pm

I stand corrected! - It seems that the import of oil from the Middle East to the UK peaked (in volume terms) in ~1975 and in %age terms ~1980. You are right - we now import very little from them, with our major supplier being Norway. In '06 the Middle East & Africa combined only amounted to 9% - and 7 of that 9 was from Africa (though where Africa stops & the middle East starts is anyone's guess!)
I had not appreciated the size of the drop after OPEC did its thing in the mid 70's.